Sentences with phrase «not have biological children»

Parents must be over 35 years of age, couples must be married 10 years, and they preferred that you not have any biological children.

As a matter of fact, Nana Akufo - Addo and his present wife Rebecca do not have any biological children between them.

Adopting children is an incredibly rewarding experience for many parents whether or not they have biological children of their own.

C - level executives must advocate internally for benefits such as generous parental leave, considerations for same - sex couples who can not have biological children and student - loan repayment programs.

And during that time, we became involved with a support group to help us through the process and getting advice on what to do in terms of experiencing the grief and a loss of not having a biological child.

Adoption costs for those who can't have biological children have risen, as has the cost of raising children in general.

James Leech, of Fort Lauderdale, doesn't have any biological children but said he signed it for the neighborhood kids and all those at Stoneman Douglas.

Not exact matches

NEW YORK (Reuters)- In a landmark ruling for non-traditional families in New York, the state's highest court on Tuesday held a person need not have a biological or adoptive relationship with a child to be considered a parent.

However, she later found out that this wasn't the case: her mother had been unable to care for her at the time of her birth, but later married her biological father and had another child with him.

While Robert Kraft is not the biological father, he is thrilled with Ricki's blessing of having a healthy child.

We would mother our own biological children, not someone else's.

But being a stepmother is like being in - between — not fully mother (I have no biological children of my own), not fully childless either.

A child conceived from artificial insemination by donor does not face the same situation as would a child having no biological and genetic father at all, but perhaps there are important similarities that could be uncovered through research.

Can't wait for psychiatrists to start prescribing my children and I medication because we have a biological proclivity to believe in illusions.

When I realized I was not able to have biological children, I made it clear to my husband: «I am ready to adopt whenever you are.»

I imagine there's something particularly special about having a biological child with one's partner (although you don't see many people not marrying the person they love because of infertility) which we will never be able to have (the one inherent advantage to a straight relationship).

From the moment when, as I have said, the phyletic strands began to reach towards one another, weaving the first outlines of the Noosphere, a new matrix, co-extensive with the whole human group, was formed about the newly - born human child — a matrix out of which he can not be wrenched without incurring mutilation in the most physical core of his biological being.

In the second verse he is talking about the God (His father -LCB- Not literally his biological father, Its a way to express himself close to God, as we are all children of God, cuz he created us all -RCB--RRB-, how he has reserved space in heaven for the believers.

Even if for unfortunate circumstances, a particular child can not have its own biological parents, the child is in general still better off having a mother and father.

For example, a child may have emotional or biological sensitivities to specific foods or around certain routines and behaviors, and tactics used by grandparents may not be helpful in working through the emotional interferences.

Newborns and younger babies who don't have a well established biological clock probably won't be affected by the time change, but older babies, toddler and children are more likely to be thrown off by the drastic switch.Here are 4 ways you can help your child (or children) adjust to the time change: Read more

One of the reasons that Id rather have my own biological children than adopt (though I fully plan to adopt one day) is that I can't imagine raising a child that I didn't nurse.

But a few South Asians were wondering why we are not exhausting all our options of having a biological child.

From a biological perspective, it is not logical to have what is normal behaviour of a breastfed child to then cause obesity, rapid weight gain and / or growth.

However, we had a newborn baby girl in our care (not our biological child) for about 2 months that we were going to adopt.

I know people who have had difficulty adopting children, either because of the cost or the process or because they weren't quite prepared to give up their dream of a biological child.

About 40 % of children who do not live with their biological father have not seen him during the past 12 months; more than half of them have never been in his home and 26 % of those fathers live in a different state than their children.

I feel that by saying APs don't raise children as if they were their own, you're implying that APs love their children less than they would / do biological children.

And since my husband and I don't plan to have another biological baby, it's likely I'll never nurse another child.

She's interested in an «ethic of responsible parenthood,» which sounds good on surface but borders on elitism once you start exploring what that may mean: George Lucas adopted two children as a single man and I will bet that Sawhill would not insist that he have a partner first and wait until they are «ready to be parents» — he was wealthy enough to hire surrogate moms until he married again and, last year, became a biological dad at age 69.

Having Parental Responsibility doesn't make you liable for paying child support: if you are recognised as the biological father, you will have to pay child support — whether or not you have Parental Responsibility.

If one partner is the biological parent and the other is not, the nonbiological parent only has an automatic right to be guardian if he or she has legally adopted the child.

For mothers who do not breastfeed their infants the intervals between births is shortened allowing them to have more children during their reproductive years — reducing the reproductive costs associated with being a biological rider.

What's awesome about this is that research has learned that it doesn't matter if the father is a biological father, a single father, or a stepfather — it's their involvement in the child's life that is most significant.

As if mom shaming hasn't gone far enough, let's tell non-biological moms that what they're doing (parenting) isn't as good, or the same, as parenting a biological child.

Do you really think that, after years of raising and loving a child who you didn't give birth to, they would walk away, just because they met their biological mom?

Keep in mind, this is not the fault of the child or the parent, it is a biological function that has occurred and there are solutions for bed - wetting.

While very few would argue that a man should be able to force a woman to have a baby she does not want, at the same time most people would also expect a man to provide for a biological child even if he did not want it.

Whether this means they won't have more children, or won't be having any biological children at all, it's a personal decision moms get to make on their own.

And also remembering that children generally don't become available for adoption and placements aren't made because the biological parents have a stable home that they can bring a baby into.

This has certain merits of its own; the child would not feel any urge to find his / her real parents later in life, and the biological relation would allow the parents to contribute in many medical emergencies, like blood and bone marrow donation.

Dear Abby: I have read in your column so many times about agencies that help adopted children «find «their biological parents, but since I am not adopted, I never gave the subject much thought, until now.

Stepfathers are widespread not only in modern industrial societies but also in subsistence - level societies as well.6, 51,52 Many studies have found that, compared with resident biological fathers, stepfathers invest less in the children who live with them, both in the United States37, 39,53 and other cultures.54 - 56 Stepchildren are more likely to have emotional and behavioural problems than resident genetic offspring, 39,40 although there is evidence that children who have close relationships with their stepfathers have better outcomes.41, 57

Ever since becoming a mother I've been very aware that motherhood through adoption is not and never will be the same as mothering your own biological children.

And while it's true that their first choice may have been to have biological children, it doesn't mean that adoption is second best.

When images and memes circulate demeaning women who don't breastfeed or didn't breastfeed long as not having tried hard enough, being lazy, giving their child poison, being unfit mothers, and deserving of guilt for falling short of the «best is breast» mandate or «biological norm» jargon, the connections we should have are torn down, not fortified.

Programs serving fathers of young children have grown in response to two needs: (1) mothers are more likely to be employed outside of the home, thus placing demands on fathers to become increasingly involved in child care and child rearing, and (2) a growing number of biological fathers do not reside with their children and face significant challenges with being actively involved in their children's lives.

While each woman is entitled to her opinion on the topic, such public figures speaking out against breastfeeding photos only serves to remind us that we've been conditioned to believe that breasts are only to be viewed publicly as sexual objects, not as biological vessels for feeding our children.

Thus, it is not surprising that breastfeeding has been consistently associated with improved central nervous system development, as indicated by improved visual acuity in relationship to formula - fed infants.4 Second, both biological properties and differences in maternal - infant interactions during the feeding process can lead to improved motor and intellectual development outcomes.5, 6 Third, breastfeeding appears to be protective against the onset of childhood obesity, 7 a condition that has enormous psychosocial consequences for children.

Fertility law should recognise the rights of children to know their biological parents and not hide their identity, an independent peer has claimed.