People who use kids against the other parent have huge issues, and should probably
not have custody of their children, they should be the ones with visitation and not custody.
However, if a parent is seeking sole custody, he / she should be prepared to present evidence of why the child's other parent should
not have custody of the child.
Often, when parents aren't married there is a custody decree from a court that spells out who does and does
not have custody of a child with respect to issues like medical care, but it does not appear that this is the case here.
Often, when parents aren't married there is a custody decree from a court that spells out who does and does
not have custody of a child with...
Because it is a child's right to have a relationship with both of their parents, a Judge will usually order that the spouse who does
not have custody of the children will be able to visit the children.
This reflects the fact that parents who don't have custody of their children are still parenting them, even if they don't live with them most of the time, rather than just «visiting» with the kids.
And it's also important to remember that even if one parent does
not have custody of the children, the court may still award them child support, so that they will have the financial resources necessary to provide for the children in a manner consistent with their current standard of living.
Does Article 20 TFEU preclude a third country national from being refused a residence permit because of lack of means of subsistence in a family situation in which his spouse has custody of a child who is a citizen of the Union and the third country national is not the child's parent, does
not have custody of the child, and does not live with his spouse or with the child?
36 The referring court asks whether the fact that the applicant for a residence permit lives together with his spouse, is not the biological father of the child who is a Union citizen, and does
not have custody of the child may affect the interpretation to be given to the provisions on citizenship of the Union.
If you're divorcing in this state, and you have a history of perpetrating family violence, you can't have custody of your children — even joint custody shared with their other parent.
The percentage of obligor's income model takes only one parent's income into consideration — the one who does
not have custody of the children.
In Alabama, there is a rebuttable presumption that parents with a history of abuse should
not have custody of their children.
State law requires both parents to provide financial support; the parent who does
not have custody of the children typically pays support to the other parent.
If a mother is very sick after childbirth and requires additional help or child care, the father may be required to help pay for these expenses if he does
not have custody of the child.
When you do
not have custody of the children and want to prevent your ex from taking your children, you will also need to speak with a San Diego family attorney to discuss your options to prevent the move.
However, if a parent is seeking sole custody, he / she should be prepared to present evidence of why the child's other parent should
not have custody of the child.
A Mississippi court presumes that a person who has been convicted of family violence should
not have custody of a child.
Because it is a child's right to have a relationship with both of their parents, a Judge will usually order that the spouse who does
not have custody of the children will be able to visit the children.
Not exact matches
This is
not a process that the state
of MN takes lightly and they are generally adamant that fathers continue to
have visitation and share legal
custody of their
children.
lmao sure tell that the the hormone driven teens
of the world... you can only
have woopie if your going to marry, marriage will go through the roof... but so will divorce and lawyers will love that mentality because
child custody battles make them loads
of money and let's
not forget the physcologist / phychiatrists that will make big money
having to help all these emotionally damaged adults that were dragged through
custody battles due to the fact their genetic donors procreated when it was the best time for them.
Add the fact that mothers are almost always assigned primary
custody of minor
children and that
child support is
not mandated in almost 40 percent
of all settlements and in any case is often irregularly or never paid, and you
have a recipe for all kinds
of trouble.
Since more divorced moms
have custody of their
children, it can put them out
of the dating loop — but
not divorced dads.
The upshot is that «many do
not attempt to be awarded
custody of their
children for fear
of fighting a losing battle, even when welfare professionals agree that
children would be better placed in their primary care.»
Depending on how you arrived at sharing joint physical
custody with your ex, you may
not be thinking about the «rewards»
of this
child custody arrangement
has to offer.
Whether the parents
have joint
custody, or whether one is the custodial parent and the other is
not, some careful planning and an effort to put the good
of the
children first can help create a more amicable and successful experience with co-parenting.
If an Alabama court determines that domestic violence
has occurred, the court will presume that it is
not in the best interests
of the
child to be placed in the sole
custody or joint legal or physical
custody of the person accused
of domestic or family violence.
An Ohio family court will
not modify
child custody unless there
has been a change in the
child's circumstances and the modification is necessary to serve the best interests
of the
child.
The answer may surprise you:
not all parents who
have sole physical
custody of their
children are legally considered custodial parents in the eyes
of the courts.
These records are evidence
of continuous contact between you and your
child if you don't
have custody, or perhaps the lack
of regular contact between your
child and his other parent if your
child is currently living with you.
Not only are
children scarred by witnessing their parents battle one another, but using the courts to devise a
custody and access arrangement is a waste
of money - money that could
have been better spent to the needs
of the
children.
If a parent
has been convicted
of an act
of domestic violence, a court in Oklahoma presumes that joint
custody does
not serve the
child's best interests.
Courts in many states
have shared this reluctance to divide
custody, declaring that divided
custody is to be avoided as
not in the best interests
of the
children and that it will be sanctioned only under exceptional circumstances.
If parents
have joint physical
custody of three
children all at different stages
of development, an iron clad schedule,
of who
has the
children when, does
not allow for the needs
of the individual
children.
If she doesn't file for
child custody, for states that presume two parents who sign a birth certificate
have custody of the
child, an unwed mother may be left with little recourse against a father.
If the
child's father
has not signed the birth certificate, then
custody of the
child belongs to the mother.
The study, published in the Journal
of Family Psychology, debunks the myth found today in courtrooms all around America that it is
not a problem when one parent relocates, whether that parent
has custody of the
children or
not.
Under South Dakota law, a parent who
has been convicted
of domestic violence,
child abuse or assault is
not fit to
have custody.
This toolkit tells you how to ask for a
custody, visitation,
child support and medical support order if (1) you and the other parent are
not married (or don't want a divorce), (2) you and the other parent
have signed an «Acknowledgment
of Paternity» and (3) there are no existing court orders about your
child.
Everyone
has a general idea
of what
child custody is, but
not everyone knows all the different types
of child custody that parents and guardians can
have.
This means that birth parents do
not have legal
custody over a
child, minimizing the risk
of custody battles
Finally, fathers who
had sole
custody of their
child were
not asked if they
had spoken to their
child's doctor in the previous year, excluding 92 fathers in our sample (5 %) on this question.
Just two days after the state's highest court expanded the definition
of a parent to include caretakers who did
not officially adopt or do
not have biological ties to their
children — a Manhattan mom was the first to benefit from the new ruling in a
custody case yesterday.
????? IS THERE ANY ONE AT ALL ON THIS PAGE????? First things first i
have a 7 year old son and shared
custody he is a very big part
of my life i completely understand if you raised your kids and don't want any part
of a
child at this point BUT i am
not looking for a mother for him he
has one...
I am currently single, I don't
have any
children but I do
have primary
custody of one
of my nieces.
im a 49 yr old man divorced / i only
have one
child a daughter 16 yrs old i
have sole
custody of her so she lives with me / i
have been single now for a few yrs and im drama free / i do
not tolerate lies cheating or being used or played / im honest no matter what its abt and i expect the same in ret...
Of course, the
children accepting their authoritative temporary
custody wouldn't be enough; Shane
has to be willing to understand them too.
But guardians may
not always
have physical
custody of a
child or be in charge
of decisions about schooling.
That may
not be a bad thing if you
have custody of one or more
children and lived apart from your spouse during the last six months
of the tax year, in which case you can use the advantageous Head
of Household filing status.
While Microsoft got
custody of the
child in the divorce and
have been planning Bungie's departure for some time now, you're fooling yourself if you think the software giant isn't slightly shaking in their boots while watching their breadwinner walk out the door into the wild west
of multiplatform development.
Ken, it's
child custody I was talking about, where we don't speak
of parents as
having rights against each other.