The mediation process is not binding on the parties, and the mediator does
not hear evidence.
It was found that the Judge did
not hear evidence from the parties regarding the disputed facts and therefore this lead to a sympathetic approach to the mother's position.
The judge had ruled the jury should
not hear evidence of this incident at the trial.
«You didn't hear any evidence that he held himself out to Mr. Aiello or to Mr. Gerardi as a guy who would be going back into government where he could sell his office to them for the money that he was earning as a consultant during the summer of 2014,» Bohrer told jurors in his closing arguments.
I have
not heard any evidence to suggest it is possible.
In particular, pipeline opponents are angry that the review panel is
not hearing evidence about emissions from the Alberta oil sands and the greater issue of global warming.
The SCC could do the reference in two and a half days because it was
not hearing evidence from a number of witnesses who had to be examined and cross-examined according to some justifiable rules.
We do that so they don't hear the evidence of the previous witness.
Not exact matches
«A leading expert on making decisions and influencing others presents a career's worth of
evidence on why the views you don't want to consider are often the ones you need to
hear most,» is Grant's quick description of this book, out March 20.
«This case has already been dismissed with prejudice by the court that
heard it, which ruled in Yelp's favor and also found the claims
not to be supported by credible
evidence,» Vince Sollitto, Yelp's vice president of communications said.
It's probably
not going to be possible to have a jury of people that have never
heard of the bands, that have never
heard the music, but the real question is, even with that understanding, can they only focus on the
evidence that's being presented by the parties at trial and only use that
evidence and nothing from their own life experience outside of the courtroom to make that decision?
But we haven't
heard or seen any direct
evidence yet.»
«I think, given the extraordinary
evidence we've
heard so far today, it is absolutely astonishing that Mark Zuckerberg is
not prepared to submit himself to questioning in front of a parliamentary or congressional
hearing, given these are questions of fundamental importance and concern to his users, as well as to this inquiry,» Damian Collins, the member of parliament heading the UK committee, said earlier on Tuesday.
But if you have
evidence to the contrary then let's see it — but please let's
not hear about how many active funds underperform the index again!
At a
hearing last week in Asheville, North Carolina, U.S. District Judge Max Cogburn said he would consider dismissing the lawsuit, saying the DoJ may
not have the
evidence to try this as a fraud case.
Included in the
hearings»
evidence is an exasperated e-mail sent by Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson's chief of staff, Jim Wilkinson, on Sept. 9, 2008: «I just can't stomach us bailing out lehman.
I understand that the Big Bang can't be «proven» outright, but the reason scientists detest
hearing about intelligent design is that it has no
evidence to support it.
«In 2014 the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice issued Mr Page with a reprimand after finding that during a Family Court
hearing he had allowed himself to be influenced by his religious beliefs and
not by the
evidence.»
«This is a rare occurrence and I can assure Ruth Percival and James Percival that it is one I do
not take lightly, but given the
evidence, this is a matter that ought to be referred to the DPP and I am going to adjourn the inquest without
hearing any further
evidence.»
Yes I know this will happen because I have been through these arguments time and time again and when I pull out my Bible that people claim to have read and match it to the scientific
evidence that points very clearly to the validity and truth of the Bible they shut up and don't want to
hear it.
But you can't tell a person who
heard god speak (or saw a leprauchaun or threw a penny in a well and had the wish come true) that they don'thave
evidence.
Have you
not heard that absence of
evidence is
not evidence of absensce.
That order was contested at a
hearing on May 13, 2014 [court transcripts available], and that restraining was dismissed and vacated for lacking
evidence and
not meeting the legal burden of proof [Hennepin County Case # 27 - CO-13-8209, filed May 16, 2014].
That means I do
not believe any of the god claims I have
heard, because there is never, ever, any hard, verifiable, logical, objective
evidence to support them.
The Government say they have
heard evidence «that the current policies supporting fathers in the workplace do
not deliver what they promise, despite good intentions».
In the United States, the Louisiana state Supreme Court ruled last year that state law does
not require a priest to notify authorities after
hearing evidence of child abuse from a child making a confession.
I don't know if the man in his 20's is telling the truth or
not, but I don't believe everything I
hear without
evidence.
Science can't at this point and amiit this but YOU seem to know... we'd like to
hear your
EVIDENCE from your conclusion.
Pretty compelling Colin, but haven't you
heard that Satan strode to all corners of the Earth, as well as the Heavens, planting false
evidence supporting the theory of evolution?
I don't
hear Francis telling him how to do his job, like better strategies for insulting women, handling his addiction issues, or his propensity to blatantly lie, and then deny it when confronted with the
evidence.
if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to
hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the
evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.
You can relate in exhaustive detail and provide voluminous
evidence that the vast majority of the 1.5 billion believers of Islam were
not responsible for nor in approval of the 9/11 terrorism, and at the end of your plea for common sense, they will, with a glazed look, just repeat their criticisms of Islam as though they never
heard a word.
But he added: «We still believe there is more to learn and we are disappointed that there is still
evidence that has
not been
heard.»
But if the father sat through the trial of his son, and saw the weight of the
evidence, and maybe even
heard the confession of his son to his crimes, the father would be forced to believe what he did
not want to believe.
Hearing stupid atheists respond to my posts is the best
evidence that i'm right... you get all these angry morons that don't have a clue what they're talking about trying to attack my argument, «BUT THOSE PEOPLE WHO MURDERED MILLIONS THEY WERE
N'T DRIVEN BY ATHEISM TO KILL».
N'T DRIVEN BY ATHEISM TO KILL»....
that's
not sufficient
evidence... you have to show it... sounds more like you don't want to
hear of it that he would spare other atheists... besides..
Haven't you unbelievers ever
heard of
evidence where someone survives a terrible tragedy when the person should have been killed!
But none of the apostles figure in this story, and whatever historical element may reside in it, it was
not the finding of the empty tomb that brought the apostles to faith in the risen Christ, and if Paul ever
heard the story he never thought it worth a mention, even when he assembled the
evidence of witnesses in I Corinthians 15.
belief in anything without supporting
evidence is a childrens game... We teach our children
not to lie, judge a book by its cover, or to take anything at face value or to just believe without questioning... you know, we say stuff like check the source and don't believe everything you see /
hear... should we teach seeking knowledge or to have faith in without?
Hearing the Judge state there was
not enough
evidence to support an assault or harrassment is all I need.
During the
hearing Bishop Benn described her as «aggressive» and «nit picking» rather than someone who was trying to help, although Ms Scolding said this is
not how she came across when giving
evidence.
I
heard a radio program where the speaker Steve someone said dinosaurs were on the ark with Noah... Really he touted about scientific
evidence not supporting things then follows it up with a statement like that.
When someone believe something that there is NO
evidence for and believe that they can talk to people that aren't there, and can
hear them as well, we call this delusional.
But, the complete lack of any
evidence of supernatural intervention in the lives of humans as a result of their specific pleadings, seems to me to be sufficient
evidence that a) their God is mythical, b) their God is
not able to answer prayers, c) their God does
not want to answer prayers, or d) their God has moved on and can't
hear their prayers.
Of course, I don't think you want proof, so you foolishly keep asking for
evidence you refuse to review.You only want to believe a book that tells you what you want to
hear.
The inquiry
heard overwhelming
evidence to suggest that this time was
not long enough for refugees to «move on'to alternative forms of support and income.»
I didn't start to regain my pre-cancer cognitive and physical functioning until about nine months after
hearing my oncologist say, «no
evidence of disease.»
I dare
not jump into your copy and pasted list there from a less reliable source as I don't have the time, but I caution you, don't believe all the lack of
evidence you
hear, it's there and it's well accepted.
Topher missed the
evidence parts due to having his fingers in his ears while chanting «Nah nah nah nah nah nah can't
hear you, nah nah nah nah».
And then Fr Luther was
heard to be saying something that looked, superficially, like a complete contradiction of his usual theme — he wanted concrete
evidence of their faith: «Dear friends, the kingdom of God — and we are that kingdom — does
not consist in talk or words but in activity, in deeds, in works and exercises... a faith without love is
not enough rather it is no faith at all.