Sentences with phrase «not hear views»
«What is the point of commissioning a review that will take more than two years to report and which will not hear views from the public in an open, transparent manner?»
http://www.politics.co.uk/ Not exact matches
But Schatz offered a different view, noting that while he may have flubbed one of his questions in the hearing, that should not be a sign that lawmakers need to be experts in order to legislate.
«A leading expert on making decisions and influencing others presents a career's worth of evidence on why the views you don't want to consider are often the ones you need to hear most,» is Grant's quick description of this book, out March 20.
I've written before about how Twitter has a tendency to become an echo chamber, where certain points of views on issues are blown up while other perspectives aren't heard at all.
Truly loyal employees know that you most need to hear what you least want to hear: that your ideas may not work, that your point of view is off, that you made a mistake.
Heineken's «Walk - in fridge» ad — in which a group of women goes nuts over their friend's walk - in closet, only to hear their husbands and boyfriends in the next room losing their minds over a walk - in refrigerator stocked with Heineken beer — garnered more than 4 million views on YouTube, not to mention the millions of impressions the ad made on the regular tube.
Because I was repressing my own point of view, because like in that Nilsson song, «Everybody was talkin» at me, so I couldn't hear the echoes of my mind.»
«We're hearing from college coaches, college administrators, and the NCAA directly, and their view is, if these young men don't want to be in college longer than, in essence, one season, then they probably shouldn't be there.»
It's not clear yet whether others in the cryptocurrency industry — or tech at large — share Powell's views, but I'd love to hear your opinions on this subject: DM me on Twitter @jenwieczner or email me at [email protected]
Sessions famously — or infamously, depending on your point of view — said that «good people don't smoke marijuana» during a hearing on the impact of state marijuana legalization laws.
Usually I use the time to check in with any broker / dealers I haven't talked to on the day to hear their latest market views
I suspect that in India — as opposed to here in Canada — the Trudeau Family's effort to go full Bollywood will be viewed more kindly by ordinary citizens who hear about it, as an eccentric but friendly gesture, not the grave insult Conservative politicians and Canadian pundits are trying to spin it into.
I think what creationists really want is NOT to be the only voice in the discussion but to at least be a voice and be heard as an alternative to a view that is not 100 % provNOT to be the only voice in the discussion but to at least be a voice and be heard as an alternative to a view that is not 100 % provnot 100 % proven.
Yup, that's what you get when you FORCE your views on those not wanting to hear them.
This att ¡ tude is reinforced each time some young whippersnapper ignores the repeated abjurations to not go down by the river and ends up providing lunch for the crocs in full view and hearing of his soon - to - be-former playmates.
I will truly pray for your humility in not - knowing to return to you so that you may widen your view and hear others to learn even you, as I, DO NOT HAVE IT ALL RIGnot - knowing to return to you so that you may widen your view and hear others to learn even you, as I, DO NOT HAVE IT ALL RIGNOT HAVE IT ALL RIGHT!
«The merest accident of microgeography had meant that the first man to hear the voice of Om, and who gave Om his view of humans, was a shepherd and not a goatherd.
I don't feel the need to cater to the religiously naive and uneducated by acting like there's a difference especially when these same religious folk would surely deem a person of an opposing religion / view that heard voices crazy.
But as is the case with most of these posts, non-believers really don't want to hear any dissenting views.
Anyway, I hear what you are saying, but I think you are arguing against a view I don't hold.
Religion has been and always will be a tool used to motivate masses; most have all heard the opium of the masses quote - and just because it came from someone whose political views are contrarian to ours, doesn't make that statement less true.
Dialogue predominates and many voices, many points of view are heard; such a multitude of voices can not be unified discursively, and they never are.
My religious views (or lack thereof) should not preclude me from having my voice heard just like any other citizen.
When you hear a Christian advocate personal purity, do you hear a judgment of yourself or others, or do you get angry because you don't want to live that way and then decide that the Christian's spoken point of view is a judgment?
It is not the judges right or duty to express his personal opinions or beliefs while sitting on the bench, especially while giving a verdict.Judges are there to make sure due process and a fair and impartial hearing or trial takes place for all those involved.this particular judge's rant on the muslim world based on his views from serving in the military had absolutely no bearing on the case and should not have even been brought up much less used to chastise the victim with.
But, for the most part, I think this view has some merit, and does help explain what Jesus might have meant in John 16:12 where He said He had much more to teach, but could not do so because they were not ready to hear it.
I thought straight away this is a joke as scriptures tell us only the father knows the time of his sons return and hes keeping it to himself he hasnt even told his son yet.Mark 13:32 This a mystery isnt God all knowing and isnt Jesus God it is a mystery.Yet I like that that is the case because it proves that the father is not the son and the son is not the father they are separate yet they are one just like the holy spirit.I have come across denominations that believe the father son and holy spirit are the one person i asked them how they can say that when Jesus was baptized we see 3 separate persons.We have enough information to know that we are in the last days the signs are present and increasing.Ever since Israel became a nation the countdown has begun.The verse the enemy will come like a thief in the night i have heard preached many times and i believe the preachers have got it wrong because they preach it from the view for the church to get there act together or you will miss out.This view is incorrect because if you are a born again believer following him in obedience and relying on the holy spirit you are not walking in darkness but are walking in the light so you will not be caught unaware as those who are sleeping this is a warning for those who are sleeping or walking according to the flesh they are in darkness.Remember the 10 wise virgins the ones who were alert and keep refilling there lamps went in with the bride those who slept were left behind and so it will be when the Lord returns.Now is the time to prepare our hearts and lives to be ready for his return.It is an exciting time to be living and we are to live in the expectation that the Lord could return at any time brentnz
This may sound absurd since most people do not hear stones talk, but in an organic world view, everything is understood to be living to some degree.
In the eyes of Jesus, however, this view of light was not «of God»: «You have heard that it was said, «You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.»»
When I hear the fundamentalist cry that the president isn't a Christian, the first thought that comes to mind is another cry of «Western infedels» from those that hold fundamentalist Islamic views.
if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheview has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheView has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.
I am not disrespecting their views but think about it, have you heard anything... I mean anything new from the pro-life side lately?
I try to be fairly thorough in my research and explanations, but just discovered one view on Genesis 1:4 I hadn't heard before.
One of these foundations is the view that when we see a table, hear a trumpet, taste sugar, etc., what we really see, hear, or taste are not ordinary objects, but instead our own ideas or images — the colored shape directly apparent to us, the loud blare, the sugary taste.
In other words, in 15 to 20 years that I have more identified with the pro-life side and debated, discussed and exchanged views with the other side, I have not heard really anything new.
Yes, I am a male worship leader and writer and not once in all the times that I have ever played or heard this incredible song, have I viewed it through the eyes of pervert.
Muslims in general if left alone with out your intervention might end up fighting each other due differences of views in their faith, but if west keep on applying pressure causing starvation, harassment and confrontation against Muslims and against their faith, this will only lead them to leave behind their differences and jointly or individually confront their enemies, those who wants to deprive them from their rights of faith and belief and the more they are pressed the more they would complain by reacting and not by words and cries since words and cries seem does not reach, heard or work out now a days since being their judges and executors are all of non religious such as atheists, infidels, polytheists who consider their vast interests above all humanity and faith issues such as mercy, leniency, compassion, pity, sympathy, kindness all that of human mutual heavenly code of conduct.!?
Now we may be looking at different problems here, or have different considerations in mind; but from where I view the matter, Bultmann's own statements seem to evade the crucial aspect of change in scientific thinking affecting the vision of our world; and his position, as amplified by Ogden's comments, seems to me simply not to square with the facts, as one may glean them from hearing scientists talk among themselves.
Not that that means much, but it is a novel view I have never heard mentioned.
The contemporary NEED to be tolerant and not the traditional usage of the word (accepting that someone else's view be heard) we have a new definition which is framed as being only able to say that their claim is as valid as any other.
It is a rugged and strong land, a land whose charm is austere: rocky hills climbing their juniper studded slopes steeply to the sky - line, narrow glens, hasty watercourses, but ever the sudden view from a hilltop over peopled valleys and far regions where mellowing distance clothes the hills in a veil of allurement and entices one on to things that the eye hath not seen nor the ear heard.
I've known hundreds of Jews in my life and not only have they never tried to impose their religious beliefs or views on myself or others, but I've never heard a single one talk about how «great» being a Jew is.
Even if you have never heard of this view before, and don't know of any further resources, what do you think of this view?
People hear our sermons sprinkled with Greek, Hebrew, and quotations from theology books, and they realize they don't have the time or training to do all this study, and when they try with the limited time and resources they do have, more often than not, they get scoffed at or ridiculed by someone with more training and knowledge for having a view that shows their ignorance.
Honestly, I am not sure I have ever heard that particular view on baptism before.
In that conversation, voices have been heard urging a view of conscience that is curious, even dangerous: Under certain circumstances, conscience may permit or even require that a person choose acts that the Church has consistently taught are intrinsically wrong — such as using artificial means of contraception, or receiving Holy Communion while living the married life in a union that's not been blessed by the Church.
The people who hate on him for expressing his views are the true problem... freedom of speech does not just apply to what you like to hear.
When being a Christian is still an unwritten requirement for the highest government office, it's vital for those who don't view reality through a lens that distorts their views with myths and beliefs that don't stand up to even the most basic logic and reason, to make their voices heard.
To All here; Would want to hear your views here and if such acts agree with you and wouldn't mind that happening to your posts in your own screen name?
Christianity has also been largely subverted into a communist view (we hear it all the time from you rich christians, about how if «you don't work you don't eat).