According to TWU, all people can choose to be heterosexual; by extension no one is inherently
not heterosexual.
Melgaard's schizophrenic accumulations of vulgar ephemera might evoke the installations of Thomas Hirschhorn — that is, if Hirschhorn's papery images of war - ravaged, blown - apart bodies and Hellraiser - like mannequins were replaced by cum - dripping penises and self - fisting platypuses; that is, if Hirschhorn were in fact
not a heterosexual Swiss man but a sexy, hairy, Australian - born Norwegian gay guy hell - bent, in the abject tradition of Mike Kelley and Paul McCarthy, on figuratively shitting all over mainstream culture.
Others besides Dale, not all Christian and
not all heterosexual, also have learned this lesson, perhaps as they cared for the likes of Cleve Jones, quite unaware of his AIDS sainthood.
They are
not heterosexual — for many this is a plain and simple fact of life.
Some persons experience sexual desire and attraction only or primarily to persons of the same sex; whatever they are, they are
not heterosexual.
So how do you know that what Paul is referring to isn't a heterosexual engaging in homosexual behavior?
The fact remains that people have and still justify horrible acts, from slavery to beating children who aren't heterosexual, with scripture.
All these kinds of pairings come with a wholly different context and meaning, as do interracial couplings between people who aren't heterosexual or cis.
The private Christian school, located in Langley and about an hour's drive from Vancouver, has an anti-gay covenant that, essentially, discriminates against anyone who isn't heterosexual.
I am so tired of reading things like «has an anti-gay covenant that, essentially, discriminates against anyone who isn't heterosexual.»
Not exact matches
Apple's and Facebook's reproductive benefits policies could also appeal to gay and lesbian couples who want to use a surrogate or a sperm donor to have a baby, or
heterosexual couples who incur in vitro fertilization costs
not covered by insurance.
After the typical questions about a job applicant's gender and race, Goldman Sachs (gs) asks candidates to indicate their sexual orientation via a drop - down menu including the choices bisexual, gay man, gay woman,
heterosexual, lesbian, other, and «prefer
not to say.»
Many people already know about the Kinsey scale, the near - ubiquitous system that allows people to gauge their sexuality on a sliding scale, which revealed that people do
not always fit exclusively into
heterosexual or homosexual categories.
The health service said the move was to keep in line with equality legislation to ensure those who do
not identify as
heterosexual are treated fairly.
It could also have a positive effect on womens» employment and careers by making it easier to balance work with home and childcare obligations — since men in
heterosexual marriages still often aren't doing their share on that front.
for me a committed homosexual couple is the same as a committed
heterosexual couple;
not the same as a rapist, pedophile, or drunk.
«All
heterosexuals can
not understand LGBT concerns, «all homosexuals are evil», «all bisexuals are always promiscuous»....
... also, what diseases are particular to homosexuals that cdn't be or are to
heterosexuals?
So, whatever the reason, there are gay people that will always be gay and the vast majority of whom are
not going to be chaste and are
not going to be able to successfully or happily sustain a
heterosexual relationship.
If marriage is a «lifestyle» choice for
heterosexual couples, as people seem to believe, why should homosexual couples
not be allowed to marry?
You can't really define a
heterosexual by anything more than as someone whose natural attraction is to members of the opposite sex.
The normal world knows that
heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual (and anything inbetween) is just an orientation... it is
not a statement of rape, promiscuity, or being always fabulous... lol.
I don't mind people like June and
heterosexuals.
This passage also says these people gave up
heterosexual passions for homosexual passions... again... doesn't accurately describe gay folk today.
Because homosexuals «have no choice but to be homosexual,» he declares, «they are
not choosing that option over
heterosexual marriage; and so they are
not sending any social signals that
heterosexual family life should be denigrated.»
Let me put this another way, in a way that doesn't exclude me from the discussion; do you consider it wrong for
heterosexual couples to have anal sex?
By giving benediction in 1930 to its married
heterosexual members purposely seeking sterile sex, the Anglican Church lost, bit by bit, any authority to tell her other members — married or unmarried, homosexual or
heterosexual —
not to do the same.
It's that his personal history —
not only the two divorces, but also the repeated affairs and the way he behaved during the dissolution of his marriages — makes him the most compromised champion imaginable for a movement that's laboring to keep lifelong
heterosexual monogamy on a legal and cultural pedestal.
In addition, with the overwhelming majority of people continuing to enjoy
heterosexual marriage, I am
not persuaded that the biblical theme of gender complementarity, which is modeled between Christ and the Church, is under threat, nor that this theme is authoritative for all relationships.
Mr. Rich was gratified, indeed exultant, over the box office success of The Birdcage, noting that the same weekend it opened a Robert Redford movie about a
heterosexual love affair did
not do nearly so well.
I'm
heterosexual, as far as I can tell, but that doesn't make me monogamous.
More lies... Poor Bob is such an uneducated fool he doesn't know the difference between being gay and a pedophile and he hates the the truth that
heterosexual behavior and homosexual behavior are normal aspects of human sexuality.
The official news release carefully pointed out that the organization was «
not officially connected» with the NAE's convention but that its statement of faith is the same and its membership (open to both homosexuals and
heterosexuals) is composed of «members of NAE and various evangelical churches.»
1) In any conversation, you should
not assume that everyone who «passes» as
heterosexual is in fact
heterosexual.
And I see no reason why the self - sacrificing love of Jesus can
not be modeled in a committed same - sex relationship as well as it can be modeled in a committed
heterosexual relationship.
And then there is a small contingent of us who approach this conversation from a unique vantage point — we are in a
heterosexual marriage with someone who does
not entirely identify as
heterosexual.
Gerard J.M. van den Aardweg has shown how homosexual attraction is
not just a variant on
heterosexual attraction.
If monogamous
heterosexual behavior alone satisfies the will of God, why didn't Jesus marry?
The denomination has developed a blessing rite that mirrors current wedding ceremonies for
heterosexual couples and allows each bishop to decide to allow same - sex marriages in their churches or
not.
«While I am sure most of the Christians you encounter of the over 40 age group probably did celebrate the passing of that ridiculous amendment, rest assured that this 48 year old
heterosexual married woman most definitely did
not.
having ssid that i think that for God sin is sin and only sin he can't forgive is the unpardonable sin of unbeliving that Jesus is the the word made flesh who paid the penalty for sins on the cross at calvary he loves homosexuals as much as
heterosexuals.
In an open letter, he went on to say: «As Christians we know it (
heterosexual marriage) is God's plan; but it is God's plan for humanity,
not just the people of God.
However, this type of video won't change the «Christians» who need it any more than
not tipping a homosexual will turn him into a
heterosexual.
If
heterosexual marriage is so darn important, then why don't they spend as much if
not more time encouraging it, than they do discouraging same - gender marriage?
A
heterosexual person can
not help a homosexual person to develop her or his full personhood, whatever that may mean, if the
heterosexual equates homosexuality with sickness or immorality.
When I see a
heterosexual couple together just being a couple, my mind does
not wander to their sex life.
Those things are
not so different suffered by promiscuous
heterosexual counterparts who engage in similar behavior, which is part of the point: Abnormal sexual behavior has significant health dangers.
You said, «Those things are
not so different suffered by promiscuous
heterosexual counterparts who engage in similar behavior, which is part of the point», yet you fail to get the whole point.
If you really do
not hate gay people, perhaps you might consider dissecting what you just said and ask yourself, If somebody substituted
heterosexual for gay and said the same thing to you, would you feel loved or despised?
Sometimes I imagine him responding by saying, «Who are you to ask me about gay marriage, when you can't even keep your
heterosexual marriages together?»