Sentences with phrase «not holy writ»

Note: These are just examples, not holy writ.

These exceptions are really internal contradictions that get into the documents because this is committee writing, not Holy Writ, and every group wants its say, including the anti-anthropocentrists.

First, when you say Einstein / Hawking came up with specific things that supports your point, it's not holy writ, they could be wrong, so disagreeing with them doesn't make me wrong.

ANYONE who says that either WG1, 2, or 3 isn't holy writ, or that the Copenhagen - style efforts towards mitigation have failed (and will likely continue to fail), or that there are more pressing human welfare issues in bag - for - buck terms GETS THE TREATMENT.

Not exact matches

And like most religions, its adherents believe that it is holy writ that can't be questioned.

Although the early Christian writers had the Old Testament as their Scriptures, not one of them had any idea that he was writing something that would itself become Holy Writ.

Noting that we do not live in a sacred world valuing «received knowledge» from holy writ, but in a profane world harshly criticizing that tradition, Victoria Erickson of Union Theological Seminary in New York City wondered if we dared invite our worst critics into our classrooms for dialogue.

5 Asked about the Inquisition, he said, «Holy Writ was intended to teach men how to go to Heaven, not how the heavens go.»

If you wish to cite Holy Writ once again to prove that this is not possible, there's not much else one can say other than to mention that someone who has never traded options should not imho be holding himself out as an authority.

Albeit by far too many — not the least of whom were those in their ever - growing army of unthinking MSM «partners» who should have known better than to glom onto the holy writ of press releases.

One of my chief frustrations with the whole topic is how partial information, and extrapolated conjectures from it, are treated as Holy Writ, not to be questioned, and ironclad proof of the «mainstream» narrative.

The claimant in my case wasn't a Russian oligarch, an A-list celebrity or an Arab billionaire (groups who seem to issue writs like they are going out of fashion) but a seemingly innocuous super-wealthy self - styled «holy man» from the Punjab (a state in Northern India) who is reported never to have stepped foot in Britain nor apparently reads, writes or speaks any English.