Sentences with phrase «not ideological bias»

The very fact that she did bail demonstrates that she's motivated by the science not any ideological bias.

The primary concern is not ideological bias but the apparent narrow - mindedness of today's instructional focus.

Not exact matches

James Damore was fired by Google on Monday for circulating «Google's Ideological Echo Chamber,» a highly controversial 10 - page memo suggesting that women are underrepresented at the company because of biological differences that make them less inclined to tech and leadership roles and not because of bias.

The same is true of many media reform efforts: by attempting to get people excited about liberal bias in the news, or nudity or profanity in a particular program, or the ideological bent of a certain series, or whether a network is «Christian,» concerned leaders have diverted the attention of viewers from the most important problem, the basic point, namely, that the whole process - of - television is providing us with a worldview which not only determines what we think, but also how we think and who we are.

20This is not, however, to say that all interest is «biased» or «ideological» in the sense that it expresses, in Ogden's words, «a more or less comprehensive understanding of human existence, or how to exist and act as a human being, that functions to justify the interests of a particular group or individual by representing these interests as the demands of disinterested justice» (The Point of Christology [San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1982], p. 94).

Reinhold Niebuhr has not only exposed the ideological bias in definitions of justice, but he reminds us that the settlement of conflicting claims always involves forces which operate above and beyond considerations of principle.

While Sidney B. Simon at the University of Massachusetts and his colleagues claim that their values - clarification approach «does not aim to instill any particular set of values,» they certainly reveal their ideological bias toward the autonomous, bourgeois, rationalistic self when they talk about «learning a process for selecting the best and rejecting the worst elements contained in the various value systems.

Some might argue that politicians don't really believe in this bias, but simply use it as leverage to promote their own ideological positions.

It is the engaged feminist intellect (like John Stuart Mill's) that can pierce through the cultural - ideological limitations of the time and its specific «professionalism» to reveal biases and inadequacies not merely in the dealing with the question of women, but in the very way of formulating the crucial questions of the discipline as a whole.

While our ideological preconceptions undoubtedly affect how we synthesize information, and even «objective» science is not immune from confirmation bias, this does not mean that folks are unable to reason or change views.

most of our ideological opponents think they're actually right about the science, which means they would not want to prevent science from being taught, but rather prevent what they view as biased environmentalist science being taught.

For sure we know there is a strong ideological bias and corresponding identity association, or you wouldn't get that polarization.

Taking a neutral stance at this point on rehashed work from «NIPCC» (Fred Singer and friends), well known for serial, serious errors in overall interpretation, analysis and communication of the science and transparent but largely unexamined ideological bias at play in their playground «reports» — never mind suggesting that this kind of effort «competes» with the work of the world's climate scientists and the 2,500 multidisciplinary specialists contributing to IPCC reports combined with the tens of thousands of additional scientists and many others who raise real questions that result from reading, reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information in both IPCC summaries and domestic science and discussion of the science, knowledgeably and in good faith and with open identification of the nature of the social and political issues — is just not credible.

If that weren't the case, then there wouldn't be identifiable ideological biases in political polling agencies and every poll would have the exact same outcomes.

Apart from the irony of using a Deltoid blog to try and show that those two suffer from «ideological blinkers» (don't get me wrong, I enjoy Deltoid, in good part because he is so honest about where he is coming from that I know where I stand), the posts you link to in no way show an inescapable conclusion of ideology as far as I can see, and I stand by my position of incomprehension that you would discount anything those two say on grounds of proven ideological bias.

Not being rude, but I get the feeling that the conclusion is more that you don't agree with them, and don't understand how they can hold some of the views they do, which is not the same thing as ideological biNot being rude, but I get the feeling that the conclusion is more that you don't agree with them, and don't understand how they can hold some of the views they do, which is not the same thing as ideological binot the same thing as ideological bias.

Back in the day when science was not questioned because sciences asked questions instead of as the case for AGW where science just supplies answeres without even a question being asked, data physical measurement, and strict adherence to the scientific method were what drove science and there was no political or ideological influences biasing whart was done.