Sentences with phrase «not immaterial»

If you broaden the same calculations above to include all of Wake County, the numbers are obviously less impactful (8.5 % annual increase in County - wide income in one year), but not immaterial IMO.

(The role of the Internet in distracting the public is not immaterial either, and some connectivity can satisfy demands for modern conveniences and lower pressure for political reform.)

These are not immaterial or irrelevant failures: for example, Eduardo Zorita said that his attitude towards the MBH reconstruction changed when he learned of the verification r2 failure.

Selections from the Permanent Collection, MOCA / / Harry Dodge's «The Virtual is not Immaterial (Plastic Sunset / External Anus),» 2016.

It is not immaterial in the way conceptual art aspired to be.

Emotions, however, are not immaterial: they are neurochemically - mediated and physical insofar as they have neurochemical correspondents.

«From a trinitarian perspective, God is not an immaterial substance».

Does the Mormon position» that Jesus was begotten by an immortal (but not immaterial) father» contradict the ancient Christian doctrine that Jesus had no natural father?

Not exact matches

In addition, other risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial could affect the accuracy of any such forward - looking statements.

«Some not - immaterial proportion of the companies that I invest in that are successful are successful in something other than what I invested in.

In the base year used in the five - year growth calculation (e.g., 2012), any companies with revenue of less than $ 200,000 will have their revenue for that period lifted to $ 200,000 for the purpose of calculating five - year growth that is not grossly exaggerated by immaterial differences in the base - year revenues of otherwise equal candidates (for instance, a company that grows from $ 1 to $ 2 million would have a higher growth rate than a company that grows from $ 2 to $ 3 million).

In the base year used in the two - year growth calculation (e.g., 2015), any companies with revenue of less than $ 200,000 will have their revenue for that period lifted to $ 200,000 for the purpose of calculating two - year growth that is not grossly exaggerated by immaterial differences in the base - year revenues of otherwise equal candidates (for instance, a company that grows from $ 1 to $ 2 million would have a higher growth rate than a company that grows from $ 2 to $ 3 million).

A manager may think these types of differences to be immaterial, but they are not.

Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or those we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Pro forma results of operations have not been presented as the historical operating results of Media Temple are immaterial.

Pro forma results of operations have not been presented as they are immaterial.

Our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be harmed by any of these risks, as well as other risks not currently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial.

Although it's not contagious and the number of half monkeys having such illness is quite immaterial than alarming, yet the patient revealing such symptoms must be brought to the nearest vet for immediate treatment.

Although it's not contagious and the number of half monkeys having such illness is quite immaterial than alarming, yet you should be brought to the nearest vet for immediate treatment.

God by definition is immaterial (not material) so therefore He can not be observed using the scientific method, which can only describe material phenomena.

While, at times, he talked as a Greek in setting flesh and spirit in sharp opposition, he always was thinking as a Jew; he was contrasting, not material flesh and immaterial spirit, but the natural man uninspired by the divine Spirit, on one side, and the spiritual man transformed by God's grace, on the other.

The important discrimination, as he saw it, was not between material and immaterial — a distinction with which he never dealt — but between moral and immoral.

However, the court stated, «Cannata's lack of formal training in Catholic doctrine is immaterial; this is because the ministerial exception does not apply only to those who are ordained.»

The answer is that our materialist is not, in truth, concieving of «thinking without an immaterial substance» but rather he conceives only of «thinking with matter present».

Even if you can't bring yourself to call it «God,» it is undeniable that the cause, whatever it is, must be transcendent and preexistent, as it had to have existed before everything else in order to have caused everything else; it must be immaterial, as its existence preceded the existence of matter; it must be intelligent, as evidenced by the complexity of the universe it caused; and it must itself be uncaused, existing necessarily rather than contingently.

We aren't just saying «God did it,» we are saying that an intelligent, transcendent, immaterial, preexistent, uncaused being — called God — did it.

Agree except the immaterial part, we can't be sure if there has always been «material» or not.

He is: • Supernatural in nature (as He exists outside of His creation) • Incredibly powerful (to have created all that is known) • Eternal (self - existent, as He exists outside of time and space) • Omnipresent (He created space and is not limited by it) • Timeless and changeless (He created time) • Immaterial (because He transcends space) • Personal (the impersonal can't create personality) • Necessary (as everything else depends on Him) • Infinite and singular (as you can not have two infinites) • Diverse yet has unity (as nature exhibits diversity) • Intelligent (supremely, to create everything) • Purposeful (as He deliberately created everything) • Moral (no moral law can exist without a lawgiver) • Caring (or no moral laws would have been given)

One who does not believe in God, for example, may find the existence of free, nonhuman, immaterial persons such as Satan quite implausible; one who already believes in the existence of at least one such free, nonhuman, immaterial person — i.e., God — may find it much less implausible.

God is: • Supernatural in nature (as He exists outside of His creation) • Incredibly powerful (to have created all that is known) • Eternal (self - existent, as He exists outside of time and space) • Omnipresent (He created space and is not limited by it) • Timeless and changeless (He created time) • Immaterial (because He transcends space) • Personal (the impersonal can't create personality) • Necessary (as everything else depends on Him) • Infinite and singular (as you can not have two infinites) • Diverse yet has unity (as nature exhibits diversity) • Intelligent (supremely, to create everything) • Purposeful (as He deliberately created everything) • Moral (no moral law can exist without a lawgiver) • Caring (or no moral laws would have been given)

Thus it conceives the world of nature as something derived from and dependent upon something logical prior to itself, a world of immaterial ideas; but this is not a mental world or a world of mental activities or of things depending on mental activity although it is an intelligible world or a world in which mind, when mind comes into existence, finds itself completely at home.

I once cite «Realism and Idealism,» the passage about objective idealism in which Collingwood clearly states his conception of the world of nature: «Thus it conceives the world of nature as something derived from and dependent upon something logical prior to itself, a world of immaterial ideas; but this is not a mental world or a world of mental activities or of things depending on mental activity although it is an intelligible world or a world in which mind, when mind comes into existence, finds itself completely at home.

«11 A priori ideas are no abstractions of the human mind, but form an immaterial world of potentialities, that are not only preconditions of the sensible reality, but also of human thought itself.

And the supposed transformation is not compatible with a dualistic conception which assumes that psychic phenomena are «immaterial» and fundamentally different from material processes.

Gender, race, or other personal characteristics not related to performing the task are immaterial.

The motive is immaterial — the effect on others is not made less negative because it's believed and acted on with sincere good intention.

While at their highest point such activities, particularly conceptualising, are immaterial and so are not ultimately dependent upon the body, Aquinas held that in this life the whole gamut of rational activity needs various interior sense powers that come with the body.

As the mind is immaterial, it follows that it can not be the power of the body, or therefore passed on by physical generation alone, but must be the power of something else — the soul, which is created by God.

An argued transition, for instance, from the analysis of material to immaterial (supersensible) substance - in effect, the transition from physics to natural theology - is not to be found.

We can only show this if we can show that we have a quite different kind of consciousness (understanding and selfreflection), which can not be explained materially and, therefore, requires the immaterial soul, created by God, to explain this power.

Evolution may account for our physiology but, as Aristotle discerned, the mind, because it is immaterial, is not passed on by generation but «comes in from outside», as he put it.

@Todd — then I don't buy this concept of a immaterial standard.

«The part of us that doesn't die would have to be something SIC immaterial [I believe you mean «immaterial» in the sense of «non-corporeal» as opposed to «having no use or value»]».

I would say so far, the case for this «immaterial standard» has not been demonstrated, much less proved.

Since the Greeks (as indeed most of the ancient world though often in vague and undefined ways) were accustomed to think of death in terms of the survival of an immaterial soul, the Jewish emphasis on the resurrection of the fleshly body seemed not only unnecessary, but unspiritual and even repellent.

I don't see how our ability to discern things as or interpret things as mutually exclusive for certain conditions const itutes something immaterial.

«The post is about whether this immaterial part of us [which does not exist] is conscious or unconscious until the resurrection».

You can make «assertions,» and reject «assertions,» but you can not provide me or anyone with reasons as to why yours are valid without making use of the immaterial, which you reject as being real.

Such introspection, though, is not an empirical basis for inferring an immaterial designer.

You see, you use immaterial, rational statements which show that you can not live in a world that is purely material in nature.