Sentences with phrase «not in a free form»

Not exact matches

This means that a Canadian company with a subsidiary in Bermuda, for example, can bring back foreign profit tax - free in the form of a dividend — provided the subsidiary is carrying out active business, such as sales or manufacturing, and is not merely a P.O. box.

In any event, the point isn't whether the requirement to complete the long - form census form violates the charter, I don't think it does because it's probably either a violation «in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice» (under section 7) or a violation which is «reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society» (the test under section 1), but that it does nevertheless violate the right to privacy which is one of our fundamental rightIn any event, the point isn't whether the requirement to complete the long - form census form violates the charter, I don't think it does because it's probably either a violation «in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice» (under section 7) or a violation which is «reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society» (the test under section 1), but that it does nevertheless violate the right to privacy which is one of our fundamental rightin accordance with the principles of fundamental justice» (under section 7) or a violation which is «reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society» (the test under section 1), but that it does nevertheless violate the right to privacy which is one of our fundamental rightin a free and democratic society» (the test under section 1), but that it does nevertheless violate the right to privacy which is one of our fundamental rights.

The firm generates so much free cash flow that it can't put to work that nearly all of it goes right back out the door to owners, either in the form of share repurchases or cash dividends.

But there can be specific Church forms of homophobia too: pressurising us to change our sexual orientation (although people who want to seek change in their orientation should be free to do so, and some find that their sexuality does change); saying that gay people will go to hell; not permitting us to work with youth or children (assuming gay people are more likely to be predatory or paedophiles); and holding us back from ministry roles.

(Bultmannian spiritualizing, for which, if God is the Wholly Other, all these manifestations are just forms of expression with no real content, is certainly quite unacceptable, for why should not the Almighty be free to act in this way too?)

Because the birth control cases all focus on a 1993 federal law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, not the Constitution, the Justices will face questions about whether the mandate to provide free access to 20 forms of birth control drugs or devices, sterilization, screenings, and counseling imposes a «substantial burden» on religious freedom of nonprofit employers with religious objections to some or all contraceptives, whether the mandate in fact serves a «compelling interest» of the government, and whether an attempt to provide an exemption from the mandate satisfies the requirement that such an accommodation is «the least restrictive means» of achieving the government's policy interest.

I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage (Ex 20:2): As Israel's liberation from Egypt demonstrated in a nation - forming experience, God not only creates us free; God sets us free and then provides a «codification of freedom» in the Ten Commandments.

Feel free to rail away at Islamic violence, that does nt in any way shape or form reflect on Christianity.

Through a series of brief questions at the end of his book, Sigmund invites liberation theologians to seek ways of fusing capitalist market «efficiency» with the «preferential love for the poor,» to consider how private property is not always oppression but may in fact free people from it, to develop liberalism's ideal of «equal treatment under the law,» to nurture the «fragile new democracies» in Latin America, and, finally, to develop «a spirituality of socially concerned democracy, whether capitalist or socialist in its economic form,» rather than «denouncing dependency, imperialism, and capitalist exploitation.»

Relying on prophetic passages, particularly from Jeremiah, McCabe demonstrated the frequency with which God is shown to speak in the conditional form of address with reference to future events.8 These conditional prophecies, McCabe argued, imply that God did not absolutely foreknow free human decisions.

It is not just free - floating groups banded together for narrow political gain, but an intelligent form of life requiring the constant engagement of its members in discussion and decision - making, in defining and redefining its goals and purposes.

The crucial thing here was not that the State, particularly in its more or less totalitarian forms, weakened and gradually displaced the free associations, but that the political principle with all its centralistic features percolated into the associations themselves modifying their structure and their whole inner life, and thus politicized society to an ever - increasing extent.

«His work in philosophy forms part, and a very important part, of the movement of twentieth - century realism; but whereas the other leaders of that movement came to it after a training in late - nineteenth - century idealism, and are consequently realistic with the fanaticism of converts and morbidly terrified of relapsing into the sins of their youth, a fact which gives their work an air of strain, as if they cared less about advancing philosophical knowledge than about proving themselves good enemies of idealism, Whitehead's work is perfectly free from all this sort of thing, and he suffers from no obsessions; obviously he does not care what he says, so long as it is true.

I agree but add: God had no alternative to willing that there be some free creatures, first because (pace Alston) the idea of not creating at all could occur (if I may say so) only to a confused creature, second because, as Peirce, Bergson, and Whitehead have seen, by a «creature» we can consistently mean only a lesser form of the freedom or creativity which in eminent form is deity.

Persons who shun marriage simply to remain free to please themselves are not to be honored, but those are to be honored who have adopted other forms of dedication in place of marriage, whether by deliberate intention, by force of circumstance, or because no person has appeared with whom they could wholeheartedly make an enduring covenant.

Although not without its idealist elements, the analytic starting point of this form of internationalism was a realist assessment of the mid-twentieth-century situation: Totalitarianism was a mortal peril to free societies and resisting its aggressive encroachments required the United States to take the lead in defense of the West, since Europe had unmanned itself in the two mid-century world wars.

That does not free us from the responsibility of constructing such worlds or of forming them in service to him.

Jesus» going away, the writer of John reminds us, is for our advantage, for it frees him to come to us in ever new forms, ones not so restricted by the particularity of Jesus» spatio - temporal existence.34 In short, the positive significance of God's responsiveness to the contingencies of the world and his appropriation of the world into his own being requires that he be sufficiently free of the world to be a creative and constructive factor in it regardless of the actual contingencies that may arisin ever new forms, ones not so restricted by the particularity of Jesus» spatio - temporal existence.34 In short, the positive significance of God's responsiveness to the contingencies of the world and his appropriation of the world into his own being requires that he be sufficiently free of the world to be a creative and constructive factor in it regardless of the actual contingencies that may arisIn short, the positive significance of God's responsiveness to the contingencies of the world and his appropriation of the world into his own being requires that he be sufficiently free of the world to be a creative and constructive factor in it regardless of the actual contingencies that may arisin it regardless of the actual contingencies that may arise.

It is now generally agreed that the forms of mathematics are not inherent in the structure of the mind, but are free constructions of the symbolizing imagination.

The ability of biology to detail the organisation and constitution of life - forms, not just on a cellular level, but now also on a genetic and molecular level, and its description of how such factors canaffect the global behaviour of an organism, should be taken into account in the theological and philosophical discussion of free will, individual identity / personality, conscience, the soul, and other areas concerning human behaviour, especially in regard to morality.

The revelation of the Word of God is a matter of the free decision of God, not a matter of bringing to the Bible the right kind of pre-understanding or the latest findings in form and redaction criticism.

In this post you have suggested «To require people to live according to scripture... does not create free human beings... it is really just a religious form of bondage... [And] the bible is not to be used as an instruction booklet on how to follow the proper steps to salvation».

This article is arguably hypocritical as well as stomach - churning, since it begins with the suggestion that «Because of the amazingly diverse multicultural contexts in which pastoral ministers are called upon to work today, it is impossible to prescribe one liturgical model that will be always and everywhere appropriate»: this flexible and open - minded liturgist then proceeded to argue in The Tablet that only the Mass of Paul VI is always and everywhere appropriate and that its very existence automatically abrogated all previous liturgies for ever: presumably those who prefer the older form are not to be given the dignity of a group or «culture» to be catered for by his free and easy multicultural ways, but are to be simply dismissed as a bunch of liturgical perverts.

This can take the form of an extra 60 days of fasting at the end of Ramadan, feeding 60 people in need, or - not quite so easy in the modern world - freeing a slave.

If these selves are not partially capable of self - determination and thus partly free to wish, choose, and act in independence of the rest of the universe, then they are not distinct selves at all but are indistinguishable from a cosmic causal system.35 Similarly, as explained above, Hartshorne holds that love in the form of sympathy, either immediate or mediate, is a fundamental feature of the human condition and of the total cosmos.

And yet the actual situation of human existence is one in which the self is not really free, one in which people often do not have a clear sense of who they are, and one in which true personality is lost in various forms of enslavement to convention or mass - mindedness.

And they would not be forbidden by their faith to seek to discover whether God has revealed an error - free form in which people can know, love and serve him.

Obviously we can not share in these various Afro - Asiatic forms of religion nor can we remain indifferent to the fact that each of them, in its own way, should regard itself as being the equal of any other and should authorize its followers not to seek to discover whether God has revealed the perfect and definitive form, free from all error, in which he wishes to be known, loved, and served.

tIn answer to free pizza rethuglicans are definately not edible in any form or fashion they stick in your craw and cause you to regurgitate

Ecclesiastes helped form the framework for the New Testament authors» vision of existence, and, brought to its completion by Jesus» teaching, presents a paradoxical charge to the Christian: «Do not put your hope in this present world, and you will be free to enjoy it more than anyone else.»

In a statement quoted by Hasker in his discussion of what he calls a «more subtle form» of the above argument (although it simply is my argument), I said that according to traditional free will theism it would have been possible for God to create «creatures who could enjoy all the same values which we human beings enjoy, except that they would not really be free» (Process 74In a statement quoted by Hasker in his discussion of what he calls a «more subtle form» of the above argument (although it simply is my argument), I said that according to traditional free will theism it would have been possible for God to create «creatures who could enjoy all the same values which we human beings enjoy, except that they would not really be free» (Process 74in his discussion of what he calls a «more subtle form» of the above argument (although it simply is my argument), I said that according to traditional free will theism it would have been possible for God to create «creatures who could enjoy all the same values which we human beings enjoy, except that they would not really be free» (Process 74).

Among them were pantheism and the positions that human reason is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood and good and evil; that Christian faith contradicts reason; that Christ is a myth; that philosophy must be treated without reference to supernatural revelation; that every man is free to embrace the religion which, guided by the light of reason, he believes to be true; that Protestantism is another form of the Christian religion in which it is possible to be as pleasing to God as in the Catholic Church; that the civil power can determine the limits within which the Catholic Church may exercise authority; that Roman Pontiffs and Ecumenical Councils have erred in defining matters of faith and morals; that the Church does not have direct or indirect temporal power or the right to invoke force; that in a conflict between Church and State the civil law should prevail; that the civil power has the right to appoint and depose bishops; that the entire direction of public schools in which the youth of Christian states are educated must be by the civil power; that the Church should be separated from the State and the State from the Church; that moral laws do not need divine sanction; that it is permissible to rebel against legitimate princes; that a civil contract may among Christians constitute true marriage; that the Catholic religion should no longer be the religion of the State to the exclusion of all other forms of worship; and «that the Roman Pontiff can and should reconcile himself to and agree with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.»

«The First Amendment,» he argued, «does not authorize Congress to pick and choose the persons or entities or the organizational forms that are free to exercise their religion» — a view that was later affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Hobby Lobby case.

Us free thinking Christians choose a relationship with God built upon faith, hope, and love, not scary stories formed in an apostolic dream.

$ $ is used for marketing the gospel in the form of sending missionaries out (that takes money), printing and distributing bibles (paper isn't free), building churches (concrete doesn't grow on trees).

Also, In your other comment you asked how large my baking sheet is, my are 18 ″ x 25 ″ but you can use any size since this is a free form candy and your chocolate should not fill the baking sheet all the way to the edges.

A lot of recipes included some form of sugar, butter, or processed sauces and spice mixes, and in some cases even quinoa or rice noodles (which, even though gluten - free, are definitely NOT grain - free, nor paleo).

We do not offer high quality advertising services for free (in any forms — blog post, video production, banner ads) in exchange for products or a chance to win something out of a draw!

Even for people who are not gluten free, this little grain has a pleasant nutty taste delicious in all its» forms!

I guess you have been living under a rock somewhere that you haven't seen it at the stores, but they do sell gelatin in sugar free forms.

If there can be no clearer indication that this will be the Summer of Pie at the Smitten Kitchen — as if a 6 - week onslaught of galette after pie smackdowns after savory tart built on a platform of tartlets crusted bettys and free - form pretties did not already lead us to that conclusion — my pastry blender broke this week after putting in five very good years.

If you're not sure what galettes are, they're basically free - form pies i.e. they're pies that don't need to be made in a pie tin.

I can't think of any dessert that couldn't be made easily in animal - free form.

* sigh * If only such a dairy free fudge existed... (Since we're dreaming why not make it a healthy dairy free fudge in reindeer form to match the holiday?)

I should of labeled this recipe «refined sugar - free» because, yes, of course it still does have sugar in it, just in a different form that is not destructive to the body like white sugar is.

But chocolate has its own natural rich ingredient in the form of cocoa butter (don't let the name fool you, it is dairy - free!).

now i known your saying a miracle of having an injury free season, but when he gets tired and there is no one on the bench to replace him so we can rest him... fatigue does play a factor in form... we will end up with him going on another run of not scoring goals.

And with the need of 1 more important goal desparetely, momentum with the other side, a chance at free kick to bury the game and Ramsey steps up to take it???? Even when he was in form last season, he did not take the free kicks.

we couldn't score against west ham and some of the matches we won, we won with own goals, so the problem eased when walcott was introduced as a striker and it also brought out Ozil's form as we had a free flowing attack with Ramsey on the right... So imo, we should just play Coq and Elneny and shift Ramsey to the wing, our attack wil be so unpredictable and free flowing add Bellerin's overlapping runs, no way would leceister cope with d movement of walcott, sanchez and ramsey ± bellerin... we press them hard and score 2 quick goals, then later we bring in the Ox and Giroud to kill them off....

In my view, both Sanchez and Perez are free spirits whose best form plays out when not tied to too many responsibilities on the pitch.