Sentences with phrase «not in a good financial position»

The German car manufacturer is not in a good financial position in the aftermath of the emissions scandal.

Peters said that, like many other families, Kerry and his wife aren't «necessarily in danger or terribly over-extended, but also not in the best financial position.»

If you are thinking about spending $ 3,000 for a new flat - screen TV or $ 30,000 for a new car, but you have to borrow the money, that means that you are probably not in a good financial position to buy those items.

Not exact matches

And despite lessons learned from the economic crisis — where, arguably, too many extroverted risk - takers in leadership positions wrought financial ruin — and the value of having quiet leaders who, as Good to Great author Jim Collins puts it, «build not their own egos but the institutions they run,» a workplace stigma around introversion still exists.

When people see banks browbeating the bond rating agencies and accounting firms to whitewash the quality of what they're pawning off on their customers, when they see bank lobbyists getting Washington to block state prosecutions of financial fraud so as to clear the way for more predatory lending and false packaging of the junk securities they're selling and to win the right not to reveal their true financial position, there's a good reason not to buy what's in these black boxes.

The forward - looking statements in this presentation are, unless otherwise indicated, stated as of the date hereof and are presented for the purpose of assisting investors and others in understanding our financial position and results of operations, our future operations, as well as our objectives and strategic priorities, and may not be appropriate for other purposes.

This recipe doesn't always guarantee success, but should another financial meltdown occur, such companies will be in a much better position, financially, to weather the storm.

Here is an excerpt: «The NDP in 1991 was not in a good position given the depth of the recession underway, the implacable anti-inflationary obsession of the central bank then still under the leadership of the zealous zero inflation policies of John Crow and the implacable opposition of the financial press.

4 years and more ago, we were not in the financial position we are in today to bring in top players whilst retaining our current best.

The Mail believes that this makes it appear that the 20 - year - old isn't stalling over a new deal just to get better financial terms, but instead an attempt to secure guarantees with regards to the position he would fill in Brendan Rodgers XI.

He is a player who we can't afford to lose.The club knows this, the fans know this, and just as importantly so does Mesut Ozil.The fact that he will be in a position to get himself a very nice Signing On Fee from whichever club he signs for after June means he will get the financial rewards he always wanted.Who can blame him for getting the very best for himself.If his abilities had been appreciated by the club and management earlier then the player would have not been in the position we have now where the cards are all held by him.To keep him will cost the club a huge signing on fee and colloidal wages but that is the price we must pay.We need him so pay him provided it is what SVEN M and RAUL advise.Im sure the player himself would be impressed that these 2 are involved and the whole structure of the club is moving forward.

This is Wenger legacy, this is what he wants to be remembered for... He left the club in a healthy financial position (well and the 17 years in a row of CL... Not like we were going to win it, ever!!).

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It's the fans that keep sacrificing because this team can't get their head out of their own ass... please give me some examples when a top club ever let their best player leave for free at the end of a season... Wenger needs to go to PSG and get some money and talent for Sanchez so that we can end this nonsense once and for all... then he needs to publicly apologize for the way in which they handled the whole situation... if they allow Sanchez to go for free there is no way this club, under the tutelage of Kroenke and Wenger, will ever layout the necessary coin to replace such a talented player, especially considering that Wenger will be a lame - duck manager once again in the final year of his contract and we know how well that went last year... open your eyes people, Wenger has spoken publicly about how he hopes that the next manager can take this club to the next level... WHAT?!?... he then went on to speak about leaving them in the perfect position to be successful, which is one of the reasons why several pundits felt Wenger would leave after last season based on the financials and the fact that so many players had only one year left on their respective contracts... who says this shit??? If you believe you're leaving things in the best possible shape for your potential successor to achieve greatness it raises a couple of serious questions: Why can't you take things to the next level if everything is as great as you say?

Let's get the facts straight here.He never demanded # 400,000 a week.All that is just media talk.However, I support your point of the fact that him going does not mean disaster.We've survived with far better players leaving you know.If Arsenal had replaced Van Persie the season he left we would've challenged them for the title that season.However, at that time we were financially poor and had to settle for some second rate players.Now we are in a better financial position and I expect us to be more ambitious and that involves trying as much as possible to replace any player who leaves.This doom prediction doesn't show the character of a top club.Even Chelsea won't behave like how we do if they lost Hazard.I hate the way Arsenal allows players to treat it.I actually thought only smaller clubs behaved that way.

I can only hope that he decides to take a position upstairs at the club after he leaves as manager, because the man really does deserve the utmost respect for what he has achieved, not just in honourable success but financial success as well.

Without good financial position you can't exist as a club in the top tier EPL.

We have not lost our position as a global leader in science and technology innovation, but even the best policies will not lead to continued advancements and breakthroughs without financial commitments to the fields of science and technology from our Federal and state governments.

If anything, by not having a financial interest in a dating company or website, surely I'm well - positioned to create a completely impartial awards.

«To encourage principals to take up positions in these remote areas they are using very good financial inducements, but still they can't fill the positions.»

Phil shared numerous years of experience in auto retail, to ensure that not only did they sell me a car, but he also placed me in a better financial position by doing so!

If your financial position is not good enough in order to buy dialogue essay, you have the only one way out from the situation, which is to write your dialogue essay on your own.

Choosing the investment option with the highest returns won't necessarily be the best strategy for someone picking investments to get them in a position of financial stability 30 years down the road.

While it's not a traditional financial literacy tenet, one of the best things you can do if you're in that position is ask your boss for a raise.»

Even if activists or financial acquirers do not make a run at the company, SureWest would be in a far better negotiating position with a potential strategic acquirer, such as Comcast, with a higher stock price.

It could be argued that the company is not in a good enough financial position to be acquired just yet.

To make things better, we are not strict about your credit scores as long as your financial profile shows that you are in a position to service the loan comfortably without compromising other financial obligations.

You may not end up living the life of an MI6 agent, but you will put yourself in a better position for financial prosperity.

So I have just one wish for you — the good luck to be somewhere where you are free to maintain the kind of integrity I have described, and where you do not feel forced by a need to maintain your position in the organization, or financial support, or so on, to lose your integrity.

Calculating future loss of earnings can be tricky at the best of times, but the intention of this sum is to put the injured party back in the financial position they would have been in had it not been for the accident.

[69] While I do not doubt that the Public Guardian and Trustee's position is well - intentioned, it is, with respect, artificial and misguided to judge the merits of the appeal in isolation from the financial ramifications that would arise from an unsuccessful appeal.

As a final comment, notwithstanding the error noted by the Court of Appeal («In the normal course, someone on the acquisition team would have been assigned responsibility for determining whether financial instruments that gave a lender the right to veto a change - of - control existed and, if there were, communicating with the lender to ascertain its position»)(see para. 22, FN 18), the Court acknowledged counsel's «excellent» oral and written submissions on appeal — even stating that the interests of the parties «could not have been better served».

«I'm not sure what financial position [UBS] is going to be in when all is said and done and when I look at the very serious amounts of money paid to professionals in these cases, even with this decision, somebody needs to ask the question are the UBS shareholders better off than they would be or should have been?»

Not only do they get to put the trophy in their lobby, they're already in a significantly better financial position as a result of the honored activity.

Even the best insurance policy is not valuable if the insurer has a poor financial standing, as the company might not be in a position to honor its commitments.

But, maybe in some instances one working spouse contributes more to the income or would want to leave their significant other in a better financial position, then as long as purchasing a life insurance policy would not be a financial burden, it could be an option.

An unbiased fee - based financial planner who does not get commissions for life insurance products may be in the best position to help you find a policy that fits your needs.

As you may or may not know, A.M. Best look towards the financial security of the company to assess whether they are in a position to pay their claims.

While frequent job - hopping isn't a good idea, staying at the same job in the same position can hurt your employability and financial well - being.

Well, today I was finally able to access financial documents for my institution that outline salaries for all positions, and lo - and - behold I discover that I am NOT being paid mid-range, but am in fact paid pennies above the bottom 25th percentile.

I'm not saying you have to leave or move, but I am saying many couples make this choice, at significant financial risk, and more often than not find themselves in a better position down the road.

They don't others to think that they stayed in a dead marriage just long enough to put themselves in the best possible financial position to get divorced.

If your parents are in the financial position to help you, you're better off going to the Bank of Mom and Dad, (depending on how's it's structured, it's not considered a second mortgage in many cases).