Sentences with phrase «not in a logical way»

I try to be faithful to what I see but not in a logical way.

Then you continue: «Simply noting that something happened before without humans does not in any logical way show that humans are not causing it today».

Not exact matches

, and in the piece they discuss why stories are much more influential than facts (again, a conclusion backed by numerous studies) through their ability to change emotional beliefs in a way that «logical» arguments just can't touch.

For these reasons I have to assume this whole «sending dilbit by rail is dangerous» is a bogus threat because it simply would not be done that way in any logical system.

For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.

DO NOT be an apologist or accept the explanation «your mind is too small to understand the greatness of science» or «evolution moves in mysterious ways» when you come upon logical inconsistencies in your belief.

Both will want their own way and we know crashes in today's plastic vehicles don't make as loud a noise when the vehicles were made of metal but the fatalities of recklessness and arrogance for not thinking things through to a logical conclusion are the same.

Again, I don't aim to lock anybody into a logical box where the answer must only be, «the Christian God is real» because, in truth, there is simply no way to do that.

In a similar way I think you argumentation with TheOldAdam was largely emotional and not logical — though it had the pretense of reason.

If you hate them in the same way that you condemn them for being, it makes you no better than the Stereotypes you portrayed in your comment, so grow up, and use a logical argument, instead of the very hate Democrats decry, and the Tea Party embraces.Hate against any group of people you dis - agree is still hate and is not tolerable in my opinion.

As logical as it seems to stay away from teachings that cause such debilitating fear (so much so that the thirteen - year - old me created escape plans for the inevitable AntiChrist Army that would march down our street to shoot me after the rest of my family had successfully been raptured), it would be even less logical to believe that God would create a group of strange people created to be forever distanced from Jesus because we can't know Him in the right way.

What a question i was so pondering upon this i burnt the potatoes for tea but i managed to rescue them from the brink of distruction any way where was i. To me love is not the act in itself because that is a response to love or to be loved.Nor is it a feeling because sometimes we choose to love others despite our feelings we lay aside our own desires for the sake of others.Nor is love confined to reason because it isnt always logical or reasonable and can be totally illogical.

It doesn't take much to figure out that the Deist is merely making up his / her own terms about God; they may come to those terms in somewhat of a logical way, but when you ask them the «hows» about their «faith,» they seem to come back to the «personal relationship» they can not articulate.

Of course there is no way to measure physically as to which side is right, including the atheist side, and yet you still make your choice because in your POV it is the logical choice to make, wherein my POV there are times that such physical evidence is not available and so a leap of faith needs to be taken.

I keep hearing that there is a minority of the most brilliant scientists who are believers, so in a similar way, that doesn't seem logical, not to me.

A control reading makes this dual role of a Prolog program evident in a way which the abstract logical reading does not.

Eric — I haven't heard of «balance» in the zero - ing out way, but that does seem the logical extension of the «wiping clean» approach.

Hartshorne's criticism of paradox, and Whitehead's insistence that God is not an exception to all metaphysical principles but their «chief exemplification,» are products of logical thought that in no way depend upon process philosophy: indeed the converse is the case, for this philosophy is largely built upon such principles of logic.

So the argument is not perfect, but it is way more logical and beautiful in context.

Unfortunately Agnostics and Atheists are the most trusted less in this country than any other belief, lack of belief, group in the entire country, running for public office as a non believer is a sure way not to win, so I running as a christian is the only logical approach to public office if you want to actually win

DO NOT be an apologist or accept the explanation «your mind is too small to understand the greatness of God,» «God is outside the Universe» or «God moves in mysterious ways» when you come upon logical inconsistencies in your belief.

II think that the writer of this article do not really understand the real Christianity and he tries to put it in a way to appear as complex or not logical.

As in art, music, and poetry, the truth of revelation is not something that we might arrive at in the same way as scientific or logical truth.

DO NOT be an apologist or accept the explanation «your mind is too small to understand the greatness of god» or «god moves in mysterious ways» when you come upon logical inconsistencies in your belief.

One can not prove anything by assuming the logical coherence of the classical idea of an ens realissimum or unsurpassable actuality, for this coherence is in no way known or knowable.

«But then coming back to music and having it feel so urgent, the only thing that felt really logical was to be able to sort of challenge myself and express myself in a way that I hadn't before.»

@Hilltop Yes, but this «creator» is interpreted in many different ways by many different people who, in the past, did not have the resources to approach a belief system in a completely logical way.

When we look at it in this way, the problems of our world — internal and international conflicts, delinquency, terrorism, widespread violence — do not appear any more as strange and mysterious phenomena, due to the irrationality and wickedness of a few, but as the «logical» and foreseeable expression of an «unviable» family, organized in a perverse and self - destructive way;

The very logical rigor which made Greek mathematics exemplary also stood in the way of introducing any idea which could not be rigorously defined.

Some philosophers — viz., those who accept either a weak (natural necessity) or a strong (logical necessity) version of lawful necessity — have argued that (4b) directly supports (1)- (3) in a way (4a) logically can not.

Leaving the body is not so much a logical contradiction as a particularly ungainly and undignified thing to do, in the same way that sex is ungainly and undignified and that being born is ungainly and undignified.

He continues to deduce the consequences of premises in a logical way, but this is in order to test them as hypotheses, not to establish the truth of their consequences.

The positivist, according to this account, can avoid this conclusion only if he can consistently make good the claim that the term «God» is meaningless, which is a way of saying that God's purported existence is not a logical possibility in any sense.

Keep in mind that what's in your heart is most important - even if your brain and body get in the way of expressing it - and - having an extremely logical thought process does NOT make you less of a Christian.

Some of his work is quoted by others in papers and articles I read so I know there are others greatly concerned abut what he is doing here, not just antagonists like Troubleunderfoot, who by the way, is asking Jeremy to really consider the logical conclusions of what he is trying to teach.

If the division was any busier then I'd ofcourse rather see Anderson vs another prospect just because that seems like more logical matchmaking, but as the way things are (and I'm not saying the UFC couldn't change the way things are if they really invested in it) I think this is as good a match up as we can ask for from a sport perspective.

I am someone that tends to think in a pretty analytical and logical way and thus I can not come to firm conclusions or firm opinions without a decent amount of tangible evidence to stand on.

Truth is neither side can prove anything either way in reapect, and since science must jump off at the supernatural (that outside of known natural laws) they can't automatically discount those that have had religious experiences that give certain individuals logical reasoning based off their faith inter purely of natural experiences.

Don't yell, take emotion out when you discipline your child (a good way to do this is by using natural and logical consequences), and speak to your child in a pleasant and friendly tone.

The voting evidence suggests it is the logical one although I guess electoral reform will be the stumbling block - http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/mpsee.php Still, it would give Labour the chance to demonstrate that the Lib Dems are essentially a party of the centre - right in a way that we are not, to renew our policies, and to reach out to those genuinely progressive MPs who have, by some mischance, ended up in the Lib Dems.

Which is another way of actually NOT making a logical argument, but instead just re-stating your point when you think you're proving it — in other words, a classic cop - out.

Aluzu reiterated his resolve in following the case to a logical conclusion, saying he was not satisfied with the way the police were going about the matter.

They then prove that any particular 2D Ising model — i.e., with a particular set of coupling and external fields — is equivalent to an instance of a logical problem called the satisfiability, or SAT, problem, in which the goal is to come up with a set of logical statements, A, B, C,... that satisfy a long logical formula such as «A and not (B or C)...» The theorists present a way to map the SAT problem onto the 2D Ising model.

During early development, many cells move around, mixing and shifting in ways that don't seem logical.

I like that It Starts With Food doesn't shy away from explaining the science but also presents it in an easy to understand and logical way.

In this way, it is much more logical to understand that excess carbohydrates, not excess fats, cause weight gain.

Our bodies came with great built - in feedback mechanisms, and to think that we must eat constantly to keep from being hungry (our body's way of telling us to eat) isn't even logical.

Unfortunately for Martha there aren't any studies that indicate how to effectively communicate a new idea to another person in a logical, non-emotional way so that we can all help each other to get better.

In the DVD commentary track for The Man Who Wasn't There, Billy Bob Thornton makes the brilliant observation that the logical casting for the dapper, taciturn barber would be Clooney while he, himself, would have been the obvious choice for Clooney's character in O Brother, Where Art Thou; that the brothers have «corrected» themselves for this picture goes a long way towards explaining both the pleasures to be gained from Clooney's deft comic timing (and a courtroom scene that is at once a throwback and a revelation), and the problems with a film that in apparently striving to be accessible and lightweight becomes something, for the first time in the Coens» joint - career since Crimewave, disposable and undistinguisheIn the DVD commentary track for The Man Who Wasn't There, Billy Bob Thornton makes the brilliant observation that the logical casting for the dapper, taciturn barber would be Clooney while he, himself, would have been the obvious choice for Clooney's character in O Brother, Where Art Thou; that the brothers have «corrected» themselves for this picture goes a long way towards explaining both the pleasures to be gained from Clooney's deft comic timing (and a courtroom scene that is at once a throwback and a revelation), and the problems with a film that in apparently striving to be accessible and lightweight becomes something, for the first time in the Coens» joint - career since Crimewave, disposable and undistinguishein O Brother, Where Art Thou; that the brothers have «corrected» themselves for this picture goes a long way towards explaining both the pleasures to be gained from Clooney's deft comic timing (and a courtroom scene that is at once a throwback and a revelation), and the problems with a film that in apparently striving to be accessible and lightweight becomes something, for the first time in the Coens» joint - career since Crimewave, disposable and undistinguishein apparently striving to be accessible and lightweight becomes something, for the first time in the Coens» joint - career since Crimewave, disposable and undistinguishein the Coens» joint - career since Crimewave, disposable and undistinguished.

I have tried to order the sheets in a logical way, although not necessarily in «difficulty» order, the topics are grouped.