Sentences with phrase «not in awe of»

Who is not in awe of an uncalloused mind lit by bedazzling precociousness and disarmingly naive ambition?

This artist, though, is not in awe of the digital.

I prefer to create smaller works, where the viewer is not in awe of a giant edifice to my ego.

You guys want to comment, but get all up in arms when someone replies in a way not in awe of or inline with your dogma...

South Bend was primed for a golden moment, but Michigan was not in awe of tradition; now Notre Dame is 0 - 2

That's not to say Vinaite isn't in awe of what she helped produce.

Not exact matches

But even more than that, I'm in awe of my co-founder, who brings so much to the table that I don't — and I feel honored that he chose me — chicken poop and all — to be his wife.

But according to Andrew Maynard, the director of the Risk Innovation Lab at Arizona State University, what you won't find in the document is any information about some of the most likely reasons the awe - inspiring project might fail.

In New York City, the TV and film industry has a true partner, not to mention a mayor who will always be slightly in awe of the work you dIn New York City, the TV and film industry has a true partner, not to mention a mayor who will always be slightly in awe of the work you din awe of the work you do.

«For eight months, she got up in front of these people who couldn't even hear her and gave speeches,» says Michael, managing to sound both awed and amused.

But while daydreaming about these, we shouldn't forget to be in awe of the invention of fractional - reserve banking.

Aren't you in awe when you contemplate the mysteries of eternity, of life, of the marvelous structure behind reality?

Fisher does not mention the not awe - inspiring 21 cent an hour wages paid to garment factory workers in Bangladesh, 112 of whom just died a fiery death in the Tazreen Fashions factory outside of Dhaka because there were no outside fire escapes.

I have watched in awe at the booming world of Initial Coin Offerings (ICO) and the millions willingly thrown at dubious new ideas (just look at MatchPool a «dating» service that raised $ 6 million in 2 days) as well as the ease that new market indexes are built and get to dominate the crypto markets in days not years (see Iconomi buying 9 % of Byteball without spending a dime).

The best applied filter can't replace the feeling you get when you actually sink your toes into the sand or stand in awe of a setting sun.

That's not to say that Atheists couldn't be in awe of the beauty and wonder in this world and the universe, they absolutely can be (and they should be if they have any form of empathy and sense of wonder) but they can never consider themselves to be at all «spiritual» because that instantaneously makes them no longer atheist!

PS: The word in the Bible often translated as «fear» of God means «awe», not «please don't hurt me».

people really need to study the bible — not for Christianity sake but for theirs - the athiest would like everyone to understand them and used this phrase — But when I explain that atheism is central to my worldview — that I am in awe of the natural world and that I believe it is up to human beings, instead of a divine force, to strive to address our problems — they often better understand my views, even if we don't agree.

If we sit still we all have a certain amount of awe and wonder, of curiosity, of creativity, of joy, guilt, and hope, despair, wanting... But, the difference is, what we confess in the creed does not come to us from our own head or soul.

Even primitive societies were aware of it, and it inspired not only feelings of religious awe (many expressions of which are found in the Bible itself) but also the earliest attempts at mathematical science.

After reading Faithful Families (and dog - earing nearly every page for Dan), I felt relieved — relieved I didn't have to understand theodicy before praying a simple blessing over my son's bed at night, relieved I didn't have to know all the answers before staring in awe into a starry sky, relieved I didn't have to be free of doubt to be full of gratitude at our family's «gratitude café.»

(Exodus 20:19) So long as such fearful awe was central in the people's attitude toward Yahweh, approach to him would be not direct but indirect; Moses and Aaron and their successors would address him on behalf of the tribe but, one by one, the tribesmen would have as little as possible to do with so dangerous a deity.

The goodness is not only a moral goodness of reuniting broken relationships, but it is goodness in the sense of beauty, of awe, of magnificence.

Scientific discoveries in physics or biology do not disprove the existence of God, but in my view do just the opposite by uncovering some of awe inspiring complexities of this universe that could only have come about through a creator.

When Abram next impatiently demands proof that he will indeed inherit the promised land, God enacts the awe - inspiring covenant - between - the - sacrificial - pieces and, in the eerie darkness, gives Abram some bad news: not he but only his seed will inherit the land, and then only after they have suffered four hundred years of slavery as strangers in a strange land.

Revelation 6:12,13 Note that these things would happen «before» the «awe - inspiring day of God» so they would be a warning to get people's attention (if they are paying attention) that the day is approaching but it's also said that not even the son knows the day but only the Father and it would be as a thief in the night.

Yes, maybe she doesn't believe in a «God», but awe and power in nature is almost pantheistic, and «spirituality» is more of a faith in the self.

We are perhaps not as awed as the first audience of the Book of Job might have been by God's invocation of Leviathan and Behemoth — we can see such creatures in the zoo — but this picture of God as the agent of pure destruction, as the divine arsonist, is surely unsettling.

One can not help but be in awe when he contemplates the mysteries of eternity, of life, of the marvelous structure of reality.

I mention, only because my... paradigm (I'm not much on beliefs, in the usual organized religion sense)... includes a «Divine» of my own definition, that equates to something like «awe of life, love, and knowing that there is much we don't know» (< — sorry, not the easiest thing for me to get into words, hopefully that gets the gist of it) that I don't see as a «personal other», but, in my paradigm, I see that Divine as being systemic to everything, hence insights from what I learn / experience can be termed as the Divine acting.

Thirty years later — after Mary Ann Evans had come to London and become Marian Evans, then (in her mind, though not in English law, since the man with whom she lived was married to another) Marian Lewes, and ultimately the great and famous novelist George Eliot» she wrote in very similar terms to Harriet Beecher Stowe: for the good of humankind, orthodox Christianity must be replaced by an ethical religion that would instill in us «a more deeply awing sense of responsibility to man, springing from sympathy with the difficulty of the human lot.»

The New Testament does not substitute a friendly God, a permissive or sweet doting daddy in the sky, for the awe, wonder, holiness, and terror of Mount Sinai.

Indeed, the kindling of new life in the process of reproduction of organisms would be awe - inspiring, if it were not so commonplace that it is taken for granted.

And third, we give thanks not in order that God will know that we are thankful but precisely in order to make ourselves thankful: to help ourselves realize not only how lucky we are in comparison to so many others (which is part of it), but how fortunate we are just to be in this world; to help us appreciate the many blessings which each and every one of us enjoys; to rekindle in us the sense of wonder and awe and gratitude in response to all that we so often and so cavalierly take for granted.

OF course and many don't appreciate your version of shock & awe — your whole cartoon series culminating in the zombie toonOF course and many don't appreciate your version of shock & awe — your whole cartoon series culminating in the zombie toonof shock & awe — your whole cartoon series culminating in the zombie toons.

I am spiritual, I feel awe in the face of this unimaginable large universe and amazingly varied planet, but I don't believe in god.

This kind of internal contradiction seems to run through much traditional theology; it finds explicit expression in Luther's dichotomy between the terrible God, who put him not only in awe but in utter terror, and the tender and loving God whom he knew in Jesus Christ as the savior, the loving friend, and the gracious Father of men.

All of us in our varied ministries tend to be awed by the structures and potency of the establishment of Baal, even though we know, somewhere down there in the timid, secret resources of faith, that all the stuff of Baal doesn't make God — power, technological sophistication, machismo, sex, political, military, and economic domination, energy independence (ha!).

And something else is very important the «awe» which the majesty of the Buddha arouses in us is not just a consequence of our awareness of his deeds, as is the case in Himayana where the Buddha is venerated because of his great accomplishment.

-- Last but not least, as members of the human species, our universal responsibility is to encourage comprehension and appreciation for the excellence of the human spirit in all its manifestations; and for inspiring awe and wonder for a cosmos that brought forth life and consciousness and holds out the possibility of its continued evolution toward higher levels of insight, understanding, love, and compassion.

As for the message being «fear God, do NOT lean to your own understanding, do NOT question God, sins, repentence, heaven, hell, awful things are coming and it's your fault,» I think the «fear» God, in the right sense of «fearing» in the sense of awe is in there.

So in spite of my trepidation, and in awe of tradition, and knowing that this gives an impression of audacity when what I feel is rather an obligation that I can not avoid, I am impelled by my understanding (such as I am capable of) to raise this challenge.

You said «This presents a real problem in that you would not argue your position if something inside of you is not gnaw awing to break through the darkness.»

lunchbreaker When we go with position 2 «In the beginning God created» and stand in awe at the wonder of it all as Einstein did then my only assumption, based upon that creators character, is that I wouldn't want to miss it for the worlIn the beginning God created» and stand in awe at the wonder of it all as Einstein did then my only assumption, based upon that creators character, is that I wouldn't want to miss it for the worlin awe at the wonder of it all as Einstein did then my only assumption, based upon that creators character, is that I wouldn't want to miss it for the world!

God is with us, not in awe and majesty, but in that most accessible of human forms, the baby who reaches out for our embrace.

Wrath is not a predicate of God, but a description used in the Hebrew Bible to convey the experience of an awe - inspiring, «terrifying» God who intervenes in history out of love for his people.

The fact that evolution itself is blind and uncaring doesn't mean we can't be in awe of its products, which aren't «merely» anything.

But Jesus carried the burden and joy of it in his heart, and Jesus» associates sensed with awe that there was a mystery about his consciousness of himself into which they could not be initiated.

Not in any sort of religious sense, but Peace2All put it pretty succinctly with the idea that a sunset can bring you a moment of awe, but it's just our planet revolving away from the sun for 12 hours.

Lack of belief in such things does not mean we don't find awe and wonder in the world.