The German car manufacturer is
not in a good financial position in the aftermath of the emissions scandal.
Peters said that, like many other families, Kerry and his wife aren't «necessarily in danger or terribly over-extended, but also
not in the best financial position.»
If you are thinking about spending $ 3,000 for a new flat - screen TV or $ 30,000 for a new car, but you have to borrow the money, that means that you are probably
not in a good financial position to buy those items.
Not exact matches
And despite lessons learned from the economic crisis — where, arguably, too many extroverted risk - takers
in leadership
positions wrought
financial ruin — and the value of having quiet leaders who, as
Good to Great author Jim Collins puts it, «build
not their own egos but the institutions they run,» a workplace stigma around introversion still exists.
When people see banks browbeating the bond rating agencies and accounting firms to whitewash the quality of what they're pawning off on their customers, when they see bank lobbyists getting Washington to block state prosecutions of
financial fraud so as to clear the way for more predatory lending and false packaging of the junk securities they're selling and to win the right
not to reveal their true
financial position, there's a
good reason
not to buy what's
in these black boxes.
The forward - looking statements
in this presentation are, unless otherwise indicated, stated as of the date hereof and are presented for the purpose of assisting investors and others
in understanding our
financial position and results of operations, our future operations, as
well as our objectives and strategic priorities, and may
not be appropriate for other purposes.
This recipe doesn't always guarantee success, but should another
financial meltdown occur, such companies will be
in a much
better position, financially, to weather the storm.
Here is an excerpt: «The NDP
in 1991 was
not in a
good position given the depth of the recession underway, the implacable anti-inflationary obsession of the central bank then still under the leadership of the zealous zero inflation policies of John Crow and the implacable opposition of the
financial press.
4 years and more ago, we were
not in the
financial position we are
in today to bring
in top players whilst retaining our current
best.
The Mail believes that this makes it appear that the 20 - year - old isn't stalling over a new deal just to get
better financial terms, but instead an attempt to secure guarantees with regards to the
position he would fill
in Brendan Rodgers XI.
He is a player who we can't afford to lose.The club knows this, the fans know this, and just as importantly so does Mesut Ozil.The fact that he will be
in a
position to get himself a very nice Signing On Fee from whichever club he signs for after June means he will get the
financial rewards he always wanted.Who can blame him for getting the very
best for himself.If his abilities had been appreciated by the club and management earlier then the player would have
not been
in the
position we have now where the cards are all held by him.To keep him will cost the club a huge signing on fee and colloidal wages but that is the price we must pay.We need him so pay him provided it is what SVEN M and RAUL advise.Im sure the player himself would be impressed that these 2 are involved and the whole structure of the club is moving forward.
This is Wenger legacy, this is what he wants to be remembered for... He left the club
in a healthy
financial position (
well and the 17 years
in a row of CL...
Not like we were going to win it, ever!!).
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is
in no
better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to
better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a
position - by -
position basis...
in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but
in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest
in, as they seem to have a pretty
good history when it comes to that
position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie
in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base...
in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player
in question feel
good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)...
in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did
in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this
in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players
in the final third... he was never a
good defensive player
in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely
in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and
financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)...
in their places we need to bring
in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker
position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly
not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model
in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically
in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking
in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were
well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a
financial necessity, like it ever really was...
It's the fans that keep sacrificing because this team can't get their head out of their own ass... please give me some examples when a top club ever let their
best player leave for free at the end of a season... Wenger needs to go to PSG and get some money and talent for Sanchez so that we can end this nonsense once and for all... then he needs to publicly apologize for the way
in which they handled the whole situation... if they allow Sanchez to go for free there is no way this club, under the tutelage of Kroenke and Wenger, will ever layout the necessary coin to replace such a talented player, especially considering that Wenger will be a lame - duck manager once again
in the final year of his contract and we know how
well that went last year... open your eyes people, Wenger has spoken publicly about how he hopes that the next manager can take this club to the next level... WHAT?!?... he then went on to speak about leaving them
in the perfect
position to be successful, which is one of the reasons why several pundits felt Wenger would leave after last season based on the
financials and the fact that so many players had only one year left on their respective contracts... who says this shit??? If you believe you're leaving things
in the
best possible shape for your potential successor to achieve greatness it raises a couple of serious questions: Why can't you take things to the next level if everything is as great as you say?
Let's get the facts straight here.He never demanded # 400,000 a week.All that is just media talk.However, I support your point of the fact that him going does
not mean disaster.We've survived with far
better players leaving you know.If Arsenal had replaced Van Persie the season he left we would've challenged them for the title that season.However, at that time we were financially poor and had to settle for some second rate players.Now we are
in a
better financial position and I expect us to be more ambitious and that involves trying as much as possible to replace any player who leaves.This doom prediction doesn't show the character of a top club.Even Chelsea won't behave like how we do if they lost Hazard.I hate the way Arsenal allows players to treat it.I actually thought only smaller clubs behaved that way.
I can only hope that he decides to take a
position upstairs at the club after he leaves as manager, because the man really does deserve the utmost respect for what he has achieved,
not just
in honourable success but
financial success as
well.
Without
good financial position you can't exist as a club
in the top tier EPL.
We have
not lost our
position as a global leader
in science and technology innovation, but even the
best policies will
not lead to continued advancements and breakthroughs without
financial commitments to the fields of science and technology from our Federal and state governments.
If anything, by
not having a
financial interest
in a dating company or website, surely I'm
well -
positioned to create a completely impartial awards.
«To encourage principals to take up
positions in these remote areas they are using very
good financial inducements, but still they can't fill the
positions.»
Phil shared numerous years of experience
in auto retail, to ensure that
not only did they sell me a car, but he also placed me
in a
better financial position by doing so!
If your
financial position is
not good enough
in order to buy dialogue essay, you have the only one way out from the situation, which is to write your dialogue essay on your own.
Choosing the investment option with the highest returns won't necessarily be the
best strategy for someone picking investments to get them
in a
position of
financial stability 30 years down the road.
While it's
not a traditional
financial literacy tenet, one of the
best things you can do if you're
in that
position is ask your boss for a raise.»
Even if activists or
financial acquirers do
not make a run at the company, SureWest would be
in a far
better negotiating
position with a potential strategic acquirer, such as Comcast, with a higher stock price.
It could be argued that the company is
not in a
good enough
financial position to be acquired just yet.
To make things
better, we are
not strict about your credit scores as long as your
financial profile shows that you are
in a
position to service the loan comfortably without compromising other
financial obligations.
You may
not end up living the life of an MI6 agent, but you will put yourself
in a
better position for
financial prosperity.
So I have just one wish for you — the
good luck to be somewhere where you are free to maintain the kind of integrity I have described, and where you do
not feel forced by a need to maintain your
position in the organization, or
financial support, or so on, to lose your integrity.
Calculating future loss of earnings can be tricky at the
best of times, but the intention of this sum is to put the injured party back
in the
financial position they would have been
in had it
not been for the accident.
[69] While I do
not doubt that the Public Guardian and Trustee's
position is
well - intentioned, it is, with respect, artificial and misguided to judge the merits of the appeal
in isolation from the
financial ramifications that would arise from an unsuccessful appeal.
As a final comment, notwithstanding the error noted by the Court of Appeal («
In the normal course, someone on the acquisition team would have been assigned responsibility for determining whether
financial instruments that gave a lender the right to veto a change - of - control existed and, if there were, communicating with the lender to ascertain its
position»)(see para. 22, FN 18), the Court acknowledged counsel's «excellent» oral and written submissions on appeal — even stating that the interests of the parties «could
not have been
better served».
«I'm
not sure what
financial position [UBS] is going to be
in when all is said and done and when I look at the very serious amounts of money paid to professionals
in these cases, even with this decision, somebody needs to ask the question are the UBS shareholders
better off than they would be or should have been?»
Not only do they get to put the trophy
in their lobby, they're already
in a significantly
better financial position as a result of the honored activity.
Even the
best insurance policy is
not valuable if the insurer has a poor
financial standing, as the company might
not be
in a
position to honor its commitments.
But, maybe
in some instances one working spouse contributes more to the income or would want to leave their significant other
in a
better financial position, then as long as purchasing a life insurance policy would
not be a
financial burden, it could be an option.
An unbiased fee - based
financial planner who does
not get commissions for life insurance products may be
in the
best position to help you find a policy that fits your needs.
As you may or may
not know, A.M.
Best look towards the
financial security of the company to assess whether they are
in a
position to pay their claims.
While frequent job - hopping isn't a
good idea, staying at the same job
in the same
position can hurt your employability and
financial well - being.
Well, today I was finally able to access
financial documents for my institution that outline salaries for all
positions, and lo - and - behold I discover that I am
NOT being paid mid-range, but am
in fact paid pennies above the bottom 25th percentile.
I'm
not saying you have to leave or move, but I am saying many couples make this choice, at significant
financial risk, and more often than
not find themselves
in a
better position down the road.
They don't others to think that they stayed
in a dead marriage just long enough to put themselves
in the
best possible
financial position to get divorced.
If your parents are
in the
financial position to help you, you're
better off going to the Bank of Mom and Dad, (depending on how's it's structured, it's
not considered a second mortgage
in many cases).