Sentences with phrase «not joint property»

Items that are not joint property under the statutory regime comprise premarital assets, inheritances and gifts acquired during the marriage, and chattels acquired by a spouse during the marriage for normal personal use or for the exercise of a profession.

Not exact matches

Private equity group Sirona Capital and Luke Saraceni's Saracen Properties are wrapping up their joint venture Westbridge Property Group, having not completed any projects in the three - year partnership.

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, increased competition; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the Company's ability to differentiate its products from other brands; the consolidation of retail customers; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share, or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's inability to realize the anticipated benefits from the Company's cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; changes in laws and regulations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; failure to successfully integrate the Company; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the nations in which the Company operates; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives that the Company uses; exchange rate fluctuations; disruptions in information technology networks and systems; the Company's inability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which the Company or its customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's dividend payments on its Series A Preferred Stock; tax law changes or interpretations; pricing actions; and other factors.

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, operating in a highly competitive industry; changes in the retail landscape or the loss of key retail customers; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the impacts of the Company's international operations; the Company's ability to leverage its brand value; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share, or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's ability to realize the anticipated benefits from its cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; the execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; tax law changes or interpretations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the United States and in various other nations in which we operate; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives we use; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or breaches of security; the Company's ability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which we or the Company's customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's ownership structure; the impact of future sales of its common stock in the public markets; the Company's ability to continue to pay a regular dividend; changes in laws and regulations; restatements of the Company's consolidated financial statements; and other factors.

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, increased competition; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the Company's ability to differentiate its products from other brands; the consolidation of retail customers; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's inability to realize the anticipated benefits from the Company's cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; changes in laws and regulations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; failure to successfully integrate the business and operations of the Company in the expected time frame; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the nations in which the Company operates; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives that the Company uses; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or breaches of security; the Company's inability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which the Company or its customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; tax law changes or interpretations; and other factors.

Freddie Mac's 97 % financing product is open to repeat buyers, as long as the borrower does not have «any individual or joint ownership interest in any other residential properties» at the time of purchase.

The Beijing - based company said the joint venture, which Wanda has not yet named but was referred to as Wanda e-commerce, will set up e-commerce services in its 107 commercial real estate properties throughout China this year.

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

Reginald Johnson, Gjonaj's chief of staff, said the Council member owns property but files a joint tax return with his wife, who is a nurse, and would not qualify for the rebate.

Memorialize the US Congress to support House Joint Resolution 29, the We The People Amendment, an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to establish that only human beings, not corporations, are persons entitled to constitutional rights, including the right to vote, and that money is property, not protected speech.

The annual disclosure forms legislators are required to submit to the state Joint Commission on Public Ethics only asks the elected officials to provide income ranges, not specific dollar amounts, for their outside income as well as the value of stock and property owned by them or their spouse.

Two scientists at the Joint Quantum Institute have now formulated a universal theory to describe the properties of these Efimov states, a theory that, for the first time, does not need extra adjustable unknown parameters.

And although the research in humans isn't conclusive, some laboratory studies have suggested that its compounds display properties similar to drugs commonly used to treat joint pain.

When you die, your debt will not pass on to the members of your family or your beneficiaries, unless they are joint owners of the property.

However, as shown in the example above, these joint tenants will each face the same lack of legal protection as John in a case where the transferring party did not have perfect title to the property.

Secondly, I wish to know — For a certain property, me and my wife jointly applied for the loan (since she would not have individually qualified for the required Loan Amount) and bought a under - construction property in joint name.

Spouses typically hold property as joint tenants, whereby upon the death of the first, the asset passes directly to the survivor and does not make up part of the estate of the deceased.

And even in community property states, debt before the marriage is not joint debt.

If you didn't have a joint cardholder and didn't live in a community property state, available money will be collected from your estate but the credit card issuer would have to walk away from any debt in excess of that.

Even if the person who is insured brought most of the property to the joint household, that doesn't mean the other person didn't contribute or that their loss isn't significant.

It might be fine, since having a home is definitely a benefit to the child, but since the child will presumably not be named as a joint owner of the property, it might not be quite kosher.

For instance, community property states, such as Arizona, California, Idaho and Louisiana, also require spouses to not have filed a joint income tax return and that all the understated income belonged to the guilty spouse.

States that do not allow garnishment may seize your bank accounts (and sometimes part of a joint account), sell off non-exempt property, or place a lien on your property.

Relatives are not responsible for the deceased member's debt, unless they co-signed for a loan, credit card, have joint ownership of a property or business or live in one of the nine community property states: Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin.

For example, management continues to find attractive investment opportunities, not just in new properties that offer attractive cash yields, but also by working with numerous partners via joint ventures to remodel its existing assets and construct brand new buildings from the ground up.

Water's buoyant and light resistance properties combined with heat makes hydrotherapy an ideal treatment and / or exercise for dogs who: 1) can not bear weight on their joints, 2) are recovering from surgery, 3) need exercise that won't aggravate an existing condition or 4) need the progression of degenerative conditions slowed down.

Additionally, if several climate properties are estimated simultaneously that are not independent, such as S and ocean heat uptake, then combining evidence requires combining joint probabilities rather than multiplying marginal posterior PDFs [Hegerl 2006].

The prenuptial agreement also stated that the Family Court would not have jurisdiction over any pre-marital property of either party or over property acquired after the marriage, unless same be titled in joint names, and that this agreement as to the absence of jurisdiction shall be unmodifiable.

In those cases where it is clear either (a) that the parties did not intend a joint tenancy at the outset or (b) had changed their original intention, but it is not possible to ascertain by direct evidence or by inference what their actual intention was as to the shares in which they would own the property, «the answer is that each is entitled to that share which the Court considers fair having regard to the whole course of dealing between them in relation to the property».

Where it is clear that the parties did not intend a joint tenancy upon purchase, or had changed their original intention as to their beneficial shares, but it is not possible to ascertain by direct evidence or inference what their actual intention was, each is entitled to that share which the court considers fair having regard to the whole course of dealing between them in relation to the property.

The presumption of joint and equitable ownership can be rebutted by evidence that the parties did not at the time of purchase intend to own the property jointly in equity, or that the parties» intention as to beneficial ownership has changed over time (for example, where the parties did not share their financial resources).

Very often it is also necessary to represent an inheritor against the other joint heirs, when they could not find an agreement about the property; a public auction by court can be then a solution in those cases.

Looking at the enumerated facts: Alan advertises a room to rent in a joint tenancy property in which they are lead tenant - not an offer, this is an invitation to...

Worth pointing out that joint property (e.g. joint tenancy in real estate or joint ownership of a car) reverts to any survivors and doesn't form part of the estate.

Alert Don't Place Excluded Property In Joint Names If You Don't Want To Share It Say Vancouver Richmond Mandarin Chinese Speaking Family Lawyers.

WE REPEAT NEVER PUT EXCLUDED PROPERTY in the other spouse's name or even in joint names but if you do then do not do it without a signed contract saying the property is still fully ePROPERTY in the other spouse's name or even in joint names but if you do then do not do it without a signed contract saying the property is still fully eproperty is still fully excluded.

In court, his practice covers not only the general range of commercial disputes embraced in his arbitration practice but in addition he has appeared as Counsel in a number of fraud actions involving recovery of stolen property, Ponzi schemes, resolution of disputes between shareholders / joint venturers, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious conspiracy, professional negligence, structured financial products including Islamic finance.

Pennsylvania does not recognize the concept of community property, which is how married persons hold title to joint property in Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin.

When a spouse dies, the property might pass to the surviving spouse (if it is titled in joint names), by beneficiary designation, by will or trust instrument, or under the laws of intestate succession (for those who do not have a will) or statutory share (for spouses who have been cut out of the will).

The business, or some of the business, is now carried on by only one or some of the joint tenants, either alone or in partnership with others, and the other joint tenants do not occupy any part of the property for business purposes.

Our highly rated * Unequal Property Division Excluded Property Lawyers also warn clients not to place excluded property in joint names for fear the exclusion from sharing will Property Division Excluded Property Lawyers also warn clients not to place excluded property in joint names for fear the exclusion from sharing will Property Lawyers also warn clients not to place excluded property in joint names for fear the exclusion from sharing will property in joint names for fear the exclusion from sharing will be lost.

Whether property be owned as tenants in common, or as joint tenants, if the parties can not agree on the sale of the property, the BC Court has the power to do so under the provisions of the Partition of Property Aproperty be owned as tenants in common, or as joint tenants, if the parties can not agree on the sale of the property, the BC Court has the power to do so under the provisions of the Partition of Property Aproperty, the BC Court has the power to do so under the provisions of the Partition of Property AProperty Act RSBC.

Yet despite the rising number of people involved in buying a first property, a worryingly high 33 % of joint buyers putting down uneven deposits would not put a legal agreement in place to protect their respective contributions in the event of a split.

The parties made a conscious decision to put the property in joint names, but did not take any legal advice.

As the property in Stack v Dowden was in joint names, the judgment does not look in detail at the first hurdle of establishing a beneficial interest but concentrates on the second hurdle of quantification.

The husband appealed against the joint lives bonus award, arguing that, in accordance with B v S (Financial Remedy: Marital Property Regime)[2012] EWHC 265 (Fam), [2012] All ER (D) 189 (Mar), save in exceptional cases, an award for maintenance should be based on the principle of needs alone, not sharing, and this was not such an exceptional case.

The defendant's appeal to the Court of Appeal was allowed on a majority judgment on the basis that: l The question was whether or not a joint intention could properly be inferred from the parties» conduct since separation that, over time, the 50/50 split would be varied so that the property was currently held 90 % by the claimant and 10 % by the defendant.

There is a presumption that when one person transfers title to property gratuitously into the name of another (including into a joint tenancy) the transfer is not a gift, but the person receiving an interest in the title gratuitously, holds the title in trust (known as a resulting trust) for the transferor during her lifetime, and for her estate after death.

Further, the subsequent arrangements after the transfer into joint tenancy between her son and daughter - in - law with respect to the property did not have the effect of severing the joint tenancy and creating a tenancy in common.

The Court in Bindra explained its decision to do nothing with regards to the property in India as a «Catch 22 situation»: To grant her judgment against the Husband in Canada and still allow her to retain joint ownership of the Property in India would not be apprproperty in India as a «Catch 22 situation»: To grant her judgment against the Husband in Canada and still allow her to retain joint ownership of the Property in India would not be apprProperty in India would not be appropriate.