Sentences with phrase «not judge them in the states»

Meredith is called on often, not only to judge Cavaliers in other countries (she will not judge them in the States at this time due to specialing dogs), but also to present breed seminars and write articles about Cavalier breed type.

Not exact matches

He told U.S. Magistrate Judge Marianne Bowler that he understood English and did not require the assistance of an interpreter, and that he had no family in the United States.

BISMARCK, N.D. — A North Carolina - based private security firm hired by Texas - based pipeline developer Energy Transfer Partners won't be banned from North Dakota, though a judge is still weighing whether TigerSwan operated illegally in the state during protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline and might be subject to fines.

Part of the judge's ruling had to do with the notion that although those interns learned a lot on the job, «those benefits were incidental to working in the office like any other employee and were not the result of internships intentionally structured to benefit them,» the ruling states.

Since the OCC has not reached a final decision on the fintech charters, the claim of harm by the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) was speculative, U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich wrote in her decision tossing out the case, issued late on Monday.

I didn't attend the speech, but to judge from the PowerPoint slides that accompanied it, he began by extolling the virtues of the law he enacted in the Bay State when he was governor — market reforms coupled with mandates and a subsidy for premiums.

While the denial of a blue slip does not legally restrict a judge from being approved, Glenn Sugameli, an attorney who is an expert on judicial nominations, told Business Insider in an email earlier this week that «no circuit court nominees have been confirmed over objection of one (or two) home state senators — including under Obama.»

In his 19 - page order, Carver County Judge Kevin Eide appeared to accept those six claims, stating, «The court is not aware of any objection or dispute with the statement that these persons are the siblings or half - siblings» of Prince.

In an August 10, 2009 hearing before Judge Rakoff in a case involving alleged disclosure issues at Bank of America (bac), Rakoff responded to the SEC's evasiveness by stating: «You are not going to be particularly effective with this court by telling me what I already know, namely, that you filed a rather uninformative bare bones complaint.&raquIn an August 10, 2009 hearing before Judge Rakoff in a case involving alleged disclosure issues at Bank of America (bac), Rakoff responded to the SEC's evasiveness by stating: «You are not going to be particularly effective with this court by telling me what I already know, namely, that you filed a rather uninformative bare bones complaint.&raquin a case involving alleged disclosure issues at Bank of America (bac), Rakoff responded to the SEC's evasiveness by stating: «You are not going to be particularly effective with this court by telling me what I already know, namely, that you filed a rather uninformative bare bones complaint.»

Also March 20, 2018: New York state Judge Jennifer Schecter rules against Trump's lawyers» motion to dismiss the defamation case by Summer Zervos, citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Clinton v. Jones that presidents are not immune from civil suits.

According to Reuters, Judge Kimba Wood issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the Alibabacoin Foundation, and ordered the defendants (including ABBC Foundation's CEO Jason Daniel Paul Phillip and CTO Hassan Abbas) to explain to the court «why an order should not be issued granting a preliminary injunction,» which would prohibit the defendants» usage of the Alibaba trademarks anywhere in the United States.

Zervos scored a victory recently when a New York Supreme Court judge ruled that her suit could go forward, rejecting the Trump team's argument that a sitting president can't be sued in state court.

Because whether they believe in God or not the Bible states that we are all Gods children and only God can judge us.

It is worth noting that Judge Miner's inability to parse that distinction was not shared by the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law, a twenty - four member commission appointed by Governor Cuomo in 1985 to advise on questions of biomedical ethics.

Central to this Court - led revolution is the idea that the Constitution is in a state of more or less perpetual evolution, whence it follows that judges need not be bound by the precise words of the document, or by prior precedent, or by settled historical meaning.

In an apparent reference to the United States, Francis said «one nation alone can not judge» the best means of stopping groups like ISIS, which calls itself the Islamic State.

christ was beaten and cruxified on a cross bc he preached of being the SON OF MAN, the only what to get to heaven but gays who are living in sin and refuse to repent are accepted at work and everywhere they go and society cheers them on when they get married or when a state recongizes them, and anytime they are killed society comes to their defense, but i say to you, is will not be man that will judge them iw till

The judge stated that women praying at the wall, with whatever ritual garments, a Torah, etc. is not in an attempt to cause a riot.

Here, for instance, is Judge Richard Arnold of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals explaining why states can not ban the killing of a «living unborn child» while it is in the process of being delivered.

Of course «the grossly immoral and dishonest doctrine of despotic state sovereignty, the exclusive judge of its own obligations, and responsible to no other power on earth or in heaven» is not there.

The grossly immoral and dishonest doctrine of despotic state sovereignty, the exclusive judge of its own obligations, and responsible to no power on earth or in heaven, for the violation of them, is not there.

Seeker - First let me state that no one can judge whether or not you were truly saved in your teens.

That wasn't even Olson's case, but with assists from a federal district court judge who came out as being in a same - sex relationship only after ruling and retiring, and elected officials who chose to forgo their traditional duty to vigorously defend state law, Olson and Boies did succeed in disenfranchising millions of Californians on a procedural technicality.

By the way by no means does this mean that I am particularly against Islam, I am also against Judaism, Christianity, and any unproven dark age manifestation of a all knowing, creator, If there was a god he sure does «nt need help enforcing his edicts and morals, remember that if there is a god then as many religions state, people will be judged upon there beliefs and sins after death and spend eternity in heaven or hell, so why is it so important for people to butt in and start trying to control each other and force people to believe in something that many think is absurd and insane.

However, such assertion does not mean a single, overarching ideology serves to legitimate — in a functional sense — whatever the United States and / or its leaders do, since the ideology also provides the language in terms of which they are judged.

The judge also heard that Isaiah has been living in a state of low - level consciousness, is unresponsive to stimulation and can not breathe independently.

Protestants and Catholics will have to judge for themselves how well the declaration succeeds in stating «a consensus in basic truths,» and whether it makes the case that the 16th - century condemnations do not apply — even though they remain on the books as «salutary warnings,» to which teaching and preaching must attend.

We might fairly have inferred that there was in Paul's mind a fixed association of ideas — resurrection, lordship, judgment — even if he had not explicitly stated that in his preaching of the Gospel he proclaimed a «Day when God judges the secrets of men through Christ Jesus» (Rom.

The preacher is right everyone should be who they are... but then again the Bible does state that it is an abomination to God... But get this... before God can judge you Jesus has to judge you... the BIble says NO MAN COME TO THE FATHER BUT BY ME... we have no room to judge others or talk about them because no sin is big or small they are all the same... the only big sin is not being saved and believing in God... if we are saved and if we believe we have nothing to worry about... but again we have no room to say who is right and who is wrong because it's not our place all that we can do is pray and prayer can change things...

In the Life he reproves the skeptical Boswell and warns him about judging: We are not, he says, «to judge determinately of the state in which a man leaves this lifIn the Life he reproves the skeptical Boswell and warns him about judging: We are not, he says, «to judge determinately of the state in which a man leaves this lifin which a man leaves this life.

Does the Bible not also state that only God can judge and he alone knows what is in your heart.

CNN: «Choose Life» license plates ruled unconstitutional in North Carolina A federal judge ruled that North Carolina's new «Choose Life» license plates are unconstitutional because the state does not offer a pro-choice alternative.

Overturning a lower court's decision that ruled that the laws unconstitutionally limited access to abortion in the state, New Orleans - based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals judges wrote, «on its face does not impose an undue burden on the life and health of a woman.»

I have heard some atheists state that they are taking action because they feel they are descriminated against or people judge them if they mention they do not believe in a higher power... really?

For, in Hegel's system, evil arises as a metaphysical necessity and is judged not according to its causes and effects in persons but in view of the whole, be it state or world history.

Judge Noonan points out that the employee was not required to participate in or even listen to the services; he then recounts the historical record of free exercise claims under the Court's «compelling state interest» standard:

Lawyers for Kentucky's Department of Insurance are encouraging a judge to hold Medi - Share, a cost - sharing ministry that helps pay medical bills for Christians who don't smoke or abuse alcohol (among other qualifications), in contempt for continuing to operate in the state more than a year after a circuit court judge ordered the Florida - based group to stop until it meets Kentucky insurance regulations.

On Buttiglione's scheme, the priest has to judge the state of the penitent's soul — to decide whether to say, «You're in a state of mortal sin, you're deprived of sanctifying grace, if you died at this instant you would be damned, and you can't take communion»; or «You are committing grave sin, but as you're a bit all over the place right now, you're not in a state of mortal sin, nor will you be after your next grave sin.

But Hertzberg holds that Israel should not be judged differently from other nations, and that in the exercise of nationalistic power Israel's record compares quite favorably with that of other modern states.

Even the partial democracy used in New York and D.C. is itself an exception, as judges — not the people or their elected legislators — have been the primary instruments of policy change in this social revolution which now has touched nineteen states.

The judge clearly stated in her own words that it's not in the best interest of the child to have that name!

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judgnot give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judgnot be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judgNOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judgnot WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judgnot change whether or not he exists you will be judgnot he exists you will be judged.

In Guatemala, birth mothers are required to sign a document in court in which they state they are relinquishing their child, but they are not interviewed by a judge as to their reasonIn Guatemala, birth mothers are required to sign a document in court in which they state they are relinquishing their child, but they are not interviewed by a judge as to their reasonin court in which they state they are relinquishing their child, but they are not interviewed by a judge as to their reasonin which they state they are relinquishing their child, but they are not interviewed by a judge as to their reasons.

The two judges, chile specialist Stephanie Walker from New Mexico State University and margarita expert Al Lucero, owner of Maria's Restaurant in Santa Fe, were not buying it.

Arsene is lucky to be immortal at the club, but in the real world managers are judged over the current state of the team, not the past!

In St. Louis, for example, a judge overturned a city ordinance that would have required a public vote on funding for a new stadium, clearing the way for a riverfront project that will cost $ 388 million in tax incentives and state and city bond proceeds as part of a $ 998 million plan that may or may not convince the Rams to staIn St. Louis, for example, a judge overturned a city ordinance that would have required a public vote on funding for a new stadium, clearing the way for a riverfront project that will cost $ 388 million in tax incentives and state and city bond proceeds as part of a $ 998 million plan that may or may not convince the Rams to stain tax incentives and state and city bond proceeds as part of a $ 998 million plan that may or may not convince the Rams to stay.

The decision by a three - judge panel stated that, «the Commissioner properly exercised his broad discretion under the collective bargaining agreement and that his procedural rulings were properly grounded in that agreement and did not deprive Brady of fundamental fairness.»

After three years at Patton State Hospital, to which a California Superior Court judge had committed him for a maximum of seven years as a mentally disordered sex offender, Watson handwrote a letter in January 1984 seeking an early release: «My crimes (the only ones I ever had are child molest) are not anything to be proud of nor is my history of these crimes something to ignore.

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse

It seems that when people state «don't judge me» they are not comfortable in their own use of judgments.