Commonly used disinfectants do
not kill human papillomavirus (HPV) which makes possible non-sexual transmission of the virus and creates a need for hospital policy changes, according to researchers from Penn State College of Medicine and Brigham Young University.
Although a tarantula can't kill humans, «the venom of Australian tarantulas is deadly to dogs,» Marshall says.
Not exact matches
After a preliminary investigation, Police chief Sylvia Moir said that the collision that
killed 49 - year - old Elaine Herzberg wasn't Uber's fault and the accident «would have been difficult to avoid» regardless of whether the other car was autonomous or
human - driven.
But
killing off their few fellow
human inhabitants may
not be the right answer for the characters in the long run in a world full of the undead.
«Horrific mass
killings receive the most media attention, but as can be seen by the numbers, they only represent a small portion of the total costs -
human and medical - of gun injuries in the United States,» said David Hemenway, director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center in Boston, who was
not involved with the study.
«I think the self - driving car has the opportunity to
not only improve productivity for the people in the car, which will be a huge economic boost for those people; Not only has the opportunity to save lives — over a million people die worldwide in road deaths today caused by human drivers, and I think we can take that very close to zero, which is very good for both human welfare and for economic productivity — it's a very serious dent in productivity when people get killed; And then all the ancillary industries that end up getting built out.&raq
not only improve productivity for the people in the car, which will be a huge economic boost for those people;
Not only has the opportunity to save lives — over a million people die worldwide in road deaths today caused by human drivers, and I think we can take that very close to zero, which is very good for both human welfare and for economic productivity — it's a very serious dent in productivity when people get killed; And then all the ancillary industries that end up getting built out.&raq
Not only has the opportunity to save lives — over a million people die worldwide in road deaths today caused by
human drivers, and I think we can take that very close to zero, which is very good for both
human welfare and for economic productivity — it's a very serious dent in productivity when people get
killed; And then all the ancillary industries that end up getting built out.»
Its a WAKE UP CALL to all the
human beings of the world but Muslims, these r the people who r responisible for
killing of innocents all over the world, Americans have to understand that ISLAM does
not have the concept of co-existenc this is the words of Jinnah, if they are
not stopped then the days are
not far behind when US and European countries will have Kashmirs where Muslims out numbered the Natives and now dominate the place.
You can
not separate this verse from the context of the
killing of another
human.
William just thinks that we should just
kill everyone who doesn't agree with him and then the world will be perfect, because he is the greatest
human being alive.
That did
not happen: there is no geological record of a world - wide flood, there is
not enough diversity to regenerate the population we currently, there is
not enough water to cover the earth to the height of Everest, the logistics of retrieving and returning animals to the then - unknown Americas, Australia, etc. were staggeringly difficult, managing the animals on the Ark was impossible — a few
humans keeping predators from their prey, cleaning the waste, etc., pretty much all life on earth would have been
killed, etc. etc..
The law says we can
kill and eat animals as long as it's done in a safe and humane way, it also says a fertilized egg isn't a
human until it reaches 24 weeks.
It is
not for me to interpret God's word as carte blanche to
kill other
human beings.
The Holocaust was
not all about the Jews, it was about Nazi Germany's attempt to
kill off ALL who did
not comply with their standards of a
human being.
God does
not need to become
human and
kill himself for the sins of man.
Yet could
not VHA have suggested to the U.S. Supreme Court that, since the Court has held that there is a constitutional right to
kill unborn
human beings, there is surely also the constitutional right, even of a secular hospital, to refuse to?
While it also doesn't necessarily
kill, it does damage to the
human body as a social creature.
Christians do
not believe in the «
human»; we believe in God — a God we believe, moreover, who intends to
kill us all in the end.
So we Christians do
not oppose nuclear weapons because they threaten to destroy «mother earth,» but because the God we serve would
not have one life unjustly taken even if such a
killing would insure the survival of the
human species.
It doesn't have any direct effect on the
human system other than the negative aspect of getting appendicitis and
killing you.
nobody has a right to mock about others, you are judged by your actions and deeds, it's
not possible to know about every faith in this world, but how ignorant can
human mankind be especially after innocent Sikhs
killed in Oak creek Wisconsin which was very widely covered.
After God
killed all the people on the planet, why
not make a better
human, instead of allowing the species to continue after it had proven itself unworthy?
I believe that
human actors who fail to give pride of place to moral boundaries that must never be crossed, such as the direct
killing of the innocent, and who instead are ready to see their obligations in terms of moving beyond them in favor of «good results,» will be harder put «to take seriously the role that divine authority plays in morality»; for they will to that extent lose a sense of the moral limits that remind us of our finitude and anticipate consideration of a law of our being that is
not one of our making.
If we actuall had a Congress who cared about the People they swore to serve and did
not take vacations 1 week for every 2 they work (new Boehner rule when he became Speaker), actually did work and created bills that were other than ending abortion rights or
killing Medicare, stopped opposing ending the fraud Bush wars that raise our debt by more than a trillion a month (and Republicans then blame Obama for the rising debt from their wars), and acted like
humans we would already be well into recovery.
Further, it is
not true that being
killed by a fully autonomous military drone necessarily violates the dignity of the
human person.
If a person needs the fear of eternal punishment by a make believe god to deter them from
killing, stealing or any other sort of malevolence, they are
not decent
human beings to begin with.
An omnipotent ruler probably wouldn't need to
kill a whole bunch of infants to try (unsuccessfully) to make a point to some
human ruler — but maybe he's just a sick and twist omnipotent being...
From the colonial period through the twenty - first century, federal, state, and territorial governments have an unbroken tradition of protecting conscientious objectors who can
not abide the government's mandate to
kill, cut, or medicate another
human being.
Liberals generally are for the
killing of babies and other horendous ideas that war against the sanctity and liberty of
human beings... Giving men with this kind of a world view «equal time» isn't what I think God desires.
The term «
kill» is loaded because you wouldn't call it «
killing» when a guy doesn't protect every single sperm — yet, it is destruction of
human life.
The issue of organs is very important because you still have
not answered the big question, at what point is it wrong to
kill the continuation of
human life, which we both agree continues with the sper.m and egg and why is it at that point and
not before?
Those are
not human beings who are brothers, fathers, or sons that we are
killing in our wars; no, they are «Krauts,» «Japs,» «Chinks,» «V.C.,» communists or mercenaries.
While we do
not have anything like a final, scientific approach to maximizing
human happiness, it seems safe to say that rap.ing and
killing children will
not be one of its primary consti.tuents.
A civilization can
not tolerate private executions, as a civilization can
not long survive the license to
kill unwanted
human beings.
As for what I apparantly do
nt get, the thing I do
nt get is how someone could
kill a
human life on purpose, as you said conception is the continuation of
humans.
I'm
not going to define good and evil according to
humans, since that would
kill moral realism, and most Christians (most people, in fact) would
not be willing to let that happen.
A pure
human invention used to dominate and
kill others that don't think or believe like us.
States can crush or
kill human beings, but they can
not alienate them from their responsibility to God and conscience.
We
humans seem have a fascination with war, battle, bloodshed, violence and
killing our enemies, don't we?
Though on a smaller scale than in the early «80s, political
killings still go on, yet
not one ranking military officer has ever been tried for
human rights violations —
not even in the Romero case, despite the unassailable evidence implicating (then Major) Roberto D'Aubuisson and his cohorts.
Does this new finding prove an invisible, all powerful, magic man who lives in the sky had an evil talking snake tempt a woman, made from a rib, to disobey him, whereby he put a curse on all future humanity, then later changed his mind and decides to lift his curse by impregnating a
human woman with himself and having himself tortured,
killed, and raised from the dead, so that if you believe all that, you get to live forever in heaven after you die, but if you don't, he will torture you forever in hell?
to show this, i would like to have any
human who believes that hitler was doing «gods work» to come over and let me give them a acid shower, or just
not feed them, or maybe
kill all the people they know in front of them and them
not feed them.
Ironic how
human beings want to
kill each other to avenge the honor of God, much less the honor of the violent, hate - talking prophet Muhammed, a mere
human being,
not a god.
And don't claim aything about this «
humans as the higher standard, rule over the animal kingdom» B.S. People
kill much more indescriminently than any animal ever did.
Its funny that you want to take my right as a
human to defend myself with as much firepower as possible but you do
nt want to «trample» the rights of women by
not allowing them to have abortions which
kill over a million children per year.
We would
not interfere with the wilderness ways in which animals suffer and are
killed by one another, but we think that there is far more, and far less necessary, suffering among creatures for whom
human beings have assumed responsibility.
On the question of taking a
human life, for example, the church has always distinguished between
killing and murder, murder being the morally condemned act, and
killing the physical act which is
not always wrong.
Religion however has tried to supersede our humanity and tell us it's okay to
kill those other
humans because they aren't like you, they don't worship the same God as you, they don't have the same hope for an afterlife, they aren't special and «chosen» by God like you... that is the true face of evil on the planet, the one that tries to make you forget your humanity with bribes and extortion.
I just wonder why they are
not fighting just as hard against other forms of «
killing humans» like the death penalty (no one can say no innocent people have died on death row) the poor and sick and many elderly being allowed to starve and freeze because the religious right doesn't want to shoulder that burden through their taxes.
BO says abortions should be «safe, legal and rare» but says nothing about the basic tenet of proper
human conduct i.e. Thou Shalt
Not Kill.
After all, in the Holocaust they were
killing actual
human beings, people who were undeniably,
not just potentially or marginally, real people with real rights.