Sentences with phrase «not learn science»

Let him not learn science; let him invent it.»

JDJ, «Smart» isn't learning science from your preacher, or from a book written thousands of years ago by men who know relatively little about the natural world.

Because if you don't enjoy it, you won't do a good job and you won't learn science.

And those purveying the «culture / hype» angle seem to me to be taking advantage of the fact that most people won't learn the science.

Sounds like you haven't learned the science or the facts yourself, and this means you're playing their game, on their terms, in their context.

Not exact matches

Memrise, if you're not already familiar with it, is an amazing tool to help people learn anything from science facts to a foreign language more quickly using fun associations to make new words or ideas stick (I've used it personally and absolutely endorse it for memorizing new vocabulary especially).

Don't miss these mind - blowing science facts you never learned in school.

Customer service isn't rocket science, and these tips will help you learn how to deliver it better than your competition.

There's something I've learned in the last 10 years as President of a growing small business that you probably won't hear elsewhere: For burgeoning small businesses, establishing a sales quota is more art than science.

It's a good lesson to learn from science — where typically we just don't know.

Hence science can not be proof for faith, because faith relies on infallibility and constancy, and science relies on the belief that there's always something more to be learned because we * don't * understand it all yet by a long shot.

Not surprisingly, studies show that when teachers do integrate science knowledge into students» lives, the students learn the science better.

If humans are the result of so - called «intelligent design» then why do we have too little room on our jawbones to accommodate wisdom teeth (unless this alleged «god» intended our teeth to rot out since we're not supposed to have learned science, and therefore that the presence of bacteria plus acids are a bad environment for tooth enamel), and that so many of us are near - sighted, and that women can have FACIAL HAIR (is that a cruel joke?)

Woe to those who do not learn the lessons of SCIENCE!

They don't want to learn about science!

but not taught as fact and right after science class where they learn Darwin's theory of evolution, watch videos on the big bang theory, have a field trip where they meet up with an archeologist to uncover one of our ancestors remains that weren't as evolved, learn how old the earth truely is etc.....

I would never expect to learn about science from a preacher, just as I wouldn't expect to learn about religion from a scientist.

Not that science isn't any good to learn.

As science developed, it was learned that what they once thought to be true no longer was - the earth was once thought to be flat, we know it isn't so.

If people just go to his web site they will learn that evolutionist scientists agree that they can not disprove creation, but evolution can not be prove either because they are both speculative science

If you didn't learn basic science in school, I feel badly for you.

In school, Christian children are forced to learn all about evolution in science and history, but can't even speak the word «God» without being frowned upon.

@Put - up or shut - up, «If people just go to his web site they will learn that evolutionist scientists agree that they can not disprove creation, but evolution can not be prove either because they are both speculative science»

I also agree that it is not a book of science, the way I see it, the Bible is a way for us to learn about God and one of the ways He uses to talk to us, and to be honest, I don't really pay attention to the evolution theory or any other theories, if it really happened or not (or if it keeps on happening), is fine by me, I respect those who believe them to be true.

we either learn about science and math, or we ignorantly ignore it and choose to believe in a magical being who does nt really exist.

Clearly if there was any evidence for such things, it would be science — and not religion (woo) and we could do real tests to learn more.

> It's one of the great mysteries It's only a mystery if you don't want to spend some of your time learning about science and facts.

There's more to life than book learning and if you can't see beyond the ignorance of man's science into the wonder that is this existence, you're probably an incredible bore.

As humans embraced science you see, they learned things, such as the fact that lightning is not caused by a lightning god, thunder not by the thunder god, the sun is not a god, on and on.

In my opinion, being agnostic on many things, I believe we have much more to learn in Dawkins» area of expertise before we can really get to an educated answer to the issue, but that is just a gut feeling, but with serious consideration to what we don't actually know on the issue from these fields of science.

We now learn things in elementary science classes that Newton, as intelligent as he was, couldn't even dream.

Many people place man at a higher plateau in knowledge as we learn more and more about our universe through science, and yet our predecessors knew enough to not throw out their religion just because their knowledge grew in scientific matters.

According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, Camden schools could not afford science, art, music, or physical education teachers, or staff to detect learning disabilities.

Of course the Greeks do not have the final word on the subject, and we can possibly learn a lot from science about the results of morphogenetic causation.

When political science students were challenged about being Republicans, they were not thereby disenfranchised from voting; when economics students were challenged on the merits of capitalism, they were not thereby excluded from purchasing notebooks, But when students were told that everything they had learned about their religion before entering this class was wrong, did we know — or care — if their capacity to function religiously in a mature fashion was diminished?

And secondly, Stephen Barr's point seems to be a real solution: that theologians need to learn the language of science - not just absorbing the factual evidence of recent discoveries, but also the methodologies and modes of thought that scientists, whether quantum physicists or population geneticists, employ in their day - to - day grappling with problems in their fields.

Muslims do not support atheism absurdity of evolution, but existence of truth absolute Muhammed, atheism absurdity of evolution is a fundamental of atheism, pagan ism, self center ism, product of observation of animals se x, having nothing to do with physical science, To learn causes of mayhem among atheists kafeers, Cristians, Jews, Hindus please visit http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uwOL4rB-go and click on Like.

not a random process at all), evolution as «just a theory» (might want to learn what theory means in science), and Darwin's BS deathbed recantation identify you as having gotten your information from misleading sources, i.e., sources that have little understanding, and perhaps very little honesty, concerning evoutionary research.

Yet, the truth is, the average person at the start of America could farm, build their own homes, etc., Not that we couldn't have learned what they did, I mean, to understand the mathmatics, langauges, science of their day it seemed the average person was pretty sharp.

I shared my experience after many years of doubt and have learned that science and spirituality are not mutually exclusive.

Paul Stufflebeam I don't consider myself a child anymore, but I do consider myself a lifelong learner, and this world, with it's science and innovation, provides new things to learn each and every day.

Science is not the source, nor the end, just a medium to learn truth absolute of a matter, having no value of its own, a source in mind of a hindu ignorant Atheist, self centered like an animal, Atheist.

I didn't claim I want to learn science from Bible, but you can try it, it may open some windows for you.

Incorrect jma58... science is the opposite of limiting learning because it agrees it does NOT know all the answers and therefore continues to seek them.

You can learn about as much science from the quran as you can physics from «Horton Hears a Hoo»... now your sure that nest can fit an elephant?

Nevertheless, it is not an exaggeration to say that the East has been learning a great deal from the West about form, especially as that has been studied in mathematics and science.

What is ironic is that these «modern» theological trends do not comport very well with what modern science has learned about time.

Accordingly, the social sciences may be expected to play an increasingly important role in liberal learning, as it becomes ever more evident that the conditions of human existence are not simply imposed by fate, nor the results of the interplay of blind, impersonal forces, but the consequences of deliberale human action.

Science is sometimes hard to understand, and if you're not willing to invest the time and effort it takes to learn, one option is to believe a just - so story.

One important aspect of the Renaissance in Europe was that by freeing their learning from the scholastic system, by taking teaching and learning from the monopoly of the clergy and making it available to other classes, the way was opened to new knowledge and new sciences which secured for Europe progress which the Muslims did not, or would not, recognize.