It's for authors who won't leave a legacy publisher to strike out on their own without having a credible, go - forward marketing plan.
Why
not leave a legacy of lifesaving by making a planned gift to KCHA?
Not exact matches
The old saying that it's amazing how much you can accomplish if you don't care who gets the credit may apply to
leaving a
legacy as well.
Personally, I find the concept of
leaving a
legacy fascinating, especially since I don't have any offspring, which most people believe is the natural way to
leave a lasting mark on the world.
Legacy leadership is
not necessarily about the products and services you
leave behind.
For users that don't want to risk
leaving a trail for fear of creating an online
legacy, or allowing strangers into their personal information, anonymous social networks are the ultimate social media solution.
A president dares
not leave their historical
legacy in the hands of those who opposed them, or even to benign neglect.
Lesson: As an entrepreneur, it's important to set goals and work toward them every day to ensure that you
leave a lasting
legacy that's
not filled with regrets.
But he
left a
legacy of quirky, if
not thoughtful, quips that served as the closing segment of the show for decades.
Not only do they want to
leave with an abundance of retirement funds, they also want to
leave a
legacy.
We don't know the name of the boy who brought five loaves of bread and two pieces of fish to Jesus» sermon, but he
left a
legacy that far surpasses his meager means.
He
left as a
legacy his encyclical «Pacem in Terris,» which was addressed for the first time
not just to Catholics, but to all those of «good will.»
Rush's
legacy when he
leaves this plane of existence will be hatred for those
not like him... old, fat, white, male..., his inability to get the facts right... Rush has never seen a fact that he couldn't spin into something totally unrecognizable.
What is clear is that many in the UK embraced Billy and his method and many thousands are glad he did it the way he did.If the true converts stands at 100,000, that's still
not a bad
legacy to
leave.
Not only did Hume's racism affect his argument, as it was those outside of his white, genteel world who made miracle claims, it
left a lasting
legacy, as Keener notes that it was explicitly adopted by none other than Kant.
When he died in 2009, Father Neuhaus
left not only a tremendous intellectual
legacy to the Institute; he
left a generous bequest as well.
His father was a struggling preacher when he started that church so it doesn't seem he would have a huge
legacy to
leave him.
Like Thomas Jefferson, who did
not live up to the Declaration of Independence's lines about equality — Jefferson did
not mean women, did
not intend to and did
not free slaves — but who did provide a charter for equality, Luther was often a person of contradictions whose mixed
legacy left some things worse.
god is
not real, the GLOBAL flood never happened, and jesus was just a delusional schizophrenic in a long line of delusional schizophrenics who
left him a
legacy of delusions to base his off of... The
legacy is known today as jewish mysticism, jesus was after all a jew and he grew up like every other jew did — by learning his culture and history of his people — they keep records, RELIGIOUSLY!
So often we spend our days without meaning, doing things we do
not love or even feel good about; and our life trickles on by without us building a
legacy to
leave behind.
Marchetti retired from ARS in 2001,
leaving behind
not only a
legacy of excellence in rice breeding and plant pathology, but also a prized collection of 1,000 rice blast specimens he isolated from Texas, Arkansas, and other rice - growing states.
However Ms Holgate said Australia Post, which returned to a $ 95 million profit this year after a $ 222 million loss in 2015, don't want to spend too much on infrastructure for Amazon's benefit and be
left with
legacy infrastructure.
A precious lady who loved the Lord with all of her heart and
left a beautiful
legacy not only with her family but with all that knew her.
If this article was meant to cheer me up, well it didn't MANURE, SHITTY, CHELSHIT they have all won the EPL in recent years, if their teams are
not top notch at certain time at least they try to build it again to win, our case is different we have this dinosaur
leaving in past glories, the man became a stingy little tyrant and his personal satisfaction seems to be shove it to the fans that btw pay his outrageous salary year after year with nothing to show for, look at the pic yes we qualify to CL so what, we are the 5th biggest team in the world, we are
not SOTON, SPUDS or HULL but we are as far as these teams to win a real trophy, it will
not happen while Le Frog is still in charge, what a way to stain a
legacy, he should have retired honorably while fans like me still had admiration for the man...... WENGER go to.......................
He is building his own
legacy in BvB, he was first choice in ManU before LvG, yet he didn't
leave.
Don't be silly pires, of course what he done in his first ten years was very much appreciated, I've said many times on here if he'd have
left around 2008 he'd have been an absolute hero with the fans, but his killing his
legacy by the day with his stubbornness to face up to the truth.
Mourinho has
left the door open for midfielder Frank Lampard, 36, to return to Chelsea in some capacity and believes his time on loan Manchester City from MLS side New York City will
not harm his
legacy at Stamford Bridge --(GetWestLondon)
He needs the opportunity to
leave his managing
legacy with financial backing to bring success, and
not just stability, it seems he is finally being afforded this chance.
In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the
left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul,
not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his
left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his
legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)
@ 007 good point man but this is purely based on everyone's view on what factors they judge greatness in my perspective greatness is
not only about winning I agree sir Alex was the most successful manager in the history of bpl but if u see the team he
left behind then u will certainly doubt his
legacy this is just opposite with arsene after giving us the hint that he might be
leaving at the end of next season the other statement he makes is to
leave a platform for incoming manager so that he can do well.This is the difference between him and arsene.
Honestly, with all your
legacies and things you have done for th club, it won't be great if you fail to win the EPL / UCL one more time before you
leave the club.
I have no doubt that he wants to win, I have no doubt that he want s to
leave a great
legacy, I also have no doubt that he just does
nt have the skills as a manager to do that anymore.
Can't disagree with most of that but having difficulty identifying any Mourinho «
legacy»
left after any of his 7 stints in 15 years at the 6 clubs he has managed.
Wenger will move forward (whether it be into Arsenal's administration or
not), and the club will be
left with the
legacy he has helped create.
Deal with it: Wenger is at Arsenal
not because he can't be sacked, but because like Ferguson, he has achieved so much for his employers and
left indelible
legacies on football.
Wenger must
leave now until his
legacy is
not tarnished any more than that.
he's going to taint his
legacy i'm sure of it; and he'll regret he did
nt leave after he won FA in 2014.
This is Wenger
legacy, this is what he wants to be remembered for... He
left the club in a healthy financial position (well and the 17 years in a row of CL...
Not like we were going to win it, ever!!).
I will anoint him as the greatest manager of all time when he creates a dynasty,
leaves a
legacy that doesn't stink and does it with a lesser team than the ones he has cherry - picked to date.
Kyrie Irving
left James and the Cavaliers for Boston so he could create his own
legacy as a star player,
not The King's apprentice.
It's
not the
legacy I want to
leave at OU.
But when Belichick finally walks away from the NFL, the rise of
left - footed punters appears to be another way his
legacy has impacted the game — whether he calls it a coincidence or
not.
Wenger killed his
legacy around 4 years ago, last season he was given a chance after the FA cup to
leave with a shred of dignity —
not now, just get out and
leave that stupid sleeping - bag jacket with the broken zipper.
In fact with a vision-less and passion-less board as ours, Wenger as arrogant and as past it as he might is the only semblance of sanity, I don't support Wenger I believe he is currently doing a marvelous job, I support him because I can see a couple of moves ahead already, if Wenger
leaves and the board stays the same, we are massively effed, Newcastle will be child's play, Kroenke's other teams are mid table contenders, he will simply look at another money making model for Arsenal, even Usamanov believes Arsene needs backing, if Usmanov came in today, he will
not fire Wenger, he will seek to work with him, give him a clear mandate, back him up without pointing at the balance sheeets and if he still does
not deliver, looks like a guy who would fire Wenger mid s - season,
legacy or
not.
It
leaves a bitter taste that causes resentment toward a man that I actually admire for his past achievements but can't understand why he would blindly allow his
legacy to dwindle like our premiership challenge does season after season..
but he is hurting himself and his
legacy more than anyone or anything else by
not knowing when to
leave.
Was
left a
legacy with Man United and couldn't cut it took them out the top four and struggled to get them back in especially a club with the talent they had and the money behind them.
Alongside the usual his
legacy is
not going unbeaten, that was George Graham's team — ignoring the fact that Graham had been gone 9 years,
leaving a team in 14th, and David Seaman, Lee Dixon, Steve Bould and Tony Adams were long retired.
For goodness sakes, younger people do
NOT derserve the
legacy Baby Boomers are
leaving them.
And, while the causes chosen by wealthy old people to advance may
not exactly match societal needs, tax funds can fill the gaps that no one wealthy was interested in donating to at death, so it doesn't really matter all that much exactly what charitable
legacies the rich
leave, even though they and their heirs can feel good about the charitable
legacies that they do
leave.