If anything, Jesus was
not less man but more.
In his sermon «St Paul's Characteristic Gift», Newman shows St Paul is numbered among another group «in whom the supernatural combines with nature, instead of superseding it, invigorating it, elevating it, ennobling it; and who are
not the less men, because they are saints».6 Newman argues that the characteristic that sets the Apostle apart is that the fullness of the divine gifts do not destroy his humanity but rather elevate and perfect it.
Not exact matches
First, there were 125
men in one large room... The
men were very considerate of each other, and I didn't hear a raised voice ever, much
less an argument.
Washington suffered from a number of otherwise debilitating, painful ailments and diseases throughout his life that would have taken a
lesser man down — but
not the
man who founded the most powerful country ever to grace the Earth.
That shift came as prime - age
men contributed a few more minutes of housework, but
not enough to offset the gap, suggesting that the tasks like laundry and cleaning are probably being outsourced, while online shopping is more efficient.As they spent
less time on chores, women worked and slept more, the data show.
I once saw (but frustratingly can't currently locate) a great headline on an article responding to the question of why women are
less aggressive about negotiating compensation than
men.
If your team is anything
less than an equal balance of
men and women, then it is probably
not the best it can be.»
Agreeable
men don't always finish last, but recent studies show they tend to get paid
less.
The newer ad is a little
less aggressive, though some of the text proclaims «
not sipped,» «
not soft,» and «
not a fruit cup» (when that last text appears, an older
man can be seen flicking a lemon slice off the rim of his pint).
It's a situation called «occupational segregation,» and it's a common reason why women earn
less than
men across the economy,
not just at Google, Glassdoor's Chief Economist, Dr. Andrew Chamberlain told Business Insider.
But legislation in America has
not been very effective: Women, on average, are still paid 20 percent
less than
men.
Shaq's book report revealed it had been
less than transformative: «This is about a young
man who has power, wealth, and women (much like me), and gives them all up to pursue a holy life (
not so much like me).»
However, women are still promoted
less than
men, and those that do negotiate are 67 percent more likely, than
men or than women who don't negotiate, to have their personal style described in reviews as «bossy» or «too aggressive.»
With all the extra time on their hands sans practices, games, and travel — and with most of them
not even 40 yet, much
less 65 - plus — how will these
men spend their time?
Instead of calling for repression, we should stop punishing children and adults for failing to obey the unhealthy dictates of masculinity —
men need
less repression,
not more.
They are
less comfortable investing in stocks when they don't fully understand the risk and they tend to ask more questions than
men before buying.
While the senator is indeed far
less wealthy than many of his Senate colleagues — as well as his fellow presidential contenders — he is
not exactly a
man of modest means.
But won't that make the
men correspondingly
less productive?
Two
men are trying to make the holiday
less stressful — and more fun — for troops who can
not be home with family by sending sports equipment overseas.
Reducing power differentials can help,
not only because women are
less likely than
men to harass but also because their presence in management can change workplace culture.
The Kochs, Sheldon Adelson, to a
lesser degree George Soros (since his political giving does
not approach the scale of these
men and has declined in recent years) are massively influential players in our political process.
The vast majority of
men don't take more than a week off, and they're
less likely to take time for a second child.
Still,
not all
men experience
less irritation with electric shavers, so your mileage may vary.
«Some of the most successful
men of the 19th century never went to college, and today, those who didn't go to college are more intelligent, better informed and
less easily fooled than the people who did go to college.»
We are both
men of faith yet that does
not mean there would more or
less peace between us.
They weren't violent (or at least they were
less violent than
man) they were shorter, they ate more vegetation — they weren't giants.
common guys you are powerful beings... take your power back and eliminate all this
man made religion... religion is
not god is
not allah or whatever you want to call it RELIGION IS A BUSINESS... religion mission is to exploit your emotional system and tell you that you are
less than you are... BUT YOU ARE BIG AND POWERFUL BEINGS..
Second: The Creation tale is simply a way for early humans to explain
mans creation and «fall» from God's predetermined path... The old testament is full of stuff more related to philosophy and health advice then «Gods word» However, this revelation has
not made me
less of a christian... In Contrast to those stuck in «the old ways» regarding faith (
not believing in neanderthals and championing the claim that earth is only 6000 years old), I believe God created the universe on the very principle of physics and evolution (and other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms was the first step in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and us.
don't you think
less of a
man who marries a fool for a bride?
In fact, most American Catholics disagree with some of the Vatican doctrines (birth control, for example); there are Baptist Churches that don't treat women as
less than
men in God's eye, etc..
However, the
man is
not a literature specialist, so what reason do I have to seriously consider what he has to say about «fairy tales,» much
less about «philosophy» and «theology» when he hasn't even so much as an undergraduate degree in either of those areas.
A
lesser animal isn't going to accidentally evolve into a
man.
Please, any Christian, honestly answer the following: The completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000 human beings are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife» comes from the field of: (a) Astronomy; (b) Medicine; (c) Economics; or (d) Christianity You are about 70 % likely to believe the entire Universe began
less than 10,000 years ago with only one
man, one woman and a talking snake if you are a: (a) historian; (b) geologist; (c) NASA astronomer; or (d) Christian I have convinced myself that gay $ ex is a choice and
not genetic, but then have no explanation as to why only gay people have ho.mo $ exual urges.
Either Jesus was a real
man in history who we know absolutely nothing about, due the the Bible's completely innaccurate and conflicting accounts, or he didn't exist at all and was a
lesser god that was created based on many of the tenets of the Cult of Osiris.
anyone who doesn't believe in God won't believe that He created anything much
less man i
n His own image.
If priests aren't taking a stand against the practice of having children kneel in front of
lesser men... they are just wasting time and allowing the abuse to continue.
I believe that
man is, by nature, an exile and will never be self - sufficient or complete on this earth; that his chances of happiness and virtue, here, remain more or
less constant through the centuries and, generally speaking, are
not much affected by the political and economic conditions in which he lives; that the balance of good and ill tends to revert to a norm; that sudden changes of physical condition are usually ill, and are advocated by the wrong people for the wrong reasons; that the intellectual communists of today have personal, irrelevant grounds for their antagonism to society, which they are trying to exploit.
According to the work produced by David B. Barrett's religious statistics organisation (FYI, the
man was a Christian no
less) atheists number more than Jews, Sikh's, Shintos, Baha'is, Jains, combined, and if you want to consider all «non - religious / secular / agnostic / atheist» together, since the whole «non-religion» movement is kinda riddled with people who find conontations of words like «atheist» to be bad enough to
not want to declare themselves atheist, you'll find the number of that non-religious group also amounts more than those religions plus buddhism, and taoism or even Confucianism.
Great scholars may have studied the Bible, but that does
not change the fact that it was written by
men whose understanding of the universe was
less than that of today's average third grader.
The ugliest presentations of racism may have been pulled out, but it's clear that we're still dealing with the after - effects — even now, social mobility is
less evident in black
men who play by the rules than white
men who don't.
From their start, Mormons never thought women to be
less than
men but equals, «for the
man is
not without the wife and the wife is
not without the
man».
If there is indeed a soul or purpose for
man that is greater than self (animal) evolution would point towards something greater
not something
less than or limited to the purpose of an ape or a plant.
One understanding of human nature common to the modern era sees
man as standing both above and outside nature (after Descartes, as a sort disembodied rational being), and nature itself as raw material — sometimes more pliable, sometimes
less — for furthering human ambition (an instrumentalist post — Francis Bacon view of nature as a reality
not simply to be understood but to be «conquered» and used to satisfy human desires).
«Rain forests deserve indeed to be protected, but no
less so does
man, as a creature having an innate «message» which does
not contradict our freedom, but is instead its very premise.»
Not one of the
men - child I've carried and birthed and carried again are
less than a strapping 6 feet tall now.
Anything
less in this fallen world is merely vain speculation and a pipe dream because like it or
not there is real evil in the heart and mind of
man and it permeates everything around us — even in the church.
I suggested that perhaps the lifeboats on the Titanic point to a more general sense that the stronger in a dangerous situation are morally compelled to protect the weaker in a dangerous situation, and that mothers can be awfully protective of their children after all, and that a
man who (for whatever reason) might be weaker than a woman in a given situation should
not feel like
less of a
man if she protects him.
And as a woman, referring to God as She or as Mother serves as an important, liberating reminder that I am indeed created in the image of God,
not as some
lesser being who exists in perpetual subordination to
men, but as an expression of God's very self.
If the story of Jonah should
not be a fact, even if Jonah had never lived, still would the profound truth of this narrative, the love of God for Nineveh and the so - called heathen, be none the
less precious in the eyes of all those who love their fellow
men.
(Luke's version is
less impressive: «You are like graves which are
not seen, and
men walk over them without knowing it.»)