Sentences with phrase «not liberal bias»
This view of mass media as being partisan and untrustworthy was popular among Republicans well before Trump's entrance to political arena (and accounted for a big reason of popularity of Fox News cable channel, which positioned itself as «not liberal biased» from the start).
https://politics.stackexchange.com/ Not exact matches
Barring not just Trump but also his sometime antagonists, like Angela Merkel and Justin Trudeau, would mitigate the appearance that the company was acting out of liberal political bias.
However, that won't stop conservative groups, including Trump and his supporters, from arguing that it proves liberal bias.
I think you should be very careful to insure your reviewers don't have a liberal bias and, therefore, exercise censorship rather than «filtering».
Indeed, even on this point Arendt's touchstone was not only the mission of the Congress for Cultural Freedom but also what she perceived as its bias against those thinkers of German liberal extraction, such as Paul Tillich and herself.
The irony here is that this bill would have actually increased attacks upon religion, as many gays and lesbians, as well as their supporters and those who are not biased towards them, are actually also members of churches, albeit more liberal ones.
Typical liberal CNN bias... the hand outs have to stop for those able to work... all these lazy people that do nt want to work are poor at their own doing...
Although I'm not convinced that reporting on the incident reflects a liberal bias as much as the more practical «if it bleeds it leads» bias, it is clear that much of the rhetoric among left - wing personalities like Keith Olberman has been infused with unfair generalities.
The same is true of many media reform efforts: by attempting to get people excited about liberal bias in the news, or nudity or profanity in a particular program, or the ideological bent of a certain series, or whether a network is «Christian,» concerned leaders have diverted the attention of viewers from the most important problem, the basic point, namely, that the whole process - of - television is providing us with a worldview which not only determines what we think, but also how we think and who we are.
An «argue [ment] against God» does not, in and of itself, indicate a position with a «liberal bias» and one that «hates God», right?
Defenders of the press argue that reporters» liberal instincts do not necessarily translate into liberal bias in handling of the news.
Addressing dignity is not a question of political concessions or liberal bias, but of meeting fundamental human needs.
People who are politically liberal may see Wikipedia biased one way, people who are politically conservative may see Wikipedia biased a different way, but if you see mainstream Reliable Sources as biased then you can't claim Wikipedia is biased for accurately reflecting those sources.
The accusations of liberal media bias are not new.
Before some of you write angry letters to the editor about the liberal bias infecting search engines, consider this: The results for «miserable failure» were not directly shaped by anyone at Google.
When it comes to prejudice, it does not matter if you are smart or not, or conservative or liberal, each group has their own specific biases.
When talking and thinking about the Blaine Amendments, we should focus not only on the prejudices and biases of Nineteenth Century Brahmins, Radical Republicans, and Klansmen, but also on the ongoing arguments of which these Amendments are a part: about education, citizenship, tolerance and pluralism in a secular, liberal state.
I think you should be very careful to insure your reviewers don't have a liberal bias and, therefore, exercise censorship rather than «filtering».
The Washington Post is a crap newspaper, it's freaking liberal to the point that it's biased against about anything that doesn't lean to the left.
# 22 — Your comment is not only biased fake news, it is also overly political but it is not deleted by the moderators because it is a liberal comment.
For example, before proposing that the expert consensus for AGW is politically biased, shouldn't you in all humility trace the political biases of Joseph Fourier, John Tyndall, Svante Arrhenius and so forth through the present, and show us where a «liberal» bias crept in?
As the above figure indicates, the difference in perceived consensus between the left and right can be explained by Kahan's preferred cultural bias explanation, but the «liberal consensus gap» can't.
It has a liberal bias not so much a party - political bias.
Of course, we can't be highly confident if we assume bias by ideology, and it would be a mistake for me to do so in your case (just as it would be a mistake to do so in Dan's case - even though I can point you to many cases where «skeptics» have assumed bias in Dan's case by labeling him as a «liberal» or «AGW zealot» or whatever)..