Sentences with phrase «not liberal ones»

It may be that it was conservative activists, not liberal ones, who were the prime movers in the realignment of our politics, and that they remade America» if not always in the ways they had intended.

If you believe in what is written in the Bible you generally have conservative values not liberal ones.

Not exact matches

Labor doesn't control the upper house, where the Liberals, Nationals, One Nation and Greens have 21 MLCs to Labor's 12 voting ones.

One complained that an election wasn't needed at this time, describing it as a «blatant power grab by the Liberals.»

It's hard to tell how many do this — I know of a few politically engaged Liberals who periodically hold Tory membership cards too — but it's a fact of life for those of other political stripes in a one - party province like Alberta: the political direction of the province is decided at the PC leadership conventions, not in general elections.

However, one area the Liberals aren't expected to deliver any good news in are telecommunications services.

One of the missing facts in Darcy's report is that while conservatives with big microphones taught their listeners not to believe what is reported in the mainstream media (and especially the elite press in New York and Washington) they themselves still relied on those sources as their baseline reality — minus the liberal «spin,» of course.

And for their turn, Kenney's surrogate MLAs — he's not one himself yet — hammered away daily with scripted attacks on pipelines, and picked up Kenney's campaign theme of equal - time bashing of Notley and Trudeau, in hopes of tying an unpopular NDP premier to an unpopular - in - Alberta Liberal PM and arguing she won't defend Alberta's energy sector.

For one thing, says Plant, when the Liberal government started the registry the only enforcement mechanism available was to make it an offence not to register.

But even in the best - case scenario in which Mark Carney's conduct is blameless, we are still left with the prospect that not - insignificant elements in the Liberal Party of Canada were willing to risk one of the most crucial elements of our governance for partisan gain.

Trump was not the champion we sought, but he is the one we have — the only one who can save us from Clinton's liberal agenda, say two GOP strategists.

The Texas conservative also alleged Facebook had not acted to censor liberal groups the way it had conservative ones.

On the one hand one must be careful not be appear like one is using the disaster as a photo opÂâ $» as Liberal PM Jean Chrà © tien...

IMHO, there tends to be little electoral overlap between the provincial and federal levels, at least in this province, and in fact the vote splits between right, left and centre are quite different with one unified Conservative party (more aligned with Wildrose than with Alberta PC), and a not - quite - as - moribund Liberal party in play.

It's worth noting that Wynne offered her mea culpa not to the people of Ontario, i.e. the ones paying the usurious bills that drop through the mail slot, but to fellow Liberals meeting to discuss party issues, who were no doubt concerned at the government's plummeting popularity.

So even if we can plausibly imagine that a slightly better Morsi and a slightly more disciplined opposition might have existed and could have made better choices over the course of the last year, and thus allowed the fragile shoot of democratic compromise to take hold, these choices weren't made, and so the chasm between the liberals and the faithful, and the dependence of the former upon the army, are now simply the facts of Egyptian situation, the ones that one must now work from, right?

Last month, as church halls and Mosques in North Kensington responded as one to the horrific disaster at the Grenfell flats, Tim Farron, ironically a leading liberal, stepped down from his post saying that he couldn't do his job because of the hostility to his faith.

I'm not talking about a media cynic like Chris Matthews who tries to turn liberal self - congratulation into ratings or Jimmy Carter in one of his pharisaical moods.

This «flexibility» is one reason why liberalism has not committed suicide but instead renews itself in every generation as something different yet recognizably liberal and always claiming the moral right to rule.

Do you seriously think for even one millisecond that the religiously driven anti-intellectual climate in America is not largely due to adults telling kids that evolution isn't true, that climate change is just a big liberal conspiracy, or that generally speaking nobody really needs to be good at math or science anymore?

Yeah, Henry Rollins might provide a workable way (for sophomoric liberals) to protest LAPD heavy - handedness in the early 1980s, and other minor Western maladies, and maybe punk music really could strengthen your spine in the aughties if you're an alienated Egyptian liberal youth under the boot of Mubarak, but no, the example of Rollins and such sure can't find help you navigate your way to political effectiveness between the Egyptian military on one hand and popular Islamist groups on the other.

He is one man who said something he shouldn't have and you judge everyone as a result, typical liberal hypocrisy.

I trust that Matt Walsh understands (as I do), that not all «liberals» are deep down inside hateful evil people, and that the hateful ones, in fact, probably represent only a small (yet loud) fraction of left - wingers.

I don't mind gays, that's their choice between them and God, but one thing I'm sure of: the more and more «Liberal» this world gets, everyone and every group is going to want apiece of God and history'til eventually someone is going to «Liberate» us FROM God (Already having some try) and when that happens....

One stops to think of actual countries of sand, which include more than a few particularly violent locales, places where people are not as willing as Mary Oliver to concede the comfy and common received idea of liberal Christianity that we all worship the same deity by «whatever name.»

Where there's a will, there's a way, is the American faith, so can not the almighty dollar purchase a liberal Islam, one in which Kumail in The Big Sick can feel at home?

I agree that the cause of fighting for gay rights is definitely one worth fighting for, I just don't want people grabbing and thumping Bibles to do it — conservative, progressive, liberals or New Agers.

PaulD The ones who were against slavery were described as «liberal», non-Bible-believing, and not «real» Christians.

The irony here is that this bill would have actually increased attacks upon religion, as many gays and lesbians, as well as their supporters and those who are not biased towards them, are actually also members of churches, albeit more liberal ones.

In any case, I wish to make clear that both terms are used here in a broader sense, such that the liberal view of interest (or self - interest, or happiness) is simply one of the alternatives.2 In speaking of a private view of self - interest, I mean that human community is thought to be solely instrumental to, i.e., not constitutive of, happiness.

This is a question that arises, not for all Protestants, but for liberal ones.

One of the biggest fallouts (to oversimplify) then was that conservatives cared about personal morality and not involvement in social ethics / issues of evil, while liberals cared about social ethics / issues but were seen as lax about morality.

So when liberal scholars and agnostics criticize the Bible and question its authority, we get defensive, not so much because of our theology of the Bible, but because it feels like they are attacking a loved one.

Whether one voted for the Liberal Party of not, Canadians were thrilled to see a cabinet that reflected a fuller picture of who we are — First Nations, immigrants and born - and - raised Canadians, men and women, regional representation, gay and straight, Christian and Sikh and atheist and Muslim among other religions, differently abled, different socio - economic stories, and so on.

CNN, do you really think people don't notice that the only religious views you present are liberal ones??? This is not an open - minded religious blog, this is liberal indoctrination.

On the one hand, we have deleted the somber aspects of God, thereby ignoring the tart warning by that relentless opponent of liberal theology, J. Gresham Machen, that «religion can not be made joyful simply by looking on the bright side of God.»

It reminds me of the way liberals used to want to construct the debate about the causes of family breakdown as poverty or fatherlessness — as if both can't matter, and, in any event, one way fatherlessness matters is that it leads to poverty.

Although one type, which I call canonic, did express a kind of conservative standpoint, and although another, which I call empiric, conveyed the outlook of many liberals, those two categories did not exhaust the interpretive options that members employed in their stories.

I don't identify as liberal, or a nice sweet one especially.

You can not possibly believe that Liberals (which I'm happy to say I'm socially liberal and fiscally conservative) are baby killers?!? I have many conservative and many liberal friends — all highly educated — and NOT ONE view abortion as a form of contraception or in any way a good thinot possibly believe that Liberals (which I'm happy to say I'm socially liberal and fiscally conservative) are baby killers?!? I have many conservative and many liberal friends — all highly educated — and NOT ONE view abortion as a form of contraception or in any way a good thiNOT ONE view abortion as a form of contraception or in any way a good thing.

So, (1) whatever position one takes on this matter, left or right, conservative or liberal, one should acknowledge that the law really does forbid homosexual sex between males but not between females.

i) Bart Ehrman is one of the most — if not THE most — liberal biblical scholars on the planet.

On the one hand, by our historical amnesia we break our continuity with historic Christian faith as did the liberals and, on the other, we accord to some preachers a magisterial authority in interpreting Scripture not unlike Roman Catholics do!

I certainly don't want the Liberal Democrats just to be a party that tries to somehow get its foot in the door in Whitehall from one government to the next.

Liberals have pretty much one complaint: keep religion to yourself, don't mix it with your politics, don't try imposing it on greater society.

One relative in particular won't even talk to me hardly, and blames me and all the rest of the liberal - commies for President Obama.

When these people arrive in the South, however, they usually can not find a liberal or moderate congregation in the local area, or at least not one large enough to offer the range of services they are accustomed to.

How come not one liberal elite Hollywood type questions Obama's Christianity??? Oblablah claims he's a Christian and uses Scripture in some of his speeches... yet the usual liberals aren't upset at ALL about his so - called beliefs.

As a result, Mormonism can not be neatly placed in any one of the Catholic - Protestant - Reform categories or along the liberal - conservative - fundamentalist continuum developed to deal with the diversity of normative Christianity.

Premier's research comes following a month that saw church halls and Mosques in North Kensington responding as one to the horrific disaster at Grenfell Tower, and Tim Farron, ironically a leading liberal, stepping down from his post saying he couldn't do his job because of the hostility to his faith.