Sentences with phrase «not live by the rules»

it rests with those that are closed and do nt live by the rules that Jesus Christ put forward — in other words — YOU.

I chose homeschooling because I knew I could not live by the rules imposed on my children... yet I don't lose any sleep when people assume they think they know why I homeschool or what it entails.

They think God appointed them to judge me because I don't live by their rules.

In this age of moral relativity, when relationships seem to be so easily trivialized and the impoverishment of other people is so easily neglected, it seems necessary to hear the Word of God from James, who chastises us for not living by the rules of right conduct.

Not exact matches

They should remain something that complements your existing strategy or indeed allows growth, but you should not be reliant upon them as they have the power to change the very rules you live by... They could increase commission or block sellers in your category and even undercut you on your best - selling product.

And it's a good rule to live by, especially if you haven't heard of Suitsupply.

As an advisor, I don't live and die by the 4 percent rule.

«At one point I recognized that Warren Buffett, though he had every advantage in learning from Ben Graham, did not copy Ben Graham, but rather set out on his own path, and ran money his way, by his own rules...» I have just quickly glanced at Bronte Capital's blog post, but I am sure Todd Combs and Ted Weschler were not hired because they lived and died by Buffet's word but rather because they manifested the teachings of value investing in their own styles.

While it would be difficult to take a lack of fresh credit strains as evidence of restored health in the banking and lending system, we can't rule out the possibility that the Rube Goldberg machine created by the Fed and the Treasury will be enough to take us through a period of years (or if we follow Japan's example, decades) where we will gradually bury the losses of the banking system, trading a short - lived period of adjustment instead for a long - term period of stagnant credit.

A life form that can not be ruled out as impossible, as has been acknowledged by Dawkins, himself.

If a group of people choose to live by a certain set of rules and actually don't mind, then their beliefs should be respected as we would want our beliefs to be accepted and respected as well.

It's interesting to see how people will find their own truth, dig in their heals and be blind to any other idea... What would Jesus do is an interesting question... I consider my self a Christian and a spiritualist... because I believe it's just not as black and white as one religion or another thinks... there is way more grey area... but a fundamental truths that are a good rule to live life by, wether you are christian or not... treat others the way you want to be treated... do unto others... I am my brothers keeper... all apply.

Institutions become soulless, ruled not by persons but by procedures, and collective life becomes more and more careerist and commercialized.

I don't fear any «invisible man in the sky» who hasn't produced one credible, empirically based instance of his existence in over 3,000 years What is needed is for people to stop living by the rules of myth and mysticism and start living by the realities of the here and now

I don't believe in God, but I do believe that «Do unto others as you would have them do unto you» is a pretty great rule to live by.

Christian rules (I won't call them laws, it implies validity) apply to those who accept them and choose to live by them.

For the vast majority of atheists I've talked to, all that they know is that they don't like the rules that Christians are told to live by.

Why not establish a humanist set of rules we can all live by and call it a day?

I don't think it necessarily means leaving the family, but no longer subscribing to its rules, conforming to its pressure, or defining our lives by that social structure that is so firmly entrenched.

And when I live by faith — I choose to follow Jesus from my heart — not just live by rules of my mind or what should be done.

Do nt want to live by the Feds rules?

We do not have to live by all of the rules in the Bible, such as the ones in the Old Testament.

Bob, Since we (USA) have never tried to live by the gtolden rule, I guess thats proof that it doesn't work.

Many who hated Scalia's rulings could not help but be entertained by his razor - sharp writing, which he used especially in his dissenting opinions to carve up the majority's reasoning (my favorite is Planned Parenthood v. Casey, where among other things he referred to the majority's «Nietzschean vision of us unelected, life - tenured judges — leading a Volk who will be «tested by following»» the Court's rulings obediently).

Sorry, you don't get to cherry pick rules of right or wrong from a book when nobody can live by all the rules.

while the writer has little knowledge of the bible, he is also greatly lacking what he should know to write such a article, the laws give to people of all walks of life is the commandments given by moses, religion does not have anything to do with goverments laws or rulings, he told us straight the one law that there is no forgiveness for is murder, rulers and goverments take it upon themselves to make the decision whether to go to war, or if a person should be put to death, as far as jesus and the apostles are concerned thier labours was a work of love and true humanitarian towards all peoples, races, religions, they never asked for anything for themselves, and they never took from one to give to another.

I know for a fact that despite all my talking and writing about love, there are many area of my life not ruled by love.

She does not mean to be a totalitarian religious society whose life and decisions are all ruled by the orders of a central authority.

I wish people would accept that the «Bible» is not gods word neither was it wrote by god but by men who put what they decided they wanted as rules for everyone else to run their life based on, every thing from what type of fabric you can wear at the same time to what you can eat on certain days.

Why we can not learn by being told and while we live under their rule is a long question; but, for most of us, we must separate ourselves from our parents in order to learn the hard way, before we can, in returning, step up to take their place.

The Jewish scholar C.G. Montefiore saw this quite clearly and was startled by it, «The advanced radicalism of these rules or principles is very remarkable», but then proceeded to comfort himself by claiming that Jesus did not live up to them: `... but practically he does not apply them... so far as he is concerned, he holds fast to Judaism and the Old Testament.»

Personally, the existence of the death penalty, which is supported by most «godly» people leads me to believe that we humans are just one more animal species living in a godless jungle, although having ruled out the existence of God, I can't yet rule out the existence of Satan.

I'm not asking anyone to live life by my rules.

and if you want to me life by those rules then you need to prove what you believe is 100 % true, and not just your feelings

Our Lords word says not to worship idol, that one only needs to go to Father through Jesus Christ, His word lays the moral rules to live by.

Nor is the problem that so many people rattle off the golden rule without trying to live by it, like the scribes and Pharisees whom Jesus criticized on the grounds that «they say, and do not»; probably glib rattlers - off of the revised rule could be expected to fail as frequently to practice what they preach.

A personalistic philosophy of life does not offer us absolute knowledge;... we discover divine purpose in so far as our human purposes are ruled by the New Testament principles of logos and agape - reason and love.

The roughly rule utilitarian ethics I live by just defines not only basic rules to live by on a daily basis, but more general acts of «good» and «evil» behaviors.

There are some basic rules of thumb that societies live by across the world (don't kill, don't steal, ect...) because a society in anarachy doesn't work, or rather, it doesn't work as well as a civil lawful society.

If God truly decided he'd provide his will for us, as a set of rules to live by, why on earth would he not provide it to all the humans he created?

And the weekend rule is a choice to live differently — not by the winds of your own decisions but with an intentional choice of inviting Christ to be Lord.

«Stop living by old rules about what you can eat and how you should wash before you eat ~ that's not important.

Unlike the Christian god that wouldn't ever change his mind or doctrine... except for cursing the world for eating an apple... except for telling Abraham to sacrifice his son, but then stopping him... and except for killing nearly all life on Earth and then because of the guilt says I'll never to do that ever again - in exactly that way... and except for deciding that 2 of himself (Father and Spirit) weren't enough any more, and creating / fathering / spiriting as Son... and except for forgiving all sin, when «In the beginning» he had cursed the universe for the eating of an apple, by having his creation torture and kill his only begotten Son... and except for having to repeat himself about the unchanging eternal rules, to Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Saul / Paul, Mohammed, Joseph Smith, Bahá «u «lláh, David Koresh, and a whole host of others... and except for... and except for...

If the Supreme Court somehow obtained jurisdiction over this independent sovereign power, according to Coons it would not be acting «either as or for the state, but as the arbiter of legal sovereigns who need a way to live together by some rule more humane than naked power.»

In the world we live in, not everyone is playing by the rules you mentioned, so all bets are off.

It is concerned not with rules but of actions directed by our life in Christ.

Indeed the style of life that is governed by rules or principles has not yet been liberated.

I also on the flip - side don't want to play according to others rules and demand either, like by political correctness, dismissing some real facts and truth, or being told by what I call liberal fascist and others how I should think, live, eat, read, or believe.

«WE HAVE THE VICTORY» For those struggling with thoughts of unforgiveness and attacks on the mind especially deceiving thoughts and doubts these are from satan in the word they are called fiery darts we are to quench those darts by faith so we need to read the word and believe that Gods word is true.We also have the victory over these thoughts because when we accept Jesus the holy spirit dwells within us so satan does nt have authority over us he can not rule what belongs to God he can only deceive.We can not defeat the enemy in our strength we need the holy spirit when we try and overcome him in our strength we struggle especially with our thoughs and in the area of sin.If you are having evil thoughts or doubts commit your way unto the Lord and let him fight your battle.Tell the enemy he has no authority over you that you are under the covering of Jesus Christ and when you have doubts memorise verses on faith ie greater is he that is in me than he that is in the world.The holy spirit is just like Jesus talk to him be friends with him he helps us to live like Christ and gives us the power to do it.We are overcomers more than conquerers through Christ who strengthens us.brentnz

If I had to ascribe a definition it would be that some people don't buy what big religion is selling but live by a set of rules that guide them (to be a better person / contribute to society / whatever).