Sentences with phrase «not live this philosophy»

Not exact matches

It's a philosophy that may have limited the company's circulation (it's currently distributed in California, Colorado, Oregon and the Philadelphia area), but Cilurzo says that's less of a concern than people having a beer that doesn't live up to the brewer's standards.

Name: Jeff Chapin Company: Casper Work - life balance philosophy: I have a good signal for whether or not I'm doing good at this or not.

Name: Heidi Zak Company: ThirdLove Work - life balance philosophy: I don't think there is such a thing.

Name: Tristan Walker Company: Walker & Company Work - life balance philosophy: I don't think about that; I just think about what's important to me.

Name: Chieh Huang Company: Boxed Work - life balance philosophy: It means that you're not having regrets on either front.

Name: Bruce Poon Tip Company: G Adventures Work - life balance philosophy: I don't think it exists.

Name: Carrie Dorr Company: Pure Barre Work - life balance philosophy: I don't believe work - life balance exists the way society has been describing it.

Name: Barbara Corcoran Company: Forefront Venture Partners Work - life balance philosophy: It doesn't exist.

Name: Christene Barberich Company: Refinery29 Work - life balance philosophy: I don't mind working long hours, especially if I feel the work is feeding me in return.

It's not about filling their heads with ancient philosophies and rote facts; it's about filling their hearts with a passion for learning and the desire to make a difference - to make their efforts and their lives meaningful -; both in the near term and in the long run.

As Buffett has shared in a video clip, the book changed not only his investment philosophy but also the course of his life.

Just look at his overall philosophy of life affirmation: Essentially that says we shouldn't let all the ideas and doctrine around us and let it drain our energy.

As for your disrespect on display towards «a profit motive», I take it part of your philosophy was receiving a salary that barely met your basic needs for a spartan living and not a dollar more, right?

Michael lives by TELUS» philosophy to Give Where You Live, and when he isn't cheering on his kids at a soccer game, hiking in the local mountains, or hitting the ski hills, he can be found helping others achieve their goals.

In support of our philosophy to give where we live, TELUS, our team members and retirees have contributed $ 440 million to charitable and not - for - profit organizations and volunteered more than 6.8 million hours of service to local communities since 2000.

Great quote from PwC US Chairman Tim Ryan who told the New York Times that his philosophy in life is «bad news doesn't...

We can not afford to pay 26K a year so our kids can attend a school with a philosophy that is tuned to our values and life style.

My philosophy has always been — life is short — enjoy as much as you can afford to — but make sure you always pay yourself first to ensure you don't HAVE to work forever.

Ayn Rand's fiction and philosophy is not Christian by any stretch, but it is an expression of life - affirming, anti-tyrannical humanism.

If they would get rid of the term «10 Commandments» and call them say «Good Advice for God fearing Men and and women» or «a philosophy for modern living», they wouldn't be stigmatized as they are.

Second: The Creation tale is simply a way for early humans to explain mans creation and «fall» from God's predetermined path... The old testament is full of stuff more related to philosophy and health advice then «Gods word» However, this revelation has not made me less of a christian... In Contrast to those stuck in «the old ways» regarding faith (not believing in neanderthals and championing the claim that earth is only 6000 years old), I believe God created the universe on the very principle of physics and evolution (and other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms was the first step in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and us.

I believe in the «theology» of Christiandom, not the philosophies of Christiandom's Pharisees who reap the benefits and do live in the niched richness of Life while only giving meager breads to the very poorest of lots cast upon the lands.

As things have turned out, there are those that think that it's unChristian and unbiblical and that we're being boastful and arrogant, and those that understand that, in our context and times... we're living by the philosophy that we don't want to ask people to do something that we're not willing to do ourselves.

I do not expect to find my moral philosophy codified in the Constitution, and others may find the moral claim of fetal life outweighed by compelling interests of equality and individual autonomy.

The philosophies and teaching were not new, there were only revelutionary in the backwards area he lived in.

There are some pearls of wisdom which are useful in life in many philosophies and scriptures - this does not make any one of them absolute truth.

Based on Hitler's life and his philosophy, however, it does not seem like Hitler made Jesus his lord.

But there began a period of craving to understand the meaning of life, and since philosophy did not seem to offer the ultimate answers to such a quest, I finally decided to probe the Christian tradition more seriously than I had considered worthwhile before.

I say this as a life long student of many religions and philosophies (Spelling not being one of them) and as a Mormon convert.

It is not the articulation of a philosophy, a world view, or a way of life.

On this point, he placed himself in alliance with Arthur Holmes and quoted approvingly of Holmes» criticisms that Clark had not properly understood the purpose of philosophy to elaborate a vision of life through a number of sources, including the philosopher's own historical context.

It is not taught as the truth about life in most philosophy departments.

In a satirical magazine launched in 1721, the school's self - appointed jester sneered, «I have known a profligate debauchee chosen professor of moral philosophy; and a fellow, who never look'd upon the stars soberly in his life, professor of astronomy... and, not long ago, a famous gamester and stock - jobber was elected professor of divinity; so great, it seems, is the analogy between dusting of cushions, and shaking of elbows; or between squandering away of estates, and saving of souls!»

This quest requires an internal renewal of theology and philosophy — not merely as academic disciplines, but as ways of life — and they need to be brought to bear on the governing assumptions, the unarticulated ontology of our culture.

Not only is the mutable world separated from its divine principle — the One — by intervals of emanation that descend in ever greater alienation from their source, but because the highest truth is the secret identity between the human mind and the One, the labor of philosophy is one of escape: all multiplicity, change, particularity, every feature of the living world, is not only accidental to this formless identity, but a kind of falsehood, and to recover the truth that dwells within, one must detach oneself from what lies without, including the sundry incidentals of one's individual existence; truth is oblivion of the flesh, a pure nothingness, to attain which one must sacrifice the worNot only is the mutable world separated from its divine principle — the One — by intervals of emanation that descend in ever greater alienation from their source, but because the highest truth is the secret identity between the human mind and the One, the labor of philosophy is one of escape: all multiplicity, change, particularity, every feature of the living world, is not only accidental to this formless identity, but a kind of falsehood, and to recover the truth that dwells within, one must detach oneself from what lies without, including the sundry incidentals of one's individual existence; truth is oblivion of the flesh, a pure nothingness, to attain which one must sacrifice the wornot only accidental to this formless identity, but a kind of falsehood, and to recover the truth that dwells within, one must detach oneself from what lies without, including the sundry incidentals of one's individual existence; truth is oblivion of the flesh, a pure nothingness, to attain which one must sacrifice the world.

everything in the universe evolves, not only life forms but also memes, Religion is a meme so it also change in conformity to its era or time of its conception as faith.Because in pre scientific times thousands of years ago, the scientific method of approach or philosophy has not existed yet, myth or merely story telling is considered facts, The first religion called animism more than 10,000 years ago believed that spirits or god exists in trees, rivers, mountains, boulders or in any places people at that time considered holy.hundreds of them, then when the Greeks and Romans came, it was reduced to 12, they called it polytheism, when the Jews arrived, it was further reduced to 1, monotheism.its derivatives, Christianity And Islam and later hundreds of denominations that includes Mormonism and Protestants flourished up to today.So in short this religions evolved in accordance to the scientific knowledge of the age or era they existed.If you graph the growth of knowledge, it shows a sharp increase in the last 500 years, forcing the dominant religions at that time to reinterprete their dogmas, today this traditional religions are becoming obsolete and has to evolve to survive.But first they have to unify against atheism.in the dialectical process of change, Theism in one hand and the opposing force atheism in the other, will resolve into a result or synthesis.The process shall be highlighted in the internet in the near future.

I am an avid reader of the sciences and philosophy as well so I believe that with my educational and life's background I can speak intelligently on these subjects but certainly not exhaustively and stand ready to discuss evidence (s) for and against with anyone willing to dialog without rancor or name calling or nastiness.

The message of this book is that democratic life should be conceived not as an enterprise of autonomous men, no matter how clever they may be in organizing to pursue their interests, but as a way of realizing the Will of Heaven — that is, of doing the truth and serving the right in which man's proper being and destiny consist, This is another manner of signifying the «public philosophy» earlier mentioned.

A personalistic philosophy of life does not offer us absolute knowledge;... we discover divine purpose in so far as our human purposes are ruled by the New Testament principles of logos and agape - reason and love.

But while I am not political, I am very wary of philosophies of life or technique built on straightforward narratives drawn from situations of great moral complexity and insoluble tragic dilemmas.

Everyone does something in their life that they know is sin but do anyway because they still like it, including people insistent on your philosophy and that they themselves don't regularly do things they like that are sinful.

If Heidegger's philosophy of «historicity» and «authenticity» means anything at all, it surely means that life and thought can not be separated — Heidegger's least of all.

However, Stapledon has not yet made concrete those aspects of Whitehead's metaphysics that he so admired in Philosophy And Living.

But in an interesting example of the philosophy he advocates — that the process is more real than the material fact — Whitehead himself remained more affected by the process, not the content of his early life and education.

The real opposition for Buber is not between philosophy and religion, as it at first appears to be, but between that philosophy which sees the absolute in universals and hence removes reality into the systematic and the abstract and that which means the bond of the absolute with the particular and hence points man back to the reality of the lived concrete — to the immediacy of real meeting with the beings over against one.

Since he can't seperate Obama's theology from his philosophy (and he home schools his children, obviously without a dictionary), what gives this idiot the right to dictate to people on how they will conduct their lives.

The real conflict for Buber is not between philosophy and religion, but between that philosophy which sees the absolute in universals and hence removes reality into the systematic and the abstract and that which means the bond of the absolute with the particular and hence points man back to the reality of the lived concrete — to the immediacy of real meeting with the beings over against one.

I don't think the Pope was challenging governments to change philosophy, but is merely calling on his followers to re-prioritize their lives from money and material things to spiritual wealth.

Those who understand Buber's philosophy will not hesitate to answer yes, for that philosophy is essentially concrete, close to experience, and realistic as only a life open to the reality of evil in the profoundest sense could produce.

If you're using what Jesus said as a starting point (not a bad one, regardless of your faith), there is still much to discuss and hash out to interpret that philosophy in our modern lives.