Sentences with phrase «not lose assets»

He explained that if the bitcoin exchange rate changes too drastically, then trades will be suspended for a while so that traders will not lose their assets.

If they were hacked, then users did not lose assets as a consequence.

The primary benefit of an unsecured loan is that you won't lose any assets, meaning home or car, if you can't make payments.

You don't lose your assets and once the creditors agree to your proposal, your payment remains fixed even if your income changes.

Not exact matches

If the owners don't tell anyone about their assets (which may be worth millions), they may be lost forever.

At close to half a billion dollars, it was well beyond the outer limits of what investors had ever paid for a publishing company of Wired's size — never mind one whose operations were on track to lose $ 11 million that year (not even counting a onetime $ 20.5 - million write - off to put the company's disparate assets under one corporate umbrella).

«This is a high - risk asset class; nobody should invest in this with money that they can't afford to lose.»

Families and individuals who didn't have a portion of their wealth stored in a real asset such as gold lost everything.

Stock in structured - finance firm Coventree lost more than half its value Tuesday after it said various Coventree - sponsored trusts could not fund maturities of Canadian asset - backed commercial paper due to what it called a «market disruption.»

Portis won't reveal exactly how much he lost through these alleged misdeeds, but among the assets in his 2015 bankruptcy filings he included a $ 1 million note from Ahmed's firm as well as «potential» claims of $ 2 million and $ 8 million against Brahmbhatt's and Rubin's firms, respectively.

You shouldn't use home equity to pay for depreciating assets like cars, which begin losing value the moment you buy them.

Money that you'll need in the short term or that you can't afford to lose — the down payment on a home, for example — is best invested in relatively stable assets, such as money market funds, certificates of deposit (CDs) or Treasury bills.

It's just the dollar losing value, not the assets rising in value.

You are seeing your return on investment on the cash flow and no matter what is happening in the economy you are not in danger of losing the asset or your initial investment.

People's paper assets primarily stay the same while everything else goes up in value, so most investors are losing money and being left behind by not investing in assets that keep up with inflation.

Every asset that has risen in price that one didn't purchase was an opportunity lost.

Volatility has again risen above 21 % on a possible trade war between the US and China, and the market is not losing any time in repricing numerous assets.

The stock was cheap, but the business was so lousy that the management team not only failed to keep it operating, but also lost all of its cash and assets.

Investors don't want to own an assets that's likely to lose its value over time, after all.

The idea is not to avoid losing money on any particular asset class.

Model 1 - Preservation of Capital Asset allocation models designed for the preservation of capital are largely for those who expect to use their cash within the next twelve months and do not wish to risk losing even a small percentage of principal value for the possibility of capital gains.

To avoid losing money in the markets, don't follow the crowd and don't buy into overvalued assets.

Such considerations would seem to make a general discussion of asset allocation impossible, but all is not lost.

Though you may lose some of your tangible assets if you are unable to repay the loan, you won't lose strategic control of your business; provided you legally protected your personal assets.

Instead, they often spread their wealth out over a variety of different investments so they don't take as much of a hit if one asset loses value.

Maybe the right question isn't why they lost money on the hedging transaction, but why they apparently have a boatload of questionable assets so massive that they need to use whale - sized leverage to hedge the default risk in the first place.

With tax loss harvesting, we report losses on our portfolio, but we don't really lose the money, as we invest it into a similar asset.

We've reduced our costs and divested assets, but we can't stand by and watch our business continue to lose money.

Apparently we have no money to spend despite making a 20mil profit this window and over 100 mill of cash reserves kroenke is trying to get a 1 billion dollar loan to fund his new NFL stadium no wonder he's trying to show that his other assets can make money We're not signing anyone for the rest of the window Gazidis is a pushover interested in making as much profit as possible and wenger lost it can't keep up with all these younger managers

If ozil wonders around the pitch moaning as he has, gets knocked off the ball like he really couldn't give a ****, makes little the effort to keep the team shape i.e. actually runs when he loses the ball (rather that standing looking like a little boy who's just had his ice cream taken off him) or the opposition breaks, then he is as much of a liability as he an asset.

he knows his days are very limited...... and the owners don't want to lose the only good asset in their company.......

With Wenger overstaying his welcome, our owner's frugal tendencies, the vast accumulation of dead - weight and their failure to shore up the contracts of our most attractive assets, we have not only lost out on some potentially franchise - changing options, of which two now ply their trades in the EPL, we have likely scared off a host of others.

As an Alex believer and someone who thinks Mahomes has the tools to become a HoF caliber QB, I think Alex's greatest asset over his career as a starter for the Chiefs is and has been his ability to not be the reason the team loses games you would expect them to win on paper.

In turn, Mourinho is certainly looking in the right places to address his problem, but it remains to be seen how successful he is with such pursuits as both Atleti and Torino will not want to lose their most prized assets.

this window has just finished i am already thinking about who we will get for the january window we might try for khedira on a really low offer as he is free agent almost would help boost numbers in midfield in the new year as we will no doubt need to filling the numbers about then also i will hold my hands up and say i was wrong this morning for giving wenger stick and saying welbeck is rubbish i have been out in the cold light of day and had a chance to reevaluate the situation and realized that this could be a canny shrew transfer on wenger behalf actually if wenger can turn the clock back and work his magic on welbeck and get him scoring goals and improve his game then we could have a great underrated signing on our hands its wengers absolute trust in him that might be what makes him a great player as this is something that he never had at old mordor if anybody can make him a world beater wenger can he loves this little pet projects improving players against the odds welbeck has the skillset to be high class player upfornt he just needs to work very hard on his finishing i think once he gets a few goals under his belt he will settle in fine and he is a team player you could put him on the left against man city to shore up that side and he will put in a great shift without a complaint that could be his biggest asset to us or on the right whenever we need him there ithinkwenger might start himon the left against city to protect the left back against navas and i bet you if he does a great job we will take a shine to him quickly i am hopeing he will be one of those wenger gems that he finds and polishes up to a high finish i must admit i was annoyed as some other gunners were at not signing d / m and c / h but if wenger does win the league with this lot it will be his greatest win yet and what might play in to our hands is the unpredictable nature of the league in the last few seasons if we get on a good run at the right time we might be hard to stop look at city they should have never lost to stoke but the result is there in black and white for all to see and i think chelsea will hit the skids after a while to just because cesc and costa are doing well now thats there main threat but teams will work out how to stop them as the season goes on and chelsea will become predictable i think we might just do well this season after all

By January when Zach was limping and grimacing up the floor with a bad ankle and hip and Thibs kept playing him 35 minutes in a lost season, i realized that he wasn't much of an asset manager either.

When you're trading half your roster and all of your assets for a superstar that A) doesn't want to be there longterm, B) is recovering from a potentially chronic injury, and C) has never won an MVP... maybe fighting that battle means you've already lost the war.

Although the biggest mistake is not obtaining any assets (draft picks) 3 years ago as we lost Aldridge, Matthews and Robin Lopez for nothing.

Im a big fan of Walcot - but he's proven to be injury prone, and Im not convinced he'll stay - so this looks like a great way to get an upgrade - and the fact that we don't lose a home - grown player is a big asset too

Silent Stan cares about share prices, losing assets for free without them earning the club equal to their cost is not going to boost share prices and as such I can not see AFC being happy to do that.

Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger is not keen on losing his prized asset who is valued at around # 35m but with the circumstances, it would be smart if Wenger allows Ox to move on.

While a large injection of cash would be nice, Villa would be losing one of their most coveted assets in James Milner, who was sensational for Villa last season and were it not for the England internationals superb form last season, the club wouldn't have got as close to Champions League football, as well as two domestic cups, as they did in 2009/2010.

It was mentally insane to keep her as leader that after she lost 63 seats and even more so now as she not only had minimal gains this time but she's probably going to lose seats again next time because you won't have African American and Latino voters coming out to vote in such large numbers which was Obama true assets, racial identity politics (not criticizing it, just saying he did it well).

By some cause, people loses trusts in the bank and wants to retire all of his money, and the bank can not pay because not all of his assets can be converted to money so quickly.

The tribunal explained that the admittance of the EFCC staff under cross-examination that Saraki was not invited for clarification on the grey areas in his assets form, grossly affected the competence of the charges, adding also that the claim by another banker that all documents it had linking Saraki to the alleged offences were lost in a fire accident further neutralized the evidence.

Dark Souls Remastered will bring places like Lost Izalith and Blighttown into 1080p or 4K (depending on your setup), but what it won't do is incorporate new assets — probably.

Somewhere amid all of the film's biggest assets, the story gets lost, but that's not likely the reason someone would ever watch this, now is it?

Even if you do not consider yourself to be wealthy, when you own assets such as a home and a car, you risk losing these possessions if you are liable for costs that exceed your insurance coverage limits.

Not because you're happy about losing money, but sell the asset.

You don't want delinquent payments and defaulted loans to cause you to lose your assets, negatively impact your credit rating, or cause financial distress for your family.