Sentences with phrase «not luxury players»
Ozil is not a luxury player as a luxury player is just excess to your needs.
http://www.justarsenal.com/ Not exact matches
Ozil is pure class - but unless he chooses to add effort, tracking - back to his game — he will NEVER fit in an EPL team - You just can't afford the luxury of a player who is only good at passing, and offers no goal threat himself -
we can not have the luxury of so many players not having defensive discipline!
Fabregas is a luxury player and doesn't have a place in todays game at the to level.
With the likes of Coquelin, Xhaka, Elneny and hopefully Cazorla competing for those midfield spots you could say that the always attack minded Welshman is a bit of a luxury player whose impact off the bench could be more than from the start, don't you think?
One can't afford the luxury to have a midfield player locked in denying the opposition only.
He prefers luxury and cold players, like ozil, those that givesbeautifull moments but who cant gives you glory (not for themselves at least and thats why they does nt deserve 300.000 a week).
The details aren't yet known, but among the major issues discussed were draft - pick compensation for free agents, something the players hoped to avoid; changes to the international bonus pool, and the luxury tax threshold.
Arsenal personnel are too simple minded and i think this stems from the personality of the manager, i strongly doubt the players felt the emotion of s lost of two points, compared to that of the fans, we need personnels to be benched and shown that they have to work for their space, but guess what we do not have that luxury for some players and position, thats why our captain felt like a point was ok, thats why wilshere feel there is no need to track back, the whole sense of responsibility for ones action is not there and all the manager does is pat them on the back and say we will get them the next time.
In an era in which banks are lambasted for using taxpayers» money to fly their executives on luxury private planes, it's a smart bet for players not to use their own cash to do the same.
Having options wont be a problem, but I do nt think we should get too many luxury players, so surely a top ST is up next?
We do not have the luxury of developing defenders and further more there is no one there to develop them.As far as we can tell Wenger will ruin even the best players out there so no chance for prospects to learn anything for this geriatric crew that is the Arsenal staff.
We have the likes of The Ox, Walcott, Ramsey, Wilshere etc, we don't need another luxury player when we have pressing issues in the squad.
If he doesn't show such attributes by next season, he may just be a luxury player.
Arsenal has nothing other teams do not have, if you cant provide players with the luxury of being a serious club who competes for trophys than you need persue them to stay bec of the money, and Wenger again is doing his poker games
It doesn't warrant him staying but it's still quite a feat (yes he had the luxury of forgetting UCL because of that small team mentality) 3) allowing a good recovery year from a disastrous season, by winning the league early which is a huge confidence boost for the players hopefully (especially after Pique's comments about the inferiority).
He is a luxury player and at times it has pained us to have a player like that when the team wasn't set up for it (Wenger fault, he picks tactics).
Leicester players puls will go up for every match as they maintain the top spot the thing however is that they do nt play any cup or Euro meaning only 12 games 3.5 months that's a luxury
Player ratings GK - 5 not much to do looked a bit shaky on crosses Bel - 6 got forward but poor crossing Mon - 7 did ok but impact for the goal Gaby - 7 defended well looked solid Kos - 6 did ok Coq - 6 ok defensively but poor distribution Xhaka - 6 did ok at times but very average player Gibbs - 6 wing back looks to suit his ability but would like more from him Walcott - 5 looked average and positive enough in possession Ozil -4 poor in possession and none existent without the ball, luxury player Sanchez 5 worst game I've seen him have and embarrassed the team by going down after the ball hit him although the Leicester player deservedPlayer ratings GK - 5 not much to do looked a bit shaky on crosses Bel - 6 got forward but poor crossing Mon - 7 did ok but impact for the goal Gaby - 7 defended well looked solid Kos - 6 did ok Coq - 6 ok defensively but poor distribution Xhaka - 6 did ok at times but very average player Gibbs - 6 wing back looks to suit his ability but would like more from him Walcott - 5 looked average and positive enough in possession Ozil -4 poor in possession and none existent without the ball, luxury player Sanchez 5 worst game I've seen him have and embarrassed the team by going down after the ball hit him although the Leicester player deservedplayer Gibbs - 6 wing back looks to suit his ability but would like more from him Walcott - 5 looked average and positive enough in possession Ozil -4 poor in possession and none existent without the ball, luxury player Sanchez 5 worst game I've seen him have and embarrassed the team by going down after the ball hit him although the Leicester player deservedplayer Sanchez 5 worst game I've seen him have and embarrassed the team by going down after the ball hit him although the Leicester player deservedplayer deserved a ref
And I just don't see Wenger getting another one of these «luxury» players who sometimes won't bother track back and defend.
Diaby, Chamakh, Sanogo, Szechmy just to mention a few players who should have been offloaded long ago but who we kept and hoped will come good... not all managers have the luxury of a job for life like our Wenger so comparing other managers who» s job depends on results to him is unfair and impractical
Ozil is a luxury that Arsenal really can't afford.The only time he tends to shine is when the whole team is playing to the best of their ability... which is... as we know... not often enough.This being the case it would benefit the team to sell him to Barcelona for the reported # 50million and bring someone else in instead.Such a player would undoubtedly have less talent but in all liklihood would be able to perform on a more consistent basis.
The only thing which makes our team unbalanced is playing the luxury item we bought called ozil.I thought he would need time to adjust to physicality of premier league so i supported him, but the guy hasn't improved he tries to dribble past ppl but runs into them somehow, tries to do showboating at unnecessary time which he fails to do miserably.And i see him giving too many back passes when he should drive forward.And the biggest reason i stopped liking him as a player is bcoz of his sulky attitude.No passion or drive for the club, as if he wanted to be at some other club and is just doing the job without his heart in it.He neeeds to be placed on the bench and make him work hard to retain his place.Ramsey and coq in middle with ox and sanchez on both wing and cazorla as cam will make us a more balanced midfield.
One of the luxuries of the 10 - day DL instead of the 15 - day DL is that you can be more decisive with injury decisions because there isn't the additional 5 days of action missed if a player is ready.
I don't think we should only because it would be a luxury as we have many similar attacking midfielders of various quality — too many fairly similar players.
He looks to be far too much of a luxury player, and if you're not going to contribute defensively then you have to be scoring and assisting with regularity.
I don't understand why any teal fan would straight out reject a top quality player even as a luxury.
We can't afford to play 4 lightweight luxury players up front away from home where teams are going to contest the midfield.
Think Wenger has the luxury of not needing the motivational team talk here — all the players will know the situation.
from Mauritius — you guys tell me — we are challenging for trophies right — then investment needed — removing players who are not willing to play for arsenal must go right — bringing new players is a necessity not a luxury — how we will perform from now is the question to address — two defeats too much too earlier
A young striker should not be a cover, but rather a «luxury» player.
Don Balon believe that the player's agent was the one who offered his client to Zinedine Zidane's side, with the Madrid boss viewing the forward as a player who the club don't need on their books, with the Frenchman, who is reportedly very happy with his squad, viewing a deal for Sanchez as a luxury one.
To get the best from the player and play to his strengths it would be so beneficial to both the team and Ramsey if he had the protection of a top class CDM.He does his fair share of defensive work but it's not his natural game.He has never had the luxury of a top CDM in all his time at the club for the simple reason Wenger thought players of the calibre like Song Denilson Flamini Coquelin And now Xhaka were the answer and has been continually proved wrong.
Just because the depth players are bad doesn't mean we need to spend a 1st on a luxury pick.
I don't think he and Ozil should play together and Cazorla is too good to sit on the bench and to be honest him Podolski are luxury players who are being used wrong.
Ozil is just a luxury not a player you can count on to take you through 38 games in the PL
No, we do nt have the luxury to f... around with players.
With the end of Brady's career on the horizon, the team may not have the luxury to mine the middle rounds of the NFL Draft for a player to patiently develop.
Ozil is a pure playmaker more than any of them, but when you don't have talent in every position he starts to look like a luxury player.
They're in the luxury tax, Wall's extension hasn't even kicked in yet, they'll have $ 98 million in committed salaries with only 4 players under contract in 2019 - 2020 (and Oubre up for his post-rookie contract extension).
Like I said, not a bad player but we can't afford the luxury of having glittering individuals and no collective team.
watching spurs last night, they had the luxury of bringing wanyama off the bench, and toby alderwield not playing, and still beat united comfortably, those 2 players wud walk into our side, terrible transfer planning
Ozil is a great luxury player, but sadly Arsenal don't deserve him and can't afford to play him considering the current state of the club.
As see it Ozil is a luxury player player who you either accept his weaknesses (not defending, can't / won't tackle, etc) and put a couple of defensive midfielders behind him or you should not play him.
His impressive domestic performances have earned him interest from Premier League giants Manchester United and Liverpool, but this hasn't been enough for Scotland Under - 19 manager Ricky Sbragia to pick the youngster, describing him as a «luxury» player.
In Sanchez we already have one of the world's finest wide players and an other onbe would be great but at this time, an un needed luxury if it means we don't sign a top nr 9.
Like everyone has said before on this forum, he's a luxury player, because a team will need to accommodate for a player like Ozil and Arsenal do not have the financial muscle or players to do that.
I still can't believe we were going for Suarez and only offered # 40 million + # 1 we refused to go any higher on that amount, but then we forked out # 42 million on a luxury player we still don't need to this day.
Missouri State has a decided advantage when it comes to post defense, as Paul Lusk has the luxury of not exposing his best offensive player in Johnson to fouls because of elite post defender Obi Church.
He is a luxury player who is not 100 percent dedicated.