Sentences with phrase «not mad science»

No, it's not mad science — it's an effort to combat the Zika virus scourge.

Not exact matches

the natural cycle would be for man to grow up Stop Believing In Gods All Together.They said that it's stupid for any one to say theres no god They have no proof.Ok After Going Crazy i called them PHONY For never getting mad or angry OR CURSING.Then I Insulted Joseph Smith for being a HABITUAL LIAR.After Telling them That evolution is right.And Their Religion Is RIGHT NEXT TO SCIENTOLOGY In Made Up Horse Crap Then kicking them out.I Started To Think (NO Not about god He doesn't exist) But of science He said no one can proof there's no god.

@Atheist Science may have brought about mad cow (Not sure if this is true, but I'm not going to look it up and argue), but it also eradicated small pNot sure if this is true, but I'm not going to look it up and argue), but it also eradicated small pnot going to look it up and argue), but it also eradicated small pox.

Science may have brought about mad cow (Not sure if this is true, but I'm not going to look it up and argue), but it also eradicated small pNot sure if this is true, but I'm not going to look it up and argue), but it also eradicated small pnot going to look it up and argue), but it also eradicated small pox.

Now apply that mad science to the world of hot - n - spicy.

From a professional perspective, I have had lots of lovely opportunities come my way, and made real progress with Science Sparks in a slightly mad, bursting with ideas and not able to focus / sleep / concentrate manner, but on a personal level, I have a real sense of failure about the last month or so.

They were bound, gagged and given drugs that drove them mad or caused millions of babies born with birth defects... husband weren't allowed to see their wives, new moms were allowed to hold their children but maybe 30 minutes every few hours (breastfeeding was out of the question for many), dads could only see the infants through a glass until after mom and infant were released... Yet we argue that medicine and science are correct??

It wasn't just hard on the CV; it took a great deal of joy out of the science, which for me has always been about swapping mad ideas over a few pints in the conference bars.

They can vote in Parliament on issues like stem cell research and policy on mad cow disease, they can pass the Government's science budget without even knowing what it says, but they can not actually engage with the scientific community.

While he's not very Luthor - y in a lot of obvious ways, they actually managed to get the character fairly spot - on in terms of his villainy, cruelty and penchant for poor foresight in regards to mad science.

We all know Igor from his million or so incarnations (best in Young Frankenstein), but what we didn't know is that the hunchback himself dreams of becoming a mad scientist and winning the Evil Science Fair.

On the otherside when eco-outfits over-exaggerate the issue that annoys me, but doesn't make me mad because they aren't attacking the science and calling it all a scam.

«After the debacles of Climate-gate, GM products and MMR, I want to explore why science isn't trusted» — hmmm, I remember one Professor Richard Southwood reassuring the British people that British beef was safe to eat during the «Mad Cow» scandal.

Some environmental justice NGOs do not want to discuss geoengineering for fear that it will validate the «mad science» and distract civil society, governments and business communities from focusing on less drastic measures that will have impact on climate change.

If we knew how to fix society through scientific study we would not be in such a mess that we are now considering an idea that Ray Pierrehumbert, climate science professor and a rogue member of the committee, describes as «wildly, utterly, howlingly barking mad».

It all just reinforces the observation that it is not about rational science or communication at all — but some mad riff using random scientific jargon — who can forget the symplectic manifold of the Hamiltonian — to posture about inferior denier science.

I'd might be mad too if I was humiliated by a correction from an introductory science text too but I can't say for sure because it never happened to me.

Richard like other religions it also uses the concepts like «heretics» used for those that fail to believe in the «right way» and creation of «evil «which explains way they need to paint AGW sceptics as not merely wrong but «mad or bad» And above all its amazing how often the word «belief» are seen in what is supposed to be science.