Sentences with phrase «not make less money»

You want to make more money while selling less chicken, not make LESS money while giving away more chicken.

White says, «Women - owned businesses do not make less money because they are women - owned.

You aren't making any less money either.

Not exact matches

«Contrarian companies do not simply follow the crowd or the quick buck but rather look for ways to make money where barriers to entry are lower and there is less noise,» says Bradley.

It feels less like Instacart isn't so much a handy service, but a way to hack a grocery store to make money by marking up yogurt and eggs through an app.

As I recall the headline read, more or less, «Women Don't Negotiate Because They're Not Dumb,» and the author went on to cite research to make her point that when women do ask for more money, people tend to hate it, and «pushy» women end up paying mightily in terms of career progression and opportunities.

«People have come back from maternity leave, and they don't want to work 80 hours a week — they're ok making less money to work less,» he says.

«Your competition may offer a better compensation plan, but smart salespeople realize that if the pre - and postsales support is not available, they will make less money on a more generous comp plan,» says Schmidt, CEO of $ 20 - million Abraham Technical Services, in Maple Grove, Minn..

These aggregation services offer an easy way to check your statements and balances but don't allow you to move money, making them much less valuable to hackers.

But here's the thing: Like them, you probably didn't launch a business to make less money than you did at your last job.

«It's the first generation that is making less money than their parents, so we've got to give them a super-convenient solution, but we can't compromise on the quality of the food.

Currently, they pay less than developed countries for drugs, so companies don't make as much money there.

But once you get them all setup and integrated into your workflow, you'll be able to spend less time on the administration side of your business, and more time on the money - making side... and who doesn't love that?

[6] In another recent Medscape report, nearly 49 % of employed physicians were satisfied with their income, which could reflect that even if they were making less, the benefits of a regular paycheck and possibly doing less work for the same money might compensate for not being self - employed.

Each year I feel like I learn something new about taxes and even though it doesn't make paying taxes less painful, it makes me feel more aware and smarter about how I use my money.

Because it's been less than three years since money was contributed to the RRSP, the $ 10,000 is added not to your spouse's income but to yours since it is essentially the income you weren't taxed on when you made the contribution.

I'd have to argue though, if it does help us subconsciously to spend less money by using debit / cash, why not make the switch?

The big money in the last major move wasn't really made as gold hit $ 1425 in November or $ 1550 in April, it was made during the summer weakness of July and August when gold traded at less than $ 1200.

I'm willing to walk you through all of the formal steps that you need to follow in order to choose the most reliable services, to be sure that you won't lose your money, and to get you the lowest fees (In order to make more many you need to spend less, right?).

In retirement, you require your existing assets to be stable and predictable, since you are not making money from work (or making less from work).

I haven't met an employee, except very highly compensated ones (and then only rarely), who did not have an deeply emotional response to the possibility of ratcheting downward in any given year (i.e., making less money).

It seems like most of your articles are assuming your readers make this great money and don't take into account that there are tons of us trying to be financially responsible on less than half what you're working with.

Gays can't get married, women make less money, millions of children don't have access to healthcare, and cops can stop and frisk anyone they feel like in some places.

I had spent so much money buying books about fishing, attending fishing conferences, going to Africa to fish, and founding the World Fishing Training Center that although it was true that I had never caught any fish, this did not make me any less of an expert in fishing.

The willingness of President Bush (in his better moments) to spend money to shore up civil society — making it perhaps less necessary to spend money down the road, as the promise of the «ownership society» was fulfilled — was taken as an opportunity by those not invested in that «limited» project (I have in mind here both the conventional Republicans in the Bush White House and the pork - barrelling Republicans in the House and Senate) to open the federal purse with relative abandon.

Think about that, because Romney can care less about anyone who can't do nothing for him to make more money and if you don't see that you should ask the lord for help because you are blind and walking through the wilderness...

I didn't realize that quinoa has become less available to the peoples of South America because it makes more money being sold overseas, but it makes sense.

I never did the smash cake, seems point less, cakes cost to much money to just make a mess out it andd I am not a fan of messy babies or kids and sugar.

Going through with it and doing a little calculation proved me wrong though - in fact, if you buy your nuts in bulk, as I do, you can make your own almond milk for less money than the bought stuff, and the nut pulp needn't be wasted but is a bonus that you can use in other kitchen creations.

And the best thing about the deal is that I'm not going to make any less money if I don't do it, if I have to get off halfway across.

Money doesn't make the strain feel any less miserable.

Yeah yeah yeah It's a priority to get a new striker in of course it is PROVIDING that he cost less that a fiver, is world class, French and is young enough to make a profit on when we resell him So not really a priority at all!!!!!! The priority here is the same as it's always been and that NOT spending any money (where is the BT sports money we have gonot really a priority at all!!!!!! The priority here is the same as it's always been and that NOT spending any money (where is the BT sports money we have goNOT spending any money (where is the BT sports money we have got?)

If we don't make the Champions League, I expect nothing less than for Wenger to go on a crazed spending spree and splash any money it takes to sign Pogba, Cavani and a World Class keeper.

we wont for many a year cos the reality is kroenkes model does nt require us to win the league, he still makes money, ivan only furthers that with his business acumen and arsene is great at working with less an still achieving moderate success.

2 things; wenger has to take massive crtisism for favoritism with certain players and for spending latley on less than whats needed e.g why play ozil, ramsey, walcott, when they havnt performed, anyone can see a front 3 of welbeck, sanchez and perez would cause havoc Xhaka wtf he cant takle, is not mobile enough and has the temper and the decision making skills of a of a suicide victim, why did nt we go in for Kante less money and 10x a better player or even Schneiderlin thinking about what happens after wenger ask yourself this will we win the league next year with wenger then ask if we got the right manager next year would we win the league

One of the issues Jordan is looking into these days is sports related — how big money - making collegiate sports like football and basketball push lesser revenue - producing sports like men's wrestling slowly into obscurity and how to keep college education and sports connected in a way that emphasizes academics and not TV money.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

If, which he won't, Kroenke allows this fanbase to continue disappearing and reducing the clubs commercial value — which many fans choose to overlook when saying he will stay on — the many club sponsors keeness to stay involved, plus vast TV money, will drastically reduce and make Kroenkes asset far less valuable.

Usmanov mentions less popular sports like volleyball, because maybe investments are sometimes made for the love of the sport, not for the money it brings.

Facts of the season so far, we have half the points of the league leaders, less points than this time last year, only two fit first team defenders, more money in the bank than ever before.how much proof do you need that wengers job is to make money for his boss and not win trophies.

3 is a silent pick em so money line the game with a dog of 3 pts or less, 85 % of teams that cover 3 points as dogs win the game outright so why give the books any more than you have to, make sure you take dogs in first half ONLY, i cant stress this enough, more times than not if a dog will cover the game, (big dogs +7 or higher) they will show up early and you do not want to get screwed in the 2nd half by blowing the cover, these are things the sports books never would tell you but surely will save you a lot of aggravation in the LONG RUN

On the other hand, Kronke couldn't care less about Arsenal winning football matches as all he cares about is making money as is clearly evident by the sport franchises he owns here in the states.

so simple to answer, Stan wants money and cares less of club success, Wenger wants money and can't achieve any success, don't you see this match is made in heaven?

we can't even get rid of players that have barely mannered to us for several years... which is incredibly annoying considering that our beloved owner would never risk his own financial resources whether he brought in some new blood or offloaded several failed Wenger projects for less than market value... he would simply make a little less and the burden would fall squarely on other sources of income, primarily us... I don't know about you but I would gladly use all the money they have been stockpiling to rid ourselves of those that don't meet acceptable standards and to replace them with a few higher priced gems... I know, I know, Wenger and his minions have been scouring the globe for years now to find anyone that was as good as our current lot to no avail, but I've just got to believe there must be two or three guys somewhere out there that can play this crazy game

Ferrari getting the largest share of F1 revenues is no new thing, but that doesn't make it any less frustrating and showcase how unequal the distribution of this money is.

We're used to financial bullies making the big, expensive move, but we're less used to the financial bullies slowly using their money over time to construct a roster, concrete block by concrete block, that a spring hurricane can't easily topple.

Besides, having much lesser money does not always make a football club unworthy to be title contender.

Hunt doesn't owe you losing money or making any less money.

Does that mean we make good money elsewhere and therefore being less reliant on CL money means we have money, and therefore should we not spend it?

And now I couldn't care less if we finish 5th or 6th, What's the point, when he doesn't want to spend, It's always been about making money and not winning major trophies.