What you write may make sense to you, but it may
not make sense to the reader.
It won't make sense to the reader.
Not exact matches
However, I do
not believe that it was based on the evolving knowledge, thought, and understanding of the writers, but done / shown in a way so the
reader would come
to understanding in a proccess that would
make sense.
The Pope called for thoughtful reflection and said: «there is an urgent need for reliable information, with verified data and news, which does
not aim
to amaze and excite, but rather
to make readers develop a healthy critical
sense, enabling them
to ask themselves appropriate questions and reach justified conclusions.»
However, it's important
to ensure that every link
makes sense for the
reader — don't just through a random link in there that doesn't A).
I was also in a hospital thx
to this blog & Dr. Amy, after a very successful out of hospital birth (
not home b / c I couldn't do it being a
reader here), it would have
made sense to do a legal Homebirth in Oregon, where it is mainstream, but because of the work exposing OR's rates here, I could
not.
Also a voracious
reader, she breezed through a book about the Big Bang, showed it
to her religious - education teacher, and said, «See, doesn't this
make more
sense?»
Many of my friends and
readers know that I am a big evolution buff, and from an evolutionary perspective, it
makes perfect
sense to me that our immune system and thyroid gland are sending a message
to our body in times that are
not safe.
Rather than teach two compartmentalized writing genres, doesn't it
make more
sense to blend the two and have the student convince the
reader of the theme or the character change or the author's intent?
They will learn
to decode and how
to use various «comprehension strategies,» but they won't become expert
readers because they won't be able
to make sense of the texts they are encountering.
The reason is that the high - ability
readers did
not have the context
to make sense of what they were reading.
Many of them had never learned what
readers do
to make sense of text because they did
not have support at home
to reinforce their school learning.
By way of example, I ask beta
readers to highlight any sentence or section that doesn't
make sense, or that they have
to reread.
I didn't know that some
readers on WattPad would reach out
to authors, but that
makes sense.
Nobody wants a lecture; on the other hand, if the author's concern over infodumping borders on the obsessive — as it does for many —
readers will find themselves dissatisfied, even disoriented because they're
not getting the background they needed
to make sense of the tale.
A really good beta
reader, though, will approach editorial levels of commentary and be ready and willing
to tell you if bits of your book don't
make sense.
Since we don't know what device or software the
reader will use
to read our eBooks, it only
makes sense to utilize a format that has been designed for that very purpose, doesn't it?
This will appeal
to people who like the tectonic feel of physical buttons or often hold their
reader in one hand while commuting and exclusively using the touchscreen does
not make practical
sense.
There isn't a right time that
makes sense for every author; the question can only be answered in the context of your larger goals and what you would like
to see happen after a
reader acquires your e-book for free.
The problem that most people have is that they don't have a large enough
reader base
to do this on their own, and even if they did it would
make the most
sense to point your most loyal fans
to your book once it is back
to it's normal price since these are the people most likely
to actually purchase your book.
If it
makes sense in context and doesn't prompt a
reader to complain, you should be fine.
Fans of comics and graphic novels tend
to be a more technologically adept consumer niche of society, so it just
makes sense that these fans would enjoy reading their favorite story lines on high - tech devices; avid collectors may still choose
to purchase hard copy editions of the comics for the intrinsic and investment value of the titles, but now
readers will
not have
to choose which format they prefer.
Telling a
reader she should pay more for a book simply because she buys other products at a higher price doesn't
make economic
sense to her because she sees a lower priced version of the higher priced product that delivers essentially the same result.
When you confront your
reader with, in the first paragraphs, sentences that don't
make sense, you are doing the worst thing
to readers an author can do.
This model
makes a lot of
sense to me for technical books - both as
reader and as someone who has considered writing one (and so far decided it wouldn't be worth the amount of time it'd take
to write it well).
A recent Bowker study, mentioned in the article, does seem
to say that many Japanese
readers aren't interested in ebooks, but, again, this
makes little
sense as Japanese
readers have pioneered a new form of digital reading: scanning your own books and reading them digitally.
They might fill in the blanks on a query that doesn't
make any
sense — and queries that don't
make sense to the uninitiated
reader is my big weakness.
Yet we need
readers with «virgin eyes» — those who don't know the story —
to ensure our story summary
makes sense to that random agent or potential
reader.
Whilst on one level it
makes sense that Smith would want
to keep up with Jones (he says, trying
to spin a combination «keeping up with the Joneses» / Alas Smith & Jones crack out of the shaky assumption that everyone will understand Amazon also goes by the name Jones, which it doesn't), e-
readers on the whole aren't exactly the kind of thing that Smith's regular customers would likely go for, by its own admission: CEO Kate Swann describes the chain's base as «lighter book
readers», with figures showing the average Smith customer buys just three books a year, with particularly strong showings from non-fiction and children's books.
I changed «Kindle devices»
to «Kindle ebook
readers» so that it
makes more
sense to those that don't know the difference.
It really
makes no
sense to continue cutting down giant life forms so that we can write things on them,
not to mention the fact that more and more
readers are seeing the convenience of ebook
readers.
They seem
to believe that casual
readers (users who don't think a dedicated reading device
makes sense) form a Long Tail that will end up being more important than eReader owners and physical book buyers.
Smaller publishers and independent authors will be impacted the greatest: spending $ 200 - $ 600
to give away one's books just doesn't
make sense, especially when they can go onto their Twitter or Facebook pages and essentially run the same contest, even if they miss out on the ability
to reach new
readers through the site.
Since we don't know what device or software the
reader will use when they want
to display our eBooks, it only
makes sense to utilize a format that is tweaked for that very purpose, doesn't it?
The editor is
not emotionally invested in the content and topic and can be more objective about so it will
make sense to your
reader.
It
makes sense to me that for the first print run publishers stick largely with the current model but use POD on the backlist; that could have tremendous benefits
to author and pub house both if done correctly (
not to mention
readers, who'd be able
to order older books by a favourite writer and
not face the flipping frustrating «out of print» or «no stock available» options.
I don't normally promote or share my fiction stuff with my non-fiction audience (because you want real
readers buying your books,
not other authors), but it
makes a LOT of
sense to incentivize scifi and fantasy authors into sharing books with their audience
to win free book promotion or author services.
While Tumblr may
not seem like the obvious home for the blog of a best - selling novelist, it starts
to make a whole lot of
sense when you think about the fact that «under 25» is the exact age group of Veronica's
readers.
It didn't
make any
sense to do it as they normally did, but they pitched the idea of doing it through Thrillbent, so we will give Top Cow a section of Thrillbent that is their own, and they will run four or five digital comics with a
reader voting component
to see in American Idol - style which will come back next week.
«Will this
make any
sense to a
reader in India» isn't something I used
to ask myself.
This post isn't really going
to make any
sense to readers if they are unfamiliar with the security I'm writing about.
Therefore, the
reader is free
to discover whether or
not current valuations
make sense based on historical norms coupled with fundamental values.
The trick is
not to turn blog
readers into bespoke tailor customers, but
to turn bespoke tailor customers into blog
readers, if that
makes any
sense.
Here's what he wrote, and it's highly relevant
to the discourse playing out among Dot Earth
readers on why acting
to limit climate dangers
makes sense (or doesn't):
In this particular case, a
reader drew my attention
to a distinction between insulated and insulated buckets that I hadn't thought about and which
makes sense in the context.
Today, with constantly updated compilations maintained
not only by commercial online services but the Government Printing Office, it
makes better
sense for both writer and
reader to understand that a citation in a brief or opinion
to 37 C.F.R. § 205.22 refers
to the provision in effect at the time of writing.
Evidently, the Kindle Paperwhite doesn't compare directly
to the tablets above but if you are a heavy
reader and absolutely prefer your laptop over a tablet when you are on the go, this might just
make more
sense.
«Lorem ipsum» is
not going
to make much
sense to the
reader if it pops up in the middle of your skills summary.)
That means you can't just stuff in keywords
to appeal
to the applicant tracking system and have it
make sense to human
readers.
Don't just list your MOC IDs and military acronyms, as they may
make perfect
sense to you but won't mean anything
to a civilian
reader.