Not exact matches
(As Christians, we don't believe Christ made
meaningless statements.)
If they can
not provide credible, convincing, verifiable evidence for their
statements, they are completely
meaningless.
They say that «God is love» which is an absolutely
meaningless, nonsensical
statement,
not to mention the problem with equating love with a being that would let anyone spend even one millisecond in a place like hell.
The concept of operation and becoming as self - transcendence gives no warrant for causally linking anything with everything, and negative
statements such as «This can
not produce that», or, «From this that can
not come», are
not to be rejected out of hand as
meaningless.
No Jeremy answer Ben's question and don't avoid it with this
meaningless statement!!!
This perspective is primarily concerned to eliminate nonsensical
statements, or at least to distinguish between nonsense (non-verifiable) and sense (verifiable) Under the pressure of this demand by logical positivists, those who speak and write in the field of religion have
not only felt called upon to clear up the fuzzy and
meaningless jargon that often characterizes their field, but many have relinquished all terms that refer to the non-verifiable.
A negation sign in front of a
meaningless string of symbols does
not convert the whole into a meaningful
statement.
If you didn't have the idea of god, my
statement would be
meaningless.
And if
not, the
statement is politically
meaningless.
«Do you think it's
meaningless that you signed a sworn
statement that you wouldn't do what you've done?
Your broad
statements with zero basis other than «I can't see...» and other such
meaningless phrases do
not equal analysis.
RC is
not a Lion's den but rather a reality check place, you will
not get away with blank
meaningless statements here.
Not to mentionIf you cared one bit about the veracity of your
statements you would know that statistically speaking, the examples you use are
meaningless.
Meteorologist Art Horn: «To say the 2010 was tied with the warmest year on record is essentially
meaningless when viewed in a true historical context»: «The reason they do
not give this record its true historical context is because their
statement is really political»
Don't just make
meaningless statements (a la KR) about how «I'm mixing up exchange and sink rates» — show me where the damn math is wrong.
And when we say accomplishments we mean real ones,
not just vague
statements which are
meaningless for hiring managers (i.e. quote one of your colleagues saying something good about you or say that you helped the company achieve its goals).
Statements like «proven leader» or «hard worker» are both subjective and
not provable, which renders them
meaningless.
Do
not make
meaningless statements that are clichéd and
not substantiated such as «hard working».