«Thou shalt
not model the atmosphere as a static body or mathematical layer»
Do
not model the atmosphere as a single body or layer 3.
A. Do not model the «earth» as a combined land / ocean / gas «thingy» (experiments 1 to 5) B. Do
not model the atmosphere as a single body or layer (See experiment 4 & 5) C. Do not model the sun as a 1/4 power constant source without diurnal cycle (See experiment 5) D. Do not model conductive flux to and from the surface and atmosphere based on surface Tav (See experiment 5) E. Do not model a static atmosphere without moving gases (See experiment 4 & 5) F. Do not model a moving atmosphere without Gravity (See experiment 4 & 5) G. Do not model the surface as a combined land / ocean «thingy» (See experiment 1)
Not exact matches
Scholasticism Theology moved from the monastery to the university Western theology is an intellectual discipline rather than a mystical pursuit Western theology is over-systematized Western Theology is systematized, based on a legal
model rather than a philosophical
model Western theologians debate like lawyers,
not like rabbis Reformation Catholic reformers were excommunicated and formed Protestant churches Western churches become guarantors of theological schools of thought Western church membership is often contingent on fine points of doctrine Some western Christians believe that definite beliefs are incompatible with tolerance The
atmosphere arose in which anyone could start a church The legal
model for western theology intensifies despite the rediscovery of the East
Not a real one, of course, but rather a virtual voyager, a computer
model that plumbs the otherwise - inaccessible depths of Earth's anoxic past (or an alien planet's present), exploring the possible chemistry of gases in the
atmosphere and ocean that could have occurred there.
The study also suggests that the standard Community
Atmosphere Model version 4 has difficulty simulating the MJO because it produces sufficient upper level heating but
not enough lower level heating.
Cronin says current climate
models don't account for these sharp gradients, which could churn the
atmosphere above.
Their finding that the lunar rocks are enriched in the heavier potassium isotope does
not favor the silicate
atmosphere model, which predicts lunar rocks will contain less of the heavier isotope than terrestrial rocks, the opposite of what the scientists found.
«This is true for both types of
models — those driven with observed sea surface temperatures, and the coupled climate
models that simulate evolution of both the
atmosphere and ocean and are thus
not expected to yield the real - world evolution of the PDO.
The team also wanted to know whether the conditions on land interacted with the
atmosphere to affect climate, because most of the current climate
models don't simulate the Green Sahara period well, she said.
«Using
atmosphere and ocean grids that have the same shape is in a sense an obvious thing to do, but it is
not being done in all
models,» Randall explains.
Despite large temperature increases in Alaska in recent decades, a new analysis of NASA airborne data finds that methane is
not being released from Alaskan soils into the
atmosphere at unusually high rates, as recent
modeling and experimental studies have suggested.
The widely accepted
model for evolution of the
atmosphere states that O2 levels did
not appreciably rise until about 2.4 billion years ago.
Likewise, while
models can
not represent the climate system perfectly (thus the uncertainly in how much the Earth will warm for a given amount of emissions), climate simulations are checked and re-checked against real - world observations and are an established tool in understanding the
atmosphere.
Now astronomer Travis Barman of the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Ariz., says he found the missing water by analyzing light that shined through the
atmosphere of one of those planets, called HD 209458 b. «It's
not really that surprising,» Barman says, because
models of such planets»
atmospheres predict that water should be mixed in.
The analysis showed that changes in cloud cover can serve as a proxy in climate
models for wind velocity in the
atmosphere, which can
not be directly measured.
But the
models also suggest that the scheme could go too far: Adding excess sulfur could increase ice in Antarctica, «overcompensating» for warming, says Rasch, which could affect ecosystems and the global ocean -
atmosphere system in a myriad of ways that scientists haven't studied.
The problem was that theoretical
models and analyses of ancient rocks eventually convinced scientists that Earth's earliest
atmosphere was
not rich in hydrogen.
By
not accounting for these differences,
models have likely over-estimated the amount of water lost to the
atmosphere in some regions.
These are very important observations,» says Jonathan Fortney of NASA Ames Research Center, who has
modeled extrasolar
atmospheres but was
not involved in any of the new reports.
«Perhaps as the surface warms the
atmosphere has a capacity to release warmth to space in a way the climate
models don't take into account.»
But climate modelers can't add enough carbon dioxide (a planet - warming greenhouse gas) to their Mars
atmosphere models to get the temperature high enough to keep water from freezing.
In an interesting twist in this finding is that our radiative transfer
modeling revealed that the particles in L - dwarfs have to be so high up in the
atmosphere that they can
not be part of a simple single cloud, which base is set by the condensation of silicates.
Christy, McNider, 38.5 years, volcanoes, ENSO,
models,
atmosphere, response, Daily News, party line, Tans, NOAA, surface data, Homewood, AMS, Menne,
not covered, Michaels, Maue, JRA - 55, Darwall, modelers, BioScience, polar bear, icon, 1.3 trillion barrels
For this study, the researchers could only make computer
models of the
atmosphere as we don't currently have telescopes that are powerful enough to actually «see» the chemicals it contains, but when the next - generation Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) eventually goes online, we'll be able to scan exoplanets»
atmospheres to see what they're really made of.
Then, they run the same
models again, this time simulating an imaginary world where humans haven't released the greenhouse gases that drive climate change into the
atmosphere.
Those were
not intended to be exclusive or exhaustive examples, hence the «e.g.» I know we both know what an energy - balance
atmosphere model is.
Computer
models of the
atmosphere's behavior are important to capture those other potential drivers: «There isn't just one factor at work, but many.»
The simple energy balance
model of the
atmosphere does
not include a term for the fourth power of temperature.
Although it is well established that the Sun's magnetic field is responsible for the supply of energy to the
atmosphere, exactly how this magnetic energy is converted into thermal energy is still
not understood in detail, as
models struggle to simultaneously encompass the very disparate temporal and spatial scales on which the heating has to occur, in different structures, with a wide variety of characteristics (e.g. open versus closed structures, short quiet - sun loops versus hot active - region loops and large - scale interconnecting loops).
The computer
models in use are
not, by necessity, direct calculations of all basic physics but rely upon empirical approximations for many of the smaller scale processes of the oceans and
atmosphere.
A
model without any dynamics in the
atmosphere doesn't even have the right information in it to even have a chance of doing cloud feedbacks correctly.
«Also, if the
atmosphere isn't accumulating heat at the rate forecast by the
models, then the theoretical positive climate feedbacks which were expected to amplify the CO2 effect won't be as large,» McNider said.
First and foremost, these
models assume Proxima b has an
atmosphere, which might
not be the case at all.
Hale says that their
model of Charon / Pluto interaction is valuable because it helps us look back in time at the chemicals present when our Solar System was formed, as Pluto hasn't had its
atmosphere blasted away by either the extreme heat of the Sun or its solar wind.
The independent
model, on the other hand, offers something else that a chain restaurant
model does
not — a unique
atmosphere, which often allows the restaurant to charge higher prices than competitors in its class.
Don't get me wrong, the game looked great with an incredible
atmosphere and detailed environments, but the in - game character
models weren't anything super special and in stark contrast to the Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within-esque
models shown during loading screens.
Hawkinson's works confront
not only the palpable, corporeal aspects of human nature; he has also created pieces which explore the metaphysical facets of human consciousness and the yearning to rationalize and map the intangible forces governing the universe: Ruffle (2009), a 44» x 44» x 44» hanging sculpture made of aluminum mesh, aluminum tape, and bondo, and Track (2009), a 92» x 60» x 24» allusion to Edward N. Lorenz's visualizations of deterministic chaos based on a mathematical
model of the
atmosphere constructed out of a aluminum tape, neoprene, pvc, and wire will also be on view.
The reason for this disparity in figures is that previous
models did
not take into account the gradual reduction in the ocean's ability to absorb heat from the
atmosphere, particularly at the poles.
If your aim is to to prove that current GHG
modeling of the
atmosphere is sound, that's
not near good enough.
Proposed explanations for the discrepancy include ocean —
atmosphere coupling that is too weak in
models, insufficient energy cascades from smaller to larger spatial and temporal scales, or that global climate
models do
not consider slow climate feedbacks related to the carbon cycle or interactions between ice sheets and climate.
If you are
modelling the GHE using a single grey body absorber that is
not wavelength dependent, then you have warming throughout the whole
atmosphere.
This term often requires additional qualification (e.g., as to whether or
not the
atmosphere is fully coupled to an ocean — see «Atmosphere - Ocean General Circulation Mode
atmosphere is fully coupled to an ocean — see «
Atmosphere - Ocean General Circulation Mode
Atmosphere - Ocean General Circulation
Model»).
I'm an astrophysicist, but I wouldn't pretend to understand how to
model the
atmosphere without some serious technical reading that goes waaay beyond his book.
He took the industry line, that delay was smarter than prompt action, and that physicists»
models of change in the upper
atmosphere weren't enough reason to be concerned about ozone loss — that there wasn't proof yet that it would cause harm at ground level to humans, so wait, delay.
Wouldn't it be a pretty good first approximation to
model a one square meter of earth and the
atmosphere above it with average albedo, average solar input, average cloud cover, etc?
... as long as weather satellites show that the
atmosphere is
not warming, I can
not put much faith into theoretical computer
models that claim to represent the
atmosphere but contradict what the
atmosphere tells us.
The work is an estimate of the global average based on a single - column, time - average
model of the
atmosphere and surface (with some approximations — e.g. the surface is
not truly a perfect blackbody in the LW (long - wave) portion of the spectrum (the wavelengths dominated by terrestrial / atmospheric emission, as opposed to SW radiation, dominated by solar radiation), but it can give you a pretty good idea of things (fig 1 shows a spectrum of radiation to space); there is also some comparison to actual measurements.
I'll be happy for someone to clarify this but don't the
models run through a succession of time cycles for a number of defined «columns» of the
atmosphere — so isn't there a chance that a small initial error could accumulate.
When faced with durable uncertainty on many fronts — in the
modeling of the
atmosphere, in data delineating past climate changes, and more — pushing ever harder to boost clarity may be scientifically important but is
not likely to be very relevant outside a small circle of theorists.