Sentences with phrase «not more danger»

Not exact matches

A serial entrepreneur — she owns four restaurants and has founded two companies in addition to Thinx — Agrawal says that the danger of male investors asking the women in their lives for advice is that, more often than not, those women are not their target customers.

To make employees more comfortable about being monitored, make sure that your attention doesn't pose any danger to their autonomy — and make them aware of this.

The real danger in the current negotiations, isn't so much that they might not be finalized until shortly after Oct. 17 — the Treasury would be able to pay creditors and all its bills until Oct. 22 — but that they will lead to more abrupt spending reductions.

As long as you keep your mind sharp, Fernandez doesn't see danger in relying more on Google for hard facts.

Though you may need more guidelines and procedures as your company grows, you don't want to stymie creativity or lose your appeal to top talent, which are real dangers of overly corporate cultures.

European Climate Commissioner Miguel Arias Canete told reporters in Brussels he deeply regretted the U.S. pullout from the pact to fight the dangers of global warming, which was signed by more than 190 countries, and said it could not be renegotiated as Trump has suggested [B5N1G8011].

He should be asked to make the case for its existence — not only why targeted advertising is more beneficial than traditional advertising, but why he thinks the associated dangers are worth the risk.

The governor urged more people to flee, but Houston officials recommended no widespread evacuations, citing greater danger in having people on roads that could flood and the fact that the hurricane was not taking direct aim at the city.

If you wanted to be a contrarian — and you ran a TV network that didn't have sports — you could argue that ESPN was in more danger than it looked, because most people didn't really want to pay for it — they just had to pay for it.

I wouldn't say like others, but much more than the others exactly because of the danger given that millions of people live in the volcano.»

Quite a few are going the way of Greece, quite a few more are in danger of doing so and quite a few of those that so far aren't are scrambling to avoid it by cutting back on social spending before there is a default crisis.

Those dangers can be overcome only by the realization that in speaking of more abundant life, Jesus is not proposing to free us by making us richer; he is proposing to set life free from precisely that sort of error.

Wives feel more treasured and revered by their husbands, who would not subject them to the dangers of contraceptives.

The danger of believing that there is something more after death, an after - life for the soul is that you will put off being the best that you can be now in hopes of avoiding expending some effort and sliding in under the wire to a Heaven which no one can prove exists or does not exist.

On the other hand such personalism iuris divini, which despite its importance can not here be proved theologically, is a principle of resistance against the well - known dangers and shortcomings of democracy in large societies where self - government by the people, for example, by plebiscite is no longer possible and the representation which takes its place be - comes more and moe autonomous.

But isn't it more likely that he or she is trying to teach students about the dangers of propaganda and the horrors of the Holocaust?

The idea here is exactly what Paul says in Romans 8:31 - 39: God's power does not remove us from persecution, danger, difficulty, sickness and death, but makes us more than conquerors in and through all such things.

In a global conversation about danger, fear and Syrian refugees, we're seeing a resurgence of the countercultural practice of loving people we don't think are like us — and in extending Gospel - saturated love to them, we realize we are far more similar in our human needs.

Would you not call that more of a present danger to this country when the odds one is likely to suffer at the hands of a «terrorist» will be at the next «staged» terrorist plot conveniently foiled by the FBI or Obama's gardner, or face american terrorism at the hands of a barely educated, double - digit vocabulary TSA thug?

Think you are wisely right to have your concerns but let me Guide you to ask which branches of Islam handles each mosque you know of and find out more about their mentality and they call for since not all branches of Islam are of danger, but you mentioned some thing which make me feel that there is a possibility that you got the most redial branch of all Islam branches... This branch is taking advantage of the presence of non harming Muslims to expand it's redical teachings by offerings or force turning Islamic communities from normal to most redical of all... do not favor to give the name of that branch but sure you will find it if you look for it...

The fact that the idiom has had a much longer and more varied history should make it possible for it to be rescued from bondage to a narrow usage which not only turns out to be unwarranted, but which is in actual danger of obscuring, even obliterating, an important value of the idiom.

While an extended republic was not absolutely immune to the dangers of factionalism, it was more likely to secure the permanent and aggregate interests of the community than any alternative system.

It's a danger to young people not to know what they believe and why they believe it, because they are much more sensitive to the accusation of hypocrisy that «you are in a Church, and you don't understand what it believes».

Not that we may thereby swamp the thing in the wholesale condemnation which we pass on its inferior congeners, but rather that we may by contrast ascertain the more precisely in what its merits consist, by learning at the same time to what particular dangers of corruption it may also be exposed.

If this were done, then the inevitable danger which every dogmatician must, confront [and here lies the dignity and greatness of his task] would be more clearly recognized: namely, the danger that he may not remain upon an extension of the biblical line, but rather interpret the biblical texts primarily ex post facto, from the point of view of his «going beyond the New Testament.

Thus have the neoconservative Jews sought — so far, to put it mildly, with mixed success — to convince their mainstream fellow Jews that the growing political strength of Christian believers is not a danger to them, that, on the contrary, in the long run it will conduce far more to the security and well - being of their children and grandchildren.

This finding does not imply that the theology or conviction of the leader or congregation is of no consequence; «rather, it is to say that the conviction, enthusiasm, warmth and competence with which the Christian faith and life are shared communicate more effectively» One of the report's conclusions is that, the dangers of «clericalism» notwithstanding, it is absolutely necessary to upgrade the quality of professional leadership if the churches are to grow and if the expectations of the laity are to be met.

If these «Christians» actually read the bible itself, they would realize that the last thing that Christ himself (who was not some kind of a testosterone hoped up person) would have done was to have placed young people (who he actually called the essence of heaven itself) in more danger than was absolutely necessary.

Or of the reality that with new life comes swollen breasts, dry heaves, dirty diapers, snotty noses, late - night arguments, and a whole army of new dangers and fears she never even considered before because life - giving isn't nearly as glamorous as it sounds, but it's a thousand times more beautiful.

Whichever is right» whether marriage is or is not a purely private matter in which the state has no abiding interest» the deeper and more immediate danger of the marriage issue for Christians is its potential use by gay activists to undermine the autonomy of the Church and other religious entities.

The more thoroughly this good is extirpated, the greater the danger that it will not be renewed, whereas Marxist theory may encourage zealots, as in Campuchea, to suppose that the more fully they destroy the society they encounter the sooner the perfected society can be built.

The more immediate danger is that many needy people will go unserved if we assume that most congregations are doing or could do something that they can not.

However... «My life is in danger, and the baby isn't going to survive either»... Then that may be a better more acceptable reason.

Those who are beginning to hold a more open position on the consumption of alcohol should be careful that in their quickness to embrace freedom and liberty, they are not ignoring dangers and even blind to how this can hurt the opportunity to reach our neighbors.

In other words, Lutherans and Anglicans are more accustomed to dealing with the dangers of alcohol addiction, while some evangelicals are not.

More than sixty years ago, some «not too many) were aware of the danger of radical feminism.

That middle ground may demand more from us and could potentially place us in more danger, but it also has the potential to not only neutralize the violent person (s), but in the best of circumstances can bring about positive changes in their life (lives) while it is eliminating their danger to others.

One would think that Hain would be more concerned about the dangers of gluten (and celiac disease) and not sell products that are made with anything that ever contained gluten.

Any more than that and it sends that danger signal, especially as women, saying that, «Not everything is safe, we should stop producing certain hormones,» and it can get all crazy on us.

Wilshere should have been brought in to create and add danger, speed to our game, Walcot some more and Giroud if needed... Ozil being supposed to sit apparently... So, it is no referee, but a team as reflecting manager... If owners and Wenger himself do not get a huge container of coffee, we will finish 12 and he will be doing the walk of shame, leave himself remembered as a loser... What they need to do NOW is bring Henry to assist him and do the job, boost, get players focused with winning spirit he has in him... Then wenger can sit all season long, bench himself as he does and watch henry do the running and screaming as other manager dio... Then we will be in top 3, meaning third; there's now way to ctach up the Manchesters and if we do nt wake up now, we will fight for fourth place; the spurs will distance us and fight for second or third.

And it happens in more games than it doesn't, with varying degrees of sloppiness / danger.

In fact I think there can be more a danger of overconfidence or complacency and we can not afford to let that happen again.

This is to say I'd probably enjoy more of the plot if it didn't involve mostly white children getting out of danger they caused by being mostly white children.

Good defensively but when Campbell has a bad game he can rarely find the right pass and just runs into danger and out of play, Walcott could still nick a goal on a bad day but he completely goes missing more often than not on those days.

Maybe if Arsenal had a manager and fans who saw challenging for the title as a priority and showed more ambition than winning the Fourth Place Cup, you might not be in danger of slipping into midtable mediocrity.

SEE MORE Arsenal forward is England danger - man claims Giorgio Chiellini Roy Hodgson bursts Wayne Rooney's bubble by saying he's «not close» to England legend The next Wayne Rooney: Five players who could break England's all - time scoring record

It is not just the danger of losing players that Arsene Wenger has warned off either, but the chance that these big wages in China will make the players staying want more.

What some of us are saying, is that by doing so much and not delegating to others he has dropped the ball very badly on occasion's, and that those occasions have become more and more often until now when they have put the progress of the team in danger.

Both are in danger of playing for new teams in 2018, but if the Packers have to choose just one, Cobb is younger, was more productive last season, and hasn't suffered a major knee injury.

He said something like «I don't feel pressure to win the title because staying in the champions league when the club was in financial danger was more pressured than winning the title».