Sentences with phrase «not moved on this issue»

The supermarket's responses to Tearfund's campaign have been published online, with the stores making the firmest commitments rated green, those in the middle getting amber and those who did not move on the issue rated red.

Why haven't they moved on this issue sooner?

The USA has long not moved on this issue and today's session was no different.

Not exact matches

Although it is against the law for travelers to occupy land which has not been designated for this purpose, it is not a criminal offense to occupy private or council - owned land so responsibility lies with the landowner and the police are not usually involved.Most of the time, the issue can be resolved by speaking to the travelers and agreeing a date by which they will move on.

Labour MSP Monica Lennon, who has been a vocal campaigner on the issue of «period poverty», said the move was welcome but did not go far enough.

Finally, don't put this issue down without reading «Making It Work,» Jeff Chu's moving profile of five businesses leading the fight against a quiet social crisis — the growing number of people on the autism spectrum who come of working age every year.

But environmentalists released their own poll this week suggesting most Americans don't really have a strong opinion on the issue, and would rather see Congress move on to other things.

While Reddit's move is controversial — skeptics point out that salaries may be based on an applicant's previous pay, which may or may not have been fair — it's nonetheless a concerted effort to lessen the disparity, and one that seems to be raising awareness for the issue at large.

Health and obesity issues weren't on their agendas,» said Sam Kass, a chef and former executive director of «Let's Move!»

If our device could be moved close to where it is needed, but still on the energy producer's side of that equation, yet just outside the meter, then the energy producers could have millions of these small devices that they own and operate, because grandma doesn't want to become her own utility company because she has a solar panel, but if the utility companies and energy providers could compete with each other to have small units that are so close to the loads, they still get the full advantage of being a supplier of energy, except with just millions of little plants, they can avoid needing transmission lines, distribution lines, substations, et cetera, that everybody is talking about being expensive, unreliable, and subject to issues.

«I think that before Oct. 1, before chargebacks became an issue, the value proposition wasn't clear on making a move to EMV and that muddied the waters even further,» Carcillo explained.

Global equity markets went on a rollercoaster ride in October, although given the cauldron of global issues that were brewing for some time and the month's history of big moves, it shouldn't be all that shocking many investors got spooked.

That way, if the inspector uncovers serious issues you are not comfortable taking on, you can back out and move on to the next suitable property.

Disagreements, as he moved out of my zone of comfort on some issues, did not diminish our friendship or his kindness.

But now those are already there at yours maybe if you prepare them right as to education and training for finally deputing them to return to their own countries with the needful backup and authority they will be useful tools for the advancement and prosperity of their nations then you will have no one wanting to immigrate leaving behind their own families and friends... in addition to that you will see those who immigrated towards your country start moving back to their own countries and this is the only solution to resolve the issue of illegal immigration and to find peace... otherwise if things go on as it is today surely slowly slowly you will find that your own countries become inherited by piling up immigrants who might get starved due negligence turn on against the Host country... that has contributed in the destructions of their countries but not towards and advancements or developments of their countries and nations to find peace and make a living..!?

Can't we just move on with this issue.

Why not form an opinion totally based on how you «feel» or your «emotions» and justify your argument on why you feel that way, rather than saying «for the bible tells me so»... That's why we can't move forward on issues in this country; people feel they can't express themselves without the safety of a group's opinion... Let's listen to ourselves for once instead of having your daddy's politics and religion handed down to you like a family asset.

I don't like labels, and I'm not defined on all the issues, but overall I've moved more towards the evangelical end of the spectrum.

What he does and says while he is here will not move the needle even one degree on the struggles over the death penalty, abortion and Planned Parenthood funding, the marriage and religious freedom issues, immigration policy, the international arms trade, or economic policy and social welfare programs.

My last point and Im out... Throughout our great nations history... we always found a way to fight through national issues and come up with solutions... Giving the problems we have now to people in the 50's and 60's... and they may actually come up with a solution... if you earnestly care about making a change... start at the lowest levels of government... go do something... find out costs... expenses... how to get more health care to people... do things like that... quit waiting on the government to provide all the answers... its not the way this country was founded... and not the way we get through problems... If you or ur family does nt have insurance... get a job that can provide you that... instead of hoping the government will do so... If you or ur family lacks access to education... move to an area that excels at it... education is invaluable... Do something about your problem... and quit waiting for the next big lotto...

If they would focus as much on the country and what is going on now maybe we could move forward and get our country back on track, but all of this blame game and other utterly nonsense that they engage in is not helping it is only tearing the country and people further apart stick to the real issues and stop with the popularity of who can throw the most dirt.

Mr Sims told The Australian Financial Review he has not had any contact with Saputo since the ACCC released its statement of issues on Thursday, which highlighted Saputo owning two of the biggest players in the region if the deal were to move ahead under the current structure.

Werner won't solve that issue, and with United, Chelsea and Liverpool for company in their reported pursuit, it's going to be difficult to convince him over a move to the Emirates if they miss out on a top - four finish too.

On my part the BFG did a decent job for a number of years and there is no doubting his love for Arsenal.He obviously has a mental issue and that is unfortunate.However that will not hide the fact that he will always be respected at our club and when he moves into the coaching role next season I truly hope he is able to provide the Coaching Guidance and Advice to our defenders that Steve Bould has proved totally incapable of doing.

However, it seems Wenger's main issue is that for some he has not moved on to another club.

Sterling is believed to be keen on moving to London, where he started his career with Queens Park Rangers, but the issue is whether or not the Gunners can afford him, and whether or not they even need another attacking midfielder or winger.

It remains to be seen whether or not he moves on next year though, as ultimately his poor form on the pitch isn't helping matters, and so perhaps if he can rediscover his goalscoring touch on a consistent basis again, then these issues will go away.

It is easy to understand Sherwood's stance on the issue, while he will be reluctant to let his star striker move to another club, he is well aware of the fact that Benteke really should be playing for a bigger team and should a big - money offer come in, the former Spurs boss will certainly not stand in the way of the deal, so I believe that Arsenal can get him if Wenger is indeed interested.

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

SEE ALSO: Klopp on Guardiola: Liverpool boss issues stern warning to new Man City manager - in - waiting Manchester United DID NOT make move for Pep Guardiola Manchester City star facing shock axe after Pep Guardiola arrival

(1) this squad has way too many moving parts and very few of our players are good enough at their preferred position let alone relying on them in whatever position Wenger and his magic eight ball decide in the tunnel prior to the game... when teams do this it generally signals issues within the club, much like Jose last year and Van Gael before him... no one gets settled, the chemistry is almost non-existent and if provides a built - in excuse when the team comes up short... these issues fall squarely on Wenger, both for his decisions regarding players coming in and for his inability to rid the team of those players who aren't cutting it... in actually fact we have only 6 real starters on this current squad and that's being generous (Sanchez, Ozil, Lacazette, Sead, Kos & Cazorla)... which is discouraging because Cazorla is injured and might never play again, Sanchez is wanting out and the club is lying to us about his injury status, Lacazette receives no service, Ozil is relatively disinterested out there, Kos is getting up there and Sead is just trying to settle in... there isn't a single other player that would start regularly on any of the other top 3 teams, which should be the standard... imagine this team moving forward if Wenger only sells before the window closes

That is the reason players will move from Arsenal, because payment is not issued on merit.

Whilst not an obviously world class name, United's issue so far this summer has been focusing on reputation rather than how a player fits into the team — but reports that they are interested in a January move for Everton midfielder James McCarthy would indicate that the trend is set to be bucked.

decent but just not enough creativity in the middle of the park... elneny passes the ball backwards more than ramsey... xhaka does not move ball on quickly enough... iwobi fine but ox and bellerin looked very poor so still the same issue... quality midfield ballplayer and attacking options still needed

I think a major issue with moving the «surplus» players is that they are on big money with Arsenal, and the teams they are trying to sell them to don't want to, and will not pay them the money they are making with Arsenal.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The problem with Wenger is that he has not the killer instinct like coachs as ferguson or mourinho, they have this winning mentality who make them able to do anything in order to win, even cheating, wenger is just a tryer, he does not give it all in the fight.The team was obviously missing 2 centers backs and one strong DM, he did not address the problem, the striker issue was addressed only by luck, if Man U did not get falcao for any reason, there was no back up plan for any other striker, remember he was in Roma.I believe his age has something to do with that as he shows the stubborness of senile people.I don t see Arsenal as a force until he moves on somewhere else.the board too is responsible for not kwowing football and trusting him blindly even when he clearly fail his duties.

The most interesting line that the Daily Mail pick up on though, is that he will not consider moving back to Spain, and should Liverpool fail to keep up their impressive recent form, two of their fiercest rivals have goalkeeper issues that need resolving.

Arsene wenger does not like confrontation in the dressing room and players, such as Van Persie, who raise issues regarding Arsenal's ambition are moved on.

Like someone said, we've simply moved on from the WOB and the AKB arguments, its massively glaring there is trouble, the players are playing as if they don't care, anyone who doesn't think the issue is our inept way of running a club or our once great manager should just listen to what Peter cech had to say after that disaster.

After the club were hit by a surprise draw with Panathinaikos, AVB moved to defend his players and insisted that complacency wasn't the issue and plenty of praise has to be lavished on their opponents.

The Real Madrid forward has told friends and team - mates that he has his heart set on a move to Old Trafford, and his personal terms will not be an issue for The Red Devils.

Hazard also didn't have much issue getting on the ball — he often moved far away from his nominal position in the left inside channel before checking his run and sprinting back into it, with McTominay essentially forced into being reactive rather than proactive in his defending due to his man - marking job.

I would of course check all of the things listed on these posts: Naps: Troubleshooting: http://babywisemom.blogspot.com/2007/12/naps-troubleshooting.html Nighttime Sleep Issues: http://babywisemom.blogspot.com/2008/01/nightime-sleep-issues.html I don't think I would work on the four hour until the night is consistently slept through and the 4 hour schedule requirements are ment (though some moms do move sooner).

While this makes it heavier that many seats at 26 lbs, you can be sure you have one solid seat, and the weight really isn't an issue if you don't plan on moving the seat once it's installed.

Because there was forgiveness — yep, that matters if you ever want to move on — and because we co-parented well with 50 - 50 physical custody, it hasn't been an issue as far as I know.

In the social media world, where things move faster than a politician changing his stand on issues, people are more ready to use you as a step stool to the next level so that makes it a bit difficult to know who to trust and who not to.

And one more quick note about all that before moving on, because that was a whole lot of all that and I can't quite open the door on all of that without addresses the very real issue of cost.

If not, you can move on to other solutions, but at least you will know for sure it isn't a hunger issue.

He starts with an explanation of what giftedness is — and is not, then moves on to discuss inclusion and other school issues affecting gifted children, perfectionism, and underachievement.