Not much character development outside of the main party, underutilized villain, technical hiccups, repetitive side quests, and a boring first act
A lot happens, but there's
not much character development.
Story is too large and cumbersome,
not much character development and not much pay off either.
I set my expectations pretty low: a lot of gross - out jokes,
not much character development, and the occasional line that made me laugh, but also made me feel bad for laughing.
Abby Olcese: I set my expectations pretty low: a lot of gross - out jokes,
not much character development, and the occasional line that made me laugh, but also made me feel bad for laughing.
I agree that there isn't much character development (the filmmakers are assuming that most viewers have some kind of emotional connection to them already) but considering the sheer size of the cast, they fact they they squeezed in any at all was impressive to me.
There really isn't much character to the characters.
There really isn't much character development, which disappoints me.
Given that the focus is on adventuring the stories never get too in - depth; with the mass of characters there isn't much character development.
Not exact matches
However, Markle won't share her real name with her
character on «Suits» for
much longer.
In fact, Canadian Tire didn't even consider eliminating the
much - loved paper currency with the mustachioed Scrooge - like
character, first introduced in 1958.
The fact is, creating virtual havoc is just so
much damn fun and a game where the
character follows the rules to the letter of the law just wouldn't be all that enjoyable.
We won't spoil
much about the
character if you haven't seen the film, but the droid, masterfully played by Marvel veteran Paul Bettany, steals just about every scene in which he appears.
When you're watching «The Incredibles,» it always feels like there's so
much more to discover about the story and the history of the
characters, which isn't always the case in Pixar movies.
One hundred forty
characters doesn't allow you to communicate
much information, so use it to drive traffic to more content rich sites like blogs, reviews, your website, or articles.
These are impressive results in their own right; it's
not easy to lose that
much money 140
characters at a time.
Because he knows his base doesn't read
much, would never go through dozens of pages of a transcript, and can be made to believe anything in 140
characters or less.
In The Road Less Travelled, M Scott Peck explains how a lot of us flee from the pain of solving problems and end up either neurotic or with
character disorders (i.e. the neurotic assumes too
much responsability and the person with a
character disorder
not enough).
however it wasn; t perfect, there was quite a lot of filler in this 12 episode season which I could have done without,
characters which were really interesting and important in the last seasons are just
not as
much right now and can be quite annoying, breaking the flow of the emotionally heavy scenes in that very episode.
@TGM, I don't think OT barbarism has
much impact on my thoughts here; but since you mention it, I have to say that the
character of Jesus seems even more astounding given the religious and cultural backdrop.
But as a person who never thought Rush Limbaugh (in the 1990s) or Glenn Beck (in the 2000s) ever said
much that should have been taken seriously by anyone (but who has simultaneously seen these selfsame
characters taken seriously despite the obvious surface objections to them), Hunstman may
not be caught in the snares of his own hunt for the presidency yet.
giants — The term in Hebrew implies
not so
much the idea of great stature as of reckless ferocity, impious and daring
characters, who spread devastation and carnage far and wide.
It does
nt explain his origins, substance, or
much more, other than his
character, motive and goal, asside from moral laws, codes of conduct, right from wrong, and how to manage life, all while believing in him.
this is so
much more real and fits so
much better with the image of a kind and loving god... thumpers would have u believe that god is the angriest, most spiteful, micro controlling, bitter, nasty
character ever put out to this world... we must remember that the god thing is supposed to produce caring, inclusion, peace and love ~
not murder, hatred, exclusion and bullying..
The «immoral» city which is controlled by a satanic
character, won't allow its inhabitants to take drugs and is
much better organized.
Having been a Baptist for nearly twenty years and a Latter - day Saint for 35 years now, I can tell you his religion, if it is lived fully, will only make him a
much better person, and
not one you would have any problem trusting from a
character and moral point of view.
It isn't the religion so
much that should be in question but the person's
character.
It is
not necessary to say
much about culture in the sense of «polish» or good manners, except that this is an important asset to Christian
character and a dangerous substitute for it.
is simply too ingrained, too
much a part of what sin is all about, for us
not to feel vexed when reminders come of the opposite reality, which it is precisely the office of religion to provide: «Accordingly, it has always been the office of Religion to protest against the sophistry of Satan, and to preserve the memory of those truths which the unbelieving heart corrupts: both the freedom and the responsibility of man, the sovereignty of the Creator, the supremacy of the law of conscience as His representative within us, and the irrelevancy of external circumstances in the judgment which is ultimately to be made upon our conduct and
character.»
On the other hand, however, it must be said that Just because of its special
character spirituality must be left
much freedom to realize itself in an individual way which can
not be commanded and institutionalized.
Although we do
not know
much about their
character, God seemed to think that they represented everything that was good and worth saving about creation.
It does
not take
much guessing to know what people like Zacchaeus do to compensate for their low
character.
Russ — I don't think you'll find people arguing too
much about the few
character names we have, but more about other pieces of information that should be available to corroborate the supernatural aspects of the stories.
Brightman emphasizes the social
character of human persons, but
not as
much as does Hartshorne.
But
not so
much if it was involuntary — then it was just a
character flaw.
But the problem is frequently
much more difficult, as psychologists (Jung) and social philosophers (Nietzsche, Sorel, Pareto, Spengler) have shown that the analysis of the social conditioning of ideas and convictions, though in itself
not entitling to decisions as to their validity or invalidity, may contribute to the realization of the partial
character of views or intentions expressed in them.
This assumption is common among highly intelligent people, like Weinberg, who haven't thought
much about the history and
character of Christianity except as a sociological or psychological phenomenon.
@Magic - Just to be clear, in trying to show that the historical Jesus existed just as
much as a Socrates or other historical
character wasn't my attempt to show he was divine.
The Bible is full of fairy tales and should only be taken as a piece of literature of great importance just as the Odyssey is, but it shouldn't be used to govern one's life,
much less to help build a relationship with the biggest fictional and ever - changing
character in human history.
There are plenty of new names — like Gwendoline Christie's Captain Phasma and Lupita Nyong» o's Maz Kanata — who don't get fleshed out as
much, but half the fun of Star Wars has always been the deeply detailed narratives such side
characters acquire over time.
I can't add
much to this flood of advice except to submit, with humility, that in my view we don't have
much choice about our fundamental emotional attitude; it is a matter of personal
character (body chemistry and the close culture of family and schooling), but this need
not affect our choice of creed and code if we have independence of mind.
Just what is the exact relationship between the determined and self - determining dimensions is never made clear: «it is
not possible to establish abstract criteria that can accurately indicate how
much our
character is determined and how
much we determine ourselves» (VV 62).
No one as
much as Kant has had a sense for the transcendent
character of this connection, and this against the whole of Greek philosophy to which he is directly opposed, rejecting Epicurean and Stoic equally: happiness is
not our accomplishment: it is achieved by superaddition, by surplus.
Those who are wise in their own minds (whether they are «educated» or
not makes no difference) often depend upon their own wisdom; whereas those who are know they have
much to learn (that is, they are «babes») are willing to accept what Jesus reveals to them about the
character and nature of God.
If all parents were like this (and
not the
character in the cartoon) we would all be in a
much better place.
This episode is huge
character development,
not so
much with the major - story - arc - connections (at least as far as we know) so there is
much to discuss.
In 1967 I saw such work as concerned with case studies» (later I realized I was dealing with religious autobiographies),
not in order to draw conclusions but to understand how a person's destiny unfolds,
much as the destiny of
characters in our Western novels unfolds.
For the church was created around a person,
not a teaching; and historically the greatest value attaching to Jesus» words is that they indicate so
much as to his own
character.
Child molestation reveals that one is
not of good
character, and no one, even a worldly sinner, has
much respect for a child molester.
Your father -
character reads to me almost...
not so
much an atheist as a misotheist.