Sentences with phrase «not much context»

Report is also from B / R so prolly not much context to it but definitely interesting

«The difference between Yelp and Google Places is that consumers tend not to trust the reviews on Google — it tends to be more anonymous and there isn't much context there.

They are careful to distance themselves from a full return to the pragmatic and functional approach by stating that a full contextual standard of review analysis need not be conducted in every single case, however there isn't much context left unturned in their analysis here regarding this question and this decision maker, and for the most part Justices Côté and Brown only pay lip service to the Dunsmuir approach.

Not exact matches

In the culture of commerce, behaviour that would be inexcusable in pretty much any other context is not only tolerated, but rewarded.

Without this context, choosing one color over another doesn't make much sense, and there is very little evidence to support that «orange» will universally make people purchase a product more often than «silver».

If there isn't any data viz, or if a bunch of pictures are missing context, then you are doing too much telling and not enough showing.»

... In my view, not so much, at least not for the individual in the context of teams.

You might witness an action and perceive it to be an injustice, but every situation has context and background, much of which you aren't privy to.

A random assortment of health information doesn't mean much if it doesn't meet at least two critical criteria, says oncologist and former Duke professor Amy Abernethy: quality and context.

In the grand scheme of things, eight seconds doesn't sound like much, especially in the context of a long documentary about a complex issue like gun control.

A much better strategy is to think about your brand name in the context of the real world, not among other startups or as a URL.

The calculation that matters, then, is not how much Google or Facebook are hurt in isolation, but how much they are hurt relatively to their competitors, and the obvious answer is «a lot less», which, in the context of that secular increase, means growth.

Dave Nadig, CEO of ETF.com and a well - known ETF expert, recently suggested as much, noting that «Duration hedging hasn't yet had its «hedge the yen» moment when investors discovered the power of currency hedging en masse, but like currency - hedged ETFs, duration - hedged ETFs may start finding a place not necessarily as core holdings, but as finely honed tools for tweaking duration exposure in a broader bond - portfolio context.»

«To put this potential into context, Indonesia's population is 252 million, not much smaller than the US and its 319 million people.»

Interestingly, in context of investment crowdfunding, it's likely you haven't heard much about Gust.

The seasonal adjustment factors for non-farm payroll employment vary between 1.0157 and 0.9920, which doesn't mean much until you put these numbers in context.

So much for Jefferson being an Episcopalian lol... in that context, I'm not even sure you could call him a deist!!

As is often the case when we have entered contexts foreign to us in the posture of humility and learning, we were moved not only by how much we share in common with «the other,» but how much we have to learn from them:

The picture of the Church that emerged was distorted by this apologetic context — too much emphasis was being given to points that were disputed (the authority of the pope, for example) and not enough given to other important points (such as the nature of the local churches).

That's an indoctrinated belief placed upon a natural human reaction, just as much as the Hindu idea that good deeds only make sense in the context of people trying to improve themselves through reincarnation, isn't it?

Actaully no their mytchical Christ did not say that «period» he said it within a much greater context, and part of that context is the musings he made while wearing his god the father hat.

If you are investing so much of your time on the Bible, I would suggest you read the Bible in its entirety, not pick and chooses passages out of context without relevance, that are suggested reading from sleazy websites.

There it wasn't so much about deconstructing theological concepts for reconstructing a theoretical utopia, but in working side - by - side as partners in social transformation enterprises that fit the context of the communities the Spirit planted us in.

There is, of course, much more to be said, but this is not the time or place to develop a full - fledged Biblical doctrine of God in the context of interfaith dialogue.

More to the point, the context speaks about confession of faith and love of one another — are these regulative statements or just as conveniently non-binding on you, someone who clearly does not take much joy in the fact that the bible * instituted * ecclesial offices?

Such bromides may be his idea of timeless «spiritual truths,» but I don't think this approach reveals much about Shakespeare, especially as his evidence consists solely of passages wrenched out of context, and therefore rendered quite meaningless.

If we remain mere amateurs in the actual Christian life, if we have not in some way accepted to obey a law within the context of Christian freedom and self - restraint, then we are no more than miserable bunglers even if we do not carry too much real ballast of historical piety.

Even when Packer walked away from the Diocese of New Westminster in 2002 at his bishop's behest (over disagreements relating to the blessing of same - sex unions), he did not attempt to embody an Anglican «ideal» in a free - church or nondenominational context (much to the disappointment of some of his Reformed friends).

There continues to be much to learn from Kierkegaard, a man who not only arrived at a radical and dialectical understanding of faith, but who did so in the context of the advent of a world that is totally profane.

2) name usage statistics do not guarantee the miraculous — but they certainly place an author in that immediate context (or at the very least, with direct access to someone who was from that immediate context), which is a MAJOR contingency that has been much debated in the question of authorship... which IS the topic you raised.

The fact that these principles have such great similarity to principles of obligation found in other religions and philosophies has led many theologians to believe that what is unique about Christian principles of obligation is not so much their context as the particular view of the world that follows from the metaphors and stories which surround them and which are found in the Christian drama.

I found that one could only relate within a particular context and that much of ordinary, everyday life — hopes and aspirations were not allowed to be expressed.

The timing and context, and even the wording of the revelation itself, indicate that the change has to do not with America so much as with the world.

Just so you're aware, I ascribe to Bible as dictating morality, as much as one can given that one needs to read it with context and not blindly follow everything to the letter of the law.

if morality truly «depends on context,» you should not be upset with anything anyone does... much less my comments against yours.

I would think that, in the context of Paul's time of orthodox Judaism, being called a «sinner» would be an ultimate insult, but being called a «sinner» today does not carry much weight.

Nevertheless, this relativization is not complete, thanks to the hard - core common sense notions and to scientifically and historically established facts (which do have considerable context - independence, even if not as much as earlier thought).

I had two significant dreams about a year or so ago and couldn't make too much sense of them but I recently remembered them and had a sense that God was speaking about my current context (I moved province in the meantime) through them.

The question is not so much the reconciling process itself, but whether we have sufficient concern to create the context in which they might be interested to enter upon reconciliation processes with us.

The context is that America did not, in Hegel's day, have much of a past.

If we would come to the Word of God with fresh eyes more often, we would realize that some of our most common interpretations of Scripture passed down to us don't make much sense when viewed within the context of the passage.

That was the case when various speakers mentioned «the Christian roots of Europe,» which in that context sounded too much like a plaintive cry: «Hey, don't ignore us.

This is grammatically possible, but does not make much sense in the context.

One knows that when people in churches today resort to the buzz - word «inclusivity,» they are intending something right and good — especially when it is heard, as it must be, over-against the militant «exclusivity» that characterizes, not only so much historical Christianity, but the Christianity of our own North American context.

All you are doing Spoc aka Bob is showing how much you don't know about reading comprehension 101 because when the scriptures are put into historical context, nowhere does it condemn the saved loving long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

This claim is frequently presented, whether implicitly or explicitly, as a correlative to the idea that Christianity often as personified by Jesus or less frequently by Paul - was «goad» for women, paid them particular attention, or at least offered them opportunities not otherwise available, to caricature, the ideal of «the Feminist Jesus».60 In an admirable and scholarly article Leonard Swidler has marshaled historical evidences to show convincingly that Jesus was a Feminist.61 The politics of such a view is self - evident, for much study of the subject has developed within a context where women were struggling to establish a proper role for themselves within the contemporary church; to this end they have sought an egalitarian past to act as model for present polity.62

As Edwards concludes, «In general, the messages sent were not always the messages received, and the historian who seeks to reconstruct the early Reformation message and its appeal must pay at least as much attention to the context of its readers (and hearers) as to the text that they read (or had presented to them).»

Its interest lies not so much in the content as in the identity of the author, Paul F. Morrisey, a Catholic priest, and the context.

So too, what it is to be a community of the disciples of Jesus will depend very much on the context and not who our neighbors are.

The context in which Paul discussed same - sex relations differs so much from our own that it can not reasonably be called the same issue.