Sentences with phrase «not nominal»

The complaint also alleges that the «payments were not in exchange for settlement services actually provided and were not nominal payments.

So we have to read the words carefully as MOST chart data are in REAL Prices, not NOMINAL Prices.

As usual, there are often many factors to for them to consider, from a number of different perspectives, when they attempt to decide whether or not a nominal spousal maintenance order is appropriate.

With all the talk of this bring a c & c spiritual successor I was expecting something more fleshed out, not a nominal plot for a multi-player focused experience.

[And yes, that's real, not nominal growth..!

«What should matter most for international investors are the real (net of the foreign country's inflation) currency returns and not nominal returns.»

It would raise the value of collateral over the value of the loans, dealing purchasing power losses to those that made the bad loans, but not nominal losses.

Gold is most correlated with real interest rates (in other words, the interest rate after inflation), not nominal rates or inflation.

It is likely to be at least in part a product of how we assess the performance of selective schools — forgetting that education is about individual improvement, not nominal benchmarks.

What's going to drive the dollar is real interest rates, not nominal interest rates.

Debt, in this case, must be rising faster than debt servicing capacity, in which case Beijing's true debt level is not the nominal debt level but rather the nominal debt level plus estimates of contingent liabilities likely to rise as a consequence of wasted investment.

Not exact matches

This may be a bit technical, but in essence, nominal GDP does not take into account inflation, and real GDP does.

However, the nominal GDP figures won't reflect the increase in prices.

«People tend to think about nominal units, not real dollars.»

Lower dollar amounts provide nominal affiliate revenue and higher priced items do not sell as readily — which might prompt an influencer to decline entering into an agreement.

The nomenclature is a tip off that transfer payments do not, except under special circumstances, result in a net increase in nominal aggregate spending in the economy.

Since nominal wages will have grown during this period, we need to account for the fact that a job paying $ 14.50 in 2008 would probably be above $ 15.00 by 2019, so would not be directly covered by the proposal.

By secular reflation, we mean at least a decade in which short - and long - term interest rates stay habitually below nominal GDP growth and high grade bonds are not really bonds any more: delivering trend returns that are close to zero or even negative.

The plan administrator has discretion, however, to establish written conditions and procedures for the transfer of awards to other persons or entities, provided that such transfers comply with applicable federal and state securities laws and are not made for value, other than nominal value or certain transfers to family members.

Of course, with debt in 2016 rising by roughly 40 — 45 percentage points of GDP while nominal GDP grew by less than 8 percent, it isn't easy to explain how the real value of assets in China grew by roughly 40 — 45 percentage points of GDP, nor why it is proving so difficult to rein in credit growth without a sharp slowdown in GDP growth.

In addition, they observe that investors may have had a benign outlook for inflation and may not have demanded much, if any, of an inflation risk premium to hold nominal securities.

This is clearly not good, because the nominal interest rate can not be adjusted in response to any shocks that hit the economy over the next 70 years.

This phenomenon means that, in nominal terms, wages tend not to adjust downward when economic conditions are poor.

In fact the growth differential must be among the most important factors in determining the relative «multiples», and it is nominal growth, not real, that matters.

In either case, for every share owned outside the program, either the existing shareholders or the chairman must give away, for free, a put option whose nominal amount is equal to the number of shares covered by the program divided by the number of shares not covered by the program.

Unfortunately, budget forecasts do not provide a breakdown of the various components of nominal GDP, such as wages and salaries, corporate profits, interest income, etc., so it is difficult to properly assess the impact of changes in the economic forecast to changes in the major components of budgetary revenues.

On the wage side, though there's always variance, most wage and compensation series have been stuck at around 2 % year - over-year growth (nominal) with some, but not much, evidence of acceleration in response to the tightening labor market.

Although the nominal value of cryptocurrencies is about $ 500 billion spread across the globe, [3] we don't believe cryptocurrencies are big enough to impact developed economies significantly.

Phaseouts that are not adjusted for inflation affect more taxpayers over time, as inflation raises nominal incomes and thus lifts more taxpayers above the phaseout thresholds.

And that's the point, really: that increased demand for the Canadian dollar affects other industries precisely because it makes the REAL price of Canadian goods higher relative to the same goods produced in other countries, not just nominal price.

The more appropriate measure of financial repression is not the deflator, whichever one we choose to use, but rather very roughly the gap between the nominal lending rate and the nominal GDP growth rate, the latter of which broadly represents the return on investment within the economy.

There are so many reasons why this is wrong (to list just the most obvious, poor countries have much lower debt thresholds than rich countries, Japanese debt can not possibly be dismissed as not being a problem, and because it is almost impossible to find an economist who understands the relationship between nominal interest rates and implicit amortization, Japanese government debt has probably only been manageable to date because GDP growth close to zero has permitted interest rates close to zero) and yet inane comparisons between China's debt burden and Japan's debt burden are made all the time.

In the event of demand shocks, there is not a large conflict between the real and nominal objectives; the monetary response is the same to meet both objectives, and the actions of all the inflation - targeting central banks would not be significantly different.

While there are some signs of recognition such as the Fed's reduction in its estimated neutral rate from 4.5 percent to 3.0 percent during the last 2 years, the IMF's explicit use of the term secular stagnation in its World Economic Outlook, ECB president Mario Draghi's call for global coordination and greater use of fiscal policy, and Japan's indicated interest in fiscal - monetary cooperation, policymakers still have not made sufficiently radical adjustments in their world view to reflect this new reality of a world where generating adequate nominal GDP growth is likely to be the primary macroeconomic policy challenge for the next decade.

If the situation deteriorates for a given issue, history has shown there is often a window of time when it is not particularly painful to switch out to a practically identical bond, with much better interest coverage, for nominal costs.

China's debt problems, in other words, can not be resolved administratively, by fixing the shadow banking system, by imposing discipline on borrowers, or indeed by eliminating financial repression (much of which, by the way, has already been squeezed out of the system by lower nominal GDP growth).

Over the long term the nominal return on a duration - managed bond portfolio (or bond index — the duration on those doesn't change very much) converges on the starting yield.

PBO did not present their forecast of the components of nominal GDP, although they have done so in the past.

In that same interview, he seems to be reaching to square these contradictions, by suggesting that the Fed's current model — targeting 2 % inflation, a Fed funds rate of ~ 3 %, and an unemployment rate of ~ 5 % — is not reliable and that they should maybe move to a different targeting regime, like price - level or nominal GDP targeting.

If the nominal exchange rate does not adjust, then an alternative is for the real exchange rate to appreciate via a rise in wages and domestic prices.

The market doesn't only tell us the nominal price.

The private sector forecasters do not decompose their forecast of nominal income and expenses into their respective components, nor do they prepare the fiscal projections.

A quick look at the inventory numbers (nominal or seasonally adjusted) reveals that steel has actually been drawn out of stockpiles, not added.

While I'm not persuaded by the argument that Canada needs countercyclical Keynesian deficit spending (I think we're already out of recession), I do know what fiscal policy I would consider worse: arbitrarily cutting spending in a weak economy to balance the budget in light of a revenue shortfall stemming from lower than expected nominal GDP.

Economists have found consistently that nominal (that is, not inflation - adjusted) wages are sticky.

Having higher nominal interest rates because of higher inflation would not help savers, because higher inflation would just erode the future purchasing power of those savings.

And «forever» is not a meaningful answer to that question, because standard New Keynesian models (and the Bank is New Keynesian) tell us that monetary systems will either explode or implode if the central bank holds the nominal interest rate constant forever.

This graph also illustrates that when inflation is sporadic or negative (called deflation), like it often was from 1871 to about 1931, the nominal and real stock returns aren't that different.

Bonds may not offer tremendous nominal value, comparatively speaking, in the current market, but they do generally offer peace of mind and stability which, for some, may be more important than they currently realize.

United charges 110,000 points each way, however United does not charge any additional surcharges, you'll just have to pay the nominal taxes and fees.