Sentences with phrase «not nuclear physics»

Well it's not nuclear physics but it can be complicated.

Not exact matches

The incident is investigated by the FSB and not police because the supercomputer was located at the All - Russian Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC - VNIIEF) in Sarov, Russia's leading nuclear laboratory.

I don't get to say what is right in nuclear physics.

To pick an example from the cosmology chapter, if the strong nuclear force, one of the four fundamental forces recognised by modern physics, and which controls amongst other things the burning of the Sun, were slightly larger or slightly smaller, we could not exist.

So then nuclear power doesn't exist by your logic because it operates under the same laws of nuclear physics as radiometric decay.

He noted that though the nuclear power plant is known for high energy density without green house gases emissions and Few Recourse limitations, it can not compare to the safe, efficient newly invented (Green) «EX5» solar Quantum physics energy generator (nuclear replacement plant) which only needs a solar panel for 8seconds.

Today, she heads the accelerator division for TRIUMF, Canada's national laboratory for particle and nuclear physics, but she learned much of her determination and perseverance — not to mention her technical knowledge and teamwork skills — at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory's (Fermilab's) Tevatron accelerator when she was a grad student.

Nuclear physicists have extended the solid state physics results to the limit of a single Cooper pair and studied Cooper pair tunneling to individual quantum states — something which is not possible in solid state physics.

He works at the National Laboratories at Gran Sasso, though he's been variously identified as a seismologist, physicist, and technician at Italy's National Institute of Nuclear Physics, not Gran Sasso's National Institute of Nuclear Physics.

However, Brad Tippens, program manager at the US Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Physics, says while most of these collaborations are not hierarchical, they can create an environment that fosters mentoring of early - career researchers and accelerates their maturation as scientists.

Together, the data make it 99.7 percent likely that the discrepancy is real, not due to chance, says physicist Luca Silvestrini of the National Institute for Nuclear Physics in Rome, who took part in the study submitted to Physical Review Letters.

«Mr. Kokabee has no training in nuclear physics, is not politically active, and is not associated with any political movement in Iran,» the letter read.

Particle physics and nuclear physics concern themselves with the study of these particles, their interactions, and matter made up of them which do not aggregate into atoms.

«I didn't sign because I thought the estimated error was not correct,» says OPERA team member Luca Stanco of the National Institute of Nuclear Physics in Italy, adding he thinks it is larger than the stated 10 nanoseconds.

«It's clear there is liquid water, but we're not sure how much,» says planetary scientist Frank Postberg of the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics in Heidelberg, Germany, lead author of the sodium study.

But because the experiments could not be repeated at any other accelerator worldwide, we had to come up with another experiment to verify the results,» explains Prof. Hans Ströher, director at the Nuclear Physics Institute (IKP - 2) in Jülich.

She responded «I don't know anything about nuclear physics.»

They attributed the radio silence to the culture gap separating nuclear and particle physics: «Nuclear physicists didn't know what to make of it» since claims of new particles are not really their thing, Feng said, «and particle physicists, who are of course extremely interested in any sign of a new particle, simply don't read the [experimental nuclear physics] arxiv listings.nuclear and particle physics: «Nuclear physicists didn't know what to make of it» since claims of new particles are not really their thing, Feng said, «and particle physicists, who are of course extremely interested in any sign of a new particle, simply don't read the [experimental nuclear physics] arxiv listings.Nuclear physicists didn't know what to make of it» since claims of new particles are not really their thing, Feng said, «and particle physicists, who are of course extremely interested in any sign of a new particle, simply don't read the [experimental nuclear physics] arxiv listings.nuclear physics] arxiv listings.»

The most recent Sierra Nevada experiment did not include special nuclear material, but it did provide physics data relevant to advancing stockpile safety.

Supporting the mission of the Office of Nuclear Physics in DOE - SC, FRIB will enable scientists to make discoveries about the properties of rare isotopes (that is, short - lived nuclei not normally found on Earth), nuclear astrophysics, fundamental interactions, and applications for society, including in medicine, homeland security, and inNuclear Physics in DOE - SC, FRIB will enable scientists to make discoveries about the properties of rare isotopes (that is, short - lived nuclei not normally found on Earth), nuclear astrophysics, fundamental interactions, and applications for society, including in medicine, homeland security, and innuclear astrophysics, fundamental interactions, and applications for society, including in medicine, homeland security, and industry.

The discovery of the Higgs boson represents the final piece of the puzzle in the Standard Model of particle physics, a theory that describes how three of the four fundamental forces — electromagnetic, weak and strong nuclear forces — interact at the subatomic level (but does not include gravity).

She didn't really understand how her physics lessons applied to the real world until she joined the first group of students sent to CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research) to see real science at work.

As he explained in an interview with the curator and art critic, Hans Ulrich Obrist, the exhibition for him was not a display of artworks, but a radical statement about the human imagination on a par with neuroscience and nuclear physics.

For example — when I took physics four decades ago, the environment around an atom wasn't mentioned as affecting nuclear decay (heck, the physical / microwave environment around molecules wasn't discussed as affecting chemical reactions)

Most of it is basic high school physics, (I have a masters in Nuclear Engineering) so it is not difficult, just very obscure and complex.

To illustrate this, could you imagine if during the effort to convince the U.S. government to embark on the Manhattan Project, the word «physics» was hardly ever used by the advocates of atom bomb development (who were simply known in this alternate reality as «nuclear * scientists *»), to such an extent that many well - placed non-physicists didn't even realize that the claims of destructive power were based on it?

If on the other hand they don't know much physics, then it's even easier... they know the power and track record of physics (e.g. electricity, nuclear power, gadgets, modern life, etc.) so they have confidence if it is said that «physics» is the reason for the CO2 - climate connection.

As a physicist, I winced when I read «This is because energy can not just be created or destroyed (unless it involves nuclear reactions or takes place on quantum physics scales).»

I.e., our critical comments should be answered, not by politicians, but by their science advisors that continued to deceive world leaders on nuclear and stellar physics after 1945 [2].

It is not surprising that there are many skeptics who like I am, are very knowledgeable in many of the over lapping fields, of gas chromatography, anthropology, radio graphics of X-ray and particle physics, biological plant and animal processes, agriculture, high power radio transmission and reception, and its attendant multiplexing of signals, mining, reforestation plans and progress realities, nuclear, gas, and coal power plant construction techniques, organic gardening, astronomy, stellar physics, global circulation pattern drivers, and have also spent considerable time out doors in a tent and sleeping bag.

Most people aren't experts in nuclear Physics.

DB, I doubt I could tell you anything you do not know re physics (Found out in college I was not one for basement labs or rooms full of blackboards, which ended my long - time plan to be a nuclear physicist: — RRB --RRB-, but just in case, and for anyone else: According to the Standard Model, photons are gauge bosons, which means that they are force carriers.

«You can not, based on the laws of physics — forget the laws of Congress — replace those nuclear plants with more wind,» he said.

Aside from a robust knowledge in anatomy and physiology or radiation physics, there's not much I can use my background in nuclear medicine technology in the practice of law.