Sentences with phrase «not objective fact»

For example, if you write or say that I'm a d # % ^ head then that is not actionable: whether I am or am not is an opinion, not an objective fact.

But what the minister preaches is not an objective fact, a moral exhortation or an intellectual doctrine.

It teaches that... [r] evealed religion is not a truth, but a sentiment and a taste; not an objective fact, not miraculous; and it is the right of each individual to make it say just what strikes his fancy.

Can you explain please more on the paragraph that says «Often what makes trauma traumatic is not the objective facts, but the meaning we ascribe to those events.»

Not exact matches

Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the continued demand for our product, the wind - down of ExpressJet's flying agreement with Delta, and the related removal from service and / or placement into service of certain aircraft, the scheduled aircraft deliveries for SkyWest Airlines for 2018, as well as SkyWest's future financial and operating results, plans, objectives, expectations, estimates, intentions and outlook, and other statements that are not historical facts.

I just think it's a matter of being in sync with one another and thinking about the end product the right way, and the fact that we have to drive business objectives and we can't create work just for the sake of creating work.

Some of these don't have a very clearly defined mission and objectives and that stems from the fact that there is no process in place to manage volunteers, which is a difficult and particular task.

But one objective fact is that this is the generation that grew up with the Internet, electronic devices and a level of interconnectedness that previous generations could not conceive of.

If this is your company and you're caught in the middle of a minefield, your best option (short of quitting) for conflict management is to rise above it: Point out the specific behavior in question, don't personalize the issue (be objective), communicate assertively and state the facts, and document everything that goes on.

The fact that the Fed has not been able to achieve its twin objectives of maximum employment and 2 - percent inflation suggests the need for lower rates, he said.

Barisan Nasional said in an email response that Bersih's findings should not be taken as objective facts as it was a «functioning arm of Malaysia's opposition».

For the majority it is clearly not enough that a provincially authorized entity might have relied on a legitimate provincial objective if it was in fact motivated to frustrate a legitimate federal purpose.

Your continual denial of bias shows you have no desire to interpret any data in an objective way, but can be expected to use whatever data comes in to confirm your biases, so I don't understand why you bother asking for evidence besides the fact that you seem to think magic is possible or that we are in a «matrix» computer program.

And not surprisingly, you dodged the point, because the extreme feminist worldview can not countenance much in the way of facts or objective reality.

I reject your evidence because it isn't in any way based on «neutral, objective fact».

You said, «Again, this is a statement of your position, not a statement of objective fact.»

Again, this is a statement of your position, not a statement of objective fact.

We have been chasing our tails for a long time when it comes to self - knowledge, and the whole human / non-human distinction evades us, especially when we are attempting to be «objective,» because we tend to think that true objectivity is possible and even desirable, when in fact true objectivity doesn't exist.

The Jews history to manipulate and to achieve their objectives has not chanced, in fact by analyzing the State of Israel today, we see that they are a closed in society prisoners within their own castle, surrounded by a concrete wall.

I still won't use «I think» phrases in expressing objective truth or facts based on the Bible.

and you believe everything you see and hear from the media, especially the ones who claim to be objective when in fact they are totally not?

I hope their laudable objective will not be hindered by the fact that they've all apparently been assigned and branded with religious and ideological identities before they're even old enough to comprehend the meaning of them, let alone make an informed decision for themselves.

However, that is not a fact for which there is objective evidence, but only your opinion.

In any case, worry less about who people are and more about the fact that all you have are a lot of personal feelings and beliefs you can't support with objective evidence.

But the very fact that they want to find him means they will not be objective as they evaluate potential evidence.

@If horses... You might not believe the evidence for God's existence is compelling - e.g., the existence of the universe; the beginning of the universe; the fine tuning of the universe for life; the realm of objective moral value; the facts surrounding Jesus of Nazareth; personal experience of God; etc - but that does not mean there is «no evidence.»

The «socially just objectives,» of course, were those determined by the Hitler party; and we must not forget that, for the conscientious German of 1933, they were in fact quite as clearly just as the objectives set up by the Communist party are for the communist (and even for a Christian of the extreme left), or as the objectives fixed by the American way of life are for the average American (and for the average Christian American).

Asking for demonstrable objective facts to support your claims is not anything like acting like religious people.

Without objective and indefatigable proof of the non-existence of Satan the argument about Jesus hallucinating is an expression of an opinion of what the truth is, not a fact.

Note that here an imagined situation is assumed to be «objective» because the subject's reaction to it is not a matter of preference but of given fact.

The fact that you start this way already shows it not to be objective since it is based on your personal opinion.

Newton's position that time is «objective» and «rules» our measurement of time (not vice versa) is vindicated by the fact that we have a rational theory of clocks, i.e., we presuppose that all our clocks can and ought to be corrected, wherever we note irregularities.

Theological statements do not describe objective facts about God and salvation, according to Troeltsch.

In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself).

Murdoch stresses that perception is not simply a passive process whereby the objective world of facts makes itself perfectly known to us.

It is not to be understood as an objective fact or a subjective feeling but as an uncompleted dialogical reality, the awareness of an address from God.

The question wasn't about historical facts, it was about whether or not objective morality actually exists.

This subjective - objective confusion destroys the essence of moral philosophy because it can not in fact establish any distinction between sheer objective description of what takes place and the discovery of the «normative,» that is, of the values which determine what man ought to do.

We can not here attempt to search out the objective and psychological motives behind this fact.

The facts of science are not hard, cold, inert chunks of objective information lying about in the external world waiting to be discovered and accumulated by the industrious investigator.

Facts like the snows that have covered Mount Kilimanjaro for thousands of years are melting Scientific proof may not be as «warm and fuzzy» feeling as political rhetoric is, but it's better to base our beliefs and actions on objective reality than on self - serving political dogma.

the fact that one needs faith is the problem... Reason Logic and Science are immediately thrown out the window you can not approach a subject without being objective, having faith is completely going against rationalism...

Moreover, the fact that, with the exception of Paul, only those who had already been followers of the earthly Jesus are reported to have seen the risen Christ appear to them, suggests that the Easter message was not something which could be pressed home by means of any objective proofs.

Their objectives were cultic, not ethical, an illuminating fact in itself as showing that social ethics had not yet seized the conscience of the rulers.

because you don't have a single fact to back up your claims whereas science is demonstrably getting closer to the answer with verifiable, objective and independent facts.

But although there can be no question that in the last analysis fact is more important than explanation, actually they can not be separated, for some measure of explanation and interpretation — adequate or inadequate, accurate or inaccurate — is part and parcel of any knowledge of objective reality it is given us to have.

And if we can not in fact be truly objective, then who is to say what is science or, for that matter, anything else?

The IPCC is not, in fact, an objective, neutral body that evaluates pure research; it is a dominantly political body controlled by a tight group of true believers — an advocacy organization that only pretends to scientific objectivity.

The reason for this change does not lie in any restriction of the historical - critical method in dealing with the objective data, as if there were one group of historical facts accessible to historiography, while other historical facts were in principle beyond the historian's reach.»

As James characterized this approach: «A fact and a theory have not different natures, as is usually supposed, the one being objective, the other subjective.