Sentences with phrase «not objects of knowledge»

These things, he said, are properly not objects of knowledge at all.

God is not an object of knowledge.

Not exact matches

Deep observation must be done in steps: «If you wish to have a sound knowledge of the forms of objects, begin with the details of them, and do not go on to the second step until you have the first well fixed in memory.»

The second way in which reason is absent from the future is not only its lack of knowledge, but the object's unfinished character.

But perhaps the most interesting idea to arise in this chapter is James's suggestion that the stream of thought is made up of bits of knowledge or, as James puts it, bits of «sciousness», which include knowledge of other objects only, not themselves.

«Each «section» of the stream, says James, «would then be a bit of sciousness or knowledge of this sort, including and contemplating its «me» and its «not - me» as objects which work out their drama together, but not yet including or contemplating its own subjective being» (PP1 304).

If it is rebutted that we need not speak of the experience as the object of knowledge of this reflexive awareness, then this view boils down to a recommendation for a radical shift in our understanding of what we mean when we speak of an «awareness of» or «knowledge of» something, a shift which is unwarranted.

If this were not the case, then these units of consciousness would change, for added to the constitution of the drop taken from the other objects of knowledge there would have to be the knowledge of itself as distinguished from the knowledge of its objects.

Theology is about God, but God is not an object of investigation and knowledge simply there for human scrutiny.

Knowledge is not the immediate entertaining of an object itself or its form, but rather the correct representation of an object with a propositional idea.

And Whitehead says that he does not think it is inevitable that the human mind spatializes, though it often does this, and when it does, one way or another, whether through partiality or something else, it deforms the object of knowledge and of experience... [But] Bergson believed that, at least to some significant degree, the spatializing tendencies of the human intellect and of human intelligence, can be overcome by a biology and a physics that is less mechanistic.

His object, therefore, the past event, is not only an eternal object but also a necessary object, an object that must be what it is, and is known rationally in apprehending this necessity; Par.39: Applying these results to our knowledge of nature: we regard nature as a self - creative process and therefore creative of eternal objects.»

The knowledge of faith is not therefore «subjective» in the sense that it happens primarily in the believer, but is «objective» because the believer participates in the eternal activity of the object of faith; the believer's subjective faith is therefore secondary and derivative.

As being can never be studied as an independent object, the history of metaphysical thought can not be without implications for the history of being:» [E] very science goes through a process of historical development in which, although the fundamental or general problem remains unaltered, the particular form in which this problem presents itself changes from time to time; and the general problem never arises in its pure or abstract form, but always in the particular or concrete form, determined by the present state of knowledge or, in other words, by the development of thought hitherto.

It is an object of aspiration, not of certain knowledge.

To measure the degree of certitude of testimony of the absolute by the norm of one of the functions of consciousness is to surrender the problematic of self - consciousness to the most deplorable metabasis eis allo genos.22 Original affirmation can not be subsumed by the standard of knowledge of objects.

For far from being a deviation from biblical truth, this setting of man over against the sum total of things, his subject - status and the object - status and mutual externality of things themselves, are posited in the very idea of creation and of man's position vis - a-vis nature determined by it: it is the condition of man meant in the Bible, imposed by his createdness, to be accepted, acted through... In short, there are degrees of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).

Knowledge in this case pertains not only to the knowledge of the object but also to knowledge of Knowledge in this case pertains not only to the knowledge of the object but also to knowledge of knowledge of the object but also to knowledge of knowledge of the self.

Thus his agreement with Thomas Aquinas, against Aristotle, that the proper object of human knowledge is not essence qua essence.

First, he distinguishes from classical empiricism a revisionary description of experience according to which sense perception is neither the only nor even the primary mode of experience, but is rather derived from a still more elemental awareness both of ourselves and of the world around us» (PP 78).6 On Ogden's analysis, both the classical and this first type of revisionary empiricism «assume that the sole realities present in our experience, and therefore the only objects of our certain knowledge, are ourselves and the other creatures that constitute the world» (PP 79) 7 With these «two more conventional types of empiricism» he contrasts a «comprehensive» type of revisionary empiricism distinguished from them by its consideration of the possibility (and then also by its claim) that the internal awareness it asserts together with the former revisionary type is «the awareness not merely of ourselves, and of our fellow creatures, but also of the infinite whole in which we are all included as somehow one» (PP 87, 80, 85).

Actually not every thing is equally related to the concept of knowledge and to know - ability, even though ii is also true that precisely as something and as an object of knowledge it must somehow enjoy equal status with everything else with respect to conceptual comprehension.5 The differing internal relations of the objects of knowledge to the concept of knowledge establishes the relevance of these as philosophical objects.

(Aristotle, whose gods were in no way dependent upon objects of knowledge other than themselves, will not be disturbed by such a conclusion, but for Plato the denial of divine providence was intolerable.)

Although Kant insists that our knowledge is always of representations, and not of objects capable of existing outside our powers of representation, Rundell points out that the representations must themselves emerge from a synthesis of reason and imagination (CJ 91).

They could not be objects of our knowledge, and even worse, from Plato's point of view, the gods who knew them would not know its, or anything in the world below.

Then when a particular situation occurs, God simply does what he had from all eternity decided that he would do in such a situation, which he had eternally contemplated as possible.1 This view has important similarities to John Cobb's exposition of Whitehead's view of God's knowledge of eternal objects, though Cobb might not wish to claim that the primordial orderings of eternal objects are conscious, as Creel claims about God's knowledge of possibilities.2

While the physical scientists have not yet arrived at a fully satisfactory account of the most elementary particles, they have acquired precise knowledge of the hierarchy of entities starting from proton, neutron and electron, through atom and molecule, to objects of our own order of size for which the precision of the laws of mechanics have made possible the extraordinary achievements of technology.

I do believe they are considering little boys the ones they are feeding... and maybe those teenage ones will be able to look at a breast not only as a object of sexual desire but first the resource that mothers use (can use) to feed their children... what a wonderful gift of knowledge and tolerance to give to them!

Moreover, Hartshorne affirms that he does not contradict himself when he asserts the additional twin theses that every concrete entity is a subject (or has objects of knowledge) and that every such entity must be an object for some (anyone will do) subject.31 Furthermore, he argues that only the panpsychistic doctrine of an ocean of subjects internally related to their objects of knowledge can make sense of our deeply ingrained conception of the world as a real nexus of temporal succession of cause - effect relationships.

«We are concerned only with Nature, that is, with the object of perceptual knowledge, and not with the synthesis of the knower and the known» (PNK vii).

That means they are curious and like to explore, but don't yet have some of the necessary knowledge to protect themselves from dangers such as fire and heat, sharp objects or dangerous digestives.

Now that your baby has a sense of object permanence — the knowledge that you still exist even when you're not around — bedtimes and nap times may be more of a struggle.

Courts have held that fathers unaware of their children may not later object to the children's adoption, particularly when the fathers lack of knowledge was his own fault.

Diarist and former Labour politician Chris Mullin was sceptical about MPs producing their own literature covering what they've been doing in office, telling the room that his successor (MP for Sunderland Central Julie Elliott), «publishes a brochure, from party funds» but this kind of thing is «vanity publishing» and «doesn't advance your knowledge very much... [but] I wouldn't object to anything pretty basic and bland.»

She wasn't an astronomy enthusiast before all this, yet now she has an object named after her, and the knowledge that Hubble was pointed at a target because of something she just up and decided to do.

Thus physicists could not glean sufficient knowledge of all the relevant variables required to calculate a quantum object's path.

The orbital data, in conjunction with the knowledge that «Oumuamua was hurtling through the solar system at a top speed of around 196,000 mph (315,431 km / h) led scientists to conclude that the object was not gravitationally bound to our Sun, and was instead a transient visitor from interstellar space.

The Hubble results have revolutionized the state of knowledge in virtually any branch of astronomy — not that every good result comes from the HST, but as these data are available publicly, they are used if ever possible; from planets, comets, and asteroids to stars, clusters, nebulae, and galaxies, every sort of objects in the sky were investigated, often obtaining most revolutionary results.

Historical materialists generally believe that it is possible to grasp the object of knowledge, that a world exists independent of our existence, and that this world can be directly grasped (although not fully grasped) in itself.

I thought that for once, I could put money in an object that will not bring me any income but that will sure bring me a lot of new knowledge.

But «The Encyclopaedic Palace» is about many other things besides — esoteric collections and vagrant archives, the limits to knowledge, the relationship of images to objects, not to mention a crazed kind of figuration.

To my knowledge there are no videotapes of Ralston Farina in performance and surprisingly few photographs — largely because he was an artist who not only eschewed the art object but objected to any documentation of his activities; his works were meant to survive only insofar as they imprinted themselves on the spectator's mind.

Sure there are feedbacks and thresholds, but to claim that we understand, and better, that we have a «quantitative» knowledge of how they work is just not supported by the scientific literature, and is the object of no consensus at all.

Having regard to Mr. Watterson's obvious lack of knowledge of his procedural rights [emphasis mine], it was incumbent on the trial judge to ensure that the procedural rules were followed or, when they were not, to advise Mr. Watterson of his right to object and request an adjournment for the purpose of meeting the evidence that was to be called against the defendants.

Summary of Experience: * Having 5 + years of experience in Object - oriented Analysis, design, development, maintenance, knowledge in support of large - scale n - tier applications using Java and J2EE technologies.