Sentences with phrase «not obvious place»

Make an effort diversify your activity, to give yourself various possibilities to become acquainted with new people, but not close yourself from meeting someone only that is why, that it can be the most not obvious place for this purpose.
It's not advertised in mainstream media, and it's not an obvious place people look at when they think of hooking up with women, but speaking from experience, this WORKS WONDERS.
Then remember that Frazier and Judge might man the corners for the Yankees for years, which means that unless Frazier goes in the trade, there isn't an obvious place for Stanton.

Not exact matches

Not everyone has friends (or family) in high places, but it is important to look at the back - story and social proof of the core team, and make any interesting differences obvious to journalists.
But, to ask the obvious question, why weren't they asked or accepted in the first place?
Business ideas can have an ideal scope, place and time for their market introduction but this isn't always obvious.
The idea that there has been no improvement in the purchasing power of Canadians is false, but it is an easy mistake to make since it is not showing up in the obvious place: prices.
PRP was running low on working capital, but since it didn't have an obvious management successor in place, its investors were unwilling to contribute additional funds.
Focusing on your qualified retirement plan may not seem like the obvious place to spend your time in business, but it can be quite valuable to you and even to your employees.
While that sounds obvious, managers are usually puzzled when they find out that, despite spending so much time in the same place, employees don't immediately bond with one another.
The most obvious problem is that the close remains unknown until the end of the day, thus, we don't know what our action needs to be at the close before the close is in place, but that's the end of the trading day.
The analysis is painful to look at because along with the obvious misspellings I didn't even attempt to correct for whatever reason, the analysis doesn't do anything but spout off random stats I pulled from it financials and places like Morningstar.
Have said previously that the cracks took place at the National Cathedral by the earthquake were a sign that the country was religiously not right going... and now here again it proves that the sign is stronger... we will see if any thing else will happen to stop the anniversary to take place at it on the 911!?! Well then it would be obvious the mistake you made by accusing Muslim community over 911...
I assure you when I see someone just spewing insults like you did here, it's painfully obvious that you're not coming from a place of superior reason.
In the first place, we may become better attuned to the ways that older, seemingly irrelevant or even harmful bits of the Christian tradition may be worth preserving, even if their strengths aren't immediately obvious in late modernity.
The pulpit is the place for the declaration of the Word of God and not the place for teaching Christian theology or the principles of Christian morality, although it is obvious that the gospel of Christ has theological implications and involves moral consequences.
Second, it is trying to more thoroughly explain, and in the light of my Tocquevillian / Liberal Education sociology of middle class music / identity, why the transition from rock n» roll to Rock occurred in the first place, and why it set a certain pattern of middle - class mixtery - music that was doomed from the beginning to fall into its now - obvious mode of Perpetual Repetition.
It is obvious there are some places on this globe that people people should not live e.g. Ja - pan, Haiti, New Orleans.
But beyond that obvious flaw in your reasoning the question remains; if individual charity were enough, then there wouldn't be a problem in the first place.
It has almost been as if we humans, with our limitations and in our finitude, not to mention our obvious and tragic defection from right alignment with the divine intention for the world and for us, were to insist that until and unless we are given what we regard as due recognition and the security of our own survival in an individualistic sense, we shall refuse to take our place and play our part in the creative advance of the universe.
So for obvious reasons, The Post feels unavoidably tied to an ongoing public discussion about the role of the press in this new era of so - called «fake news» and whether or not it will survive this shifting landscape — or if it deserves to in the first place.
That the «disgusting thing standing in the holy place» is organized religion which detours people away from using their free will to either forge their own relationship with God, or choose not to, is obvious to anyone not blinded by the churchs» (artificial) light.
What we ought to be concerned about in self - examination is not this or that supposed sin — although sometimes these will be obvious and serious enough to require attention — but rather whether we are becoming more open to the Love that is God, more readily concerned to be instruments of that Love, and more willing to share that Love with others, in whatever ways are possible for us in our given place and time.
Our present concern, however, is not with this obvious and distressing manifestation of disharmony in social life but with the disharmony itself — that is, the failure on the part of men and women to discern that true community and sound relationships within it can be found only as each of us has his or her place in a wider grouping of humans, where there is vivid contrast because each is valued as being precisely this or that person while the community as a whole has goals or ends (what used to be called «ideals») that are worthy, upbuilding, and enriching.
It didn't take long for Shepard to realize just how entrenched gluten is in the American diet — from the high - end pasta palace to the office vending machine — but the tricky part was spotting it in less obvious places: soy sauce, canned soups, ketchup and even some toothpaste.
And as each course arrived (the Icarian stew claiming its rich, flavor - deep place as an obvious showstopper), Mr. Buettner called attention to a last point about the Blue Zones: that in longevity idylls like Icaria, it's not just about what you eat, but how you eat, and how much you and your friends enjoy a meal together.
I don't care who you are — you will have a bunch of kitchen tools that have a rightful home in your kitchen but no obvious place to store them.
The youngster burst onto the scene this summer with four goals in one game against Benfica, but he has dropped so far down the pecking order that he didn't even get a place on the bench when Danny Welbeck was injured and Olivier Giroud was banned, so it is obvious that Wenger has lost faith in him.
I would rather Chelsea had won because it's plainly obvious we are not going to win the league and it would have kept Spurs below us in the battle for 4th place.
I think it's obvious that the Chargers don't have a clue when it comes to place kickers.
I can't recall the last time we had a guy in the minors knocking on the door and no obvious place to put him.
Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!
It was obvious that Ellen should have been the first to come on in place of Ozil who can't seem to trap a ball or hold on to it.
Wenger has done very well for us, he is a legend but its obvious he has gone stale and lost the hunger, motivation and most importantly the modern touch to take us to the next level... its just a shame the board are a bunch of clueless money grabbers who are afraid to confront reality head... Wenger will have to go sometime, whether he or the board likes it or not but what preparations are in place to scout a viable replacement?
The protests are aimed at BOTH Kronke and Wenger.They are both to blame for our demise.How Wenger was given a TWO YEAR CONTRACT last year was the final straw for the majority of fans who were demanding change.It was obvious Wenger was not only unable to maintain the 4th Place Trophy he had for years stayed was a Trophy in all but name, but would also fail to prevent us becoming nothing other than also rans within the chasing pack.And where are we now?SIXTH PLACE.That is down on last years pathetic effort and we show no signs of being able to improve with Wenger still in charge.
The prem teams get so much money now they can afford the best managers in the world and then buy the best players and if u think about what arsenal have done it's obvious we have stagnated with the same manager, spending the same amount of money playing the same tactics which never won the league in the first place (not including wengers first decade or so) so the past does not represent the present when every other team has improved so much!
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
even when he suffered a serious knee injury, instead of accepting the fact that he would never stick his legs into the spaces that were crucial for someone with straight ahead speed to succeed, the club actually contemplated giving him a chance to play up top where his lack of physicality, size and holding up play talents would been on display for all to see... these are not the actions of a club that really cares about winning at the highest levels, but they are the actions of a club that wasn't interested in spending the necessary resources to purchases a world - class striker, which is usually the most expensive position on the pitch... instead we adopted the horrible phrase «like a new signing» and proceeded to allow this ridiculous experiment to carry on, which ultimately caused some discomfort on the training pitch and inside the locker room as players battled for a position that shouldn't have been theirs for the taking in the first place... don't get me wrong, I believe that Walcott is a talented player, who can help a team reach their goals, if their goals are relatively modest... just look at the teams who supposedly expressed interest in his services and they weren't the kind of clubs who aspire to win at the highest levels... as for the reasons why he hasn't been bitching and moaning about moving on just look at the wage benefits he receives from our club and his obvious desire to enjoy the societal advantages that come with playing in North London for a club with worldwide appeal... so instead of continuing to try to fix a coat with a broken zipper simply move on and buy a new and better coat
Walcott is for any one with half a football brain not a starter in a top three team... For 4th place junkies maybe... No interest in that anymore... Nor for that matter is mert... if Ramsey gets back to end of season form and wilshere stops his progression can talk about putting the Welshman back but not on current form so no not our strongest line up... Though sadly failure to sign a dfm is an obvious massive failure of cheese eating surrender monkey... 8m a year....
Under Arsene Wenger it's quite obvious Bould is not allowed to open he's mouth which begs the question, whats he doing there in the first place?
Unfortunately this simple and obvious plan was not put in place and we now face a trophy less season outside the European places.
That tandem isn't good enough to get 4th place let alone win the EPL... the fact remains that when they play together Ramsey spends far more time inside the opposing teams's final 3rd which means that Xhaka has to drop even deeper to compensate for the freedom Wenger gives to his beloved Welshman... the obvious problem with that is it exposes the weakness of both players
base don yesterdays game it's obvious cazorla / wilshere & arteta can't play 2gether they lack pace have similar style + we need a striker else we may end up with fa cup / carling cup & maz 2nd or 3rd place finish
Had the European Championships taken place last summer and Benzema hadn't been involved, the most obvious candidate to replace him would've perhaps been Alexandre Lacazette, such was his outstanding form for Lyon.
Wasn't it obvious to all — except AW of course, that Santos was having a bad day, compounded by his wandering on the forward line, and forgetting — or not bothering, to go back to his place?
Another great mystery is how people expect for their dirty clothes to be found and washed when they leave them all over the house, sometimes in not so obvious places.
At first sight, early years settings don't look like an obvious place to engage with men around anything — let alone literacy / numeracy issues.
Make sure that if you come across important documents while cleaning that you put them in an obvious place where they won't get lost.
Family and friends are the obvious place to begin but sometimes this does not feel right or it's too close to home.
This sounds obvious, but diapers aren't designed to hold large amounts of urine, and once they've reached their saturation point, the only place for the urine to go is out the sides and top.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z