Sentences with phrase «not on a different planet»

Former foreign secretary and current MP for Blackburn Jack Straw formulated a definition including «an active participant in the House of Commons; to represent constituents; to legislate; to hold the executive to account...» and insisted that «MPs are not on a different planet» career-wise, although they do «have to reapply for our jobs every five years to quixotic employers» - ie.

Not exact matches

This is not always easy since there are so many different people on this planet and not everyone thinks like you do.
But for all of the others that you can't help because you don't have enough time or who are located in a different place on this planet the e-book is a great starting point.
For his imaginary Jesus is different from Chads imaginary Jesus, and indeed, there are 2 billion versions of Jesus on the planet, most of whom look at all the others and say «you are not a real Christian!»
The earthly 24 hour day is different say than a day on Mars due to different size of the planet etc.... The universe is not on the earth's 24 hour «day» so to speak.
Along with the importance of these relationships, are several other key features: the nested hierarchies of organisation at hundreds - if not thousands - of different levels on this planet... the same laws of physics and chemistry function throughout the universe, and everything is related to everything else, often in highly differentiated ways.
All materials made have a seam, so the earth has seams, it is not a solid thing like a rock, it's like patched up, it took him 7 days to patch up this planet into a ball, which you can compare to a football, which have patches of two different colors (white and black), the people that are living on this «ball» the earth, is also mixed with black and white people, who try to live in harmony with everybody, why disrupt it with foolishness.
Along with the importance of these relationships are several other key features: the nested hierarchies of organisation at hundreds - if not thousands - of different levels on this planet... the same laws of physics and chemistry function throughout the universe, and everything is related to everything else... as any system or organism is always a part of some larger system, organism or ecology, it in turn fulfils a certain function, or set of functions - which is often interpreted as having a certain «purpose» within that larger system.
It seems to me that this latest shift in 20th - century theology is not to a different issue from that of liberation theologies, but to a deepening of it, a recognition that the fate of the oppressed and the fate of the earth are inextricably interrelated, for we all live on one planet — a planet vulnerable to our destructive behavior.
In global consciousness we know that, if we go far enough back in time, we share a common origin not only with people from very different cultural and religious backgrounds, but also with all forms of life on the planet.
Got to remember Lorraine... these are the ones who have defended John Travolta and had nothing to say about Coach Sandusky... they live on another planet... where the morals are much different... not equal though... that is the fantasy part of their doctrine
One of the big points that the evolutionists love to tout is the idea that life began from primordial ooze (they don't know what's in it, where it happened, or how it happened) and from there evolved into all the different living things on this planet.
One wonders why they insist on returning here, when they could fit in so much better at sites like le g. I don't go to le g because I'm from a different planet from those guys, so we would be unable to hold a decent discussion.
Once you have a baby it can feel like you've landed on a different planet — one that your childless friends just can't relate to.
«If David Cameron thinks it is acceptable for Mr Hester to receive this vast bonus then he is not just out of touch with most people in Britain, he is living on a different planet
Unlike Kepler, NTGS will not always focus on the same area but will move its gaze so it can detect larger samples of different planet types.
A surprising discovery: The water vapor emissions from the comet are significantly different from the stores on our planet, suggesting that asteroids, not comets, may have been the main source of Earth's water.
With many friends working for oil companies, I know this is not really true, but at the same time my ambition had always been slightly different to theirs: to better understand the planet we live on, rather than exploit its resources.
If comparatively more bluish or reddish light reaches a planet's surface than on Earth, photosynthetic plant - type life may may not be greenish in color, because such life will have evolved to different pigments in order to optimize their use of available and so color the appearance of the planet's land surfaces accordingly.
Nonetheless, with rising sea level and environmental refugeeism compounding the increased demand on water, food, and land of a growing population (albeit one likely to level out mid 21st century), the combined impacts of climate change and global population increase could potentially yield a world that doesn't look that different from the one portrayed in the movie — indeed, as Jim Hansen puts it, «a different planet» — by century's end.
Perhaps if human beings evolved on planet Cybex things would be different - but we didn't.
After almost 35 years on this planet, almost 35 years of different hairstyles, questionable and not - so - questionable fashion choices, interesting friends and schools, different reasons to love myself and a heck of a lot more reasons not to, if I could write a love letter to myself, it would read: Dear self, You are perfectly imperfect.
Every single person on the planet is different if not then cancer treatments would work for all patients the same but as we know some become violently ill with treatments and others no symptoms with treatments.
Told he couldn't cancel over the phone, he typed up one of the most magnificent breakup letters we've ever read and posted it on Reddit under the title: «Planet Fitness wouldn't let me cancel over the phone and required a certified letter to cancel since I live in a different state now.
I march to a different drum in the fact, that I don't own a car, make do without leaving a carbon footprint on the planet when possible, have fun just being outside...
According to co-director Tomohiro Shibuya, Dark Souls II, though set on the same planet as the original game, does not represent a direct sequel — Drangleic is a completely different region than Lodran.
While the GT may not look vastly different than it did a decade ago, it has received several updates that help it continue to rank amongst the best coupes on the planet.
And yes, we're back to our now familiar food stock valuation debate... Aryzta investors are on a completely different fucking planet than me, happily paying a 17.2 P / E — looks pretty bloody expensive to me in light of Aryzta's recent earnings history, not to mention the EPS (on which it's based) appears almost entirely notional!?
There are billions, even trillions, of different strains of bacteria, fungi, and viruses on the planet and there generally isn't a lot of overlap between the pathogens that affect animals and the ones that affect humans.
The hole is the ideal environment for many different life forms and a lot of what you see here can not be seen anywhere else on the planet.
I think the universe holds such a potential for great multi player Large fleets space ship battles were never ever promised and in most previews even journalists said most space battles are very straight forward I agree with you on controls I agree with you on planets and plants I believe the game requires too big of grind The game lacks variety The game lacks a clear vision and clear story All of the planets bases look the same Every planet you do the same thing So as you see I am not defending the game in any sense but I do have an issue with gamers having this imaginations of what they wanted and the developers had a different vision http://www.geek.com/games/n... Please read this article.
As with Lost Planet 2, one of my favourite experiences with the game was the boss - battles you encountered, and Lost Planet 3 is no different luckily, they are just as epic and grand as I remembered them being in Lost Planet 2, but that is sadly about where the positivity for this review ends because Lost Planet 3 is just too much of the same, and that isn't always the best thing to rely on when the last game didn't get by with a lot of people.
With Mass Effect: Andromeda «s launch not too far away from now, BioWare has sanctioned the release of yet another gameplay video for the science fiction shooter, with the most recent bit of footage focusing on how exploration will work on the three different planets of Voeld, Kadara, and Eos.
Twilight of the Republic feels much more fun, Disney wanted each play set to feel different to not only one another, but also within itself, so having battles on different planets, boss fights, pod racing and space battles, all make the play set feel very enjoyable.
I've played the early exploration game on half a dozen different updates, in the process discovering not only new planets, but also new mechanics.
There exist many exceedingly different places to visit on this wildly diverse planet that can not fail to inspire such feelings, without trampling those that are susceptible to destruction.
Hacking the climate is different — we have only one planet to live on, and can't afford any big mistakes.
So if there's no external heating setting up temp differences and none from the planet (as we have from different heat capacities of surface stuff), does that really make it any different from what we have on Earth, because what we have on Earth is more interesting with all the temp variations coming into play, but they are, it seems to me, sort of superimposed on and weaving in and out of a basic which doesn't change, with stratified temp differences by gravity already well mapped.
Three and a half billion years ago our planet was quite different and Earth's earliest biosphere was dominated by microbial communities - complex multicellular organisms were not to evolve for quite some time, only arriving on the scene about 600 million years ago.
Though these two research teams used different methods, they arrived at a similar conclusion: that a crucial part of the climate system on our dynamic planet is not performing as it once did.
If I had to label myself, I would say I am a lukewarmer - but having grown up in the 1970's with the «Late Great Planet earth» claptrap, along with Howard Ruff, the 1970's ice age, the end of oil (1970's vintage), I have little to no toerance for apocalyptic claims based on evidence that is not substantially different from noise.
It's our ability to survive, it's not the planet's ability, the planet will still be here, nature will continue, it may take on a different form or shape, but that shape may not support life as we know it.
Perhaps that has been done for HITRAN's calculations of the absorption and emission spectra of different materials in the laboratory, but I think it can not have been done for its calculations of CO2's absorptions and emissions in the atmosphere because (fortunately for all life on the planet) the atmosphere can not be placed in a laboratory.
You can not say «infinity display» and NOT mean Samsung, no other company on the planet calls it an infinity display and if they are talking about a different OEM, I'd be very annoyed if I was Samsunot say «infinity display» and NOT mean Samsung, no other company on the planet calls it an infinity display and if they are talking about a different OEM, I'd be very annoyed if I was SamsuNOT mean Samsung, no other company on the planet calls it an infinity display and if they are talking about a different OEM, I'd be very annoyed if I was Samsung.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z