Former foreign secretary and current MP for Blackburn Jack Straw formulated a definition including «an active participant in the House of Commons; to represent constituents; to legislate; to hold the executive to account...» and insisted that «MPs are
not on a different planet» career-wise, although they do «have to reapply for our jobs every five years to quixotic employers» - ie.
Not exact matches
This is
not always easy since there are so many
different people
on this
planet and
not everyone thinks like you do.
But for all of the others that you can't help because you don't have enough time or who are located in a
different place
on this
planet the e-book is a great starting point.
For his imaginary Jesus is
different from Chads imaginary Jesus, and indeed, there are 2 billion versions of Jesus
on the
planet, most of whom look at all the others and say «you are
not a real Christian!»
The earthly 24 hour day is
different say than a day
on Mars due to
different size of the
planet etc.... The universe is
not on the earth's 24 hour «day» so to speak.
Along with the importance of these relationships, are several other key features: the
nested hierarchies of organisation at hundreds - if
not thousands - of
different levels
on this
planet... the same laws of physics and chemistry function throughout the universe, and everything is related to everything else, often in highly differentiated ways.
All materials made have a seam, so the earth has seams, it is
not a solid thing like a rock, it's like patched up, it took him 7 days to patch up this
planet into a ball, which you can compare to a football, which have patches of two
different colors (white and black), the people that are living
on this «ball» the earth, is also mixed with black and white people, who try to live in harmony with everybody, why disrupt it with foolishness.
Along with the importance of these relationships are several other key features: the
nested hierarchies of organisation at hundreds - if
not thousands - of
different levels
on this
planet... the same laws of physics and chemistry function throughout the universe, and everything is related to everything else... as any system or organism is always a part of some larger system, organism or ecology, it in turn fulfils a certain function, or set of functions - which is often interpreted as having a certain «purpose» within that larger system.
It seems to me that this latest shift in 20th - century theology is
not to a
different issue from that of liberation theologies, but to a deepening of it, a recognition that the fate of the oppressed and the fate of the earth are inextricably interrelated, for we all live
on one
planet — a
planet vulnerable to our destructive behavior.
In global consciousness we know that, if we go far enough back in time, we share a common origin
not only with people from very
different cultural and religious backgrounds, but also with all forms of life
on the
planet.
Got to remember Lorraine... these are the ones who have defended John Travolta and had nothing to say about Coach Sandusky... they live
on another
planet... where the morals are much
different...
not equal though... that is the fantasy part of their doctrine
One of the big points that the evolutionists love to tout is the idea that life began from primordial ooze (they don't know what's in it, where it happened, or how it happened) and from there evolved into all the
different living things
on this
planet.
One wonders why they insist
on returning here, when they could fit in so much better at sites like le g. I don't go to le g because I'm from a
different planet from those guys, so we would be unable to hold a decent discussion.
Once you have a baby it can feel like you've landed
on a
different planet — one that your childless friends just can't relate to.
«If David Cameron thinks it is acceptable for Mr Hester to receive this vast bonus then he is
not just out of touch with most people in Britain, he is living
on a
different planet.»
Unlike Kepler, NTGS will
not always focus
on the same area but will move its gaze so it can detect larger samples of
different planet types.
A surprising discovery: The water vapor emissions from the comet are significantly
different from the stores
on our
planet, suggesting that asteroids,
not comets, may have been the main source of Earth's water.
With many friends working for oil companies, I know this is
not really true, but at the same time my ambition had always been slightly
different to theirs: to better understand the
planet we live
on, rather than exploit its resources.
If comparatively more bluish or reddish light reaches a
planet's surface than
on Earth, photosynthetic plant - type life may may
not be greenish in color, because such life will have evolved to
different pigments in order to optimize their use of available and so color the appearance of the
planet's land surfaces accordingly.
Nonetheless, with rising sea level and environmental refugeeism compounding the increased demand
on water, food, and land of a growing population (albeit one likely to level out mid 21st century), the combined impacts of climate change and global population increase could potentially yield a world that doesn't look that
different from the one portrayed in the movie — indeed, as Jim Hansen puts it, «a
different planet» — by century's end.
Perhaps if human beings evolved
on planet Cybex things would be
different - but we didn't.
After almost 35 years
on this
planet, almost 35 years of
different hairstyles, questionable and
not - so - questionable fashion choices, interesting friends and schools,
different reasons to love myself and a heck of a lot more reasons
not to, if I could write a love letter to myself, it would read: Dear self, You are perfectly imperfect.
Every single person
on the
planet is
different if
not then cancer treatments would work for all patients the same but as we know some become violently ill with treatments and others no symptoms with treatments.
Told he couldn't cancel over the phone, he typed up one of the most magnificent breakup letters we've ever read and posted it
on Reddit under the title: «
Planet Fitness wouldn't let me cancel over the phone and required a certified letter to cancel since I live in a
different state now.
I march to a
different drum in the fact, that I don't own a car, make do without leaving a carbon footprint
on the
planet when possible, have fun just being outside...
According to co-director Tomohiro Shibuya, Dark Souls II, though set
on the same
planet as the original game, does
not represent a direct sequel — Drangleic is a completely
different region than Lodran.
While the GT may
not look vastly
different than it did a decade ago, it has received several updates that help it continue to rank amongst the best coupes
on the
planet.
And yes, we're back to our now familiar food stock valuation debate... Aryzta investors are
on a completely
different fucking
planet than me, happily paying a 17.2 P / E — looks pretty bloody expensive to me in light of Aryzta's recent earnings history,
not to mention the EPS (
on which it's based) appears almost entirely notional!?
There are billions, even trillions, of
different strains of bacteria, fungi, and viruses
on the
planet and there generally isn't a lot of overlap between the pathogens that affect animals and the ones that affect humans.
The hole is the ideal environment for many
different life forms and a lot of what you see here can
not be seen anywhere else
on the
planet.
I think the universe holds such a potential for great multi player Large fleets space ship battles were never ever promised and in most previews even journalists said most space battles are very straight forward I agree with you
on controls I agree with you
on planets and plants I believe the game requires too big of grind The game lacks variety The game lacks a clear vision and clear story All of the
planets bases look the same Every
planet you do the same thing So as you see I am
not defending the game in any sense but I do have an issue with gamers having this imaginations of what they wanted and the developers had a
different vision http://www.geek.com/games/n... Please read this article.
As with Lost
Planet 2, one of my favourite experiences with the game was the boss - battles you encountered, and Lost
Planet 3 is no
different luckily, they are just as epic and grand as I remembered them being in Lost
Planet 2, but that is sadly about where the positivity for this review ends because Lost
Planet 3 is just too much of the same, and that isn't always the best thing to rely
on when the last game didn't get by with a lot of people.
With Mass Effect: Andromeda «s launch
not too far away from now, BioWare has sanctioned the release of yet another gameplay video for the science fiction shooter, with the most recent bit of footage focusing
on how exploration will work
on the three
different planets of Voeld, Kadara, and Eos.
Twilight of the Republic feels much more fun, Disney wanted each play set to feel
different to
not only one another, but also within itself, so having battles
on different planets, boss fights, pod racing and space battles, all make the play set feel very enjoyable.
I've played the early exploration game
on half a dozen
different updates, in the process discovering
not only new
planets, but also new mechanics.
There exist many exceedingly
different places to visit
on this wildly diverse
planet that can
not fail to inspire such feelings, without trampling those that are susceptible to destruction.
Hacking the climate is
different — we have only one
planet to live
on, and can't afford any big mistakes.
So if there's no external heating setting up temp differences and none from the
planet (as we have from
different heat capacities of surface stuff), does that really make it any
different from what we have
on Earth, because what we have
on Earth is more interesting with all the temp variations coming into play, but they are, it seems to me, sort of superimposed
on and weaving in and out of a basic which doesn't change, with stratified temp differences by gravity already well mapped.
Three and a half billion years ago our
planet was quite
different and Earth's earliest biosphere was dominated by microbial communities - complex multicellular organisms were
not to evolve for quite some time, only arriving
on the scene about 600 million years ago.
Though these two research teams used
different methods, they arrived at a similar conclusion: that a crucial part of the climate system
on our dynamic
planet is
not performing as it once did.
If I had to label myself, I would say I am a lukewarmer - but having grown up in the 1970's with the «Late Great
Planet earth» claptrap, along with Howard Ruff, the 1970's ice age, the end of oil (1970's vintage), I have little to no toerance for apocalyptic claims based
on evidence that is
not substantially
different from noise.
It's our ability to survive, it's
not the
planet's ability, the
planet will still be here, nature will continue, it may take
on a
different form or shape, but that shape may
not support life as we know it.
Perhaps that has been done for HITRAN's calculations of the absorption and emission spectra of
different materials in the laboratory, but I think it can
not have been done for its calculations of CO2's absorptions and emissions in the atmosphere because (fortunately for all life
on the
planet) the atmosphere can
not be placed in a laboratory.
You can
not say «infinity display» and NOT mean Samsung, no other company on the planet calls it an infinity display and if they are talking about a different OEM, I'd be very annoyed if I was Samsu
not say «infinity display» and
NOT mean Samsung, no other company on the planet calls it an infinity display and if they are talking about a different OEM, I'd be very annoyed if I was Samsu
NOT mean Samsung, no other company
on the
planet calls it an infinity display and if they are talking about a
different OEM, I'd be very annoyed if I was Samsung.