Sentences with phrase «not on a regional scale»

And while weather models in a place like Seattle provide excellent detail on a local level, for Everest the models are not on a regional scale but rather a global one — for the entire continent of Asia or the Himalayan range.

Not exact matches

Myanmar Metals CEO and Chairman, John Lamb, said: «Bawdwin is considered to be in a very unique position in that it may be the only «Tier 1» - scale VMS deposit in the world that has not had any modern exploration programs or modern drilling, either searching for extensions to the known deposits, or on the regional targets.»

Saccaro boasts that the company's attention to detail on the ingredient side and its ability to mass - produce fresh food every day doesn't exist on a regional scale outside of Quest.

A campaign about education in the northeastern U.S. targeting a specific elected official may not hold my attention with content that calls out a particular politician by name (they're not MY rep, after all), but if the content also contains stats that I find relevant to education discussions where I live, then suddenly even a regional campaign can be relevant on a national scale.

According to Laepple: «We are in the middle of an experiment that we can not reverse, but which we still don't understand well enough to make clear statements at the regional level on longer time scales.

The authors note that, although their model is based on the best available data, the data for Russia and India was scaled up from regional data and may not represent the true national disease burden.

Compiling them into a large regional data set allowed us to answer questions at a large scale that hadn't been addressed before,» says Jeff Matthews, assistant professor in the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences at U of I, and co-author on the study.

But these days, with many scientists are focused on tracking greenhouse gases produced by human activities at national, regional and local scales, the current monitoring network doesn't measure up.

Water research needs to get down to the management scale; for basic research that means they need to scale up and for global research that means they need to scale down, because we need to get to a scale where things are relevant to people and to management — the regional, national and global scenarios of this initiative will help with this if they concentrate on not just sticking to the global scale, but really getting down to the people.»

The views seem mildly skeptical, but not outrageous for someone focusing on monthly anomalies on a regional scale, and who is clearly very interested in various «cycles.»

Many studies have now been published, and many more presented at national scientific meetings, on methane emissions using techniques which capture the emissions at regional scales and do not require industry permission to sample.

But since we seem to have determined that global mean temperatures do tend to track global mean forcings, the interesting science is now in determining the regional scale at which we can still make useful statements — and whether a forcing is «first order» or not will depend quite crucially on what the scale is.

Most models are much too coarse to predict trends on regional scale (and certainly can't predict extreme events), thus there is no clear answer to your question.

That it is possible to construct a metric that doesn't show regional warming in a certain roughly specified region on a certain unspecified time scale with a certain unspecified statistical technique in no way contradicts the assertion that the balance of observational evidence shows unusual recent global warming, in first order agreement with theoretical, computational, and paleoclimate evidence.

Even though on a regional scale it appears that not much occurred, there were some interesting precipitation rankings at isolated locations.

The SAB finds that the EPA did not support quantitatively its conclusion about lack of evidence for widespread, systemic impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources, and did not clearly describe the system (s) of interest (e.g., groundwater, surface water), the scale of impacts (i.e., local or regional), nor the definitions of «systemic» and «widespread.»

Global and regional climate models have not demonstrated skill at predicting regional and local climate change and variability on multi-decadal time scales.

Climate models are also used on regional scales in attempts to figure out way climate models don't perform well on regional scales.

4 On sub-global scales the answer is not so pessimistic, since the only way to get specific knowledge about regional and local scales is to self - consistently simulate the climate system at these scales.

A common theme in the debate is that since models can not make accurate predictions on regional and decadal scales, then they can not make accurate predictions on global or century scales.

Part of this is a resolution issue, but the more important issue is the modes of natural internal variability, which the climate models do a so - so job on in a large - scale sense, but not in translating the impacts to a regional level.

I would not dispute 100 - 300 year oscillations as a possibility, but my reading of the climate records reveals no evidence for a significant role for such oscillations — or at least, no role substantial enough on a global scale to have created a discernible signal outside of changes occasioned by solar variations, volcanism, and other known entities (changes on a regional scale are a very different matter and may have involved such oscillations).

On the one hand you say «I don't know how to assess skill of decadal trends» and on the other hand you also claim that the «prediction of mean temperature at the regional scale can be done fairly well given the robust temperature trend»On the one hand you say «I don't know how to assess skill of decadal trends» and on the other hand you also claim that the «prediction of mean temperature at the regional scale can be done fairly well given the robust temperature trend»on the other hand you also claim that the «prediction of mean temperature at the regional scale can be done fairly well given the robust temperature trend».

They clearly have not «proved» skill at predicting in a hindcast mode, changes in climate statistics on the regional scale, and even in terms of the global average surface temperature trend, in recent years they have overstated the positive trend.

If they continue to mislead, however, without quantifying their level of skill at predicting changes in regional climate statistics on multi-decadal time scales, they are not being honest to the impact and policy communities.

It is not the pure prediction of the (regional) trends that is aimed for (type 4), but the occurrence of certain (relevant) weather types conditioned on an assumed change in the large scale forcing.

«The reality of urban warming on local and small regional scales is not questioed by this work; it is the impact of urban warming on estimates of global and large regional trends that is shown to be small.»

However, there is not yet consensus on the best approach to estimate the drift correction at global and at regional scales.

On the paleoclimate reconstructions, I think perhaps that the focus on global reconstructions as to whether the entire globe was warmer of cooler in the past isn't particularly relevant and more focus should be place on regional scale reconstructionOn the paleoclimate reconstructions, I think perhaps that the focus on global reconstructions as to whether the entire globe was warmer of cooler in the past isn't particularly relevant and more focus should be place on regional scale reconstructionon global reconstructions as to whether the entire globe was warmer of cooler in the past isn't particularly relevant and more focus should be place on regional scale reconstructionon regional scale reconstructions.

I don't regard the flightpath stabilization policy strategy as being of much use, especially on time scales out to 5 hours, which is the more relevant time frame for most regional carriers.

In view of the multiple modes and periods of internal variability in the ocean, it is likely that we have not detected the full scale of internal variability effects on regional and global sea level change.

AR4 WGI discusses extreme weather mostly in the context of model «projections» (which are often contradictory on regional scale and therefore are «more likely than not» better used as toilet paper:) Despite the title of their report, WGI says little «The Physical Science Basis» of extreme weather.

It doesn't seem surprising to me that GCM simulations don't give useful decadal predictions on regional scale (or at least they are just beginning to get to the point where decadal scale predictions have useful skill IIRC).

Unfortunately, the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment did not sufficiently acknowledge the importance of these other human climate forcings in altering regional and global climate and their effects on predictability at the regional scale.»

Last Monday, Germany's Bundesbank board member Joachim Wuermeling said that any regulation on Bitcoin must be enforced on global scale and not just on a national or regional level, since digital money is not limited by borders.

I would be surprised if it didn't come with N but at the same time I wouldn't be purchasing this device if it did not come with N, on the basis of how slow upgrades have been — granted in most every case the upgrades have been flawless but with regional releases on an sliding scale timescale