Not exact matches
Remember Karen,
contraceptives are
not a 100 % guarantee
on no pregnancy or «deadly disease».
Their employees,
on the other hand, can choose to avail themselves of the
contraceptive options or
not as is falls within THEIR personal believe system since, being people, they can have beliefs.
If your faith prevents you from using
contraceptives, then don't, but
not providing it equates to forcing your religion
on someone else by preventing them their right to choose.
The policy goes into effect
on August 1, but U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced in a statement January 20 that religious organizations that do
not provide
contraceptive coverage based
on religious belief will have until August 1, 2013, to comply.
Because these
contraceptives are
not used properly (e.g. some women forget to take the Pill
on a daily basis), the failure rates (from Guttmacher) are 8.7 % and 17.4 % respectively.
In March, after an uproar among religious institutions that didn't want to pay for
contraceptives, the Obama administration offered several policy suggestions that would require the administrator of the insurance policy,
not the religious institution or the insurer, to pay for contraception coverage and invited comment
on those proposals.
In 2014, when Obamacare came before the Supreme Court via the Hobby Lobby case, the court ruled 5 — 4 that employers who objected to the
contraceptive mandate
on religious grounds didn't have to offer birth control directly to female employees.
According to the government's Hobby Lobby petition, the Supreme Court must decide whether or
not a for - profit corporation can «deny its employees the health coverage of
contraceptives... based
on the religious objections of the corporation's owners.»
Because the birth control cases all focus
on a 1993 federal law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act,
not the Constitution, the Justices will face questions about whether the mandate to provide free access to 20 forms of birth control drugs or devices, sterilization, screenings, and counseling imposes a «substantial burden»
on religious freedom of nonprofit employers with religious objections to some or all
contraceptives, whether the mandate in fact serves a «compelling interest» of the government, and whether an attempt to provide an exemption from the mandate satisfies the requirement that such an accommodation is «the least restrictive means» of achieving the government's policy interest.
The pope said: «We can
not insist only
on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of
contraceptive methods.
Funny to me how all the liberals who want the church to leave the government alone are the very same ones who say that churches should
not discriminate in the hiring of their clergy
on basis of religion and are saying that churches who do
not support
contraceptives are required to pay for it.
He was funny
on the
contraceptive thing, reminding people, perhaps, that married Mormons, unlike Catholics, are allowed to use
contraceptives, if
not all the time.
(d) Scaring people into
NOT using condoms, based upon his disdainful and aloof view that it is better that a person die than go against the Vatican's position
on contraceptive use.
«We can
not insist only
on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of
contraceptive methods,» he told his Jesuit interviewer.
Basing you perceptions
on religion is like using a very distorted lense to view the real world: the result is so perverted by doing it that you come up with bizarre notions like «
contraceptives are bad» «everyone else is going to an eternal torture chamber because they don't agree with me.»
If I understand him correctly, he believes that by making rational arguments we can see, for example, that the owners of Hobby Lobby, the Greens, are
not asking for an exemption, but demonstrating why the
contraceptive mandate is
not a law, and is therefore
not binding
on anyone.
Groups like Planned Parenthood have been a godsend because they work to educate women
on their bodies, provide medical care for women, and pass out free
contraceptives to these married women who otherwise can't afford to prevent children.
There is the argument that gay s e x is a sin, just as mast - erbation, premarital s e x, s e x that doesn't include normal inter-course and use of
contraceptives are all considered sins for hetero people, depending
on the Christian denomination.
We have had universal access to
contraceptives since i can remember!!!! I only pitched in with my girlfiend,
not the Neighbors or the Bum
on the corner — Get it
The Gov» t will allow murder in the form of abortion but
not allow the Catholic church to practice their beliefs
on contraceptives.
On Tuesday, Wheaton College and Belmont Abbey College won a legal round against the HHS contraceptive mandate not only for themselves, but for all fellow plaintiffs as a D.C. appeals court prompted the Obama administration to promise not to enforce the mandate (as currently written) and — on top of that — regularly report on its progress toward new rules that better protect religious freedo
On Tuesday, Wheaton College and Belmont Abbey College won a legal round against the HHS
contraceptive mandate
not only for themselves, but for all fellow plaintiffs as a D.C. appeals court prompted the Obama administration to promise
not to enforce the mandate (as currently written) and —
on top of that — regularly report on its progress toward new rules that better protect religious freedo
on top of that — regularly report
on its progress toward new rules that better protect religious freedo
on its progress toward new rules that better protect religious freedom.
mdbill — I guessing you don't know the statistics
on the explosion of the use of
contraceptives and the amount of abortion and unplanned kids?
(UPDATED) Justice Department won't oppose small - business injunctions, upping the odds that Supreme Court will weigh in
on employer - provided
contraceptives.
However, our purpose here is
not to consider divorce but rather to reflect
on how the
contraceptive mentality has spread also among Catholics.
You get the Obama administration's
contraceptive / abortifacient mandate
on steroids and a full - scale legal assault by Clinton Administration 3.0
on the capacity of religious institutions to be themselves as they understand themselves to be: communities of religious conviction with a right to their own moral integrity,
not mere instruments for delivering whatever the government deems to be a public service or a public good.
Costs for providing additional services like
contraceptives will be passed
on to ALL consumers of the insurance policy, whether they use
contraceptives or
not.
In the Fall of 2013, for instance, Pope Francis gave an interview which was interpreted — or rather, misinterpreted — as downplaying the ongoing abortion Holocaust, «We can
not insist only
on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of
contraceptive methods,» he said.
If such a product is marketed, it is likely to become a popular form of
contraceptive —
not only discouraging research
on other
contraceptives, but making abortion a completely privatized and commercialized act.
No - one is forcing
contraceptives on you, if you don't agree... don't use them but don't expect everyone else to follow your lead - some people actually care about the world they reside in and know that we are responsible for keeping it together.
As the Pope still has significant influence over the less educated masses in these parts of the World, he has exercised this power by: (a) Using some of the Vatican's incomprehensible wealth to educate these vulnerable people
on health family planning and condom use; (b) Supporting government programs that distribute condoms to high risk groups; (c) Using its myriad of churches in these regions to distribute condoms; or (d) Scaring people into
NOT using condoms, based upon his disdainful and aloof view that it is better that a person die than go against the Vatican's position
on contraceptive use.
On a visit
not long ago to Nairobi, I met a woman who used
contraceptives and limited her family to three children, which meant she had the resources to open a sewing business.
Halo ladies I had unprotected sex with my bf
on the second day of menstruation 23.2.2017 and I didn't take any
contraceptive pill and
on 4.3.2017 I had unprotected sex again but got pill
on 6.3.2017 and
on 16.3.2017 I had sex again and had
contraceptive pill
on 17.3.2017.
«You might
not support all of these issues, but it is important to know where you stand and where all Democrats stand
on a woman's right to choose, GENDA, single payer health care,
contraceptive coverage, family planning funding, campaign finance reform and the DREAM Act.»
«Scientists have been working
on a male
contraceptive for decades,» says Monica Laronda, a reproductive endocrinologist at the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, who was
not involved in the research.
The study, published
on 4 October in Lancet Infectious Diseases, also showed that oral
contraceptive use by women increased the risk of HIV infection for both women and men with infected partners, but the numbers generated did
not rise to statistical significance.
«It would
not be unreasonable to consider the development of a male
contraceptive based
on RingoA - Cdk2 inhibitors,» proposes Nebreda.
(Oral
contraceptives have a negative impact
on my mood, so I have
not taken them since realizing how they affected my mental wellness.)
We get it; condoms are notorious pleasure - busters, and
not exactly the coolest
contraceptive on the block.
For a study published earlier this year, researchers in Spain looked at two groups of women: one group that was
on hormonal
contraceptives and another group that was
not and therefore ovulated regularly.
I have
not included brand names of oral
contraceptives because like a shell game, manufacturers of oral
contraceptives are constantly changing the names, doses and contents of their birth control pills, perhaps to avoid being
on a list like the one below.
At the end of the day, I don't recommend the pill or hormonal
contraceptives as they can seriously wreak havoc
on our delicate hormones and cycle.
Although certain
contraceptive pills can have positive effects
on women with a tendency for acne, as a dermatologist I don't usually recommend starting the
contraceptive pill as a way of controlling your acne.
It is also emphasized that safe sex and the use of
contraceptives do
not rely
on men alone, Women must also take charge of their sexual lives and practice birth control themselves.
Women
on the pill can
not sign up because oral
contraceptives trick a woman into thinking she's pregnant, which causes her to seek out people with similar genes.
Specifically, we need to educate women about their
contraceptive choices (many don't know about IUDs, and those who do are often misinformed about their safety and effectiveness), make them available at no cost to the recipient, and train the medical community
on the best clinical practices.
Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor has an article headlined «Obamacare: Supreme Court hands nuns temporary victory
on contraceptives; The Supreme Court blocked enforcement of Obamacare's
contraceptive mandate and said the nuns were
not required to use the procedure set up by the government as an accommodation for religious groups.»
Although Plan B and other ECPs are part of the
contraceptive choices women need to have
on hand to make their reproductive decisions, they do
not replace other more consistent forms of birth control.
In reality, although they have become increasingly important sources of publicly funded
contraceptive care, FQHCs could
not readily serve all the women who rely
on Planned Parenthood (see «Federally Qualified Health Centers: Vital Sources of Care, No Substitute for the Family Planning Safety Net,» 2017).
Tom Price
not only wanted to prevent Planned Parenthood from serving patients who rely
on Medicaid, but he falsely believes that «
not one» woman has ever struggled to afford
contraceptives.
Moreover, some states have built
on the federal guarantee by taking steps such as ensuring that patients can receive insurance coverage for a full year's supply of
contraceptives at one time (rather than for either one or three months at a time, as is typical).10 This development is especially important for abortion patients who are
not interested in LARCs but may need time to find another type of provider for ongoing
contraceptive care — if, for example, they do
not live near the abortion clinic.