If it's
not on the classroom observation checklist, you're going to be reluctant.
Not exact matches
Here is an intriguing post by Rebecca who got to observe a Waldorf Kindergarten
classroom and her
observations on how fighting, tattling and
not taking turns was handled by the seasoned teachers: http://bendingbirches2010.blogspot.com/2012/02/nursery-observation.html
The letter went
on to cite reports of teachers who did
not receive a final tenure decision because the principal did
not complete the
classroom observation or was new to the school.
Consensus needs to be reached
on the focus of the
observation (teacher, students or both), the frequency and duration of
observations, the structure of pre - and post-
observation meetings, who is going to own and control these data (critical with video recordings), and last, but certainly
not least, the
classroom observation guide to be used.
For a number of reasons — limited reliability, the potential for abuse, the recent evidence that teachers have effects
on student earnings and college going which are largely
not captured by test - based measures — it would
not make sense to attach 100 percent of the weight to test - based measures (or any of the available measures, including
classroom observations, for that matter).
(Even though
classroom observations do
not add much predictive power, it is hoped that
classroom observations excel
on a third dimension,
not captured in the graph: the ability to diagnose specific strengths and weaknesses.)
If all the weight were placed
on classroom observations, then instructors would be tempted to go through the motions of effective practice
on the day of an
observation but
not on other days.
We contend, however, that evaluations based
on observations of
classroom practice are valuable, even if they do
not predict student achievement gains considerably better than more subjective methods like principal ratings of teachers.
In addition, our analysis does
not compare value added with other measures of teacher quality, like evaluations based
on classroom observation, which might be even better predictors of teachers» long - term impacts than VA scores.
Visiting
classrooms —
not the formal, scheduled teacher
observations, but the drop - in visits — keeps me connected to whats happening throughout my programs and allows me to maintain a pulse
on the school.
Cincinnati's merit pay plan, proposed in 2002, was overwhelmingly voted down by teachers (1892 to 73), even though the program did
not base bonuses
on student test scores, but rather
on a multifaceted evaluation system that included
classroom observations by professional peers and administrators and portfolios of lesson plans and student work.
For a number of reasons limited reliability, the potential for abuse, the recent evidence that teachers have effects
on student earnings and college going which are largely
not captured by test - based measures it would
not make sense to attach 100 percent of the weight to test - based measures (or any of the available measures, including
classroom observations, for that matter).
Based
on the earlier
observations I made and seeing the debate in action, I see that the
classroom had been intentionally set up in such a way that student voice was
not only celebrated, but used to create more opportunities for students to grow and be successful.
53 % of respondents believe that teacher layoffs should be based
on whether or
not a teacher had a poor
classroom observation.
In contrast to their view of VAM scores, teachers reported to us that they found
classroom observations helpful in providing actionable feedback
on their teaching in real time — so they didn't have to wait until the end of the year to make adjustments.
Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, does
not oppose the use of value - added data but wants to ensure evaluations are based
on «
classroom observations, self - evaluations, portfolios, appraisal of lesson plans, students» written work» as well.
Frustrated that his students were
not persisting independently
on challenging problems, this teacher decided to take the risk and open his
classroom to
observation.
Teachers in NYC fear
classroom observations are
not being used to help them grow professionally, but instead teachers must teach to try to score points
on Ms. Danielson's often misused framework.
The change has three main prongs: principals making more frequent and rigorous
classroom observations; teachers in core subjects like math and English receiving ratings based
on how their students perform
on standardized tests; and teachers in grades and subjects where those tests don't apply devising other ways to chart student growth, in collaboration with their principals and using advice from the state.
Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, doesn't oppose the use of value - added data but wants to ensure evaluations are based
on «
classroom observations, self - evaluations, portfolios, appraisal of lesson plans, students» written work» as well.
When the performance of the three groups
on the
classroom observation test was contrasted using an ANOVA, F (2) = 2.822, p =.067, the probability that the mean differences were due other than to chance alone, with alpha of p <.05, was
not considered significant.
For four years, the group has helped district officials shape the
classroom observations, voted
on every decision and scrapped ideas they didn't like.
Moreover, and based
on the very limited sample of my own
observations in person, those first two or three years of work typically do
not constitute the best teaching that a person is likely to do, so the energy and enthusiasm don't necessarily mean spectacularly good or effective
classroom results.
In the end (which is actually near the beginning of the manuscript), Goldhaber notes that VAMs are «distinct» as compared to
classroom observations, because they offer «an objective measure that does
not rely
on human interpretation of teacher practices, and by design, [they offer] a system in which teachers are evaluated relative to one another rather than relative to an absolute standard (i.e., it creates a distribution in which teachers can be ranked).
On this note, and «[i] n sum, recent research on value added tells us that, by using data from student perceptions, classroom observations, and test score growth, we can obtain credible evidence [albeit weakly related evidence, referring to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's MET studies] of the relative effectiveness of a set of teachers who teach similar kids [emphasis added] under similar conditions [emphasis added]... [Although] if a district administrator uses data like that collected in MET, we can anticipate that an attempt to classify teachers for personnel decisions will be characterized by intolerably high error rates [emphasis added
On this note, and «[i]
n sum, recent research
on value added tells us that, by using data from student perceptions, classroom observations, and test score growth, we can obtain credible evidence [albeit weakly related evidence, referring to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's MET studies] of the relative effectiveness of a set of teachers who teach similar kids [emphasis added] under similar conditions [emphasis added]... [Although] if a district administrator uses data like that collected in MET, we can anticipate that an attempt to classify teachers for personnel decisions will be characterized by intolerably high error rates [emphasis added
on value added tells us that, by using data from student perceptions,
classroom observations, and test score growth, we can obtain credible evidence [albeit weakly related evidence, referring to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's MET studies] of the relative effectiveness of a set of teachers who teach similar kids [emphasis added] under similar conditions [emphasis added]... [Although] if a district administrator uses data like that collected in MET, we can anticipate that an attempt to classify teachers for personnel decisions will be characterized by intolerably high error rates [emphasis added].
School districts are equipping principals with specialized training to conduct
classroom observations based
on evidence,
not gut feelings, using standards - based rubrics,
not... Read more»
Our
classroom observations suggest that teachers do indeed write words
on the board when they are explaining their meanings; however, this strategy is
not employed consistently or universally.
Teachers with students with higher incoming achievement levels receive
classroom observation scores that are higher
on average than those received by teachers whose incoming students are at lower achievement levels, and districts do
not have processes in place to address this bias.