Sentences with phrase «not only the logical»

Susan wrote,» I have provided you with a link to the noblest concept of reality available on this planet at this time, a philosophy that is not only logical but commensurate with modern discovery.»

I have provided you with a link to the noblest concept of reality available on this planet at this time, a philosophy that is not only logical but commensurate with modern discovery.

His principle of «modal coincidence» is, I presume, intended to resolve the problem, but if it does, it is only because the modes are real and not only logical or linguistic.

Getting your calcium from a combination of food and supplements is an important consideration and is not only logical, but also practical.

Doesn't the only logical means of improving the players» performance lie in the coach's ability to teach and coach, which involves modeling, demonstrating, providing just - in - time feedback, reflective study and practice?

Indeed, more than 45 million Corollas have been sold to date and having a hero model seems not only logical but well overdue.

Thus, not only the logical structure of the contents but also the form of the paper plays an important role in the process of assessment.

Wouldn't the only logical way to handle this be to adjust the strike prices based on the stock conversion ratio agreed upon in the merger?

With so much invested in ongoing, interconnected cinematic worlds, it's not only logical to look for every possible way to monetize them; it's essential.

These educational residence experiences are very similar to professional work experience listed on experienced Nurse resumes so starting with the education section first on entry - level nursing resumes is not only logical but simple to do.

It's not only logical, but necessary for professional development.

Not exact matches

It's a logical argument, even if Wolff doesn't consider that digital - only news organizations tend to have lower costs than their print - based cousins.

Taken to its logical extreme, his research seems to argue that boards should have only female directors, but he's careful to point out that not all women score highly on complex moral reason (sometimes known as «CMR») decision - making, and some men do.

The logical mind is an amazing tool but it isn't the only one.

Analyzing data qualitatively enables one to not only become data - driven; it also creates opportunities to become creatively - driven while weeding out the noise for a more logical approach.

Since miners are unwilling to accept segwit on its own, and since Core will not compromise, the only logical alternative is bigger blocks, which is the best option regardless.

Professional traders do not waste their trading capital, they use it only when the risk reward profile of a trade setup makes sense and is logical.

Unfortunately, we can only say this by means of logical deduction — the Act does not define «securities» and the proposed changes in C - 50 don't venture to define «other instruments.»

You can not use mythology to prove a point, you can only use facts and logical deductions therefrom.

The only logical conclusion is that there are no gods, not even just one, that the jc myth is just that, a myth, and that all religion is for the delusional.

For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.

-- and to refute your point before you make, just because it DID happen does not point to god being the only reason why and therefor god exists, that's shoe - horning god into something that has no need for god nor makes any logical sense

But a new movement today, calling itself transhumanism, carries these notions to their logical conclusion: human beings are not only manipulable objects, but raw, manipulable material; man himself, his very form, might be tinkered with, enhanced, and «reengineered,» like a species of crop or livestock.

The only logical explanation would be that he did not die on the cross and married his wife after the crucifixion.

Again, I don't aim to lock anybody into a logical box where the answer must only be, «the Christian God is real» because, in truth, there is simply no way to do that.

Because of his philosophical starting point (science goes from simple to complex), Dawkins does not regard the existence of the staircase as something whose existence needs to be proved, but rather as a logical necessity that only needs to be illustrated.

Now, if God is a mass murderer, and the Bible claims murder is a product of Satan, then wouldn't it only be logical that, if you believe in a higher deity, that it would have to logically be Lucifer?

Pacioni himself tells us that throughout his book he has «tried to reconstruct the framework of Augustine's speculation in all of its most original philosophical traits, following philosophical and logical - linguistic suggestions performing a point by point analysis of the texts not only from a philological but also a historiographical, cultural and logical - formal point of view» (p. xix).

There very definitely is such an element, only it is not logical, but emotional, or having to do with feeling.

What looks like a logical contradiction is resolved in life, for not only the Bible but our own experience tells us that to forgive others as fully as we can is both a condition and a consequence of divine forgiveness.

Just from a logical perspective, re your point no. 4 - your premise is that what you perceive as «super» natural is only that which we can not yet define — how can you know it is not outside of nature?

In Jesus of Nazareth we find the true successor to the prophets of Israel, whose concern for the common man, and whose unconcern for the forms of ancient religion, He not only shared, but took to their logical conclusion.

because in the bible it states «But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father» Mark 13:32 and if jesus warned us about the end times so that verse alone is contradicting but there is always a logical explanation.

Thus, J. R. Lucas points out that such a criterion for time involves not only technical tense - logical difficulties, 7 but also involves a denial of the basic intuition that time is a concomitant of consciousness — we are aware of time even in the most tranquil of environments (TTS 13).

Man returning from the dead in accordance with a two - thousand year old tome that not only begs us to refrain from logical thinking about the natural world but also contradicts itself incessantly?

Arminians often met this objection to foreknowledge by appealing to a logical distinction between necessity and certainty.5 The fact that God foreknows that choice X is going to be made (freely) means only that X is certain to occur; it does not mean that God's foreknowledge, or any other cause, necessitated X.

The criteria of logical validity doesn't apply to the validity of the premises, only to the reasoning.

For not only was Aristotle highly sensitive to the perils of determining the real by means of the logical — this was, after all, his chief criticism of Plato's theory of the Forms 6 — but Whitehead himself tirelessly attacked the tendency to mistake logical relationships for the structure of the real, an ultimate case of what he called «the fallacy of misplaced concreteness».

She says that causality is already a logical category that's prior to the empirical, and only my unreflective servility to mechanistic thought makes me think it can't be extended analogically beyond the sensible.

He gave everyone the Creation (it's only logical that you look around you and realize that we aren't an accident... order doesn't come from an explosion nor does something come from nothing... plus it would break the first law of thermodynamics) and a conscience so that we all will have no excuse on Judgment Day.

'' (it's only logical that you look around you and realize that we aren't an accident... order doesn't come from an explosion nor does something come from nothing... plus it would break the first law of thermodynamics)»

Hence, we may safely conclude that Collingwood did not move from one conception of metaphysics to another; he only made, in response to logical positivism, a shift in strategy towards the problem of metaphysics.

It is not logical to believe that only one denomination is right or that only your non-denominational movement is right.

Taking propositions concretely, however, means having recourse not only to its logical subjects, but to the contextual conditions brought to bear with the prehending subject entertaining the proposition.

In Der Gedanke, Frege maintains that thoughts (i.e., propositions, judgments) are grasped as unanalyzed wholes, and only later analyzed — not into subject and predicate — but into argument and function, whose logical unity is prior to their component parts (FBB 29; LU 30 - 53).

Existing as entertained in experience, propositions not only can be true or false, a capability afforded by their logical subjects, but are in fact true or false (AI 245; PR 11 / 16f, 258/394).

Rather, in the provocative words of «The Metaphysical Scheme of March 1927,» a proposition «contains» two subjects, the logical subject and the «percipient subject» for whom the proposition is or is not a valid element in experience; a proposition is not only about its logical subject, but is for any one of its percipient subjects, and thus relevant for the future (MS 321, 322).

A proposition is not simply that fusion or «contrast» of predicative patterns and logical subjects, for it does not «contain» only one subject, i.e., the logical subject.

But this, he says, only establishes the logical, asymmetrical dependence of propositions, not the ontological or causal interdependence of individuals.

There is not only a kind of logical scandal in asserting both p and not - p, where p is any proposition, but also a conviction that such a contradiction is an impossibility in the domain of existent things.