Sentences with phrase «not only your conclusions»

It should be clear from earlier messages that I don't agree with Bart on the conclusions related the real Earth system, but I prefer having also the logic right and mathematics correctly understood, not only the conclusions.

Not exact matches

And this isn't the only research that came to this conclusion.

If it was going to take Apple that long to bring a car to market, then we could only draw two conclusions: Apple wanted to develop a vehicle to use future technologies that aren't practical or accessible today, or Apple is completely incompetent when it comes to this car project.

Judging the results of your A / B split test after only a few page visits simply won't give you enough information to draw solid conclusions about the best way to improve your website.

«Kaspersky Lab does not have inappropriate ties to any government, including Russia, and the only conclusion seems to be that Kaspersky Lab is caught in the middle of a geopolitical fight,» he told the Journal.

Second, there's the «in advance» part, suggesting that not only is the thanks for something you're going to do in the future, but also that it's a foregone conclusion that your next act will be to earn the gratitude of the email's sender.

A semen allergy isn't the only culprit with those types of symptoms though, so talk to your doctor before jumping to conclusions.

It's important not only to understand what your partner thinks about spending and saving, but how they arrived at those conclusions.

«It's not a forgone conclusion anymore that the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord will be the only players,» he said.

So if you don't think we're past the great filter, and you don't think we're the first life forms with a shot at making it past the great filter, there's only one remaining conclusion: Humans are toast.

While we can't use sterile mice to make any definitive conclusions about humans, the twins study, published in the journal Science last year, provided clear evidence that the microbiome is involved in weight gain — something earlier research had only suggested.

Our basic conclusion is that the system is not only unreliable, but an absolute waste of time and money.

«Given this conclusion, we ask what benefit a borrower who shopped from only two brokers passed up by not shopping from three or four.

If you adjust for the fact that exports to the UK are not that important to rEU (as they aren't — we just learned that), the only conclusion I can draw from exhibit 3 above is that the UK will put many more jobs at risk than any other EU country will.

A mind that believes, that has dogmas, conclusions, that plays with rituals, is not a religious mind... It is only a very still, quiet, untortured mind that sees the truth.

The scientific method can only test existing data — it can not draw conclusions about origins.

He was certainly right to see the importance of human psychology, but just as he raced too quickly from the truth that knowledge rests on sensation to the conclusion that it is confined to it, so he assumed that we can only inhabit our psychology and not evaluate it.

The only logical conclusion is that there are no gods, not even just one, that the jc myth is just that, a myth, and that all religion is for the delusional.

At the conclusion of this dark episode, a critical historian might step in, thank Levy for his research, point to the ashes of Wycliffe and Hus, and explain that history knows only power, not truth.

But a new movement today, calling itself transhumanism, carries these notions to their logical conclusion: human beings are not only manipulable objects, but raw, manipulable material; man himself, his very form, might be tinkered with, enhanced, and «reengineered,» like a species of crop or livestock.

They rightly insisted on the constitutional principle that government could not intervene, but then they drew the conclusion that the discussion should thus be over» and that only bigots and un-American theocrats would continue agitating against an Islamic center near Ground Zero.

People that strongly believe, specifically, that there is no God, are fooling themselves when they say they are only being rational, and not reaching a conclusion based on faith.

Perhaps not the only reasonable conclusion, but certainly A reasonable conclusion.

As someone who has done so many times over during my almost 40 years as a Christians, I can assure you it's NOT a comfortable Book; only someone who HAS N'T read it would come away with that conclusion!!

In many cases, the Bible can not be used at all, only physical evidence along with thought - provoking questions that hopefully leads a person to a right conclusion.

So because we haven't found simultaneous existence of another civilization, you can jump to the conclusion that a being not only created the universe, but also created one species of sentient life destined to fulfill the higher purpose of existing to believe in him?

For the sake of argument, if the article (which I didn't read) used only words that left no room for doubt (in a sense saying «We know with 100 % certainty that...), would you accept the conclusions?

I've come to the conclusion that dreams and visions and the pursuit of signs and wonders is not only unhealthy, but, as Jesus said, adulterous.

«I'll pray about it» I certainly would throw that into the same bag as «the will of the Lord» for you or myself by someone else, is always generated by their personal prejudices, what don't appeal to them is not the will of the Lord, I came to that conclusion only year's after the damage was already done.

For fellow Christians to implicate one of the beacons for Christian thought in the 21st century as a bigoted, senseless, reactionary institution, is equivalent to denying the ultimate conclusions and results of Wheaton's work in the 21st century up until this point, which as a graduate living in a secular world, has been mostly of incredible benefit not only to our world, but the kingdom beyond.

The ONLY conclusion you should have is that we can not reach a conclusion at this time.

Let us not jump too quickly to a conclusion at this point; if it seems to some that we waste our time while we might be coming to a decision, we take comfort in the thought that it does not follow that we shall have only our trouble for our pains.

Not only are Cardinal Kasper's conclusions flawed but his starting point also needs to be questioned.

In Jesus of Nazareth we find the true successor to the prophets of Israel, whose concern for the common man, and whose unconcern for the forms of ancient religion, He not only shared, but took to their logical conclusion.

Your insinuation that I arrived at my conclusions based on your «talking snake» is not only untrue, you are basing your opinion upon untrue information, your delusional bias, your schizophrenic religious texts, and your ignorance.

The only conclusion I can come to is that it is full of contradictions, myths, fairy tales, violence, murder, and oppression and that your god isn't very good at communicating clearly.

Nor did the list - making approach play to the strong suit of Thomism, which requires not only definitions and conclusions but also a deeply textured set of questions and distinctions.

Not only an invalid sampling, but also leading the evidence to his bigoted conclusion, I hope this guy never gets a job again.

In conclusion, the realist thesis is this: To say that actual entities are the final realities does not mean that nexus are merely multiplicities (or sets), or that nexus are merely subjective, or that nexus only exist in the consequent nature of God.

I think the conclusion of this article should be more about whether or not people are turning to the only true hope for the world rather than turning to their own (or someone else's) twisted perspectives.

While Colson and Eckerd are certainly correct to argue that the church is not the only institution capable of addressing the moral vacuum in American society, their conclusion that «basic moral concepts... are mounting a comeback» among secular cultural elites» Norman Lear is cited as an example» is certainly overstated.

We can understand this failure as Percy's again having independently reached the same conclusion as MacIntyre: that the ethical can not be simply radically chosen, because the notion of the radical choice is itself only at home in the aesthetic mode.

It is certainly not the only way, and should not by any means be our first response to all situations; however I can not agree with Wink's conclusion, as summarized by Jeremy, that «history has proven time and time again that violence will never put an end to violence,» or that violence itself is always an evil action (Wink concludes the latter much more firmly than Jeremy.

On the other side are «creationists,» who argue — against not only science but also those faiths that accept the compatibility of evolutionary biology and Sacred Writ — that the earth was created on or around Sunday, October 23, 4004 b.c., a conclusion based on a sincere but discredited calculation by James Ussher in the seventeenth century.

Jewett believes his methods and conclusions are «not only consistent with, but required by, a wholehearted commitment to the infallibility of Scripture, rightly interpreted.

Circumstantial evidence against the accused man must not only lead consistently, step by step, to a conclusion of his guilt; it must also «exclude to a moral certainty every other reasonable hypothesis.»

Though many Calvinists argue that double predestination is the only logical conclusion to the Calvinist position on God's election of some (but not all) to receive eternal life, I am not going to belabor the point or try to refute the idea since most Calvinists claim that they do not teach or believe it... (for more on reprobation and double predestination I recommend this book: Vance: The Other Side of Calvinism, pp, 250 - 333).

Consider, as an example, the controversies surrounding the recent work of Catharine MacKinnon and Andrea Dworkin on the ethical and jurisprudential implications of pornography: their conclusion is that pornography, by its very existence, makes the exercise of full citizenship an impossibility for women, and that therefore making such literature illegal is not only consistent with, but is properly implied by, the Constitution of the United States.

The only right conclusion is that to stay here would not only hinder you, but hinder me.

In their examination of the written records, not only were they not of a mind to «insist on proving this tradition legendary», 3 but because of their Christian commitment they were ready to be convinced of the traditional view if only that were the conclusion to which their study of the New Testament records led them.