Sentences with phrase «not open debates»

Not exact matches

Encourage healthy debate on project plans and people might feel more open to speak out when they don't understand or do not agree.

Prodding your people to be less conflict adverse can lead to real benefits, according to Thompson who cites recent research that shows, «brainstorming groups that engage in open debate, challenging each other in benevolent ways, perform better than groups that don't have any debate at all.

The wisdom of any or all of this is wide open for debate, but it doesn't support the notion that oil has monopolized the Tories» attention.

That judgment, about whether the government should get involved in the entire P2P throttling debate, will likely be made by the end of the summer, but Bell certainly could not have helped its assertion that congestion is a huge problem by opening its own (non-P2P) video download store last week.

Not only that, but the perfect skill set itself is open to great debate.

It is not clear to me at all, even if we do get past the issues with mining centralization, segregated witness, lightning networks and hard forks, that Bitcoin (or Bitcoin - like) blockchain - based cryptocurrencies are the way to do it, but I'm open to informed debate on this point.

This is directed at all the anti-christian posters, The topic at question is not open for debate of if there is a God, or if Jesus existed, He undoubtedly did and DOES.

Compare that to the dogmatic stance of religion — a phony belief system that starts and end with unproven manmade tribal myths, not open to true debate, and that only changes in order to maintain power over the gullible.

like former leader... we too have kept open house and had people live with us long and short term for nearly all our married life... we've had debate, argument, sadness, hilarity... even had someone with a disturbing psychosis... not at one stage have we felt the need to make any rules... that would almost be like copping out of relationship.

This is hard for Christians, because they often sincerely believe their convictions are biblical and therefore not open to debate.

Christians may also he attracted to an approach advanced by former Harvard professor John Hart Ely who argues that courts should not themselves choose substantive constitutional values, but should issue rulings that keep the processes of political debate and decision - making open to all.

«Particularly, for this issue of married priests, it is a practice of the Church and it has been for hundreds of years but it's not doctrine - it is open for debate.»

This is not the place to get into a debate about the tribulation so all I will say is at least be open to the possibility that Jesus was warning the Church to ready for persecution and be therefore prepared to endure to the end in the face of whatever might come.

The legislation of the Qur» an is of two kinds: that which has a crystal clear and decisive meaning not open to debate, and legislation liable to have two or more meanings.

Everything flows from the opening sentence of the book, an expansion of a 2010 article from the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy: «What we have come to call the gay marriage debate is not directly about homosexuality, but about marriage.»

«Three out of five scientists do not believe in God, but two out of five do, said John Donvan, opening a debate on the issue of science and religion yesterday (Dec. 5) in New York.

Right there you lost the argument because you are not open to the other side of the debate, it's your way or the highway..

While I certainly hold some very strong personal ideas about religion, and I am open to debate anyone concerning those, I do not criticize others for following the bronze sky daddy, not at all.

I am open for any debate or questions, but again you have to understand that i am young and still have much to learn so i will admit when i do not know the answer.

Leaving aside all the gory details for a minute regarding the merits of his plan, what continues to strike me as discomfiting (but increasingly predictable) about his technocratic leanings is not just a lack of transparency regarding his ultimate intentions but a deeper and more persistant distrust of open public debate.

That conversions occur in either direction (as it were) is a matter of fact and not open to debate.

That opens the door for folks to make the logical step that since dialogue and debate will not change you or make you go away then maybe physical violence will.

You have obviously not been to an open debate forum about atheism vs theology.

Muslim contributions to the debate, such as the first Open Letter, have qualified this doctrine of transcendence, not least affirming God's basic rationality in terms of basic categories intelligible to us.

He explains that while that «sincere, personal opposition» can not be «enacted law and public policy» without harming gay couples and violating the Fourteenth Amendment, he favors a continued «open and searching debate» between those who favor and oppose same - sex marriage.

The debate lies in whether or not he performed the miracles he is credited with, which, is honestly a can of worms I'm not about to open.

and not just opinions open for scrutiny and debate for all to experience..

And because his case can not bear scrutiny in open debate, he is compelled to ward off the threat of exposure by means of catch - phrases, righteous indignation, and sanctions.

Plain and clear, not open to debate.

While there is a place for a debate about what that ruling may or may not mean, our first step must be to open up to a reality outside our personal experience.

Their definition of what it means to be a Christian can certainly be open for debate, but it is not discrimination to have a definition of what it means to be a member of a religion and live by those standards, just like it is not discrimination to have Greek standards, unless everyone who has ever been in a Greek organization is saying that every Greek Fraternity or Sorority must accept everyone who applies.

WHERE IS THE LOVE OF GOD IN ALL THIS??? This is an open forum, an invitation to debate... it isn't a place for name calling, or put downs... it isn't a place for closed mindedness... its a place to exchange ideas, and perhaps to come to a greater understanding of scripture and one another and when someone puts someone down or is dogmatic about another's beliefs it prevents dialogue.

I am not looking for an argument, but am open to exchange of reasoned debate.

And don't worry about little fvckwads like Open Mouth who can't debate one little point of yours and so they bring up a mistake from yesterday or some stupid sh!t..

you are maximizing your chances of getting your point across — not so much to the relevant person you are debating with — but to the 1000s of open minded people who read this site.

So until we can change childhood in America, we won't be able to roll this back and make room of open debate.

Anyone with a maths background, especially one specialising in probability will confirm everything I said, its not open to debate.

As for whether it's enough for us to finish above Chelsea is open for debate and at any rate I don't think there is enough evidence to allude concretely to that notion.

An honest analysis with some conclusions (not like I don't agree with most of them) which can open a real debate here.

You should not have even opened this up for debate, don't give it any legitimacy.

I thought people here were debating about two or three seasons back why he should be our top striker.When I thought the Monaco match was the icing on the cake to show how average he was it seems just like Wenger we» will never learn our lesson.Now people our okay with him being a super sub which is debatable.Giroud was a super sub in games last season because he wasn't played when he was supposed to.He's not your ideal super sub because he very hardly creates but rather requires people to create for him.Most of the time super subs are the one's who tend to create the chances and open up spaces in the opposition defence.West ham are ready to pay and hence we should demand more from them.We can then use the money from his sale on far better players.Given the same seasons, time and chances a lot of average strikers can do better than what he did.This is because Arsenal create a lot of chances and it just needs someone who can finish.Goodbye!.

In Wednesday's debate, Clinton will look to play it safe and not make any major gaffes or blunders that could open the door for a Trump comeback.

For me the debate about potential strikers should not be the amount of scored goals from open play but instead of the contribution of strikers can offer.

Whether or not, Courtois is the world's best goalkeeper is very much subjective and open to debate, but there can be argument that he is a very, very special player.

you should check your sources i know where that story came from and its not true.He has a four year contract which he intends to see out whether he will stay beyond the four years that open for debate.

However a debate broke out between commentators as to whether the phones lines were actually «open» or not.

Speaking on Sky Sports News earlier this week, former player and agent Barry Silkman described the suggestion as laughable and unworkable and another former player Craig Bellamy, speaking on The Debate made it clear he was very much against because, claiming it just wouldn't work when the window was open in other European countries.

This was one of the reasons why a change at the very top was needed but the stick the fans gave former manager, Gary Megson, wasn't called for nor deserved but we're sure Owen Coyle will get a tremendous reception at The Reebok this Sunday, although whether he leave there with the love still in tact is another question, and one that's open to debate.

When you said you did not want to debate co-sleeping, I took that literally... that you weren't interested in debating co-sleeping but rather were opening a conversation on the topics you raised: that young children need to learn independent sleeping, that science backs this, and that a mindful parenting routine can accomplish from the start and immediately this without tears.

Whether headgear in the women's game will actually make the game safer will still be open to debate, at least until studies can be done to compare injury rates among girls and women wearing helmets and those who don't (similar to those done comparing injury rates for girls wearing goggles playing lacrosse versus those that didn't - which showed that the goggles were effective in reducing injury rates.