The state has
not opposed the motion for reconsideration.
The state says it will
not oppose the motion of the political parties to expedite the case.
Not exact matches
Those who
opposed the
motion described it as impossible because it would bring division in the church and would discriminate against those who experience same - sex attraction but don't act on it.
There's a reason the rebels are
opposing the programme
motion - because they don't support the reforms.
Those
opposing the
motion argued that we don't need another leadership election.
The party remains officially
opposed to Nato, but a
motion to the conference would change this policy — albeit on the condition it does
not «host nuclear weapons».
The Liberal Democrats have long believed in giving the vote to prisoners, so can be expected to
oppose the
motion as above, but I can't imagine that they'll be joined by many others.
On topic questions included whether canceling the project would result in Manhattan
not bearing it's «fair share» of the burdens of waste removal, whether the plan is «too far in
motion» to realistically cancel or pull back, his reaction to learning that Mario Cuomo
opposes the project and what effects a major storm might have on the site.
Counsel for Saraki, Mr. Babatunde Olomu, who had said he was
not opposed to the withdrawal of the
motion, had earlier urged the judge to award a cost of N1m against SaharaReporters and Sowore.
Conservative and Liberal Democrat MPs opted
not to
oppose the
motion — a tactical decision so that they would
not be seen to vote against disabled people.
Labour's decision to back the prime minister in
opposing a Commons
motion calling for a referendum meant there was
not a chance that the government would be defeated.
John Redwood, a leading Eurosceptic, expressed hope that Labour's
motion «would
not be
opposed», though the opposition day debate and vote is non-binding and has no effect on government policy
[NOTE: I was informed late Wednesday afternoon that attorneys for plaintiffs in Wright v State of New York had filed a letter advising the Court that they did
not oppose the consolidation
motion back on Friday, August 22.
With a government suffrage reform bill pending in parliament, the WLL introduced a
motion to the 1909 Labour Party conference committing the party to
oppose any suffrage extension bill that did
not specifically include women.
But Uche would
not take any of that as he vehemently
opposed the application for adjournment and urged the court to proceed with the hearing of the
motion.
Shegelski: Actually I don't know if I'd say that, but I'd say that it allowed us to investigate all possible
motions that we could think of — within reason, of course, we can always do much more, — but for example, you can take a curling rock and simply rotate it and don't slide it and just have it go on a pure rotational
motion, so we could look at that on flat ice as
opposed to the pebbled ice.
See how I'm more coiled to create a more powerful extension as
opposed to if I'm here and I'm open, now I don't have the full benefit of that range of
motion and a full coiling through the hip.
The cats observed through human eyes, as
opposed to cameras, were at least minimally tolerant of human interaction if
not fairly social, and are potentially significantly behaviorally different than the population counted through the
motion - triggered cameras.
Initially this is difficult, although when an arrow goes straight through a head or a barrel, you'll truly feel like you have achieved something, and it's certainly much more satisfying to direct the course of these pointy projectiles using
motion control
opposed to using the stick (which is an option if the
motion control just doesn't suit you).
Even if Maryland were a proper forum, there can
not be a claim for equitable relief, as
opposed to a claim for damages, against a government official in his individual capacity, the
motion argues.
The plaintiffs lawyers
opposed the
motion, but also complained that if the defendants had shown the video earlier, they wouldn't have invested 21 months worth of litigation time, cost, doctors fees and judicial resources.
The
motions judge in SC v.
NS concluded that the act of one lawyer for a client sharing the
opposing party's compelled discovery evidence — in this case, documents — with another lawyer representing the same client in another related proceeding constitutes prohibited «use» of the evidence.
Should
opposing counsel
not be cooperative, I will work with counsel in filing appropriate
motions with the court to assist in assuring their client obtains the digital data they are entitled to.
As I have developed stronger relationships with
opposing counsel, I have noticed that I don't receive nearly as many WTF e-mails, letters, or
motions.
I'm
not saying
opposing counsel rolls out the red carpet, but they usually reach out when there's an issue, rather than file a
motion at 5:00 on a Friday, or send snarky e-mails or letters.
A related problem is the commitment to treating every matter raised in litigation as equally deserving of judicial attention — so that every
motion hearing on every minute issue (service, deposition mechanics, the color of
opposing counsel's socks — oh sorry,
not that) is afforded the same time and attention as efforts to adjudicate the merits of the case.
Border Services agreed
not to
oppose the
motion.
Many Rule 11
Motions are poorly researched because lawyers do
not want to waste time on a
Motion they may never bring, if the
opposing side can simply withdraw the offending document during the Safe Harbor period.
But you can reassure yourself that if
opposing counsel is
not serious enough to serve a
motion, you probably do
not have anything to worry about.
If the Newmarket court will insist that
motions that can be heard by the Master must wait until the Master is available, as
opposed to proceeding before a Judge at an earlier date (something I have
not had the opportunity to inquire about as of yet), then numerous
motions which could otherwise be heard in short order will have to wait many months to be adjudicated.
The angry attorney (Crite) asserts in his
motion that (
opposing counsel) Bluebaum's pleadings use apostrophes so confusingly that the case can't even proceed.
Earlier this year, Mr. Justice Savage declined a defence
motion to compel a Plaintiff to attend a doctor's examination to obtain a responding report finding that an independent examination of a Plaintiff is
not necessarily required since responding reports are to be strictly limited to «a critical analysis of the methodology of the
opposing expert»
The defendant later represented himself and did
not attend to
oppose the plaintiff's
motion for default judgment.
Copibec
opposed the stay of proceedings because the
motion was
not based on serious grounds.
The Court's decision in California State Teachers» Retirement System v. Alvarez — a suit brought on behalf of Wal - Mart Stores, Inc. — refused to adopt the Delaware Court of Chancery's recommendation that, as a matter of federal due process, a judgment in one derivative action should
not bind the corporation or its stockholders in another derivative action unless either (i) the first action has survived a
motion to dismiss because a pre-suit demand on the corporation's board of directors would have been futile or (ii) the board has given the plaintiff authority to proceed on the corporation's behalf by declining to
oppose the derivative suit.
In the example in my previous post, no affidavit of documents was delivered, no responding materials were prepared, and counsel for the defendant did
not show up for the
motion (having been instructed to
not oppose).
While the
motion never happened, I was looking forward to hearing
opposing counsel explain why they had
not read their own offer (which was two pages long).
In Wallbridge v. Brunning, the Court of Appeal held that whether a law firm can be vicariously liable for defamatory statements made by a lawyer who practices «in association» with it (as
opposed to being an associate employed by the law firm or a partner of the law firm), is an issue of general importance that should be determined at a trial and
not on a
motion for summary judgment.
The
opposing party has the right
not only respond to the
motion, but also to ask for its own court orders in its cross-
motion.