Sentences with phrase «not out of principle»

He keeps changing his position, not out of principle, but to achieve political advantage.»

Not exact matches

It's also a highly unusual set of business principles, but Keller doesn't hesitate to pull it out in the middle of meetings.

«It is nevertheless a matter of concern that the collection of the data by Facebook may have involved practices that were not fully consistent with the principles of obtaining informed consent and allowing participants to opt out,» wrote Inder Verma, the Washington, D.C. - based journal's editor in chief.

The answer is no, the technology does not break the laws of physics... if it broke the laws of physics, that's something you can find out pretty early with basic principles and math.

Of course, if Microsoft users don't like it, they are in principle free to opt out.

[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?

Not merely a collection of good ideas, this book spells out the 67 timeless principles and practices used by the world's most successful men and women — proven principles and strategies that can be adapted for your own life, whether you want to be the best salesperson in your company, become a leading architect, score top grades in school, lose weight, buy your dream home, make millions, or just get back in the job market.

«The Wildrose was not founded on political principles, like the fiscal conservatism of the Progressive Conservatives, or the social democracy of the New Democrats — but rather it was created, out of nothing, for the sole purpose of exerting political pressure on the PC government.»

Good luck trying to figure out when a PC MLA is trying to join the WR for principled reasons and not because his party is fading off the face of the earth.

In the face of that, let's not write off a guy like Francis Chan or take him to the principle's office because he forgot to mention the Lamb's book of Life or to use the words «Glory of God» when he said that angels have to cover their eyes in front of God when they are shouting out «Holy!

Before you throw the «Baby out with the bath water», you might want to consider that while not compelled to belief in a Creator, you have been a benefactor of such principles that were relied on (with great wisdom) to create our form of government.

The principle was meant to keep ALL religion out of government, not just the religions that you don't agree with.

For those youngsters who are not opposed in principle to abortion, it provides a way in which, if pregnancy occurs, birth can be avoided, i.e. if pregnancy occurs either through failed or non-use of contraception, there is a possible let out clause.

That hasn't caused me to abandon the church, but to try to live out the principles of church in a meaningful way in my own life and with those I interact with.

If a problem arises which is not dealt with clearly in the Qur» an or in the Sunnah, the answer is sought in the schools of thought, the theories worked out by «leaders of thought» who have been careful students of the Qur» an and the Sunnah, have thought profoundly about their inner meanings and understand their general principles, and who have special knowledge of virtue and the general welfare.

Needless to say, however, the actual life of a society is not just a playing out of principles.

Doors keep out those who aren't living life with the principles of God.....

In any case, even if what you said it's true and evolution and all scientific principles tomorrow were found to be strong, out still would not be evidence of a god's hand in anything.

Though Witte does not state explicitly that his methodology is shaped by the Protestant principle, he nonetheless proceeds on the assumption that historical Christianity passed over, at least in the West, into the ecclesial communions that developed out of the Reformation.

Newman expects that all legitimate developments will preserve the original idea, rely on the same principles, «grow» out of the original idea, be anticipated by prior speculation so that they do not appear out of the blue, display logical sequence of development, and so on.

I am speaking of... what every one must know in his own case: how difficult it is to command himself, and do what he wishes to do; how weak the governing principle of his mind is, and how poorly and imperfectly he comes up to his own notions of right and truth; how difficult it is to command his feelings, grief, anger, impatience, joy, fear; how difficult to govern his own tongue, to say just what he would; how difficult to rouse himself to do what he would, at this time or that; how difficult to rise in the morning; how difficult to go about his duties and not be idle; how difficult to eat and drink just what he should, how difficult to regulate his thoughts through the day; how difficult to keep out of his mind what should be kept out of it.

Someone else who is no defeatist may be of the opinion that the Church's ministry has not yet sufficiently thought out afresh these despised principles for them to be likely to be accepted.

19) of the Posterior Analytics, where Aristotle describes how the mind ascends to the first principles on which all science is grounded, he points out that the immediate point of departure of the inductive movement is not mere sense perception, but «experience»: «So from perception there comes memory, as we call it, and from memory (when it occurs often in connection with the same thing), experience; for memories that are many in number form a single experience.

Whitehead points out that the science of physics presupposes the principle of universal relativity, but that such a principle can not itself be arrived at within physics, since it is a postulation about intrinsic reality and from the limited perspective of physics «there is no intrinsic reality» (SMW 223).

The real target, it turns out, was not a humanist conspiracy of the late twentieth century, but one of the fundamental principles of modern political life.

Whitehead's own use of the term «metaphysics» is not systematic, as is well - known,» so not much is gained by pointing out that Whitehead speaks of Creativity as «the ultimate metaphysical principle» (PR 32; my italics).

The future grows creatively and continuously out of the present, and if it does not grow under causal constraints already operative and in principle discernible within the present, then our expectations about the character of the future are as groundless as Hume said they were.

Our concern has been to draw out some of the implications of these principles, whether Whitehead himself thought of them or not.

That doesn't mean it isn't your choice, and it's not my job to make your choices, if you believe you can make the best decisions for yourself, and you don't need God, that is your God given right after all, God gave you that right, to make your own decisions with a free will, for you to decide upon what is good or bad as laid out in Biblical principles (as a matter of fact historicly).

If it were not for God's restraints, there are, in the souls of wicked men, hellish principles reigning which, presently, would kindle and flame out into hellfire.

What Coons goes out of his way to avoid discussing is the principle, found in the First Amendment and most state constitutions, that government may not compel any citizen to support any religious institution, directly or indirectly.

Even if it turns out not to be, though, non-religiously affiliated people and non-sectarian institutions deserve protections — as a matter of principle.

If marriage is detached from that «natural teleology of the body,» on what ground of principle could the law rule out the people who profess that their own love is not confined to a coupling of two, but woven together in a larger ensemble of three or four?

If the principle that makes these writings canon for us — the message of Jesus the Christ — also rules out certain writings which we have considered «Scripture», this is not to profane the sacred but to uphold it, to defend it.

The lingering, unhealed pain becomes a hermeneutical principle out of which we will not be talked.

Even if Labour gave a free vote, which is unlikely, the pressure from Labour constituency activists (not Labour voters) would force most Labour MPs to vote for the change: just a few people of principle will hold out.

You can't have christian principles * and * leave religion out of it.

«13 Wholly out of keeping with Whitehead's developed views, Wieman insisted that God is not concrete but only «the principle which constitutes the concreteness of things.

Of course, people do not make up their moral principles out of thin aiOf course, people do not make up their moral principles out of thin aiof thin air.

But to this the sufficient reply is that although it is clear that Whitehead is not proceeding deductively, his setting out a definite statement of his first principles at the outset of his system indicates that he held the axiomatic method to he an ideal form in which one should strive to organize thought into a system.

One needs to work hard to get out of these lies... one should spend time to study the basic principles of the all the books we have around us this time which include the book of Mormon and LDS... then you think what make sense and what not... the accept the true one... I can assure you that there is only one Truth as two can't be truth... you just have to look for it and use ur intellectuals...

Unless a gift is in this fashion sacrificial — the giving up of something — it is argued, a gift reduces to a hidden contractual agreement, governed by a principle of self - interest; and actions out of self - interest, as Kant pointed out, are not pure gifts.

Harrison also unfolds Augustine's insightful contribution to the science — religion debate, drawing out a number of valuable principles — not least, recommending restraint where issues are not clear, and avoiding bringing Christianity into contempt by arguing for false scientific opinions on the supposed grounds of scriptural warrant.

I remember, long ago, the late Archbishop of Canterbury describing to me his attempts to argue a working - man out of his materialism on Hegelian principles; all he got was «Ow, don't talk like that; you make me feel quite funny.»

It lays out some of the big issues and principles of non-violence, but does not delve deeply into any of them.

Bohm indeed appears to find not only room for, but, even within physics itself, a necessity for «hidden variables,» which the usual scheme of quantum theory has ruled out as a matter of principle.

Principles and guidelines can be crowded out by oppressive lists of do's and don'ts.

The principle we now have to grasp is that the authority of the pastor is not something merely brought into the pastoral relationship, but is born out of that relationship.

He has pointed out that a theology which is strictly confined to the world of «here and now can not take account of the ultimate questions which men must ask, whereas every sound Christian theology is required indeed to speak of that «here and now», but to relate it to God as a creative principle and to see God at work in the immediacies of human existence in the whole range of what we style «secular existence».

Only nonviolent means were to be employed, not for the sake of strategy, but out of deep principle and belief.