Sentences with phrase «not part of the answer»

Those in the other groups are part of the problem and not part of the answer.

Not part of the answer below but relevant to «My belief is that...»: one of the things that I find most comforting about cars (and most of the physical world, really) is that it doesn't matter what I believe.

They aren't part of the answer, they are THE answer, that drives the Earth's energy budget.

Going back to Ohanian's claims about the empowering strength of pseudonymity, I have since been wondering if separating a lawyer's online and its IRL persona (perhaps — I'm hearing you scoff — by creating two distinct sets of ethics rules) is not part of the answer.

Not exact matches

Still have a conversation and offer some services; they might not be a complete answer but can work as part of a more sophisticated and integrated approach.

As you'll soon find out, the answer is one part chemistry, one part psychology, and two parts the answer to a counter-question: Who really wants to be the first to drive with a new type of battery that hasn't benefited from two decades of development?

Successful people understand this, and are extremely efficient with email, which means their first 10 minutes of the day may simply mean a quick scan and prioritizing of emails to answer later as part of your pre-planned day — not necessarily diving into the entire mass at once.

She helped me set aside a chunk of time each day for high - priority, big impact tasks (not routine stuff like answering email or booking meetings) and suggested sticking to that timeslot throughout the work week so that it became part of my regular routine.

«I do not claim that overpricing of retail milk in Canada is due to excess profits, although that is certainly part of the answer.

«I do think about it a fair bit,» he answers, explaining that part of his urgency is that we might not always have the technology to get there.

Traditional business models simply can not absorb them, and entrepreneurship will have to be part of the answer.

When asked by Goodby if he would do Hulk Hogan stories again, Denton answered that as an editor, he would not say every Hogan article on Gawker is worthy, but part of the idea of the internet is you say all the things you believe with little filters.

Mueller elaborated on his answer, saying that Google does take links into consideration as part of its ranking algorithm, but that building links directly isn't the right way to go about it.

«Answers to the housing affordability crisis won't come without hard action, and this task force is just one part of the action we need to take.

The reason I don't think there's a definitive answer to whether auto - trading software such as BinaryAutoTrader.com or SignalPush.com are is because it depends on how you use these services as part of your strategy and to what extent you consider a win - rate of 60 - 70 % a success.

One part of the answer is simple: The situation is so chaotic that death certificates aren't being signed, which means deaths aren't being officially recorded.

Still, he says that he doesn't want to be part of a party (i.e., the Republican party) that upholds what he describes as unreason, but he also doesn't claim that such alleged scientific truth regarding ultimate questions of human destiny provides answers for public policy.

It's one thing to respond to atheists who think you have the wrong answers or seekers who think you might have part of a bigger answer, but what of those who think you are answering questions that don't even need to be asked?

Part of this how the first century church exploded out of nothing from men who, by all accounts, shouldn't have been able to pull it off; part of it is seeing (actually a big part of it) is seeing what God has done in my life — answered prayer that, by all accounts, shouldn't have been answePart of this how the first century church exploded out of nothing from men who, by all accounts, shouldn't have been able to pull it off; part of it is seeing (actually a big part of it) is seeing what God has done in my life — answered prayer that, by all accounts, shouldn't have been answepart of it is seeing (actually a big part of it) is seeing what God has done in my life — answered prayer that, by all accounts, shouldn't have been answepart of it) is seeing what God has done in my life — answered prayer that, by all accounts, shouldn't have been answered.

And when they ask questions you can not answer because you do not know, just revert to the religious person's favorite default, «It is part of god's plan.

It may not be the cleanest or most satisfying answer to say that we can not fully understand God, so we need to learn to accept it, but it is part of the answer.

Humans have been lied to and misled about divinity, faith and God for so long, they would not know the truth if it reached up and bit them on the proverbial cheeks.Deception has been a part of the history of mankind from day one.Further changes to the Bible only indicates it is still as strong as ever.The New Testament without Christ is like a riddle without an answer.

Part of the answer is because your arm may be functional — your life may be functional — but you are not experiencing the fullness of what life is meant to be.

I don't have a lot of answers other than a few weeks back I decided that all the letters I had said I was going to send would be done, reflecting my thoughts, accentuating my desire to heal and in turn permit healing on their part, and much more, But I didn't do it.

One part of the answer is that in a pluralistic society we do not have many shared values by which to shape the body politic, whereas we are able to agree that economic improvements are desirable.

I just don't know the answers to the latter question, but note with chagrin that such critical issues are almost NEVER part of the discussion on health care mandates.

well done Jerry God would uphold you, God know how to save and spread the gospel, if not we could have not heard in Africa mostly some part Nigeria, up till today some were still in darkness they have not heard about the gospel but when it is time for judgement, surely they must be judge, This question it is only God that can give the accurate answer to it, for it was written that both young and old would appear in the throne of judgement either you a day child or not, for there is / was no repentance after death, and to die its once, thanks.

Part of the answer is found precisely in what the Puritans did not say.

On part of process theology, rarely anyone really answered - with exception perhaps B. Loomer, who understood himself as a theologian, to whom metaphysics interprets, but not constitutes «revelation.»

Part of gospel obedience is precisely that we do NOT know in the present the answer to questions like this.

At least part of the answer as to why some people believe and some don't is not because the Gospel is unbelievable but because some people just don't WANT to believe it.

It seems probable that failure on the part of many ministers to find adequate answers to this question is one important reason why organized religion has not made a larger contribution to the solution of the problem.

Part of the answer, it would seem, is the reduced defensiveness of a clericalist culture and a greater involvement of lay people not only in advisory roles but in actual decision - making.

I think my answer to this person would be the same to the person who says that mega-churches are superior... being a missionary doesn't glorify God... being part of or planting a mega church doesn't glorify God.

We believe that we become participants in mission not because we hold all the answers and all the truth, but because we are part of the body of Christ.

We shall find names and qualifiers for any theology, which should serve to remind us that theology is always human theology, always our word and thought, and therefore part of the problem, not the answer to that problem.

That means that what is going on in some parts of the supporting nonsocial nexus is not known to the regnant occasion and this is what I mean by saying that the activities of those unprehended parts of the nonsocial nexus answer to the notion of the unconscious, or the depth dimension of the «psyche.»

They will answer: «We have spent there a day, or part of a day; but ask those who [are able to] count [time]...» He will say: «You stayed not but a little, - if you had only known!

He would have to add that he wasn't actually for such laws right now, and it would have pleased the MSM not to have notced that part of the answer.

But when the psychologist is most «scientific,» he regards these answers as a part of the behavior of the subject and not as a source of knowledge of some inner, unobservable state.

For the most part religion subdues metaphysical thought by urging it's followers not to think independently on the big questions of life but rather rely on their doctrine for old outdated answers.

How is or how could that be «PART OF HIS PLAN»??? I don't understand and I don't accept that as a creditible answer!

Not only is Zophar not heard from in the third cycle; not only is Bildad cut short; but parts of the speeches of Job in chapters 24 - 27 would come much more appropriately from the lips of the friends than from Job (see 24:13 - 25 and 27:7 - 23).15 These peculiar problems of the text are answered b the following reconstructiNot only is Zophar not heard from in the third cycle; not only is Bildad cut short; but parts of the speeches of Job in chapters 24 - 27 would come much more appropriately from the lips of the friends than from Job (see 24:13 - 25 and 27:7 - 23).15 These peculiar problems of the text are answered b the following reconstructinot heard from in the third cycle; not only is Bildad cut short; but parts of the speeches of Job in chapters 24 - 27 would come much more appropriately from the lips of the friends than from Job (see 24:13 - 25 and 27:7 - 23).15 These peculiar problems of the text are answered b the following reconstructinot only is Bildad cut short; but parts of the speeches of Job in chapters 24 - 27 would come much more appropriately from the lips of the friends than from Job (see 24:13 - 25 and 27:7 - 23).15 These peculiar problems of the text are answered b the following reconstruction:

One answer is that, while considered by themselves a separate religion, they are not so regarded by many scholars, and as a mere part of Hinduism, their writings are overshadowed by the much more important writings of that mother faith.

The answer to such questions can not be found in an assumption of ignorance on Paul's part.

Therefore, the meaning of our Lord's answer is that this man's blindness was not the result of an immoral act on the part of his parents, and certainly he did nothing before birth to deserve this affliction.

But not much will get done, because they won't be able to decide which fuel to use, where to hold the burnings, what part of the bible answers these questions, etc etc

The woman, for her part, also says the thing which is not, albeit in innocence: she answers not the question that was asked, says more than was called for, identifies the forbidden tree as the one «in the midst of the garden,» adds «neither shall ye touch it» to the prohibition, and, most importantly, converts the predicted consequences of disobedience («for in the day thou eatest thereof, dying you will die»; 2:17) into the reason for obedience («Ye shall not eat of it... lest you die»; 3:3).

Part of the answer is that many of our one - hundred - per - cent - American patterns of life are flatly incompatible with democracy, and we don't want to admit it.

I google'd her family - She is married to a White Mormon and they have 3 children... They most definitely will be raised as Whites and will never be a part of her heritage... Just listen to her answer to the CNN Correspondant about Obama - she skipped the question entirley... This woman does not consider herself Black or Haitian American...