If Gifted Students Are
Not Placed in Some Classes, Won't Those Classes Lack Positive Role Models for Academic and Social Leadership?
Qualifying Score in same class after title is earned, provided the dog does
not place in class....
Five points for each qualifying score earning a title, provided the dog did
not place in the class.
Not exact matches
Florence is a city
not only rich
in culture and history but food as well, and the «Pizza and Gelato Cooking
Class in Tuscan Farmhouse from Florence,» operated by Walkabout Florence Tours,
places second on TripAdvisor's list.
If this isn't possible, the crew members might
place the body
in the galley or first
class — or,
in the rare event a plane has one, a compartment referred to as the «corpse cupboard.»
I know it's
not popular to say
in 2011, but compared to
places like Argentina, the U.S. remains a pretty good
place for a middle
class person to start a company:
If this isn't possible, flight crew might
place the deceased
in the galley or move the passenger to first
class.
However, business groups have been urging the Liberal government
not to raise taxes further, warning that such a move could
place Canada at a competitive disadvantage
in light of U.S. President Donald Trump's pledge to support a «massive» tax cut for the middle
class.
Unfortunately, as long as a dual -
class share structure is
in place,
not much can be done to replace the management team.
I'm aware that there's explosives all over the
place,» and it makes me too conservative for making bets that I otherwise should make because there are some great payments companies out there — Stripe, Square, et cetera — that I talked to very early and couldn't bring myself to lean
in to do despite world
class great entrepreneurs.
Since «origins» isn't scientific (since science involves observations, testing, etc) then any discussion of origins, whether naturally, or supernaturally, has no
place in a science textbook, or a science
class.
Those who don't can at least expect to be rewarded with their own
places in the ruling
class.
Religion has no
place there, just like algebra shouldn't be taught
in a history
class, or French verb conjugation
in a music
class.
Not just on a
class level but also theologically, you're very difficult to
place in a camp.
On Downton Abbey, we see that the way of life of the relational
place is being improved by middle -
class, American, Irish, socialist, and even proto - feminist contributions, but usually
not at the expense of «
class»
in the sense of knowing who you are and what you're supposed to do.
It seems to me that
in the New Testament, Paul is especially adamant on the point (
in I Corinthians 10 - 11, for example), that Christianity is no
place for the flaunting of privilege or distinction (whether
class or ethnic or whatever), and I think that is exactly what happens anytime you have a church were some members are cool and know it (and flaunt it), while others are
not so much.
Second, it is trying to more thoroughly explain, and
in the light of my Tocquevillian / Liberal Education sociology of middle
class music / identity, why the transition from rock
n» roll to Rock occurred
in the first
place, and why it set a certain pattern of middle -
class mixtery - music that was doomed from the beginning to fall into its now - obvious mode of Perpetual Repetition.
They create fear
in the lower
class by saying the conservatives will do away with welfare and then say they will keep it
in place and make sure that the people continue to get what they are getting now.The Conservatives point to the 47 % who are taking some form of government handout and tell their base that this should
not be so
in its present state, but should be reformed.
In preparing to teach a course, I looked through a folder of accumulated notes and realized that I first taught the course to an adult class consisting of three women: Jennifer, a widow of about 60 years of age with an eighth - grade schooling, whose primary occupations were keeping a brood of chickens and a goat and watching the soaps on television; Penny, 55, an army wife who treated her retired military husband and her teenage son and daughter as items of furniture in her antiseptic house, dusting them off and placing them in positions that would show them off to her best advantage, and then getting upset when they didn't stay where she put them — she was, as you can imagine, in a perpetual state of upset; and Brenda, married, mother of two teenage sons, a timid, shy, introverted hypochondriac who read her frequently updated diagnoses and prescriptions from about a dozen doctors as horoscopes — the scriptures by which she live
In preparing to teach a course, I looked through a folder of accumulated notes and realized that I first taught the course to an adult
class consisting of three women: Jennifer, a widow of about 60 years of age with an eighth - grade schooling, whose primary occupations were keeping a brood of chickens and a goat and watching the soaps on television; Penny, 55, an army wife who treated her retired military husband and her teenage son and daughter as items of furniture
in her antiseptic house, dusting them off and placing them in positions that would show them off to her best advantage, and then getting upset when they didn't stay where she put them — she was, as you can imagine, in a perpetual state of upset; and Brenda, married, mother of two teenage sons, a timid, shy, introverted hypochondriac who read her frequently updated diagnoses and prescriptions from about a dozen doctors as horoscopes — the scriptures by which she live
in her antiseptic house, dusting them off and
placing them
in positions that would show them off to her best advantage, and then getting upset when they didn't stay where she put them — she was, as you can imagine, in a perpetual state of upset; and Brenda, married, mother of two teenage sons, a timid, shy, introverted hypochondriac who read her frequently updated diagnoses and prescriptions from about a dozen doctors as horoscopes — the scriptures by which she live
in positions that would show them off to her best advantage, and then getting upset when they didn't stay where she put them — she was, as you can imagine,
in a perpetual state of upset; and Brenda, married, mother of two teenage sons, a timid, shy, introverted hypochondriac who read her frequently updated diagnoses and prescriptions from about a dozen doctors as horoscopes — the scriptures by which she live
in a perpetual state of upset; and Brenda, married, mother of two teenage sons, a timid, shy, introverted hypochondriac who read her frequently updated diagnoses and prescriptions from about a dozen doctors as horoscopes — the scriptures by which she lived.
This is
not the
place to go into the complexities of what used to be called «stratification theory,» but ever since Marx gave a prominent
place to «
class»
in his interpretation of history, there has been general agreement to use this term to refer to a system of ranking
in which the command of economic resources is the prevailing criterion.
More emphasis needs to be
placed upon the difference between the function of the purely voluntary group, such as one finds
in a church, and the controlled and
not so voluntary group found
in the
classes of a theological school.
And the moment we renounce the absurd notion that a thing is exploded away as soon as it is
classed with others, or its origin is shown; the moment we agree to stand by experimental results and inner quality,
in judging of values — who does
not see that we are likely to ascertain the distinctive significance of religious melancholy and happiness, or of religious trances, far better by comparing them as conscientiously as we can with other varieties of melancholy, happiness, and trance, than by refusing to consider their
place in any more general series, and treating them as if they were outside of nature's order altogether?
I have looked back over several posts you have made, and the low
class, degrading
place you think women hold
in the church — just does
not exist.
Charles Williams can
not be
placed in either
class.
In a recent reconstructive essay on Hinduism, Sudhanshu Ranade suggests a connection between the not - so - noble function of «the political branch of Hinduism» in Vedic times, and «the trap the BJP is leading us into today».9 This involves the task of consolidating a hierarchically - ordered socio - political structure for Hindu society reflecting true religious Dhanna and controlling these classes / castes in order «to keep people in their place [so as] to keep them from getting above themselves».10 Perhaps this is the reason that nationalism, in its Orientalist form, is so pervasive in contemporary Indi
In a recent reconstructive essay on Hinduism, Sudhanshu Ranade suggests a connection between the
not - so - noble function of «the political branch of Hinduism»
in Vedic times, and «the trap the BJP is leading us into today».9 This involves the task of consolidating a hierarchically - ordered socio - political structure for Hindu society reflecting true religious Dhanna and controlling these classes / castes in order «to keep people in their place [so as] to keep them from getting above themselves».10 Perhaps this is the reason that nationalism, in its Orientalist form, is so pervasive in contemporary Indi
in Vedic times, and «the trap the BJP is leading us into today».9 This involves the task of consolidating a hierarchically - ordered socio - political structure for Hindu society reflecting true religious Dhanna and controlling these
classes / castes
in order «to keep people in their place [so as] to keep them from getting above themselves».10 Perhaps this is the reason that nationalism, in its Orientalist form, is so pervasive in contemporary Indi
in order «to keep people
in their place [so as] to keep them from getting above themselves».10 Perhaps this is the reason that nationalism, in its Orientalist form, is so pervasive in contemporary Indi
in their
place [so as] to keep them from getting above themselves».10 Perhaps this is the reason that nationalism,
in its Orientalist form, is so pervasive in contemporary Indi
in its Orientalist form, is so pervasive
in contemporary Indi
in contemporary India.
Consider this... a person goes to college, gets a four year degree
in archaeology (or some antiquities preservation analog); spends summers sifting through sand and rock and gravel, all the while taking graduate level
classes... person eventually obtains the vaunted PhD
in archaeology... then works his / her tail off seeking funding for an archeological excavation, with the payoff being more funding, and more opportunities to dig
in the dirt... do you think professional archaeologists are looking hard for evidence of the Exodus on a speculative basis...
not a chance... they know their PhD buys them nothing more than a job at Tel Aviv Walmart if they don't discover and publish... so they write grants for digs near established sites / communities, and stay employed sifting rock
in culturally safe areas...
not unless some shepard stumbles upon a rare find
in an unexpected
place do you get archeological interest and action
in remote
places...
not at all surprising that the pottery and other evidence of the Exodus and other biblical events lie waiting to be discovered... doesn't mean
not there... just
not found yet...
It should be borne
in mind,
in the second
place, that there continued to exist within the Islamic Society churches, monasteries, synagogues, and temples serving Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians, and others; that all these survived,
not as ghost communities or depressed
classes, but as communities of living men and women who pursued their callings, professed their faith openly, and entered into polemics
in defense of it; who continued to develop their religious, philosophical, and scientific legacies; and who were at all times
in communication with their Muslim neighbors.
Creationism is
not a scientific theory therefore has no
place in a science
class.
What different does it make that he is a mechanical engineer - he is still correctly pointing out the fact that creationism is
not a scientific hypothesis let alone theory and therefore has no
place in a science
class.
If it takes
place, for instance,
in a middle -
class suburban congregation
in the United States, it must deal with the issues and concerns of that congregation, but it must
not do so at the expense of its catholic context.
Having met
in, of all
places, an acting
class, the five, as Millner puts it, «decided to snatch that elusive fairy, lady luck, and shake her magic dust all over us... whether she liked it or
not.»
Remember if you aren't at the head of the
class when it comes to the development of young talent, which means eyes on the ground everywhere, a vast array of connections with soccer associations throughout Europe and beyond and a manager willing to properly train and play said blue chippers, (like the 90s Arsenal or clubs like the modern day Monaco and Dortmund) you need to spend to win... anything
in between is highly problematic... failure to make the necessary changes leaves you
in the proverbial «no man's land» and that is currently where we reside... it's difficult to get out of this rut... just ask either of the Milan teams... next step after that is being known as a «seller», which could be us already if and when Sanchez leaves... there are only two teams that have worn this moniker
in recent times and had some decent success and that is Athletico Madrid and Dortmond, which only occurred when they both brought
in new, charismatic leaders
in Simmone & Klopp... the odds that Wenger could conjure up the magic to repeat the performances of a bygone era are incredibly low, so why prolong the agony... he's
not willing to create the hierarchy necessary to go the youth route and he's unwilling to put his team's potential success ahead of his job security by laying it on the line with Moustache, so it's time to
place all your chips
in the middle or go gently into that good night
He arguably doesn't get the credit that he deserves, but if United and Liverpool are indeed targeting Jorginho as a solution to their problems
in midfield, they're certainly looking
in the right
place as he is a reliable and consistent performer who goes about his business with real
class and minimal fuss.
also sell campbell with him signing a new contract we should get good money for him and spanish teams seem to like him, poldoski also out, theo if he is
not happy with being a team player he can also go i think he is paying the price for holding us to ransom
in his last deal he wanted more money and assurances he, ll be playing as a CF
not good enough also sanogo should be sold for his own good and do a chamack will be playing better & regularly for a smaller team (palace, newcasttle aka neufchateau:) freeing
places for
class players!!
Gundogan is a quality player who I'd be happy to see
in arsenal shirt but without another world
class strike option... Sanchez is the only one right now... I don't see much chance of progression next season and with wenger's stupid recent talk about Walcott there are real worries that the guy is looking
in right
places to strengthen squad
Yeah absolutely right.We must play with a 442 but need a Top Quality DFM.Zhaka can
not retain his
place in the side any longer.How bad must he continue to play before he is dropped?Play AMN.The boy looks a very good prospect and deserves a chance.Ramsey continues to prove he is
not anywhere near Jacks
class and offers us nothing against a defence that sits and invites us on.
This isn't an attempt to declare these
classes the best (but please feel free to weigh
in), just a
place to gather the numbers as they are.
Mertz should never have been our captain
in the first
place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly
places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world -
class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating
in the process...
not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played
in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role
in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest
in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!
4) yes Keita: he's got a release clause that get's activated next year it's around 45 mil if I remember correctly, i highly rate him as the all rounder Dm / Cm / Am does it all and can fill the cazorla void instantly, for anyone that are reading the 70 - 80 million valuation I don't see any team paying that, but making him the most expensive African player will sure tempt him to move Bid 45 mil with add ons and there is a big chance of getting him, if they don't accept that offer to make a red bull commercial that should boost the sales of that terrible tasting energy drink, Sanchez Ozil Ramsey ox bellerin wenger it's time to get drinkng that's Just good marketing for redbull, a team with no history or fans shouldn't have a say
in who to keep
in the first
place they are a stepping stone to bigger things and we are the team to make you world
class, wan na eventually play
in barca or real look at our track record we will get you there!!
Basically this long post leaves me saying we now currently have a 24 man squad
classed as over 21 (born 1993 or before)
in addition we have some highly thought of under 21s like bellerin and chambers that already command a
place in first x1 or the «23» so unless flamini, campbell, wellington, Martinez or even rosicky decide they won't be getting enough game time I do
not really see any signings more coming
in.
Sad but true... how will this depressing chapter
in clubs history end...
Not even clear that exit from fa cup and 5th
place will deliver the needed outcome with the tax dodger and upper
class twit ceding decision on his own future to the delusional one... No way to run a club unless your priority is the income stream
1) Ten years without a significant trophy yet the Manager is never questioned 2) Selling off key «World beater» Players season after season and replacing them with mediocre at best replacements 3) Keeping a 33 % shareholder who is one of the world's richest men AND a true football fan as far away from the board as possible 4) Charging possibly the highest prices
in Europe but
NOT reinvesting within the team
in any really significant way 5)
Classing 4th
place in the EPL as a trophy 6) Boasting of a # 100 million war chest for transfers then quibbling over a few hundred thousand on deals.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense
in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes
in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess
in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself
in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required
in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling
in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders,
not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points
in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis
in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself
in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him
in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive
in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players
in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence
in Real or the space and protection he receives
in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived
in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or
not surround such a talent with the necessary components...
in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them
in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion
in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin
in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation...
in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often
in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and
in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world -
class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a
place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Ospina was
in the wrong
place at the line and he did
nt move at all looking at the shot One first
class goalkeeper will jump towards the ball at least now 3 - 1
they had at least one ligitamate goal, they are 17 pts ahead of us, they are better, giroud does
not belong on the same pitch as kane, he has been a 5 yr joke, we always talk about getting a world
class center forward, we never do, gabriel is a disaster
in the box, lets face it, we are a 6th
place team...
somtyms, we arsenal fans shld stop being sentimental and look at his situation from a neutrals perspective... pple abusing Wenger concerning this summer transfers r first
class id * its... 4 d first tym, he's solving all d positional problems we've got and ur
not satisfied???? how many English teams have made signings yet??? we've competed 1 (overpayed
in fact),
placed a bid for another and d transfer window is
not officially open... what more do u want... for us to chase messi with a 250m bid b4 u lay off Wenger???? I don't like Wenger when it comes to tactics and stuff and I also don't believe he can move us to d next level but when he's tryn to do d ryt tin, I'll take it
even when he suffered a serious knee injury, instead of accepting the fact that he would never stick his legs into the spaces that were crucial for someone with straight ahead speed to succeed, the club actually contemplated giving him a chance to play up top where his lack of physicality, size and holding up play talents would been on display for all to see... these are
not the actions of a club that really cares about winning at the highest levels, but they are the actions of a club that wasn't interested
in spending the necessary resources to purchases a world -
class striker, which is usually the most expensive position on the pitch... instead we adopted the horrible phrase «like a new signing» and proceeded to allow this ridiculous experiment to carry on, which ultimately caused some discomfort on the training pitch and inside the locker room as players battled for a position that shouldn't have been theirs for the taking
in the first
place... don't get me wrong, I believe that Walcott is a talented player, who can help a team reach their goals, if their goals are relatively modest... just look at the teams who supposedly expressed interest
in his services and they weren't the kind of clubs who aspire to win at the highest levels... as for the reasons why he hasn't been bitching and moaning about moving on just look at the wage benefits he receives from our club and his obvious desire to enjoy the societal advantages that come with playing
in North London for a club with worldwide appeal... so instead of continuing to try to fix a coat with a broken zipper simply move on and buy a new and better coat
whatever you think of ramsey... and
in my books he is a decent b2b but certainly
not top
class... he is
not going to control the area between edge of box and centre line which is what all great DMs do... nor has coquelin proved that to me... he is a guttusso type player and has improved massively
in that role...
not convinced it is what will take us to challenging for titles however which is why a cavalho type DM is a needed addition especially as arteta and flamini are obviously
not up to the task... but have always said that wengers job is to get best out of ozil santi and wilshere who are the real creative world
class strengths of this squad... they need protection behind them and options
in front... at moment the real worry is that wenger will continue to use mertesakher at CB and fail to bring
in quality striker... so the song remains the same... without quality DM and attacking option we will be trying to retain 3rd
place and reach qf of cl
tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow creeps
in this petty pace from day to day to the last syllable of endless gallic bullshit....4 th
place junkies wetting themselves over 3rd
place finish should realise that other teams will be strengthening
in summer definitely the others
in top 4 and always a surprise or two outside... wenger has f @@@@@ us over for ten years now selling top players and bringing
in a string of jokers... yes that changed with ozil and sanchez... but giroud coquelin and monreal while all decent and can help us to another 4th
place but
not beyond that (coquelin could still be a top
class player but ai
nt there yet) walcott and podolski will never deliver and merteshaker would
not be
in any other top 15 team
in europe... so the idea that the squad is on the cusp of greatness is moronic and confirmed by end of season performance... we need four quality signings but i would settle for two (attacker plus DM) and an upgrade (left back)..
Maybe AlanFrank Though this is just a matter ofopion as to if they ARE world
class or
not I kow that Kondogbia bossed our midfield
in the first round against Monaco, and certainly others
in the europian market
classed im as good enough, Schneiderlin MUST be
classed as worl
class (again wihin our price range) we are
not gonna pay 60 million for any player let alone the likes o Pogba.Im
not in any way deriding what we already have BUT we do need to reinforce what we have
in order to A) push what we have to improve and work arder to keep their
places and b) to cover for the inevitable suspensions and injuries that will come.